Folks, you really need to look at things like this and take them into account.
I was very happy to see that the author used the same text I used in my video on the Vendée Genocide in ARSH 2012. The book is “A French Genocide: The Vendée” by Reynald Secher. I also used Michael Davies’ book on the Vendée, “For Altar and Throne: The Rising in the Vendée”.
The thrust of my video presentation was not only educating people (especially Americans) about this memory-holed genocide, and the REAL nature of the French Revolution, taught in American schools as a wholesome spreading of the “glorious” (in reality, Freemasonic) American Revolution to Europe, but primarily to point up the parallels between the spiraling descent into evil between late-18th century France and modern ‘Murica, and what people are capable of doing to one another with surprisingly little persuasion. And remember, almost everyone in 18th century France was a “practicing Catholic”. Consider the starting point of modern ‘Murica, and Europe is pretty much completely POST-CHRISTIAN, add some satanic rap/hip-hop “culture” and the whole sodomite zeitgeist to the mix, and… yeah.
Two commenters over at the Quillette piece put it very well:
Excellent piece. The French Revolution provided the template for revolutions in the name of progress to be used as an excuse for some people to exercise their blood lust and cruelty beneath a veneer of morality. A Breton told me of similar murders occurred when the Bretons tried to protect The Church. Those instigating Revolutions tend to be good at harnessing the services of people who enjoy killing and inflicting pain on others. As M Shalamov said ” the lust for power, for unpunished murder is great. 95% of cowards are capable of lethal meanness after a light threatening and I saw what a a forcible argument a simple slap could be for an intellectual.”
A Briton who lived in France in the late 1940s and early 1950s said the French have not fully recovered from the Revolution and this helps to explain why.
“The surest way to work up a crusade in favor of some good cause is to promise people they will have a chance of maltreating someone. To be able to destroy with good conscience, to be able to behave badly and call your bad behavior ‘righteous indignation’ — this is the height of psychological luxury, the most delicious of moral treats.” –Aldous Huxley
I wanted to drop a line just to let you know how much I have appreciated the work you have done on behalf of Holy Mother Church and the Faith.
According to McKeegan, the Vatican follows a familiar pattern with corrupt prelates.
“They quietly remove the bishop once the risk of exposure is extreme, give them a soft landing while a supposed investigation takes place (the results of which are never made public), then reinstate them in a top position far away from the original post, where the process likely repeats itself. These resemble the actions of a criminal syndicate.”
Keep the faith and please pray for me!
In this episode we discuss the story of Natasha Jaitt, the “very odd” circumstances surrounding her death, and her connections with Gustavo Vera — who is VERY close with the Junior Bishop in White (Bergoglio). Also: was Cardinal Pell completely innocent or just guilty of something else and burned for financial-political reasons? The intrigue is downright Roman… even if Kangaroo Kourts are involved.
Links, reading, and YouTube:
- Hiding from the Internet (PDF workbook)
- One alternative to Gmail (paid service)
- Another alternative to Gmail (with a free tier)
- Book: The Dictator Pope
- Book: A Distant Mirror
- Novena to Saint Joseph (starting March 10th)
- Jaitt’s “Producer” Caught on Video Lifting Jaitt’s Cellphone from Crime scene
- (YouTube) Primer on Natacha Jaitt, Gustavo Vera and Jorge Bergoglio
- Compendium of Reportage and Links on Natacha Jaitt, Gustavo Vera, Jorge Bergoglio
Feedback: please send your questions, comments, and suggestions to [email protected]
The Barnhardt Podcast is produced by SuperNerd Media; if you found this episode to be of value you can share some value to back to SuperNerd at the SuperNerd Media website. You can also follow SuperNerd Media on Twitter.
Please join me in this. I love how on this little prayer card image, on the left is St. Peter’s Basilica, and on the right is the facade of St. John Lateran – which is the Seat of the Roman Pontiff.
Also from the Vatican comes the blessing for the drug block-puberty, and in the Church you cry out at the scandal. The placet arrived in the form of a compliant interview that the official Vatican portal Vatican News has made to the philosopher of law Laura Palazzani, a member of the Pontifical Academy for Life and of the National Bioethics Committee (CNB). Palazzani has defended the recent decision of the Agency of the drug (AIFA) to include the molecule Trp-triptorelin, also known as drug blocker-puberty, among the medicinal products available to the National Health Service. In practice, adolescents considered to suffer from gender dysphoria, or who have difficulty identifying with their sex, will be able to administer at the expense of the tax payer this drug that will block for a few years a fundamental physiological event, puberty, waiting for the teenager decides what “gender” wants to be.
“THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND THE ANTI-CHURCH CURRENTLY CO-EXIST IN THE SAME SACRAMENTAL, LITURGICAL AND JURIDICAL SPACE.”
-Fr. Linus Clovis
There’s someone for everyone, and Joey’s love was Holly
In her arms, he didn’t have to prove he was a man
One day while he was working, the Gallen boys came calling
They took turns at Holly, n’there was three of them
Joey opened up the door, and saw his Holly crying
The torn dress, the shattered look was more than he could stand
He reached above the fireplace, and took down his Daddy’s picture
As the tears fell on his Daddy’s face, he heard these words again
The Gallen boys just laughed at him when he walked into the dining room
One of them got up and met him halfway ‘cross the floor
When Joey turned around they said, “hey look, old yeller’s leaving”
But you could’ve heard a pin drop when Joey stopped and locked the door
Fifty years of crawling was bottled up inside him
He wasn’t holding nothin’ back, he let ’em have it all
When Joey left the dining room, not a Gallen boy was standing
He said, “this one’s for Holly,” as he watched the last one fall
“I promised you, Dad, not to do the things you’ve done
I walk away from trouble when I can
Now please don’t think I’m weak, I didn’t turn the other cheek
And Papa, I sure hope you understand
Sometimes you gotta fight when you’re a man”
Everyone considered him the coward of the county….
(This piece was originally written on May 16, ARSH 2016 for The Remnant Newspaper, four days before Archbishop Georg Ganswein delivered his informative speech on Pope Benedict’s attempted “fundamental transformation” and “expansion” of the Petrine Ministry at the Gregorianum in Rome. I think the concept it addresses – hatred of God by Diabolical Narcissist clerics and prelates – is very much worth revisiting. I have only very slightly modified a few phrases to reflect the reality of the Bergoglian Antipapacy qua Antipapacy. I hope it helps. -AB)
A question that I have always asked myself is, “Who are the people who would dedicate their lives to a Church that they clearly hold in contempt at best, and hate at worst? What would drive a man or woman to a life driven by and revolving around such pure, focused spite?”
Who are they? They are Diabolical Narcissists.
To review, Diabolical Narcissism is the condition in which a human being freely chooses to adopt the psycho-spiritual comportment and emotional palate of the fallen angels – demons. Simply put, the DN chooses, exactly as the fallen angels chose, to voluntarily purge himself of all love. As a result, he is voluntarily incapable of empathy, and incapable of the emotions derived from love, namely happiness, gratitude, joy, and sadness.
DNs are capable only of the demonic emotional palette of anger, hatred, envy and fear. They view other human beings as 3-dimensional cartoon objects to be used as the DN sees fit to provide him with diabolical narcissistic satisfaction. And, like the angelic demons, deep down, Diabolical Narcissists know that they are monstrosities, and thus are animated by an unquenchable spite, especially toward those “mere humans”, so far beneath them, and yet capable of that which they have freely rejected: love.
DNs derive the greatest diabolical satisfaction from forming attachments, sometimes referred to as the “idealization phase”, grooming the attachment/victim, then turning on and “devaluing” the attachment/victim, and then viciously abusing the attachment/victim. DNs derive intense diabolical satisfaction from not only the actual abuse of the victim, but oftentimes even more so from the “getting away with it” – watching as others around him, not wanting to incite his wrath or lose their connection to him, give their tacit approval or even their positive approval of his abusive actions. DNs are obsessed with the notion that they are a separate superior caste, an uber-aristocracy, distinct and above everyone else, even “super-human”, and as such the “rules” which apply to the rabble and the great unwashed do not apply to them. One of the greatest sources of diabolical satisfaction for DNs is to openly commit crimes, atrocities, scandalous sin or acts of abuse and NOT be held to account – to operate outside the law or the rules of human decency. In the secular political sphere this is referred to as “oligarchy”. On the micro level it has many names: megalomania, sociopathy and psychopathy.
But what happens when a DN forms such an attachment with, and then devalues, hates, abuses, and even declares war on God?
Well, that, dear reader, is what we call a “Jesuit”. That’s a little joke. This dynamic is certainly not limited to the Jesuits. It is everywhere in the Church, and can be seen amongst the laity, and Traddyland is by no means immune.
First, the initial phases of the DN’s “relationship” with God.
It is typically cerebral narcissists, as opposed to somatic or “physical” narcissists, that seek out God Himself as an attachment/victim. Cerebral Diabolical Narcissists see God as the ultimate attachment, and eventually, as the Ultimate Victim – which, ironically, is exactly what He is. God is everything that DNs want to be: omniscient, awe-inspiring, admired and adored, mysterious and much-discussed, perfect. Some DNs, especially those that were deified as children, will view God as their only peer, casting themselves in the role of co-God, fourth person of the “Quatrine Godhead”, or demiurge.
Across the board, these DNs believe themselves to be the “only one” who genuinely “understands” God. They believe that they have a completely unique and privileged relationship with God. It is the DN and God, alone together, against the world. Some in the protestant cult milieu will even use terms like “anointed”. DNs believe that they derive authority from their privileged relationship with God, and that this authority exempts and dispenses them from laws and behavioral standards as they apply to “mere humans”. They believe that the rules do not apply to them, but that they are able to sit in God-like judgment of others without countenancing the slightest hint of hypocrisy.
It bears mentioning at this point that the deification of children is no longer the rarity that it once was, found typically in years past with genius children and the children of heredity monarchs. In fact, the entire post-Christian education system and media complex today is specifically designed to drive children into pathological effeminacy at best and full-blown Diabolical Narcissism at worst. If the children around you today seem like insufferable mini-tyrant “Social Justice Warrior Gestapo”, it is because that is exactly what they are. They are an army of DN Stormtroopers, eagerly awaiting their orders, convinced of their “otherness”, and perhaps more importantly, regarding other human beings as expendable animated sacks of meat.
For DNs who enter the priesthood, religious communities, or who find themselves in a position of authority within The Church, be it working in the Chancery, or even laymen working within the Church, their predisposition toward cruelty, sadism and abuse is facilitated by any position of authority, even if they have not yet turned on and devalued God. Their default position of contempt for others is intrinsic to their diabolical nature, and thus they are attracted to positions in which they can, under the guise of authority, dole out narcissistic abuse.
In the beginning of the “relationship” with God, the DN idealizes God, in the sense that the DN convinces himself that God is completely congruent to himself. The more he learns about God, the more he sees himself in God. At this point, one should be reminded of the Archangel Michael whose very name is a refutation of this very dynamic: Who is like God? The Archangel knows that the answer to that question is NO ONE. To the DN, the answer, exactly like Lucifer’s answer is, ME!
After a while, the DN becomes disillusioned with God. When the world fails to fall at the DN’s feet, when the DN is not regarded, adored and obeyed as co-God, when God “fails to deliver”, the DN then devalues and turns on God just as with a human attachment/target. Interestingly, this devaluing almost always goes in steps, working up finally to God Himself. For example, a DN might first turn on and devalue his parish, his religious community, his Rite (going from Roman to Byzantine, for example), or even his vows (taking a concubine(s) of either sex). These are all mere stops along the road to the final destination for the DN, the rejection of God Himself. When this happens, the DN declares war on God Himself and, motivated by pure diabolical spite, sets out to do as much damage to God as he can. After all, the bigger the enemy, the more grandiose the DN feels. And there is no bigger enemy to set oneself against than God Himself. What this means for the DN is exactly the same as what it means for the actual demons: hurting and even killing the souls of other human beings out of hatred for God – an exact inversion of the Second Great Commandment, hating others for the hatred of God.
One of the surest signals of Diabolical Narcissism in general is what is referred to as “hating your own”. In the context of The Church, the DN priest or religious (and let’s not forget the loud but dwindling army of apostate lesbian nuns prowling throughout the world seeking the ruin of souls) will hold in the highest contempt orthodox, pious, devout Roman Catholics. In the micro context, a DN will typically devalue and abuse those closest to him – spouse, children, employees, even eventually friends, which are typically just sycophants. Non-sycophantic acquaintances usually cotton to the DN and flee for their own well-being in short order. To the DN, his “flock”, in whatever form it takes, becomes his hostage. And the greatest rush of diabolical satisfaction a DN can procure is the attention, affirmation and even adoration of the very people he is taunting, tormenting and abusing, while he is abusing them.
The most strategically effective position for a DN to do this is INSIDE THE CHURCH. And so, despite their descent into full-blown hatred of God, instead of leaving the Church, they entrench. They climb the Episcopal/Curial ladder. The higher they go, the more damage to souls they can wreak; the more they can enable and protect others like themselves who seek to abuse God and destroy His Church; the more they can destroy the Liturgy; the more they can punish and scandalize those who foolishly love God; the more lies they can tell the miserable, pathetic sheep, and then sit back and watch the sheep skip merrily into hell AT THEIR COMMAND, ignoring the very Voice of the Shepherd Himself; the more they can shake their fists at God, luxuriating in their crimes and not just their total immunity from any earthly consequences, but even to the cheers and cries of adoration of the sheep whom they are slaughtering – adoration given to them instead of to God.
Do I think that certain high-ranking churchmen today could be (or already are) Diabolical Narcissists? Of course. In fact, I think most of them are.
Do I think that it is likely that they have devalued and are now consciously abusing God and with malice aforethought seeking to destroy His Holy Church even from the usurped See of Peter? Of course. I think that is obvious.
Do I think that Antipope Jorge Bergoglio is already trying to cast himself to the world as somehow over, above and “beyond” Jesus Christ Himself? Of course. That is also obvious. He, and his coven of Freemasonic sodomites, are building the Antichurch in the rubble of the True Church which they are systematically demolishing.
Christ, have mercy.
Not being beaten, raped, and attempted to be murdered by the criminal usurper antipope and His Freemason sodomite coven.
Nah, there’s no evidence to think that something might be terribly amiss. I mean, between Pope Benedict all but skywriting that the sodomites were gunning for him from the first days of his papacy, the partial attempted abdication of just the “active governance” ministry, not the Petrine Office, the retention all the visible marks of the Petrine Office, and the fact that Bergoglio is a foaming-at-the-mouth blaspheming apostate Freemason happily swimming laps in a pool of sodomy between shifts running a D11 Caterpillar tasked with scraping the Church from the face of the earth and replacing it with a Freemasonic Antichurch – nah. You’re just stupid, crazy and a schismatic if you dare think anything might be hinkey here, so shut up, stupid, ignurnt Papolator!
The Argentinians have checked in after I asked them if there was anything new on the Natacha Jaitt death that the English-speaking world should be aware of. They said the big news was that Jaitt’s “producer”, Raúl Velaztiqui Duarte, was caught on video lifting Jaitt’s cellphone from the crime scene, wrapping it in a towel, and putting it in his backpack, then lying through his teeth about this to the cops.
Not a great look for Raúl.
So, at this point, pretty much everyone in Argentina thinks there was foul play here. The thing to remember is that Jaitt was threatening not just Gustavo Vera (although it was Vera who was suing Jaitt, and that trial was set to begin right about now… with all of the discovery and presentation of evidence that would go along with a trial.) Jaitt was threatening to expose the whole Buenos Aires pedophile ring, which included celebrities and sports stars, just as it does in the U.S. and elsewhere.
Finally, let me point out that YES, Natacha Jaitt, was, in fact, a complete and total train wreck, and certainly no saint or martyr. She was a proud, self-confessed prostitute, for goodness sake. Again, this is PAR FOR THE COURSE when we are talking about people blowing the whistle on the goings-on in the gay bars and prostitution rings of any major city. If you are going to wait around for cloistered nuns to blow the whistle on such things, what you are really doing is dodging the problem entirely.
Also, it has been noted that Jaitt was a Jew. Yes, Jaitt is a Jewish name, and almost all people with that surname today are in Argentina. You realize what that means, don’t you? Had anyone reached out to this woman, the primary focus of proselytizing her could and should have been that as an unbaptized person, ALL of her sins – and they were numerous and horrific – could have been instantly and permanently washed away in the waters of Baptism. She could have had every stain of sin washed away in the Blood of the Lamb, and worn a snow-white baptismal garment. She wouldn’t have even needed to make a confession. What a lost opportunity. It COULD have been so easy. But now she is dead, and in all likelihood, she didn’t make it. We can’t say for an absolute certainty, but… yeah, it doesn’t look good at all.
This is why The Great Commission was given. This is why proselytism is such a good and charitable act. This is why we don’t just sit and shrug, and should at least TRY. This is also why SCANDAL is such a big deal. All Jaitt ever saw of “c”atholics and “c”atholicism was corruption and unspeakable evil. The word “scandal” means “stumbling block”. How do you even begin to explain to a person like Jaitt that the Holy Catholic Church is the Spotless and Indefectible Body and Bride of Jesus Christ? Relative to what she ever saw of the institutional Church, that sounds like the biggest joke ever told.
But, all things are possible through Jesus Christ. And so we continue, making ourselves appear as fools for Christ, always ready to explain exactly why it is that we have hope. (I read that somewhere once, and so I just Rosica-ed it.)