Via the NonVeniPacemBlog, with all of the focus on the Pachamama demon idols going Splashamama, it was perhaps overlooked that Antipope Bergoglio released a new ghostwritten book on Thursday, which Vatican News (formerly Vatican Radio) lovingly wrote up.  The book is idolatrously titled, “Our Mother Earth: A Christian reading of the environmental challenge.”

In it, gleefully repeated by Vatican News, is this:

“It is therefore humanity’s destiny to determine the destiny of the universe”.

Today is the Solemnity of Jesus Christ, King of the Universe.  Do not think for ONE SECOND that any of this is a coincidence.  It isn’t. This is the planned declaration by Antipope Bergoglio (who ticks every box for being the False Prophet Forerunner of the Antichrist) and his satanic-Freemasonic cabal of the “dethroning of Christ” and the enthronement of MAN, with the Pachamama demon taking the place of the Blessed Virgin Mary as the “new Queen Mother”.  The thing is, Freemasonry is satanic.  The motif of man worshiping himself (man) as god is actually the con that Freemasonry runs in order to suck people in. Pachamama has no interest in sitting at anyone’s right hand.  This all is driving directly to satanism, which is what Freemasonry is – socially presentable satanism.

Remember, Lucifer wanted to fulfill the role of the Blessed Virgin Mary.  Lucifer wanted to be the vector by which God Incarnated into the world.  This is why Satan hates the Blessed Virgin and is in a constant state of envy-driven enmity with her.  This is why the Pachamama, which is really just another guise of satan, is presented as “life-giving mother”.  This is all satan’s pathetic attempt to not just dethrone Christ, but to replace the Blessed Virgin Mary as well.

Remember this as you watch today’s events unfold in Rome.

---

O Jesus Christ, I acknowledge You as Universal King. All that has been made has been created for You. Exercise all Your rights over me. I renew my Baptismal Vows. I renounce Satan, his pomps and his works; I promise to live as a good Christian. And, in particular do I pledge myself to labor, to the best of my ability, for the triumph of the rights of God and of Your Church. Divine Heart of Jesus, to You do I offer my poor services, laboring that all hearts may acknowledge Your sacred kingship, and that thus the reign of Your peace be established throughout the whole universe. Amen.

All that’s missing now is the orgy.

But then, it’s probably just being held at Cardinal Coccopalmerio’s place. I’m thinking October has been a big month for the male prostitutes and drug dealers of Rome.

Via the Messa in Latino blog, this picture was taken at 3:55pm Rome time (09:55am EDT) Saturday 26 October.

The “always” is also a “for-ever” – there can no longer be a return to the private sphere. My decision to resign the active exercise of the ministry does not revoke this. I do not return to private life, to a life of travel, meetings, receptions, conferences, and so on. I am not abandoning the cross, but remaining in a new way at the side of the crucified Lord. I no longer bear the power of office for the governance of the Church, but in the service of prayer I remain, so to speak, in the enclosure of Saint Peter. Saint Benedict, whose name I bear as Pope, will be a great example for me in this. He showed us the way for a life which, whether active or passive, is completely given over to the work of God.

Pope Benedict XVI, “Final” Wednesday Audience, 27 February, ARSH 2013

Tell me more about how there is simply no evidence, when these 138 words (in English translation) are more than enough.

I’d also like to echo and reiterate something Mark Docherty of the NonVeniPacem blog said yesterday.  Antipope Bergoglio, in saying, on video no less, that the idols absolutely, positively are the Pachamama demon, has left zero doubt as to what it is that is happening when he enshrines these things in St. Peter’s tomorrow – the Feast of Christ the King no less.

VISIBILITY, VISIBILITY, VISIBILITY.  Our Blessed Lord is so, so good to us.  Like His crucifixion, so public, so visible, so humiliating, He is now, in these dark days, for love of us, making sure that everything about this hellish situation is VISIBLE so that we may LOOK and SEE and KNOW.

And Jesus making answer said to them: Go and relate to John what you have heard and seen.

 I can’t help but point out that the Summorum Pontificum pilgrimage is happening in Rome now.  There are Trads from all over the world converged on Rome right now, more than any other time of the year.  Rome is at “peak Trad” right now.  The troops are already mustered.  The numbers are there.  Will anyone step to the front and lead any protest action?  Will anyone sound the proverbial Horn of Helm Hammerhand?

Lastly, Regina Magazine has taken the step of publicly stating that they will no longer refer to Jorge Bergoglio as “Pope Francis”.  Let us hope and pray that they are NOT false sedevacantists now, because the See is very much occupied by Pope Benedict XVI, and has been since April ARSH 2005.  This is why I have been saying for years now that “Francis is Pope” false base premise leads to false sedevacatism (which is a distinct phenomenon separate and apart from 1958 sedevacatism – the Regina Magazine folks have absolutely NOTHING to do with 1958 sedevacantism, let it be well noted.)

 

It’s all happening, folks.

When therefore you shall see the abomination of desolation, which was spoken of by Daniel the prophet, standing in the holy place: he that readeth let him understand. Matthew 24: 15

Here is the link to the original Spanish.

Here is the full algorithmic translation:

The Pope (sic) to the Synod Fathers: The police have found the “Pachamama statues” and they will be in St. Peter’s

This scathing takedown of the truly revolting Williard “Mittens” Romney, aka “Pierre Delecto”, over at amgreatness.com is worth a read.  “Mitt Romney is that guy.” Indeed.

Which reminds one of this video from the deep video archive.  Originally titled, “Romney Go Home”, I suppose I should now subtitle it, “Pierre Delecto, rentre chez toi!”

And here is a fun little animation version that someone did.

I don’t endorse the author of the following blog, nor 100% of its contents, HOWEVER I do think that this info is worth engaging and spreading. I always like being able to look at data that is removed from current events in time – this blog article is from ARSH 2012.

The Green Virgin – Pachamama: The final balance between Common Law and the Law of Mother Nature

by Niki Raapana, June 14, 2012

Key words and names here:

Communitarianism.

Evo Morales (Communist dictator of Bolivia)

Amatai Etzioni

Active in the New World Order Project since the 1960s, Dr. Amitai Etzioni is credited with introducing the theory of Communitarianism to “the upper reaches of academia” in the late 1980s. Etzioni is heralded as the “father” and “guru” of Communitarianism.

Pachamama was ressurected by the Communitarians to become the blessed Mother of us all, and much like Etzioni’s Cabbalistic interpretation of the oral and secret Talmud with a good mix of Greek and New Testament sentiments, the Pachamama is less of a religion and more of a law religionalized.

Etzioni was Bill Clinton’s “silent” mentor, Hillary Clinton praised Etzioni in her book “It Takes A Village,” and the Obamas have known Etzioni since they began their Communitarian neighborhood activist training at Northwestern University under Communitarian Network Professor John McNight. 

Etzioni’s idea for Community Policing was adopted by the U.S. Congress in 1994. Today it is a worldwide policing strategy. Prominent Communitarian author Robert Putnam was President George Bush Jr’s Press Secretary. Putnam described Bush’s Compassionate Conservatism as Etzioni’s idea of Communitarianism to the Washington Post in 2002.

So how is Amitai Etzioni connected to the rebirth of the Andean Pachamama, exactly?

Pachamama represents Communitarian Socialism to the Bolivians who wrote it into their new constitution in 2009.

“The historic enactment of Bolivia’s new constitution that grants unprecedented rights to the country’s indigenous majority, approved by over 61% of the vote on January 25, represented the beginning of “communitarian socialism”, according to President Evo Morales.

This was not the first time Bolivia’s first indigenous president had raised the concept of “communitarian socialism”. In his April 2008 speech to the United Nations, Morales spoke of the need for “a communitarian socialism in harmony with Mother Earth”. Green Left Weekly 11

This article and the info contained therein (and there is a lot) merits dissemination and investigation. And remember, it is all from June ARSH 2012 or earlier.

“… a law religion-ized.”

New World Order. One World Government, One World Religion.

A law, religion-ized.

Yep.

I hope this helps.

Over the transom:

Ann,

Thank you for the link [answering a previous emailed question about the canonical definition of “Substantial Error”]. I must have missed or forgotten that article [reprinted in full below]. 

I must admit that when I first stumbled on your blog, and read about Benedict’s resignation not being valid, I thought you were crazy. But something told me to stick to reading, and I did. And now, you have made a logical convert of me. 

Yes, I have had that sort of push back when I have made statements unrelated to the resignation, and the answer is always the snide “you’re not a [insert name of profession]”. Does one really have to hold a degree in Canon Law to understand what it says? I hope not, because a lot of Canon Lawyers are getting it massively wrong! 

What also shook me was seeing your posts of Skojec and Hilary White openly questioning a dogmatic Ecumenical Council on the Dogma of Papal Infallibility. But, as you say, that is the logical progression when you start with a false premise. 

Kind Regards,

M

Q: What does Substantial Error mean?

A: Ignorance or misjudgment about the essential nature, main terms, or principal motive of the object of an act.

Pope Benedict’s failed attempted partial abdication violates all three terms in this definition.  The essential object of the act of resignation of the Papacy is the renunciation of the OFFICE (MUNUS).  This is explicitly laid down in Canon 332.2, simply confirming common sense. As we have discussed several times before, an OFFICE is a state of BEING.  In order to resign the papacy, you have to renounce BEING the pope, that is, holding the OFFICE.  MINISTRY (MINISTERIUM) refers to things that the Pope may or may not elect to DO or be able to DO as a result of BEING the Pope, such as teaching, governing and presiding.  A MINISTERIUM is derivative of the MUNUS.  Ministries are OPTIONAL CONTINGENT ACTIVITIES of the ontological state of BEING the holder of the Petrine OFFICE.  As we have said before, these two MAIN TERMS, OFFICE and MINISTRY, belong to completely different categories, ‘being’ and ‘doing’, and thus can not now nor ever be argued to be synonymous in English or any other language.

As we have seen from the mountain of data already cited in this space, Pope Benedict’s PRINCIPAL MOTIVE in proffering his invalid attempted partial abdication of only the “Active Petrine Ministry” for “the governance of the Church” seems to have been long-discussed and longed-for by 20th Century Teutonic theologians, as well as Freemasons looking to destroy the Catholic Church by dissolving the Petrine OFFICE – the last remaining monarchy – into a “collegial, synodal ministry”. A second co-extant PRINCIPAL MOTIVE seems to also be coercion, which is covered discretely as an invalidating factor in Canon 188.

Since the Petrine OFFICE, established by Jesus Christ Himself, cannot be “fundamentally transformed” nor “expanded”, the PRINCIPAL MOTIVE of the OBJECT OF THE ACT was defective, that is, SUBSTANTIALLY ERRONEOUS.

Can. 188 A resignation made out of grave fear that is inflicted unjustly or out of malice, substantial error, or simony is invalid by the law itself.

Hang in there, everybody!  If you are a person who is unsure of what exactly the heck is going on with Antipope Bergoglio and the Catholic Church, my advice to you is:

-DON’T FEEL BAD. THIS SITUATION IS ABSOLUTELY UNPRECEDENTED. YOU ARE NOT DOING ANYTHING WRONG OR SINFUL BY ACKNOWLEDGING THAT SOMETHIN’ SERIOUSLY AIN’T RIGHT, AND WANTING TO FIGURE IT OUT. IN FACT, IT WOULD BE SINFUL FOR YOU NOT TO CARE ABOUT THE TRUTH.

-KEEP READING, KEEP RESEARCHING, KEEP THINKING, KEEP PRAYING. Ask the Holy Ghost to direct you to all Truth, and to illuminate the path.  Remember, the Visibility of the Church is NOT a matter of how many people see it, or claim that they can’t see it.  The Church will always be visible – lit up by the Light of Christ – but people fallen into the darkness of sin will be blinded to it. Imagine Ray Charles standing on the Las Vegas Strip.  Ray’s blind.  He can’t see it.  That doesn’t mean that Las Vegas is “invisible”. It just means that Ray is blind.

Remember the Prologue of St. John’s Gospel: And the light shineth in darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it. Et lux in tenebris lucet, et tenebrae eam non comprehenderunt.

-Finally, stay humble, which does NOT mean check your brain at the door.  My new favorite saying comes from Our Lord’s words to St. Catherine of Siena: “Do you know, dear daughter, who you are, and who I AM? You are she who is not, and I AM, instead THE ONE WHO IS.  Never forget this, and you will never be deceived by the enemy.”  God is infinite love, goodness, truth, beauty, fidelity, power, justice, mercy, sovereignty, wisdom, holiness and faithfulness. If you put the reality of WHO GOD IS at the center of everything and never, ever forget it, you won’t need to have a degree in theology, or be a canon lawyer – heck, you won’t even need to be able to READ.  On the other hand, deny ANY of these attributes of God, or even just FORGET about them, and the Deceiver will pounce.

I hope this helps.

This is real, folks.

See how EASY it was? And they remembered to genuflect to Our Lord in the Tabernacle, both coming and going. Well done!!

They clearly were under the protection of St. Michael the Archangel, and threw the demons off of St. Michael’s Bridge, in front of Castel Sant’Angelo.

UPDATE: Dramatic Music Version now released with this statement from the Dynamic Duo:

To recoil before an enemy, or to keep silence when from all sides such clamors are raised against truth, is the part of a man either devoid of character or who entertains doubt as to the truth of what he professes to believe.

In both cases such mode of behaving is base and is insulting to God, and both are incompatible with the salvation of mankind.

This kind of conduct is profitable only to the enemies of the faith, for nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good.

Moreover, want of vigor on the part of Christians is so much the more blameworthy, as not seldom little would be needed on their part to bring to naught false charges and refute erroneous opinions, and by always exerting themselves more strenuously they might reckon upon being successful.

After all, no one can be prevented from putting forth that strength of soul which is the characteristic of true Christians, and very frequently by such display of courage our enemies lose heart and their designs are thwarted.

Christians are, moreover, born for combat, whereof the greater the vehemence, the more assured, God aiding, the triumph: “Have confidence; I have overcome the world.”

Nor is there any ground for alleging that Jesus Christ, the Guardian and Champion of the Church, needs not in any manner the help of men. Power certainly is not wanting to Him, but in His loving kindness He would assign to us a share in obtaining and applying the fruits of salvation procured through His grace.

SAPIENTIAE CHRISTIANAE
Pope Leo XIII
Paragraph 14

These are both from trolls, and possibly the same person sock-puppeting.

I’m TOTALLY putting these on the back cover of the next volume.  Hopefully I get some more like this:

By Daniel Brown Oct 5, 2019
The book contains nothing of any scholastic merit and Barnhardt’s essay on femenism is frankly laughable and easily dismissed. Half baked and disappointing.

By June Moore Oct 5, 2019
Dreadful, a collection of subtely or obviously misleading and inaccurate turgid self opinionated essays that contain nothing that would appeal to any professional in any field. Don’t waste your money folks. Purfunctory amateurish nonsense.

I’m also thinking perhaps a front cover medallion or diagonal banner with:

“Half baked and disappointing!”

or

“Turgid… Perfunctory amateurish nonsense!”

CLICK HERE TO ORDER