Monthly Archives: September 2022

YES, THEY ARE ABSOLUTELY TRYING TO KILL YOU. “World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day.”

(I’m printing this excerpt of an article written in ARSH 2002 by Lee Penn in full, with the footnotes, for the record. Human Population Reduction to the tune of 90% is the foundational agenda of New World Order/New Age/Freemasonry/Antichurch. They view most people as an inferior sub-species, akin to “Cave Men”, that must be made extinct. -AB ’22)

Lee Penn

SECTION 6 of 6

As part of the imminent global transformation, the radical New Age leaders look forward to a “selection” of the human race. The elect of humanity will survive to enter the New Age. Many others will die – a prospect that these gurus view with cold equanimity. 

Alice Bailey described World War II as “the broom of the Father of all, sweeping away obstructions in the path of His returning Son.”[223] Since she saw war and mass murder as part of God’s plan, it’s reasonable to ask whether other Theosophists and New Age leaders who foretell a “selection process” intend to kill their opponents, if they can. 

For several decades, in books with titles such as Happy Birth Day, Planet Earth, The Revelation: A Message of Hope for the New Millennium, and The Book of Co-Creation, Barbara Marx Hubbard has predicted “personal extinction”[224] for people who will not get with the New Age program. 

“A Quantum Transformation is the time of selection of what evolves from what devolves. The species known as self-centered humanity will become extinct. The species known as whole-centered humanity will evolve.”[225] At the time of the quantum transformation, “humans capable of cooperating to self-transcend will do so”; “elements” who maintain “the illusion of separation will become extinct … just as Cro-Magnon and Neanderthal humans became extinct.”[226] 

In referring to undesirable people as “elements,” she follows the example of the Nazis, the Communists, and others who dehumanize their opponents to justify destroying them. Barbara Marx Hubbard warns that if the selection comes, it will be violent: “Either the good will prevail, connect, link, and magnetize the majority of humanity to act with love for life everlasting, or the violent selection of the self-centered will begin.”[227] For her, Satan “is part of the selection process … that will bring forth the self-elected from the self-rejected, so that … only those connected to the whole survive.”[228] Robert Muller says that persons “who hold contrary beliefs” to those favored in the “next phase of evolution” will disappear [229] ; opponents of the UN and other “anti-evolutionary, blind, self-serving people” will have their souls “parked in a special corral of the universe for having been retarding forces, true aberrations in the evolution and ascent of humanity.”[230] David Spangler says that those who do not enter the New Age “will lose, for the time being … the ability to control or influence the developments upon Earth. … They will have moved from an active state to a relatively passive one.”[231] “Relatively passive” – like a corpse? 

All the New Age soothsayers say that the extinction of the opposition is for their own good, the beginning of their cosmic re-education. 

David Spangler says that those not attuned to New Age energy “have no place in the new world”;[232] they will be sent “where the patterns of the old still hold sway” for their “highest good.”[233] 

Barbara Marx Hubbard says that those who are against the New Age “will begin again within a different planetary system which will serve as kindergarten for the transition from self-centered to whole-centered being.”[234] 

Nick Bunick, the self-styled reincarnation of the Apostle Paul, sets the date for the selection. Between 2000 and 2010, “those people who are not living according to the laws of God” will be “no longer participating in our world”.[235] The resisters will be sent to “a different vibrational plane”[236] – not as a punishment, but to improve their karma.[237] 

Barbara Marx Hubbard says that survivors of the “selection” will go with the flow of evolution, will love “choice, diversity, flexibility, ambiguity, uncertainty, responsibility, and response-ability,” and will be able to “co-create, unite, synergize and love everyone as a member of your body.”[238] 

The inheritors of Marx Hubbard’s new kingdom will pass all the current tests for political correctness, and will be highly qualified to serve as bishops in the Episcopal Church. 

The leaders of the New Age movement argue that the earth is overpopulated, and that radical measures are needed to defuse the “population bomb.” In the 1940s – when world population was less than half what it is today – 

Alice Bailey said, “certain physical restrictions should be imposed, because it is now evident that beyond a certain point the planet cannot support humanity.”[239] 

Matthew Fox has said, “Excessive human population is a grave danger … it’s one of the reasons I joined the Episcopal church, because of its open-minded and pragmatic view of birth control.”[240] 

In 1997, Gorbachev said, “for a certain transitional period families should limit themselves to one child;” once the world’s population is stabilized, the former Communist premier would consider upping our ration to two children per family.[241 ] 

Some of these “forward-thinking” people want to go further, and reduce Earth’s population to 2 billion or less. In a November 1991 interview with The UNESCO Courier, Jacques-Yves Cousteau said: “World population must be stabilized and to do that we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. This is so horrible to contemplate that we shouldn’t even say it. But the general situation in which we are involved is lamentable.”[242] That works out to 127,750,000 people per year, and 1.27 billion people to “eliminate” per decade. Media magnate Ted Turner is more patient; he will allow 80 to 100 years to reduce the population of the Earth from 6 billion to 2 billion by a global “voluntary” one-child policy.[243] In an interview with the environmentalist E Magazine, he added, 

“I think the population should be closer to when we had indigenous populations, back before the advent of farming. Fifteen thousand years ago, there was somewhere between 40 and 100 million people. But [population researchers] Paul and Anne Ehrlich have convinced me that if we’re going to have a modern infrastructure, with commercial airlines and interstate highways around the world, we’re going to need about two billion people to support it.”[244] 

The eco-feminist theologian Rosemary Radford Ruether has a similarly low view of humanity. She told those who attended a May 1998 ecological conference that “We need to seek the most compassionate way of weeding out people. … In place of the pro-life movement we need to develop the ‘spirituality of recycling’ … a spirituality that includes ourselves in the renewal of earth and self. We need to compost ourselves.”[245] Several months later, Ruether told a national conference of Call To Action, a liberal Catholic organization, how many people must go onto the compost pile: “We must return to the population level of 1930″[246] – about 2 billion people. What the supporters of population reduction leave discreetly unannounced is how to get rid of the 4 billion “surplus” people. 

Despite his deep involvement in New Age occultism, David Spangler points out some dangers of the New Age worldview: “a desire for power, the tyranny of the group over the individual,” “an attachment to novelty for its own sake,” destruction of marriages due to pursuit of “self-development,” a misguided pursuit of “limitlessness,” losing awareness of the transcendence of God, and “unwillingness to say that anything is out of place or wrong.”[247] He also warns, “The new age movement in North America has much in common with its counterpart in Europe between the world wars. The ecological spirit and desire for transcendence expressed at that time in Germany became corrupted and channeled into the Nazi movement, which had many roots in occultism.”[248] An orthodox Christian might also offer all of these criticisms. It is unfortunate that Spangler did not use similar discernment in his other work. 

Because the radical New Age adepts extol each other’s writings, speak at the same workshops, and share board memberships in the same organizations, it’s fair to assess their teachings as a group. (If this is “guilt by association,” it’s an association that the New Age gurus have created themselves.) 

Taken together, the works of Robert Muller, Barbara Marx Hubbard, Neale Donald Walsch, Alice Bailey, David Spangler, and Helena Blavatsky are an anti-Catechism: a revival of the Gnostic heresy, a comprehensive anti-Gospel, and a point-by-point inversion of Christian morality and doctrine. The problem is not a few “smoking gun” quotes pulled from otherwise-innocent writings. The adepts of the New Age have provided an arsenal full of smoking guns, all pointed in the same direction. Those who can stand to read New Age and theosophical books in detail will find that these writers make clear their intentions for us all – just as Hitler did with Mein Kampf and as the Communists have done since Marx and Lenin. This time, let us heed the warning! 

Is the New Age movement a conspiracy? No. Conspiracies are usually secretive associations with illegal objectives. New Age leaders and their utopian, globalist allies are open about their aims, and their activities are legal. The goals of the current crop of New Agers and utopians match what radicals have sought since the French Revolution. Their project reveals the permanent vulnerability of mankind to temptation and sin. Consider: God remains forever, and does not change. Human nature does not change, since mankind is created in God’s image. The devil does not change, and the temptations he offers mankind do not change. From the Garden of Eden to the séances of the theosophists, the message is the same: you will not die, and you will be a god. Human response to temptation does not change either; apart from God’s grace, we sin. Therefore, human rebellion against God will follow a consistent pattern. People who wish to rebel against God will find collaborators and mentors to affirm them and to assist them in their plans. (Also, the religious and governmental authorities, by their oft-repeated injustices and abuses, put the same temptations, scandals, and stumbling blocks before their people, again and yet again.) What some fevered observers see as multi-generational, international conspiracies are really just successive groups of fallen men following temptation to its logical conclusion. If New Age and utopian movements show unity and consistent purpose internationally or historically, it arises from the dark spirit they follow, rather than from human conspiratorial skill. 

Format Copyright 2000 – 2003 by The M+G+R Foundation. All rights reserved. 

NOTE: Internet document citations are based on research done between September 1997 and January 2000. Web citations were accurate as of the time that each Web page was accessed. However, some documents may since have been moved to a different Web site since then, or they may have been removed entirely from the Web. 


[223] Alice A. Bailey, The Externalisation of the Hierarchy, 1957, Lucis Publishing Company, New York, ISBN 0-85330-106-9, p. 618 
[224] Barbara Marx Hubbard, Happy Birth Day Planet Earth: The Instant of Co-Operation, Ocean Tree Books, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1986; ISBN 0-943734-08-8, p. 31 
[225] Barbara Marx Hubbard, The Revelation: A Message of Hope for the New Millennium, Nataraj Publishing, Novato, CA, 1995, ISBN 1-882591-21-6, p. 111 
[226] Barbara Marx Hubbard, Happy Birth Day Planet Earth: The Instant of Co-Operation, Ocean Tree Books, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1986; ISBN 0-943734-08-8, p. 23 
[227] Barbara Marx Hubbard, The Revelation: A Message of Hope for the New Millennium, Nataraj Publishing, Novato, CA, 1995, ISBN 1-882591-21-6, p. 303 
[228] Barbara Marx Hubbard, The Book of Co-Creation Part II – The Promise Will Be Kept: The Gospels, The Acts, the Epistles, Foundation for Conscious Evolution, San Rafael, California, 1993 (privately published), p. 299 
[229] Robert Muller, 2000 Ideas And Dreams For A Better World, Idea 1748, Internet document, 
[230] Robert Muller, My Testament to the UN: A Contribution to the 50th Anniversary of the United Nations, World Happiness and Cooperation, P.O. Box 1153, Anacortes, Washington 98221; ISBN 
1-880455-07-2, pp. 148-149 
[231] David Spangler, Revelation: The Birth of a New Age, Lorian Press, 1976 (fifth Lorian Press printing 1984), ISBN 0-936878-00-2, p. 164 
[232] David Spangler, Revelation: The Birth of a New Age, Lorian Press, 1976 (fifth Lorian Press printing 1984), ISBN 0-936878-00-2, p. 160 
[233] David Spangler, Revelation: The Birth of a New Age, Lorian Press, 1976 (fifth Lorian Press printing 1984), ISBN 0-936878-00-2, p. 161 
[234] Barbara Marx Hubbard, Happy Birth Day Planet Earth: The Instant of Co-Operation, Ocean Tree Books, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 1986; ISBN 0-943734-08-8; p. 17 
[235] Kirstin Miller, “The Story Angels Want Told: An Interview with Nick Bunick,” Psychic Reader, October 1997, Vol. 22, no. 10, p. 7 
[236] Kirstin Miller, “The Story Angels Want Told: An Interview with Nick Bunick,” Psychic Reader, October 1997, Vol. 22, no. 10, p. 7 
[237] Bob Young, “St. Nick,” Willamette Week, Vol. 24, Issue 8, December 23, 1997, p. p. 24 
[238] Barbara Marx Hubbard, The Book of Co-Creation Part II – The Promise Will Be Kept: The Gospels, The Acts, the Epistles, Foundation for Conscious Evolution, San Rafael, California, 1993 (privately published), p. 120 
[239] Alice A. Bailey, Education in the New Age, 1954, Lucis Publishing Company, New York, ISBN 0-85330-105-0, pp. 133-136 
[240] Virginia Lee, “Science and Spirit: Conversations with Matthew Fox, Ph.D. & Rupert Sheldrake, Ph.D.”, Common Ground, Summer 1997, Internet version;, pp. 6-7 
[241] Mikhail Gorbachev, “Finding Our Way Five Years After the Rio Earth Summit,” delivered for Green Cross International on April 15, 1997 in Washington DC; Internet document,, p. 6 
[242] Bahgat Elnadi and Adel Rifaat, “Interview With Jacques-Yves Cousteau,” The UNESCO Courier, November 1991, p. 13 
[243] Tracey C. Rembert, “Ted Turner: Billionaire, Media Mogul … And Environmentalist” (Interview), E Magazine, January/February 1999, Volume X, number 1, p. 10 
[244] Tracey C. Rembert, “Ted Turner: Billionaire, Media Mogul … And Environmentalist” (Interview), 
E Magazine, January/February 1999, Volume X, number 1, p. 10 
[245] Michael S. Rose, “Feminist Theologian Urges Religious To Find A Way To ‘Weed Out People’,” The Wanderer, June 11, 1998, p. 1 
[246] Ann Sheridan, “CTA Conference Presents The Reality of Unreality,” The Wanderer, November 12, 1998, p. 1 
[247] David Spangler, Emergence: The Rebirth of the Sacred, Delta/Merloyd Lawrence; pp. 154-157 
[248] David Spangler, Emergence: The Rebirth of the Sacred, Delta/Merloyd Lawrence; p. 159 
[249] Catechism Of The Catholic Church, Image Books/Doubleday edition, 1995, ISBN 0-385-47967-0, 
sections 675-676, pp. 193-194 
[250] Catechism Of The Catholic Church, Image Books/Doubleday edition, 1995, ISBN 0-385-47967-0, sections 2116-2117, pp. 569-570 



The Obligatory Barnhardt Toenail Fungus post. (Yep, Ivermectin again.)

I’ve never had any nail fungus myself, but so many people have emailed in on this that it is an obligatory post.

Yes, Ivermectin seems to clear toenail fungus with an almost unbelievable speed, according to my inbox. And we’re talking about people who have fought it for years and even decades.

Here is what seems to be working for people: take the prophylactic dose orally, AND also apply either the horse paste OR the liquid injectable directly to the nail as a poultice. If you’re using the liquid, I would soak a wad of gauze in it and affix that to the nail with medical tape. Same with the horse paste – rub it generously on the nail and cover with a gauze sheath. So between the oral dose and the poultice, you are attacking the fungus from both the inside and the outside.

And within very short order… no more fungus amungus.

So add “anti-fungal” to Ivermectin’s properties.

Just brainstorming here… why wouldn’t this also knock out Athlete’s Foot, which is a fungal issue? I haven’t had Athlete’s Foot since the miserable days of forced showering in disgusting public school locker rooms, but I would think that rubbing the horse paste on the feet would likely help if not totally knock Athlete’s Foot out. And, again, file this under “It Can’t Hurt To Try”.

As always, I hope this helps.

Crowdfund Recommendation: The Chap Who Runs the INVALUABLE Bible Website has Cancer and is Uninsured

I don’t know about you folks, but I use almost every day.  It is the Douay-Rheims-Latin Vulgate Bible – the official English translation of the Bible with St. Jerome’s Latin. The website is meticulously maintained and wonderfully laid-out.

The man who runs has cancer, and is uninsured.

I’ve checked around, and he is a good chap, based out of St. Marys, Kansas.

I think it’s time for all of us users of to step up and help Mr. Paul Mann. Let’s pray that he gets to worship God in The Immaculata basilica in St. Marys for many, many years!

Mr. Mann’s GoFundMe is HERE. Let’s get this done!

Best online Bible site right here, folks. 👇🏻

THIS is why Holy Mother Church has the right to execute heretics. Right here.

Belgian faggot Cardinal and bishops “promulgate” a pseudo-marriage “blessing” for faggots, dykes and trannies.

St. Paul made it explicitly clear that to publicly ratify sodomy is a CAPITAL CRIME. Which it most assuredly is.

For professing themselves to be wise, they became fools. And they changed the glory of the incorruptible God into the likeness of the image of a corruptible man, and of birds, and of fourfooted beasts, and of creeping things. Wherefore God gave them up to the desires of their heart, unto uncleanness, to dishonor their own bodies among themselves. Who changed the truth of God into a lie; and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.

For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error. And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient;  Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy.

Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them.

Romans 1: 22-32

Sodomy is cultural cancer, so to ratify sodomy would be akin to… I dunno… injecting a drug that caused cancer into the population. It’s a crime against humanity on the largest scale – the civilizational scale.

These prelates have forfeited their lives by this crime, and it is now, as John Senior so presciently said, a GREATER crime to deprive them of the just punishment that they have brought down upon themselves – laicization and execution.

Not only will that punishment not come, there will be total silence- and make absolutely no mistake: it will be the calculated silence of tacit total approval.

With respect to those “on-side”, the effeminate and slothful man deals with problems by pretending that they don’t exist- by looking away and saying, “This too shall pass…”

And, of course, no punishment will come from the Occupied Vatican because Antipope Bergoglio is not now and never has been the Vicar of Christ because Pope Benedict Ratzinger never validly resigned per the Substantial Error clause in Canon 188. Furthermore, it is almost impossible at this point to not strongly suspect Antipope Bergoglio of being THE False Prophet Forerunner of the Antichrist, the anti-John the Baptist, squatting atop the latrine that is the Freemasonic-sodomitical Antichurch.

And yet… silence.

Gotta keep that paycheck signed by the Institutional Church coming!

Gotta keep those social connections and boozy Roman dinner invites coming!

Gotta keep that career on track!

Can’t possibly entertain… CONSPIRACY THEORIES!!!

The Key Character in Brideshead Revisited Is Mrs. Beryl Muspratt

In the aftermath of the Freemasonic-sodomitical Antichurch document “The Exuberance of Sodomy”, which is the literal Classical Latin meaning of “Amoris Laetitia”, more than one piece was written on the novel “Brideshead Revisited”, and how the entire point of the novel was essentially mocked unto destruction by Antipope Bergoglio and his army of diabolical faggots.  I wrote on this previously in September of ARSH 2016.  Here is that piece, even more relevant now than it was before. I’m posting this as pre-study for my piece on Queen Elizabeth II, which shall be posted after she is buried. -AB ’22


There are a few more points on the subject of shame that I would like to expand upon.  The first comes from the novel “Brideshead Revisited”, which demonstrates, completely contrary to the Modernist, post-Christian, Bergoglian heresy, how shame is a medicinal mercy.  If we can self-generate shame without having to have it applied from the exterior, then so much the better.  In fact, we pray for shame in the First Sorrowful Mystery of the Rosary – The Agony in the Garden, the fruit of which is “sorrow for sin”.  Shame.  We beg God to grant us the grace of shame.  But for many people, the shaming must be generated, at least initially, externally.  This is a function of charity – true charity, not the inverted platitude consisting of indifference yielding permissiveness, or in giving people “free stuff”, or just simply “what makes them feel good”.  No, true charity is joy in the existence of another and thus a focused desire that that person make it to heaven.  Full stop.

If you are not familiar with Brideshead Revisited, the context is easily explained.  Set between the World Wars in England, Julia is civilly divorced from Rex, and is shacking up with Charles, who is also civilly divorced.  Charles and Julia make a real cute couple and “love” each other (inasmuch as people who express their “love” for one another do so by knowingly flagellating and crucifying Christ in exchange for having an orgasm, can actually be said to love one another in any honest sense of the word.)  Bridey is Julia’s older brother.

[Bridey has just announced his engagement to Beryl Muspratt, a widow with three children. Julia asks why he hasn’t brought Beryl to Brideshead to meet her]

Lord Brideshead ‘Bridey’: [pompously] You must understand that Beryl is a woman of strict Catholic principle, fortified by the prejudices of the middle classes. I couldn’t *possibly* bring her here. It is a matter of indifference whether you choose to live in sin with Rex or Charles or both – I have always avoided enquiry into the details of your ménage – but in no case would Beryl consent to be your guest.
Julia Mottram: Why, you pompous ass!
[Julia walks out of the room, holding back tears]
Charles Ryder: Bridey! What a bloody offensive thing to say to Julia.
Lord Brideshead ‘Bridey’: [coldly] It was nothing she should object to. I was merely stating a fact well known to her.

Long story short, Julia eventually breaks off her double-adulterous affair with Charles and lives at home, alone for the rest of her life, reconciled to Our Lord through His Holy Church, namely through the Sacrament of Confession. Charles also converts to Catholicism and, it is presumed, lives a chaste life as well.

Beryl Muspratt, painted by all of the protagonists as a villain, ugly, frumpy, judgmental, and emblematic of “everything wrong with the Church”, even though she is never directly seen in the novel, only discussed and quoted a few times by others, is the most heroic figure in the novel.  She is reported as always being kind to Julia, but unwavering in her defense of the Truth, in this case the Truth about marriage and the Sixth Commandment.  Thus, she could never consent to being a guest in the home of a woman – even her own sister-in-law – whom she knows to be Living in Sin, because to do so would ratify the sin itself, ratify the torture and murder of God Himself, and also REDUCE the likelihood that Julia (and Charles) would repent, correct their situation, and die confessed and in a state of grace, be that five minutes hence, or five decades.  Beryl cannot coerce Julia or anyone else to love God, but she can and rightly does apply medicinal shame to Julia in the hopes that the pain of that shame might lead Julia to stop torturing and killing Christ, and thus utterly rejecting His Love in favor of having orgasms with a man who is not her husband and is also another woman’s husband, and in so doing, damning herself to hell.

It is precisely because Julia was made to feel PROFOUNDLY ASHAMED by Beryl refusing to enter her home that Julia set out on the road to repentance.  If Beryl had been a typical Novus Ordo Bergoglian Antichurch Kathy-zombie of today and sought to “encounter” and “accompany” Julia with the “tender caresses” of mendacious, Luciferian ‘FrancisMercy’, manifested by indifference to Julia and her mortally sinful lifestyle, Julia would have been EDIFIED AND CONFIRMED IN HER SIN, and thus would not have repented and corrected.  And neither would Charles – both would have been lost to hell, in all likelihood.

Interestingly, Bridey, the older brother, is revealed by his own words as being “indifferent”, and thus it is BRIDEY, with his lack of charity for the soul of his own sister, that is the most villainous character in this particular scene.  Because remember, it is indifference, not hatred, that is the true opposite of love. But even then, he concludes by stating that Julia has no right to object to the statement of facts which she already knows – namely the Sixth Commandment and Our Lord’s words in Matthew 19.  The only thing Julia has a right to object to or be hurt by is Bridey, her own brother, declaring that he is “indifferent” to her sin, and thus to the fate of his own sister’s soul, not to mention Charles’ soul.  That’s it.  And Beryl Muspratt is indeed the heroine of the novel.

The ULTIMATE misheard lyric just happened to me.

A dear friend, a Millennial, just executed the single greatest “misheard lyric” in the history of the universe.

Okay. This beats (and pat yourself on the back for each one you instantly recognize):

Money for nothin’ and “chips” for free

Every time you go away, you take a piece of “meat” with you

Sweet dreams are made of “cheese” (Who am I to disagree?)

I can see clearly now, “Lorraine” is gone



TEN priests like this man could convert the world.

This is Fr. James Mawdsley.

This is the priest who was tortured and spent over a year as a political prisoner in the dungeon-prisons of Burma. I had the opportunity to meet him very briefly many years ago before he was ordained.

Fr. Mawdsley had a null marriage in his youth. Which means he is heterosexual. I’m sorry that I have to point this out, but the fact is germane. If you’re sitting around waiting for same-sex attracted men to stand against the forces of evil… you’re out of your mind.

Fr. Mawdsley has been voluntarily suspended by the FSSP for refusing to capitulate to the Scamdemic edicts in Europe, and so that he can speak openly about Bergoglio and the Bergoglian attack on the Catholic Church and the Catholic Mass.

This video, it seems to me, is the pinnacle of sanity, right reason and manful virility. Fr. Mawdsley, having been tortured and imprisoned as a political dissident in Burma, has a level of credibility and gravitas that is not only absent in the post-Christian west, but is actively hated and despised by the effeminate men of the fallen west.

St. Philip Neri said, “Give me ten truly detached men, and I will convert the world with them.”

Fr. Mawdsley would be one of that “company of ten” that St. Philip was talking about.

Pray for priests.

Barnhardt Podcast #179: Interior Monologue Booster

[Direct link to the MP3 file]

In this episode Dr. Beep and Nurse Claire return to discuss topics medical, social, pedagogical, and preparation-al.

More links will be added below over time — check back!

Items on which to stock up before Cold and Flu Season

Links, Reading, and Video:

Feedback: please send your questions, comments, suggestions, and happy news item to [email protected] — or you can leave voicemail feedback at (302) 648-6373‬. (Alternate email addresses are [email protected] and [email protected] if you are looking for something more secure.)

Supernerd Media produces the Barnhardt Podcast, hosts Ann’s website, and more; if you got some value from these efforts and would like to return some value please visit to find out how to send a donation via a few other methods.

The Infant Jesus of Prague handles Ann’s financial stuff. Click image for details. [If you have a recurring donation set up and need to cancel for whatever reason – don’t hesitate to do so!]

Experience the Barnhardt Podcast with a modern podcast app: visit to get started!

Fundamentalism is the opposite of Modernism. Fundamentalism is believing what you profess to believe. Therefore, I am a Catholic fundamentlist, and I cannot be gaslighted by anyone for being so, and neither should you.

Let’s begin with a definition.

This is the definition of “fundamental”:

Adjective form: forming a necessary base or core; of central importance; affecting or relating to the essential nature of something or the crucial point about an issue; so basic as to be hard to alter, resolve, or overcome.

Noun form: a central or primary rule or principle on which something is based.

The root is the Latin “fundare”, meaning “to found”.

I was thinking about mathematics this morning, and found it very, very interesting that mathematicians, physicists and engineers that believe:

  • in the commutative properties of addition and multiplication
  • in the associative properties of addition and multiplication
  • in the distributive properties of addition over multiplication
  • that the reciprocal of a non-zero number x is 1/x
  • that the additive inverse of x is (-x)
  • that the additive identity is 0
  • that the multiplicative identity is 1

…are never called “fundamentalists.”

No one ever accuses an engineer of excessive rigidity or of a “fortress mentality” for his unswerving and intransigent belief in the fundamental properties of algebra.  No one deems an engineer deeply flawed as a human being if he refuses to entertain the notion that the additive inverse of x might NOT be (-x), much less tolerate a plan for a building put before him in which the plans operate on the premise that the reciprocal of 2 is ¼.

The heresy of Modernism has been well defined as “to not believe what one believes”.  Only in the irrational, self-contradicting philosophical matrix of Modernism does believing in the fundamentals of one’s professed belief system make a person either stupid, crazy or evil.

Sadly, in today’s Church, thoroughly infiltrated by Modernism, it is simply incomprehensible that a Catholic not only should, but MUST believe the fundamentals of the Catholic faith with more certainty and less doubt than the fundamental properties of algebra.  The supreme truth in the universe is Catholicism, not mathematics.  After all, five loaves and two fishes went into baskets, and hundreds, if not thousands of loaves and fishes came out.  The multiplicative identity did not hold.

Anyone who actually believes anything is, with regards to that belief, a fundamentalist. To be a fundamentalist is nothing less than to believe what you believe.

It is a truly, truly deranged and depraved mind that can hold as not just tenable, but admirable and virtuous that he does not actually believe what he believes.

What the hurling the word “fundamentalist” as a pejorative at Catholics but not mathematicians, physicists and engineers proves is that the hurler fully and completely assents to and believes in mathematics and does not harbor any doubt.  The facts of Divine Revelation to which the Church bears witness? Not so much.

Therefore, I am a Catholic fundamentlist, and I cannot be gaslighted by anyone for being so.

God Incarnate, born of a Virgin, who raised Himself from the dead on the third day, superseding the laws of mathematics and physics, of which He Himself is the author and master.