Hi Ann,

Besides the mountains of evidence that Benedict did not validly resign the papacy and the almost weekly heresy being spewed from Bergoglio, his recent denial of Our Lord’s divinity has got to be the ultimate proof that he is an anti-pope.

I say this because when Our Lord instituted the papacy, he did so on St. Peter’s explicit expression of faith in His divinity.

“And Jesus came into the quarters of Cesarea Philippi: and He asked his disciples, saying: Whom do men say that the Son of Man is?

But they said: Some John the Baptist, and other some Elias, and others Jeremias, or one of the prophets.

Jesus saith to them: But whom do you say that I AM?

Simon Peter answered and said: Thou art Christ, the Son of the living God.

And Jesus answering said to him: Blessed art thou, Simon Bar-Jona: because flesh and blood hath not revealed it to thee, but My Father Who is in heaven.

And I say to thee: That thou art Peter; and upon this rock I will build My Church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.” Matthew 16: 13-18

In other words, the founding of the papacy, and by extension the office of the papacy itself, is directly linked to the expression and belief in Christ’s divinity.

Therefore, when a man claiming to be the pope expressly denies Christ’s divinity, is there any more proof that can be made that he is not and never has been the pope?

Perhaps Our Lord was using Scalfari to again pose the question, “who do you say that I AM?” And perhaps this is the proof most fence sitters needed?

Omnium Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam

J

---

An excellent insertion here are the footnotes in the Douay-Rheims:

“Thou art Peter”: As St. Peter, by divine revelation, here made a solemn profession of his faith of the divinity of Christ; so in recompense of this faith and profession, our Lord here declares to him the dignity to which He is pleased to raise him: viz., that he to whom He had already given the name of Peter, signifying a rock, St. John 1. 42, should be a rock indeed, of invincible strength, for the support of the building of the church; in which building he should be, next to Christ Himself, the chief foundation stone, in quality of chief pastor, ruler, and governor; and should have accordingly all fullness of ecclesiastical power, signified by the keys of the kingdom of heaven.

“Upon this rock”: The words of Christ to Peter, spoken in the vulgar language of the Jews which Our Lord made use of, were the same as if He had said in English, Thou art a Rock, and upon this rock I will build My Church. So that, by the plain course of the words, Peter is here declared to be the rock, upon which the Church was to be built: Christ Himself being both the principal foundation and founder of the same. Where also note, that Christ, by building His house, that is, His Church, upon a rock, has thereby secured it against all storms and floods, like the wise builder, St. Matt. 7. 24, 25.

Tu es Petrus, et super hanc petram aedificabo Ecclesiam Meam.

Ann,

Thank you for providing us with the most current and accurate reporting on the latest scandal surrounding Bergoglio. In your latest translation of Scalfari’s article, something jumped out at me that brought me chills. If you look at the first sentence, and remove the parenthetical statements that somewhat cloud its meaning, readers are left with:

“Whoever has had the luck of meeting him and speaking to him knows that Pope Francis (sic) conceives Christ as Jesus of Nazareth, man, not God incarnate.”

Scalfari reveals that he’s not the only one that knows this is Bergoglio’s POV on Christ’s divinity! How high and how deep does the apostasy go within the hierarchy of the church?!

Keep fighting the good fight. You and others are the modern “voice crying out in the desert.”

God bless,

A. 

---

This astute point leads us directly back to an essay that I first wrote in ARSH 2014 that has become one of the most heavily cited, referenced and syndicated pieces I have ever written. It is the infamous “They don’t actually believe any of that Catholicism bullshit” essay. Here is an excerpt. Remember, this was written in May ARSH 2014.

---

Now, you can squirm and call me uncharitable all you like, but deep down you know just as well as I do that if you were able to corner the vast majority of these people at a cocktail party where they would open up to you honestly, OF COURSE they don’t believe in the Divinity of Christ. OF COURSE they don’t believe in the concept of sin, much less Original Sin, and certainly not in any sort of judgment by a personal deity, much less the ridiculous fictions of hell or damnation. OF COURSE they don’t believe in the Mass as The Holy and August Sacrifice of Calvary Made Present, and CERTAINLY not in the Real Presence of Jesus Christ in the Eucharist. I mean, come on, this is all a bunch of medieval bullshit that a bunch superstitious neanderthals used to oppress and control each other up until we “sang a newchurch into being” in 1965 after Saint Second Vatican Council incarnated in the hearts of men on October 11, 1962, and then ascended on December 8, 1965, thus liberating modern man from nineteen centuries of monumentally embarrassing and oppressive crackpot voodoo bullshit.

It doesn’t matter what the Mass was like before, and it doesn’t matter what the Fathers and Saints taught before, because MANKIND ITSELF was different, and not just different but INFERIOR. Thus everything “old” is just a bunch of bullshit, and everything “new” is good, and thus the Church must also be new, and thus different. None of that ridiculous old bullshit can possibly speak to the new, superior modern man, who, being liberated from nineteen centuries of bullshit, can now “encounter” Christ and “dialogue” with “him” as an equal – because “he” IS AN EQUAL.

Anyone who takes any interest at all in any of that archaic nonsense must then, by definition, be of sub-standard intelligence at best, and TOTALLY UNCOOL at worst. You don’t want to be UNCOOL, do you? You don’t want to be THROWN OUT OF SEMINARY, do you? You don’t want to be disdained and sneered at and mocked behind your back by your professors, superiors and peers, do you? You don’t want to be exiled to some *gasp* RURAL parish, do you? You don’t want to be demoted from being Chief Justice of the Vatican Supreme Court to a purely ceremonial position as the Patron of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta, do you? You don’t want people to think that you ACTUALLY BELIEVE THAT BULLSHIT, right?

Modern man, having moved beyond and having been liberated from the bullshit, can now act as his own arbiter of truth, conceptualizing the notions of good and evil within himself, and truth, goodness and beauty are now negotiable and dynamic. Modern man need not rely upon or even be informed by strict, rigid, antiquated, superstitious teaching (the bullshit), but now, in his superiority, can confidently rely on how things make him FEEL, and thus liberate himself and others from the bullshit, and thus stop obsessing over minutiae and trivia, and start worrying about the things that really matter: giving the state the power to redistribute wealth and incur incalculable debt so that unlimited amounts of free shit can be “given” to “poor people”, thus eliminating material inequality which is the root of social evil, and, of course, climate change. And also maintaining the cash flow from the church tax in Germany.

The concepts of “mercy” and “charity” must be redefined as “PERMISSIVENESS born from INDIFFERENCE” according to the new order – the exact opposite of their antiquated and oppressive pre-St. Vatican II bullshit meanings.

Ladies and gentlemen, in the eyes of these people there is today only one sin, and that sin is actually believing what the Catholic Church teaches. It embarrasses them. It embarrasses them to the point of rage.

In like manner also the chief priests, with the scribes and ancients, mocking, said: He saved others; Himself He cannot save. If He be the king of Israel, let Him now come down from the cross, and we will believe Him.

Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose….

This translation comes from a Roman who is fully bilingual in American English. An expert in translating colloquiums and nuance.

“(Io) Sono la prova provata” means:

I am the demonstrable proof.

First person singular.

Hold on.  We just now got the full Italian piece, and it is even worse.  “Sono” in Italian is both the verb “to be” in the first person singular (I am) and also the third person plural (they are).  So, It appears that Bergoglio applied this to TWO SCRIPTURE VERSES FROM THE GOSPEL IN A LAME ATTEMPT TO DISPROVE THE DIVINITY OF CHRIST: namely, Our Blessed Lord’s Agony in the Garden and His Agony on the Cross.

Whoever has had, as I have happened several times, the luck of meeting him and speaking to him with the utmost cultural confidence, knows that Pope Francis conceives Christ as Jesus of Nazareth, man, not God incarnate. Once incarnated, Jesus ceases to be a God and becomes a man until his death on the cross. The proof that confirms this reality and creates a Church that is completely different from the others is proved by some episodes
which deserve to be remembered. The first is what happens in the Garden of Gethsemane where Jesus goes after the Last Supper. The apostles who are a few meters from him hear him pray to God with words that were at one time reported by Simon Peter: “Lord – said Jesus – if you can remove this bitter chalice from me, please do it, but if you can’t or you don’t want me to drink it all the way ». He was arrested by Pontius Pilate’s guards
just outside of that garden.

Another episode, also well known, occurs when Jesus is already crucified and once again repeats himself and is listened to by the apostles and by the women who are kneeling at the foot of the cross: «Lord, you have abandoned me».
When I happened to discuss these sentences, Pope Francis told me: “They are the demonstrable proof that Jesus of Nazareth, once he became a man, might have been a man of exceptional virtues, but he was not a God at all “.”

The Italian correspondent adds, “Here is the PDF.  Note that Scalfari adds towards the end of his article that all of his chats with “Francis” have been “riportati alla lettera” (“reported verbatim”). 

Antipope Bergoglio is totally, totally , totally satanic.  100%.

---

Let no man deceive you by any means, for unless there come a revolt first, and the man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition,

Ne quis vos seducat ullo modo : quoniam nisi venerit discessio primum, et revelatus fuerit homo peccati filius perditionis,

[4] Who opposeth, and is lifted up above all that is called God, or that is worshipped, so that he sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself as if he were God.

qui adversatur, et extollitur supra omne, quod dicitur Deus, aut quod colitur, ita ut in templo Dei sedeat ostendens se tamquam sit Deus.

2 Thess. 2: 3-4

Folks, Antipope Bergoglio is not and never has been the Pope.

Pope Benedict’s attempted resignation was legally invalid twelve ways from Sunday. Pope Benedict XVI is the one and only living Pope, and has been all along, since April ARSH 2005.

Antipope Bergoglio’s denial of Christ’s Divinity isn’t anything that should scandalize you. In fact, we all knew this was coming. Antipope Bergoglio has nothing to do with the Papacy nor the Holy Church. He is an apostate, and an arch-criminal.

Marco Tosatti’s reportage of Antipope Bergoglio denying Christ’s Divinity to his buddy Scalfari, is here, in algorithmic translation.

When I happened to discuss these sentences, Pope Francis said to me: “They are (Christ’s own words in Garden and upon the Cross) the proof that Jesus of Nazareth, once he became a man, though a man of exceptional virtues, was not a God at all.”

Always remember, Our Lord is infinite love, perfect goodness, infinite power, and possesses infinite knowledge. He can neither deceive, nor be deceived, and He isn’t trying to trick you or anyone else – which is why everything about this bizarre situation is so stunningly visible, and frankly, obvious.

---

“Pssst. I love you. More than you will ever understand. And I am God Almighty. Emphasis on the “Almighty”. Start from there, and everything will be clear.”

The truth isn’t a democracy, but Marshall, just back from Rome, confirms Voris.

Pray the Matthew 17:20 initiative with me. Patience. Persistence. Faith. CHARITY.

Your time stamp here is 18:15

I have no better way of knowing if a man is for God than if he likes to say the Hail Mary and the Rosary.

-Saint Louis-Marie Grignion de Montfort

This is from earlier today.

The thing that Pope Benedict wears on his right wrist that looks like a watch is a life alert bracelet. The black “face” is a button that he can push if he needs help or is stricken.

Push the button, Holy Father! Push the button!!

The only thing I knew I was legit allergic to (other than ragweed pollen, but does that even count as a real allergy? Isn’t EVERYONE allergic to ragweed?) is the Sulfa antibiotic family.

Well, I found another substance, and I figure if a non-allergy prone person like me is allergic to this stuff, it deserves a word of warning.  It is a chemical that is routinely found in so-called “natural” soaps (in my case a shower gel – for maximum bodily exposure… great) called cocamide monoisopropanolamine or MIPA for short.

In August (when I bought a different shower gel for the first time), I suddenly started getting what I thought was heat rash.  It was very hot, and I was sweating a lot, so while odd, I didn’t worry much about it.  Well, this “heat rash” spread, then started getting quite nasty.  So nasty, in fact, that despite the fact that I had a very vigorous case of chickenpox when I was 3 1/2, I was looking up signs and symptoms of shingles.  Could it be that with the advent of the chickenpox vaccine that shingles was back in play for people who had chickenpox as kids? As it turned out, no.  Thank God.

I finally forensically mapped out that the rash coincided with my new bottle of shower gel.  Sure enough, ingredient number FOUR is “Cocamide MIPA”, which is an emulsifier, stabilizer and surfactant used in “natural” soaps.  And if you are allergic to it… YIKES.

Remember folks, just because something says “natural” or “hypoallergenic” doesn’t mean that there is zero chance that you could have an allergic reaction to it.  The truth is, most of these labels are just marketing ploys. “Organic” has no actual meaning other than “we’re going to charge you double-to-triple for this”.  “Natural”, “hypoallergenic”, all just buzz words.  And hey, ragweed is “natural”.  So is lactose.  So are peanuts and shellfish.

So, back to the old reliable shower gel for me!  Problem solved. I am stronger now.

And now, a little cultural appropriation, just to say we did.

Over the transom, apropos of the whole discussion about “getting credit” for anything, a reminder of this quote from The Gipper:

“There is no limit to the amount of good you can do if you don’t care who gets the credit.”
-Ronald Reagan