Monthly Archives: July 2021

Barnhardt Podcast #151: Weapon of Mass Destruction

[Direct link to the MP3 file]

In this episode Ann, Dr. Mazza, Mark Docherty, and Supernerd discuss the disastrous document vomited out of Rome this past Friday, the effects we expect to see in the short term, and quote from Church History and a few Church Doctors on the licitness and necessity for the laity to speak up and question things when the rightful defenders of the Faith fall silent. Remember that PRIESTS are going to catch the brunt of the fallout from this new document so it’s paramount we pray for priests and let them know we support them: we need them far more than they need us!

Council of Trent Session 22 says Our Lord’s words are in the Mass:

“On the Canon of the Mass. And whereas it beseemeth, that holy things be administered in a holy manner, and of all holy things this sacrifice is the most holy; to the end that it might be worthily and reverently offered and received, the Catholic Church instituted, many years ago, the sacred Canon, so pure from every error, that nothing is contained therein which does not in the highest degree savour of a certain holiness and piety, and raise up unto God the minds of those that offer. For it is composed, out of the very words of the Lord, the traditions of the apostles, and the pious institutions also of holy pontiffs.”

Links, Reading, and Video:

Feedback: please send your questions, comments, suggestions, and happy news item to [email protected]

Supernerd Media produces the Barnhardt Podcast; if you got some value from this podcast — or even just Ann’s website — and would like to return some value to support the technical effort, please visit SupernerdMedia.comwhere the PayPal option is now back!

The Infant Jesus of Prague handles Ann’s financial stuff. Click image for details. [If you have a recurring donation set up and need to cancel for whatever reason – don’t hesitate to do so!]

Listen on Google Play Music

Guest Post by Vanessa*: Our Lady of Copacabana, Terror of the pachamama demon, pray for us!

ROME, ITALY – OCTOBER 04: Pope Francis (sic) and Cardinal Cardinal Cláudio Hummes, Archbishop Emeritus of São Paulo, President of the Pan-Amazonian Ecclesial Network (REPAM), stand in front of a statue representing Pachamama (Mother Earth) as they celebrate the Feast of St. Francis of Assisi at the Vatican Gardens on October 04, 2019 in Rome, Italy. During a highly symbolic tree-planting ceremony in the Vatican Gardens on Friday, Pope Francis (sic) places the upcoming Synod for the Amazon under the protection of Saint Francis of Assisi. (Photo by Giulio Origlia/Getty Images)

A few nights ago, I was cleaning our guest bedroom that houses our books. My sister, who is in the process of converting to the Faith, has developed a devotion to Our Lady under the title ‘Star of the Sea’, so when I spotted a book I had on Marian titles, I grabbed it off the shelf to sit down with later when I had finished cleaning. Perhaps it would yield some information I could share with her.

I’d never really looked at this book before, strangely. It seems to be written by the non-Catholic Christine Barrely, with an emphasis on its pictures of antique Marian prayer cards that don’t match up to the descriptions of the titles. Basically, it seems to be meant as a coffee table book. But as I was flipping through its pages, the word ‘pachamama’ jumped out like live embers.

This strange little book has two references to an apparition of Our Lady of Copacabana, which occurred above Lake Titicaca in Bolivia in the sixteenth century, and how she was a divine response to the local Incan population’s pagan idol worship of Pachamama (Barrely, pgs. 122, 148), referred to for the rest of this essay by me as pachademon.

We were all horrified in October of 2019 at the strange pagan idol worship of pachademon we saw first in the Vatican Gardens, and secondly on the high altar of Saint Peter’s itself. Hold onto your hats, because it’s all about to get worse.

Our Lady of Copacabana, also referred to as Our Lady of Lake Titicaca, Our Lady of Candlemas or La Virgen de la Candelaria (as the apparition was on February 2, the Feast of Candlemas) appeared because the local population was worshipping the pachademon. On page six of this cringe-y undergrad’s ‘feminist’ thesis from 2017 on the ‘syncretism’ of pachademon and Our Lady, it interestingly notes, “…the drought and starvation suffered by the people of Copacabana, even though they gave offerings to their assigned patron, Saint Ann. But Saint Ann did not behave like a good mother; she did not reciprocate. Therefore, the people turned to a family member who would reciprocate, Pachamama in syncretism with the Virgin Mary.”

In researching Our Lady of Copacabana, you will find many such cringe-y attempts to conflate her with pachademon, written by non-Catholics with a patriarchal axe to grind. So basically it seems that Our Lady showed up to finally convert the local population after seeing that her own mother was being ignored as the early patron of the area assigned by the Jesuit priests.

In his book Inca Religion and Customs, early-colonial Spanish Jesuit missionary to the area, Fr. Bernabe Cobo, observed the Andean and Incan worship practices of Pachamama and chronicled ‘…in and around Copacabana long stone altars to Pachamama were erected in every agricultural field:They all worshiped the Earth also, and they called her Pachamama . . . And it was their custom to put a long stone in the middle of their fields . . . as an altar in honor of this goddess. They would pray to her before this altar stone, call upon her, and ask her to protect their (fields) and make them fertile. The more fertile a field was, the better.” (Cobo, pg. 34)

After the miraculous appearance of Our Lady of Copacabana to stop this pagan worship, a grand basilica was built there in her honor. A miraculous statue of her was even created by amateur sculptor Francisco Tito Yupanquit. on August 1, 1925 during the Papal visit of Pope Pius XI to Bolivia, the image of the Virgin of Copacabana was blessed and granted a canonical coronation. She is also the official Marian Patroness of Bolivia.

In other words, basically every decent Catholic in South America knows who she is and why she appeared.

October 7, 2019 Antipope Bergoglio presided over the idol worship of the pachademon statue in the Vatican Gardens. He knew what she was, and he absolutely has to know who Our Lady of Copacabana was, because he is South American, and because in 2017 a LARGE PERMANENT MOSAIC AND CEREMONIAL STATUE OF OUR LADY OF COPACABANA was placed in the very Vatican Gardens he later presided over during demon worship.

Don’t tell me a South American ‘pope’ wasn’t informed when that was done well into his ‘pontificate’. Odd that he did not attend, no? Is that why the first idolatrous ceremony two years afterwards was done in the gardens in front of that very mosaic of Our Lady of Copacabana, in true diabolical narcissist fashion? Shame on every single person in this video, particularly the bishops, for not speaking up in dramatic fashion when this sacrilege occured.

Oh, and the scandal obliquely referred to by the Bishop in the video that needed ‘dialogue’ to solve was this lovely story of local civil authorities and bishops blaming each other for vandalizing the jewels on the original statue of Our Lady of Copacabana at her namesake basilica. Whoops.

On October 27th, 2019 the creepy plant offering to Pachamama was placed on the high altar of Saint Peter’s. Coincidentally, this all occurred right before the first news of (rhymes with Smo-vid) appeared, as Ann has pointed out in this space before.

This is demonic, this is scandalizing.

I think of how many bishops and cardinals from South America knew this. Or any bishop or cardinal who had been to the Basilica in Bolivia, or ministered to the faithful from Bolivia, or simply had read a basic Catholic history of South America. I cringe for the good Catholics of South America who must have watched with their jaws dropped as this antipope luxuriated in pagan idol worship. I think of the mainstream Catholic outlets, the LAZY, corrupt mainstream Catholic outlets who could have found out what I did with basic research in speaking to the people of South America to find out what this demon was, and if there was ANY Catholic antidote to it.

In any other era of the Church, Francis would have been immediately rebuked and reprimanded by his brother Bishops, and lost the Chair of Peter for idol worship in gross violation of the First Commandment (IF he already didn’t deserve to lose it due to Pope Benedict’s invalid resignation).

Let us not forget that several high-profile traditional Catholic Bishops walked by Santa Maria in Transpontina, the church that the pachamama demon statue was held in, on their way to promote a book one of them had written. I leave the revealing of those names to your own research. Not one stopped to storm into the holy place, take the statue and throw it into the Tiber. It took a twenty-something year-old Austrian man financed by a popular American Catholic Youtuber to do so.

Up until that point, we did not know the demon’s name here in the West. The first time we saw it mentioned was by Antipope Bergoglio himself, rebuking the young Austrian man and identifying the statue ‘pachamama’ (h/t to Mark Docherty for this reminder).

Mainstream Catholic outlets rushed to Francis’ defense, attempting to excuse that he ‘didn’t know’, or that ‘it’s a representation of Our Lady’. He knew, and no, it is not.

It seems very clear that this was an Anti-Marian consecration of sorts to usher in the Great Reset.

And lest we get forgetful in this world of fast-paced, gas-lighting news stories it was revealed earlier this month that a pachademon monstrance is being used in Mexico.

We are in very, very dark times.

I plan on praying a nine day Rosary novena to Our Lady of Copacabana starting on July 28 and ending on August 5, her Feast Day, pleading for her intercession and in reparation for Antipope Bergoglio’s knowing and intentional sacrilege. I also encourage any priests reading this to offer Mass that day for the same intentions.

Our Lady of Copacabana, ora pro nobis!

*Vanessa is the nom de guerre of a Trad wife and mother in North America.

Annual St. Anne Novena!

The feast of St. Anne (with an “e”), the Mother of the Mother of God, is July 26th. Please join me, Ann, in my annual Novena to my namesake, St. Anne.

Fr. Z is also doing a St. Anne Novena this year too.

My main intention is obviously the Matthew 17: 20 intention, that:

-Jorge Bergoglio be publicly recognized and removed as Antipope and the whole Bergoglian antipapacy be publicly nullified

-Pope Benedict Ratzinger be publicly recognized as having been the one and only living Vicar of Christ since April ARSH 2005

-Jorge Bergoglio repent, revert to Catholicism, die in a state of Grace in the fullness of time, and someday achieve the Beatific Vision

-Pope Benedict Ratzinger repent of anything he might need to repent of, die in a state of Grace in the fullness of time, and someday achieve the Beatific Vision

Nothing less will do!

Here is the text:

In the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit. Amen.

Glorious St. Anne, we think of you as filled with compassion for those who invoke you and with love for those who suffer. Heavily laden with the weight of my troubles, I cast myself at your feet and humbly beg of you to take the present affair which I commend to you under your special protection  

(Mention your intention here…) 

Deign to commend it to your daughter, our Blessed Lady and lay it before the throne of Jesus, so that He may bring it to a happy conclusion. Cease not to intercede for me until my request is granted. Above all, obtain for me the grace of one day beholding my God face to face.  With you and Mary and all the saints, may I praise and bless Him for all eternity. Amen. Good St Anne, mother of her who is our life, our sweetness and our hope, pray for me.

Say 1: Our Father…

Say 1: Hail Mary…

Say 1: Glory Be…

Antipope Bergoglio “abolishes” the Venerable Rite of Pius V in Article I of his document – which is further proof-positive he isn’t the Pope. Quo Primum is explicit: the Pian Rite CAN NEVER be abolished.

Article one of Antipope Bergoglio’s latest fart, “Traditionis Custodes”:

Art. 1. The liturgical books promulgated by Saint Paul VI and Saint John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of Vatican Council II, are the unique expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite.

Well, let’s see. Quo primum, the great document of Pope SAINT Pius V, issued on 14 July, ARSH 1570, said of the Tridentine Rite:

We grant in perpetuity that this Missal is hereafter freely and lawfully to be used, without any scruple of conscience or fear of incurring any penalty or censure…

No one whosoever is permitted to alter this notice of Our permission, statute, ordinance, command, precept, grant, indult, declaration, will, decree, and prohibition. Should anyone dare to contravene it, let him know that he will incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the Blessed Apostles Peter and Paul.”

From your lips to God’s ear, Pope St. Pius V.

The Mass of Pius V, commonly called the Traditional Latin Mass today, CANNOT, as a matter of ontological reality, be abolished or abrogated. Even Paul VI DID NOT EVER abolish the TLM – he only implied it, and people went along with it.

The fact that Antipope Bergoglio has now declared the Novus Ordo to be the UNIQUE, as in the one and only, Roman Rite, which is an ontological impossibility in direct contradiction to Pope St. Pius V’s crystal clear and infallible, binding words, is yet another glaring point of consilience, proving that Bergoglio is NOT the Pope.

We’ve seen exactly this dynamic from Antipope Bergoglio already with his utterly ludicrous attempt to declare the death penalty “morally inadmissible”, even though capital punishment is thoroughly biblical, and has been used by the Church herself, along with every confessional state in history.

So, Our Loving God has given the world YET ANOTHER obvious proof that Bergoglio is a usurper – because Jesus isn’t a jerk, and He isn’t trying to trick anyone. It’s exactly the opposite. Jesus is doing everything He can to show us in the most stunningly visible terms who His Vicar on Earth is, and is not. Because VISIBILITY, VISIBILITY, VISIBILITY. The Church Militant is VISIBLE, including at her earthly head.

Clearly, obviously Bergoglio is NOT the Vicar of Christ, and now we have one more huge proofset of that.

What’s it going to take for someone in authority who still holds the Catholic faith to acknowledge the ever more obvious? How long are people going to evade glaring reality by saying, “Well, it’s difficult…” when in fact it is one of the easiest things in the world to see and recognize? And it just got even easier, and even more obvious.

Remember, the Bergoglian antipapacy could be ended at ANY TIME by a prelate simply making a press statement along the following lines. And yes, as with most problems in this life, the solution is excruciatingly simple… if we will just DO IT:

“Significant canonical irregularities have been identified with regards to Pope Benedict the Sixteenth’s putative resignation as proffered in February 2013, including but not limited to Canons 332.2 and 188. Pending further investigation, I hereby declare a state of suspense.”


And for the love of God, if Antipope Bergoglio “resigns” while Pope Benedict is still alive and has not validly resigned, NO VALID CONCLAVE CAN BE CALLED because Pope Benedict XVI is still the living Vicar of Christ. It is ontologically impossible for a valid conclave to be called while there is still a living Pope in Office, which Pope Benedict is and has been, uninterrupted, since April ARSH 2005, whether he likes it or not. ONLY THE REAL MATTERS.

Pope St. Pius V, pray for us.

Our Lady of Mount Carmel, pray for us.

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on us and on your Holy Catholic Church.

Antipope usurper apostate and likely False Prophet Forerunner of the Antichrist devoid of authority declares war on the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, attempts to trick the world into believing that Summorum Pontificum is abolished. Tell me again how the identity of the Vicar of Christ on earth “doesn’t matter”…







Guardians of the tradition, the bishops in communion with the Bishop of Rome constitute the visible principle and foundation of the unity of their particular Churches.[1] Under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, through the proclamation of the Gospel and by means of the celebration of the Eucharist, they govern the particular Churches entrusted to them.[2]

In order to promote the concord and unity of the Church, with paternal solicitude towards those who in any region adhere to liturgical forms antecedent to the reform willed by the Vatican Council II, my Venerable Predecessors, Saint John Paul II and Benedict XVI, granted and regulated the faculty to use the Roman Missal edited by John XXIII in 1962.[3] In this way they intended “to facilitate the ecclesial communion of those Catholics who feel attached to some earlier liturgical forms” and not to others.[4]

In line with the initiative of my Venerable Predecessor Benedict XVI to invite the bishops to assess the application of the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum three years after its publication, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith carried out a detailed consultation of the bishops in 2020. The results have been carefully considered in the light of experience that has matured during these years.

At this time, having considered the wishes expressed by the episcopate and having heard the opinion of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, I now desire, with this Apostolic Letter, to press on ever more in the constant search for ecclesial communion. Therefore, I have considered it appropriate to establish the following:

Art. 1. The liturgical books promulgated by Saint Paul VI and Saint John Paul II, in conformity with the decrees of Vatican Council II, are the unique expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite.

Art. 2. It belongs to the diocesan bishop, as moderator, promoter, and guardian of the whole liturgical life of the particular Church entrusted to him,[5] to regulate the liturgical celebrations of his diocese.[6] Therefore, it is his exclusive competence to authorize the use of the 1962 Roman Missal in his diocese, according to the guidelines of the Apostolic See.

Art. 3. The bishop of the diocese in which until now there exist one or more groups that celebrate according to the Missal antecedent to the reform of 1970:

§ 1. is to determine that these groups do not deny the validity and the legitimacy of the liturgical reform, dictated by Vatican Council II and the Magisterium of the Supreme Pontiffs;

§ 2. is to designate one or more locations where the faithful adherents of these groups may gather for the eucharistic celebration (not however in the parochial churches and without the erection of new personal parishes);

§ 3. to establish at the designated locations the days on which eucharistic celebrations are permitted using the Roman Missal promulgated by Saint John XXIII in 1962.[7] In these celebrations the readings are proclaimed in the vernacular language, using translations of the Sacred Scripture approved for liturgical use by the respective Episcopal Conferences;

§ 4. to appoint a priest who, as delegate of the bishop, is entrusted with these celebrations and with the pastoral care of these groups of the faithful. This priest should be suited for this responsibility, skilled in the use of the Missale Romanum antecedent to the reform of 1970, possess a knowledge of the Latin language sufficient for a thorough comprehension of the rubrics and liturgical texts, and be animated by a lively pastoral charity and by a sense of ecclesial communion. This priest should have at heart not only the correct celebration of the liturgy, but also the pastoral and spiritual care of the faithful;

§ 5. to proceed suitably to verify that the parishes canonically erected for the benefit of these faithful are effective for their spiritual growth, and to determine whether or not to retain them;

§ 6. to take care not to authorize the establishment of new groups.

Art. 4. Priests ordained after the publication of the present Motu Proprio, who wish to celebrate using the Missale Romanum of 1962, should submit a formal request to the diocesan Bishop who shall consult the Apostolic See before granting this authorization.

Art. 5. Priests who already celebrate according to the Missale Romanum of 1962 should request from the diocesan Bishop the authorization to continue to enjoy this faculty.

Art. 6. Institutes of consecrated life and Societies of apostolic life, erected by the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, fall under the competence of the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies for Apostolic Life.

Art. 7. The Congregation for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments and the Congregation for Institutes of Consecrated Life and Societies of Apostolic Life, for matters of their particular competence, exercise the authority of the Holy See with respect to the observance of these provisions.

Art. 8. Previous norms, instructions, permissions, and customs that do not conform to the provisions of the present Motu Proprio are abrogated.

Everything that I have declared in this Apostolic Letter in the form of Motu Proprio, I order to be observed in all its parts, anything else to the contrary notwithstanding, even if worthy of particular mention, and I establish that it be promulgated by way of publication in “L’Osservatore Romano”, entering immediately in force and, subsequently, that it be published in the official Commentary of the Holy See, Acta Apostolicae Sedis.

Given at Rome, at Saint John Lateran, on 16 July 2021, the liturgical Memorial of Our Lady of Mount Carmel, in the ninth year of Our Pontificate (sic).


Antipope Bergoglio receiving a cursed plant representing the demon “Pachamama” from a pagan witch, which he then placed upon the high altar of St. Peter’s Basilica for the consecration of the Eucharist.

Mailbag: THANK YOU and your post about The Great Awakening and the Republic of Venice

Hi Ann,

In January, you posted a short one called The Great Awakening where you recommended John Julius Norwich’s book, A History of Venice. Intrigued and very much disillusioned with the train wreck that is the United States government, I purchased the book right away. I want to thank you for that post and the referral to the book. It took me up until now to finish it but I savored every page and it broadened my education about the Republic of Venice which I knew very little about prior.

Reading the book, I was impressed with how the early Venetians, took what was really an inhospitable fragment of lands in a murky lagoon of all places, and built them up into a first-class city-state and then, expanding into what was truly a bedrock of stability in an otherwise, unstable world.

The final chapter about the fall when Bonaparte forced the “tree of liberty” and the secular “festival of democracy” was gut-wrenching. I can’t imagine how torturous that must have been for the devout Catholics in the religious and the laity.

I’ll probably never get to visit the occupied countries of the European Union ever again since I refuse to be death-vax’d. I was blessed to visit the areas that are now called Italy in the past but regret that I was never able to spend some time in Venice.

I don’t know if I agree that the type of government the Republic of Venice had is what’s right for us. Despite Venice’s stability for 1000 years, they did tolerate and enable the musloids for economic reasons rather than work to exterminate that cancer early before it metastised into the huge problem it is now {This is the single largest critique and “cringe” regarding Venice. Climbing into bed with the musloids for political and economic leverage was indeed despicable. And for this, I strongly suspect that God permitted the scourge of Napoleon. -AB}.

Same for their toleration of “religious liberty” within the Republic. And their toleration of decadence within the Republic (i.e. Carnival) led to a lax of morals, morale and national can-do right before the period of decline and the fall. I know that monarchy is where we need to be but I tend to think we need an absolute monarchy where the people don’t get to vote. {I think voting is feasible on the local trade guild and neighborhood micro levels. -AB}

It’s kind of like a border collie and sheep analogy. If the sheep were allowed to elect their sheep dogs and know they could have access to a senate and some supremacist judges to get their way, the sheep would be easy prey for the hungry wolves hiding in the bushes. Well, we’re already there. And on that note…

I really don’t see the United States surviving to the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart. In fact, I think the United States will have to be destroyed in order for the Immaculate Heart to triumph. It’s a freemasonic nation from its conception and they way things are going, it’ll be a freemasonic nation to its death.

The podcast this week with Dr. Beep and Nurse Claire spoke volumes about what I suspected was going on and has now been validated as true. Then you have the culture here. I live in Philadelphia but when I go visit my family in a relatively small North Carolina city, I see the fat dykes walking around with hoochie-mama shorts, bra-shirts and vulgar tattoos all over their legs and breasts (yep, nowadays you see pretty much everything).

Last weekend, a group of us had a Rosary of Reparation outside a museum here in Philadelphia hosting a drag queen story hour. Only two people quietly thanked us, everyone else was indifferent or hissed/cursed us. Everywhere I go it seems like its rainbow flag submission.

I now spit on the ground of Independence Hall when I walk by there and pray the St. Michael prayer when I pass by all the historical monuments to freemasonry and not to mention all the “medical marijuana” shops, palm reader shops and effeminate stores/restaurants/bars with BLM signs and rainbow flags in the windows.

Heaven is our true country as the Second Glorious Mystery of the Rosary teaches us. I hope and pray, I will get there some day and live for eternity under that Absolute Monarchy and I hope to meet you there and thank you for all you did in this valley of tears 🙂

Take care and God Bless,


Mailbag: Ivermectin clears “Long Covid” (aka when the crud lingers)

Miss Barnhardt,

I thought you might be interested in the following.

I came down with a moderately bad case of COVID in January. I asked my primary to prescribe me Ivermectin, but he declined. I was quite sick for about two weeks with strange symptoms (I won’t bore you with the details), but mostly recovered. However, most of my taste and smell never came back, and I remained tired and felt off through mid-June.

In mid-June, I started feeling ill again, with what felt like a regular cold. This time, I went myself to a local feed store and got some edible Ivermectin horse paste, and took an appropriate dose.

Within 48 hours, not only did I feel completely cured of the cold, but my taste and smell had fully returned. I have also otherwise felt fully recovered from the other long-term COVID symptoms.

This could have been a coincidence, but I doubt it based on the timing.

Your readers should know that if they are suffering lingering effects of COVID, Ivermectin may help with any long-term symptoms.


Quick Ivermectin Injectable intel: it is best to store it at COOL ROOM TEMP in a DARK spot. Don’t put it in the fridge.

Very standard: store Ivermectin in a cool, dark place. Not the cold fridge.

So basically, put it in a cabinet.

Thanks to the reader who sent the citation. 🙏🏻

I’ve given away 1200+ doses, and am sitting at the moment on 1600 more. With many more to be procured over the coming weeks. I have also bought a bunch of 50mL glass dropper-top bottles, per K in the post below. I totally see that being the hyper-efficient and low-key means of distribution.

Pro tip: they make those bottles in many colors, including blue and green. Brown looks like “medicine”. Maybe consider blue, which looks like aromatherapy oils or some such. Blue is also the color of Our Lady.