Monthly Archives: March 2019

Barnhardt Podcast #077: Kompromised Kangaroo Konspiracy

[Direct link to the MP3 file]

In this episode we discuss the story of Natasha Jaitt, the “very odd” circumstances surrounding her death, and her connections with Gustavo Vera — who is VERY close with the Junior Bishop in White (Bergoglio). Also: was Cardinal Pell completely innocent or just guilty of something else and burned for financial-political reasons? The intrigue is downright Roman… even if Kangaroo Kourts are involved.

Links, reading, and YouTube:

Feedback: please send your questions, comments, and suggestions to [email protected]

The Barnhardt Podcast is produced by SuperNerd Media; if you found this episode to be of value you can share some value to back to SuperNerd at the SuperNerd Media website. You can also follow SuperNerd Media on Twitter.

Do the BigMac Maneuver!

Click here for The Stale Big Mac Maneuver

Listen on Google Play Music

RED ALERT: Vatican Says Yes To “Sex Change” Drugs For Children

HERE IS THE COVERAGE IN THE ORIGINAL ITALIAN

HERE IS THE ALGORITHMIC TRANSLATION

Opening paragraph:

Also from the Vatican comes the blessing for the drug block-puberty, and in the Church you cry out at the scandal. The placet arrived in the form of a compliant interview that the official Vatican portal Vatican News has made to the philosopher of law Laura Palazzani, a member of the Pontifical Academy for Life and of the National Bioethics Committee (CNB). Palazzani has defended the recent decision of the Agency of the drug (AIFA) to include the molecule Trp-triptorelin, also known as drug blocker-puberty, among the medicinal products available to the National Health Service. In practice, adolescents considered to suffer from gender dysphoria, or who have difficulty identifying with their sex, will be able to administer at the expense of the tax payer this drug that will block for a few years a fundamental physiological event, puberty, waiting for the teenager decides what “gender” wants to be.


“THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND THE ANTI-CHURCH CURRENTLY CO-EXIST IN THE SAME SACRAMENTAL, LITURGICAL AND JURIDICAL SPACE.”
-Fr. Linus Clovis

An Allegory to Pray For: “When Joey left the dining room, not a Gallen boy was standing. He said, ‘This one’s for Holly,’ as he watched the last one fall.”

There’s someone for everyone, and Joey’s love was Holly
In her arms, he didn’t have to prove he was a man
One day while he was working, the Gallen boys came calling
They took turns at Holly, n’there was three of them

Joey opened up the door, and saw his Holly crying
The torn dress, the shattered look was more than he could stand
He reached above the fireplace, and took down his Daddy’s picture
As the tears fell on his Daddy’s face, he heard these words again

….

The Gallen boys just laughed at him when he walked into the dining room
One of them got up and met him halfway ‘cross the floor
When Joey turned around they said, “hey look, old yeller’s leaving”
But you could’ve heard a pin drop when Joey stopped and locked the door

Fifty years of crawling was bottled up inside him
He wasn’t holding nothin’ back, he let ’em have it all
When Joey left the dining room, not a Gallen boy was standing
He said, “this one’s for Holly,” as he watched the last one fall

“I promised you, Dad, not to do the things you’ve done
I walk away from trouble when I can
Now please don’t think I’m weak, I didn’t turn the other cheek
And Papa, I sure hope you understand
Sometimes you gotta fight when you’re a man”

Everyone considered him the coward of the county….

 

They Hate God.

(This piece was originally written on May 16, ARSH 2016 for The Remnant Newspaper, four days before Archbishop Georg Ganswein delivered his informative speech on Pope Benedict’s attempted “fundamental transformation” and “expansion” of the Petrine Ministry at the Gregorianum in Rome.  I think the concept it addresses – hatred of God by Diabolical Narcissist clerics and prelates – is very much worth revisiting.  I have only very slightly modified a few phrases to reflect the reality of the Bergoglian Antipapacy qua Antipapacy. I hope it helps. -AB)

A question that I have always asked myself is, “Who are the people who would dedicate their lives to a Church that they clearly hold in contempt at best, and hate at worst? What would drive a man or woman to a life driven by and revolving around such pure, focused spite?”

Who are they? They are Diabolical Narcissists.

To review, Diabolical Narcissism is the condition in which a human being freely chooses to adopt the psycho-spiritual comportment and emotional palate of the fallen angels – demons. Simply put, the DN chooses, exactly as the fallen angels chose, to voluntarily purge himself of all love. As a result, he is voluntarily incapable of empathy, and incapable of the emotions derived from love, namely happiness, gratitude, joy, and sadness.

DNs are capable only of the demonic emotional palette of anger, hatred, envy and fear. They view other human beings as 3-dimensional cartoon objects to be used as the DN sees fit to provide him with diabolical narcissistic satisfaction. And, like the angelic demons, deep down, Diabolical Narcissists know that they are monstrosities, and thus are animated by an unquenchable spite, especially toward those “mere humans”, so far beneath them, and yet capable of that which they have freely rejected: love.

DNs derive the greatest diabolical satisfaction from forming attachments, sometimes referred to as the “idealization phase”, grooming the attachment/victim, then turning on and “devaluing” the attachment/victim, and then viciously abusing the attachment/victim. DNs derive intense diabolical satisfaction from not only the actual abuse of the victim, but oftentimes even more so from the “getting away with it” – watching as others around him, not wanting to incite his wrath or lose their connection to him, give their tacit approval or even their positive approval of his abusive actions. DNs are obsessed with the notion that they are a separate superior caste, an uber-aristocracy, distinct and above everyone else, even “super-human”, and as such the “rules” which apply to the rabble and the great unwashed do not apply to them. One of the greatest sources of diabolical satisfaction for DNs is to openly commit crimes, atrocities, scandalous sin or acts of abuse and NOT be held to account – to operate outside the law or the rules of human decency. In the secular political sphere this is referred to as “oligarchy”. On the micro level it has many names: megalomania, sociopathy and psychopathy.

But what happens when a DN forms such an attachment with, and then devalues, hates, abuses, and even declares war on God?

Well, that, dear reader, is what we call a “Jesuit”. That’s a little joke. This dynamic is certainly not limited to the Jesuits. It is everywhere in the Church, and can be seen amongst the laity, and Traddyland is by no means immune.

First, the initial phases of the DN’s “relationship” with God.

It is typically cerebral narcissists, as opposed to somatic or “physical” narcissists, that seek out God Himself as an attachment/victim. Cerebral Diabolical Narcissists see God as the ultimate attachment, and eventually, as the Ultimate Victim – which, ironically, is exactly what He is. God is everything that DNs want to be: omniscient, awe-inspiring, admired and adored, mysterious and much-discussed, perfect. Some DNs, especially those that were deified as children, will view God as their only peer, casting themselves in the role of co-God, fourth person of the “Quatrine Godhead”, or demiurge.

Across the board, these DNs believe themselves to be the “only one” who genuinely “understands” God. They believe that they have a completely unique and privileged relationship with God. It is the DN and God, alone together, against the world. Some in the protestant cult milieu will even use terms like “anointed”. DNs believe that they derive authority from their privileged relationship with God, and that this authority exempts and dispenses them from laws and behavioral standards as they apply to “mere humans”. They believe that the rules do not apply to them, but that they are able to sit in God-like judgment of others without countenancing the slightest hint of hypocrisy.

It bears mentioning at this point that the deification of children is no longer the rarity that it once was, found typically in years past with genius children and the children of heredity monarchs. In fact, the entire post-Christian education system and media complex today is specifically designed to drive children into pathological effeminacy at best and full-blown Diabolical Narcissism at worst. If the children around you today seem like insufferable mini-tyrant “Social Justice Warrior Gestapo”, it is because that is exactly what they are. They are an army of DN Stormtroopers, eagerly awaiting their orders, convinced of their “otherness”, and perhaps more importantly, regarding other human beings as expendable animated sacks of meat.

For DNs who enter the priesthood, religious communities, or who find themselves in a position of authority within The Church, be it working in the Chancery, or even laymen working within the Church, their predisposition toward cruelty, sadism and abuse is facilitated by any position of authority, even if they have not yet turned on and devalued God. Their default position of contempt for others is intrinsic to their diabolical nature, and thus they are attracted to positions in which they can, under the guise of authority, dole out narcissistic abuse.

In the beginning of the “relationship” with God, the DN idealizes God, in the sense that the DN convinces himself that God is completely congruent to himself. The more he learns about God, the more he sees himself in God. At this point, one should be reminded of the Archangel Michael whose very name is a refutation of this very dynamic: Who is like God? The Archangel knows that the answer to that question is NO ONE. To the DN, the answer, exactly like Lucifer’s answer is, ME!

After a while, the DN becomes disillusioned with God. When the world fails to fall at the DN’s feet, when the DN is not regarded, adored and obeyed as co-God, when God “fails to deliver”, the DN then devalues and turns on God just as with a human attachment/target. Interestingly, this devaluing almost always goes in steps, working up finally to God Himself. For example, a DN might first turn on and devalue his parish, his religious community, his Rite (going from Roman to Byzantine, for example), or even his vows (taking a concubine(s) of either sex). These are all mere stops along the road to the final destination for the DN, the rejection of God Himself. When this happens, the DN declares war on God Himself and, motivated by pure diabolical spite, sets out to do as much damage to God as he can. After all, the bigger the enemy, the more grandiose the DN feels. And there is no bigger enemy to set oneself against than God Himself. What this means for the DN is exactly the same as what it means for the actual demons: hurting and even killing the souls of other human beings out of hatred for God – an exact inversion of the Second Great Commandment, hating others for the hatred of God.

One of the surest signals of Diabolical Narcissism in general is what is referred to as “hating your own”. In the context of The Church, the DN priest or religious (and let’s not forget the loud but dwindling army of apostate lesbian nuns prowling throughout the world seeking the ruin of souls) will hold in the highest contempt orthodox, pious, devout Roman Catholics. In the micro context, a DN will typically devalue and abuse those closest to him – spouse, children, employees, even eventually friends, which are typically just sycophants. Non-sycophantic acquaintances usually cotton to the DN and flee for their own well-being in short order. To the DN, his “flock”, in whatever form it takes, becomes his hostage. And the greatest rush of diabolical satisfaction a DN can procure is the attention, affirmation and even adoration of the very people he is taunting, tormenting and abusing, while he is abusing them.

The most strategically effective position for a DN to do this is INSIDE THE CHURCH. And so, despite their descent into full-blown hatred of God, instead of leaving the Church, they entrench. They climb the Episcopal/Curial ladder. The higher they go, the more damage to souls they can wreak; the more they can enable and protect others like themselves who seek to abuse God and destroy His Church; the more they can destroy the Liturgy; the more they can punish and scandalize those who foolishly love God; the more lies they can tell the miserable, pathetic sheep, and then sit back and watch the sheep skip merrily into hell AT THEIR COMMAND, ignoring the very Voice of the Shepherd Himself; the more they can shake their fists at God, luxuriating in their crimes and not just their total immunity from any earthly consequences, but even to the cheers and cries of adoration of the sheep whom they are slaughtering – adoration given to them instead of to God.

Do I think that certain high-ranking churchmen today could be (or already are) Diabolical Narcissists? Of course.  In fact, I think most of them are.

Do I think that it is likely that they have devalued and are now consciously abusing God and with malice aforethought seeking to destroy His Holy Church even from the usurped See of Peter? Of course.  I think that is obvious.

Do I think that Antipope Jorge Bergoglio is already trying to cast himself to the world as somehow over, above and “beyond” Jesus Christ Himself? Of course.  That is also obvious. He, and his coven of Freemasonic sodomites, are building the Antichurch in the rubble of the True Church which they are systematically demolishing.

Christ, have mercy.

That look? Pure hatred.

So, what EXACTLY is it going to take? Antipope Bergoglio tells priests of Rome that The Indefectible Bride of Christ is in “flagrant adultery”.

Not being beaten, raped, and attempted to be murdered by the criminal usurper antipope and His Freemason sodomite coven.

No, the Bride of Christ HERSELF is a flagrant adulteress. It’s HER fault. She’s the whore.

Nah, there’s no evidence to think that something might be terribly amiss. I mean, between Pope Benedict all but skywriting that the sodomites were gunning for him from the first days of his papacy, the partial attempted abdication of just the “active governance” ministry, not the Petrine Office, the retention all the visible marks of the Petrine Office, and the fact that Bergoglio is a foaming-at-the-mouth blaspheming apostate Freemason happily swimming laps in a pool of sodomy between shifts running a D11 Caterpillar tasked with scraping the Church from the face of the earth and replacing it with a Freemasonic Antichurch – nah. You’re just stupid, crazy and a schismatic if you dare think anything might be hinkey here, so shut up, stupid, ignurnt Papolator!

Argentinian Sources Check In: Jaitt’s “Producer” Caught on Video Lifting Jaitt’s Cellphone from Crimescene and then Lying About It.

The Argentinians have checked in after I asked them if there was anything new on the Natacha Jaitt death that the English-speaking world should be aware of.  They said the big news was that Jaitt’s “producer”, Raúl Velaztiqui Duarte, was caught on video lifting Jaitt’s cellphone from the crime scene, wrapping it in a towel, and putting it in his backpack, then lying through his teeth about this to the cops.

Not a great look for Raúl.

HERE IS THE LINK IN ENGLISH.

So, at this point, pretty much everyone in Argentina thinks there was foul play here.  The thing to remember is that Jaitt was threatening not just Gustavo Vera (although it was Vera who was suing Jaitt, and that trial was set to begin right about now… with all of the discovery and presentation of evidence that would go along with a trial.) Jaitt was threatening to expose the whole Buenos Aires pedophile ring, which included celebrities and sports stars, just as it does in the U.S. and elsewhere.

Finally, let me point out that YES, Natacha Jaitt, was, in fact, a complete and total train wreck, and certainly no saint or martyr.  She was a proud, self-confessed prostitute, for goodness sake.  Again, this is PAR FOR THE COURSE when we are talking about people blowing the whistle on the goings-on in the gay bars and prostitution rings of any major city. If you are going to wait around for cloistered nuns to blow the whistle on such things, what you are really doing is dodging the problem entirely.

Also, it has been noted that Jaitt was a Jew.  Yes, Jaitt is a Jewish name, and almost all people with that surname today are in Argentina.  You realize what that means, don’t you?  Had anyone reached out to this woman, the primary focus of proselytizing her could and should have been that as an unbaptized person, ALL of her sins – and they were numerous and horrific – could have been instantly and permanently washed away in the waters of Baptism.  She could have had every stain of sin washed away in the Blood of the Lamb, and worn a snow-white baptismal garment.  She wouldn’t have even needed to make a confession.  What a lost opportunity.  It COULD have been so easy.  But now she is dead, and in all likelihood, she didn’t make it.  We can’t say for an absolute certainty, but… yeah, it doesn’t look good at all.

This is why The Great Commission was given.  This is why proselytism is such a good and charitable act. This is why we don’t just sit and shrug, and should at least TRY. This is also why SCANDAL is such a big deal.  All Jaitt ever saw of “c”atholics  and “c”atholicism was corruption and unspeakable evil.  The word “scandal” means “stumbling block”.  How do you even begin to explain to a person like Jaitt that the Holy Catholic Church is the Spotless and Indefectible Body and Bride of Jesus Christ?  Relative to what she ever saw of the institutional Church, that sounds like the biggest joke ever told.

But, all things are possible through Jesus Christ. And so we continue, making ourselves appear as fools for Christ, always ready to explain exactly why it is that we have hope. (I read that somewhere once, and so I just Rosica-ed it.)

Repost: Asking God to make Antipope Bergoglio “a good pope” is like asking God to make Bruce Jenner a “beautiful woman”.

(Originally penned and posted on February 17, ARSH 2017.  This piece has “aged well”, indeed.)

People are losing their faith.

They are losing their faith because a man who is not the pope is masquerading as the pope, people are calling him the pope, he is an agent of evil, enacting a satanic agenda, and tearing the Church apart before their eyes.

And people keep calling this man “the pope”.

I get emails and I know other bloggers get these same emails, because I have seen them address them.  Badly.  Well, here is an amalgamated sample of the things I hear.  And below is a FIRM ANSWER.  Not some idiotic nonsense about, “Well, don’t bother your pretty little head about Pope Francis, just focus on the other good popes!  Adopt a pope! Read all about Leo XIII and pay no attention to “Pope Francis” while he drives your children, grandchildren, friends and enemies into hell.  Just look away and pretend it isn’t happening! Besides, there is absolutely nothing we can do about it anyway, and it really doesn’t matter who the pope is.”  And if that response doesn’t work, then the gaslighting (Stupid! Crazy! Schismatic! Papolater!) and Alinsky Rule 13 are deployed.

Isn’t the pope supposed to be supernaturally protected from ever doing even a fraction of the satanic, evil things this man is doing on a near-daily basis?  Didn’t Jesus say that Peter was the Rock upon which He would build His Church? Didn’t Jesus say that he had prayed specifically for Peter and that this prayer extended forward to ALL of the popes?  Is it all just a lie?  Is the Church a lie? Is the papacy a lie? Is Jesus a lie? Is God a lie?

We pray and pray and pray for “Pope Francis”, and yet it just keeps getting worse!  Tell me why I shouldn’t lose my faith!

Of course God hears our prayers.  Every one of them.  He even hears the groaning of our souls that we aren’t even consciously aware of, or able to articulate in words.  The problem is with us, and in this case, what we are praying for.

Praying that God make “Pope Francis” a good pope is like praying to God that He make “Caitlyn Jenner” the prettiest woman in the world. There is no “Pope Francis”, only Antipope Jorge Bergoglio.  There is no “Caitlyn Jenner”, only Bruce Jenner.

“Caitlyn” Jenner is a man named BRUCE Jenner.  So we have a problem right off the bat.  Yes, God knows that when someone says “Caitlyn” Jenner they are referring to Bruce Jenner, but in calling Bruce Jenner by his drag queen name, it is clear right off the bat that the person in question praying the prayer has a completely disordered connection to reality, and in this case, sexual morality.  THEN, when a person asks God to “make Caitlyn Jenner the prettiest woman in the world”, because the petition is not only asking God to ratify, support and magnify public mortal sin and scandal, but is primordially detached from OBJECTIVE REALITY, namely that Bruce Jenner is A MAN, NOT A WOMAN, well, what do you think God does with such petitions?  How do such clearly immoral petitions, detached from reality, square or jibe with God’s Perfect Holiness, His Perfect Justice, or His being the The Truth and The Author and Sustainer of Reality Itself?  Now, God is omnipotent and can certainly do whatever He wants, but He is also RATIONAL, and thus is always internally consistent.  Scripture POUNDS on this truth of God being IMMUTABLE – that is, UNCHANGING.  His IMMUTABLE WILL is intimately tied up with His RATIONALITY. That is why we can trust Him, His Promises, and His Law.

I think the Bruce Jenner example makes the concept easier to understand, but it maps precisely to asking God to make “Pope Francis” a good Pope.  First, Antipope Bergoglio IS NOT THE POPE, so how can God make an Antipope a “good pope”?  This defies the principle of non-contradiction.  In the case of the Bruce Jenner example above, beauty is a good thing, in fact, beauty is an attribute of God Himself.  For women to be authentically beautiful is certainly an intrinsically good thing.  HOWEVER, in the case of Bruce Jenner, the “beauty” being asked for is a false beauty, tied directly to a lie.  It is actually a scandalous monstrosity for a man to ape the beauty of women, so even though beauty qua beauty is good, to twist beauty into a satanic mockery of beauty is evil.  Such is the case with Antipope Bergoglio.  We all want a good Pope, but asking for that attribute in the context of an ANTIPOPE is simply irrational.  Bergoglio IS NOT the pope, so what, exactly do you expect God to do with your petition that he be “a good pope”?  Once again, here we are right back at the principle of non-contradiction.

What we all should be praying for is Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger, and that he do no further harm, repent of what he has done, and be liberated from whatever fear, coercion, error or disorientation he is under.  THEN we should all pray that ANTIPOPE Bergoglio be removed and his antipapacy acknowledged as null, and that Bergoglio repent of what he has done, REVERT TO CATHOLICISM, die in a state of grace, and someday achieve the Beatific Vision.  

Now there’s a petition completely in accord with reality that God can work with.  And the odds don’t matter.  Remember Lepanto.  What matters most is whether or not what we are asking God for is in line with Reality and His Perfect Will and Justice.

Now, after reading this, can not every single one of you look back upon your lives and see numerous instances in which your prayers, in retrospect, turned out to be based on a false premise, or asking God to bring about, strengthen or maintain something that was sinful?  I know I can.  “What I want” is not by virtue of itself a valid petition that God can or will answer.  The key with prayer – MATURE PRAYER – is the discerning of the specific petition in and of itself.  Does it make sense?  Is it rooted in Reality and Truth? Is it perfectly Just? Is it in accord with God’s Will?

This is why prayers for “Pope Francis” to be “a good pope” are not only not doing any good, but actually causing people to lose their faith.  All false premises, eventually, after enough logical corollaries, lead straight to hell, straight to the feet of satan, “the father of lies”. You CANNOT expect a false base premise to EVER lead to truth, and you certainly can’t argue that sometimes and in some cases, a false base premise is “necessary” or “the best we can do” or just “the easier way out”. Nor can you ever appeal to numbers.  No matter how many people call Bruce Jenner by his drag queen name, that will never, ever change the fact that Bruce Jenner is a man.  And no matter how many people call Antipope Bergoglio “pope”, that in and of itself will never cause Pope Benedict XVI to stop being pope and bestow the papacy upon Bergoglio. The Mob is not the arbiter of truth nor reality, as specifically stated in Canon 332.2.

This Antipope Bergoglio thing is going to get MUCH worse.  I think the odds are high that he is the False Prophet Forerunner of the Antichrist, and that he is going to set up a OneWorldReligion tied directly to the NewWorldOrder (U.N/Soros/etc.). He is going to split the Church and institute a new “liturgy”, which, it seems probable, will be the “abomination of desolation”.  People who cling to the false premise that this man is the Vicar of Jesus Christ on Earth will, it seems to me, either lose their faith, or go completely batshit bonkers, because there is only so much irrationality and internal contradiction that the human psyche can bear before it snaps.

I hope this helps.

Pray for Pope Benedict XVI and the Matthew 17: 20 Initiative.

Antipope Jorge Bergoglio and Bruce Jenner. Two men living a lie, with near-unanimous public ratification.

Vatican Secretariat of State writes official letter referring to Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger as “His Holiness Benedict XVI”.

I’ve confirmed this two ways. It isn’t an internet photoshop hoax. The post-date gave me pause, but it is double confirmed real.

“His Holiness Benedict XVI”

Papal style. Papal name. And not an emeritus in sight.

But remember, folks, there is absolutely, positively no evidence of anything whatsoever, and if you don’t swallow this Bergoglian antipapacy like a good little Legion of Christ/Regnum Christi mindless drone, you are a mentally ill schismatic.

Because, as Our Blessed Lord said to the disciples of John the Baptist, “Shut up and wait for the Sanhedrin to tell you what you have seen and heard, you stupid uppity schismatics!”