Extremely Powerful Ivermectin Testimony Video

I can’t recommend this very short video strongly enough. A man was on the brink of death with viral pneumonia and his daughter lobbied his treating physician for Ivermectin. The results were basically instantaneous. Immediate, total, near-miraculous recovery.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jvkoh6mdqy4&feature=emb_title

Now here is what makes me want to pull my hair out, and I know Karl Denninger must feel the same way: note how the daughter says that she asked the doctor, “If this were your father, would you give him Ivermectin?”

Um, THAT ISN’T EVEN A QUESTION. The father was being called “hours from death”. Why in the blue fiery hell would it be “a decision” to give him one of the most frequently-dosed drugs in the world which is safer and more benign than aspirin? We’re not talking about some crazy dangerous radiation or chemotherapy treatment here. There is basically zero risk. ZERO. Zero danger. Zero downside.

The truth is, if this CoronaScam weren’t the fully premeditated act of war and attempted Malthusian human genocide operation that it is, every government would have immediately made Ivermectin free to anyone who wanted it. Every grocery store should have had an Ivermectin distribution kiosk.

My personal plan is to dose myself prophylactically every quarter, and then new policy: the moment I feel ANY sort of crud coming on, I’m going to do a couple of quick-hitter doses just in case I’m fighting a virus. Because WHY NOT??? If what I have coming on is bacterial, well then, hey, no harm no foul with the Ivermectin. I’ll either wait out a bacterial bug as I always have (because… IMMUNE SYSTEM), or get a scrip for a mild antibiotic if I really need it.

Which brings up another point. If Ivermectin had been used as an antiviral treatment before any of this CoronaScam Putsch happened, imagine how many doses of antibiotics would have been saved over the years. People should have been keeping Ivermectin, which should be available over-the-counter in the First World like it is in the Third World, in their medicine cabinet, and trying to knock out any possible viruses BEFORE going to the doctor for an antibiotic scrip, because antibiotics only work against bacterial infections.

Goodn€$$, for th€ £if€ of m€, I ju$t can’t und€r$tand why €v€rything in th€ Fir$t Wor£d ha$ b€€n driv€n toward$ antibiotic$. It’$ a my$t€ry.

RED ALERT: Pfizer demands Argentina post its bank reserves, military bases and embassy properties as “collateral” to guarantee Pfizer’s indemnification for the poison jab

Oh, you KNOW that the media in the post-Christian west will NEVER breathe a word of this.  This is why we have to get the reportage from India.  This news outlet is totally legit in Southern Asia.  Guys, this is the textbook definition of FASCIST COLONIZATION. This is a “private” corporation in partnership with a fascist state (the former US) attempting to take literal ownership of a sovereign nation.  Ask the Indians about this.  They know ALL about it. India was RULED for over 100 years by a private British corporation – the East India Company.  Oh yes.  The Indians know EXACTLY what’s up here.

What happened in Argentina?

Talks between Argentina and Pfizer began in June 2020. In July, President Alberto Fernandez held a meeting with Pfizer’s Argentina CEO.

Then, Pfizer asked to be compensated for the cost of any future civil lawsuits. If someone files a civil lawsuit against Pfizer in Argentina and wins that case, the government of Argentina and not Pfizer would pay the compensation. So, Argentina’s parliament passed a new law in October 2020, but Pfizer was unhappy with its phrasing. The law said Pfizer needs to at least pay for negligence, for its own mistakes if it happens to make any in the future.

Pfizer rejected this, after which Argentina offered to amend the law to define negligence more clearly – to include only vaccine distribution and delivery under negligence.

Pfizer was still not happy and demanded the law be amended through a new decree, which Argentina refused. Pfizer then asked Argentina to buy an international insurance to pay for potential future cases against Pfizer, to which the country agreed.

In December 2020, Pfizer came back with more demands, and demanded sovereign assets as collateral. Pfizer wanted Argentina to put its bank reserves, military bases and embassy buildings at stake. Vaccine manufacturers have always enjoyed a certain amount of liability waiver. Say you receive a vaccine from Pfizer and then you have adverse effects because of the jab.

You can always go ahead and file a lawsuit against Pfizer. If you win that lawsuit – instead of Pfizer, the government will compensate you. This is normal. In the United States for example, the PREP Act (Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness act) gives total immunity to companies like Pfizer and Moderna.

But only if something goes wrong unintentionally, and this does not apply to negligence. But Pfizer wanted more – Not just sovereign assets but a fraud insurance, something with which Argentina did not agree with.

 

You don’t ASK a man who proffered a SUBSTANTIALLY ERRONEOUS resignation if it was invalid, you TELL him that it was invalid BY THE LAW ITSELF.

Here is the algorithmic translation of an interview with Pope Benedict XVI published in a major ITALIAN newspaper today. So odd that he never says WHO the one Pope is, only insisting that there is ONE.AB, “Fanatic who will never give up.”


“Interview with Ratzinger: “There are not two Popes. The resignation of 8 years ago? I think I did well”

by Massimo Franco

01 Mar 2021

Benedict XVI’s message to those who do not give up and to Bergoglio’s fans who fear his shadow. “It was a painful decision, but I think I did well. My conscience is fine.

“There are two popes. The Pope is only one….” Joseph Ratzinger says it in a faint voice, striving to articulate every word well. He is seated on one of the two light leather armchairs which, together with a sofa, furnish the living room on the first floor of the Mater Ecclesiae cloistered monastery.: the place where he retired, far from everything, in March 2013. His reading glasses are placed on the bedside table, next to an ancient wooden statuette depicting a Madonna and Child. «This is the Guardini Room. It is so called because it collects among other things the complete work of the Italian-German theologian Romano Guardini. It is there, behind you », explains Monsignor Georg Gaenswein, his personal secretary and Prefect of the Papal Household, pointing to the bookcase lining the walls. The editor of Corriere della Sera , Luciano Fontana, hands the Pope Emeritus a red folder containing two caricatures that Emilio Giannelli , cartoonist appreciated by Benedetto, has designed especially for him.He looks at the first for a long time, and smiles. Then he moves on to the second, and the smile widens into laughter . “Giannelli is a witty person”, he glosses with papal and Bavarian aplomb.

Until 2012, the cloistered nuns lived in the twelve cells of this building, built between 1992 and 1994 and previously occupied by the Gendarmerie and papal gardeners. Now he hosts Benedict, the four “Memores”, the consecrated women of Communion and Liberation who assist him, and Monsignor Gaenswein . It appears suddenly after a hairpin bend in the highest and most inaccessible part of the Vatican City. It is protected by an electric gate , beyond which an unreal silence reigns. Meeting Benedict is rare, especially in recent times. And even more unusual is the fact that you agree to address one of the most traumatic topics for the life of the Catholic Church in recent centuries. His clarification on the uniqueness of the Papacy is obvious to himbut not for some sectors of conservative Catholicism more irreducible in hostility to Francis. For this reason, he reiterates that “the Pope is only one”, weakly tapping the palm of his hand on the armrest : as if he wanted to give the words the strength of a definitive affirmation.

It is significant: he delivers the message to the Courier on the eve of February 28, the same day eight years ago when his renunciation of the Papacy, announced on February 11, became effective . After a long time, the disorientation, the amazement, the gossip that accompanied that epochal gesture still stagnate. And Benedict seems to want to exorcise them. We ask if in recent years he has often thought about that day. He nods. “It was a difficult decision. But I took it in full consciousness, and I think I did well. Some of my “fanatic” friends are still angry, they didn’t want to accept my choice. I think of the conspiracy theories that followed it:some said it was the fault of the Vatileaks scandal, some of a conspiracy by the gay lobby, some of the case of the conservative Lefebvrian theologian Richard Williamson . They don’t want to believe in a conscious choice. But my conscience is fine ».

The sentences come out with a dropper, the voice is a breath, it comes and goes . And Monsignor Gaenswein in some rare passages repeats and “translates”, while Benedict nods in approval. The mind remains clear, quick as the eyes, alert and lively. The white hair is slightly long, under the papal skullcap as white as the robe. From the sleeves emerge two very thin wrists that underline an image of great physical fragility. Ratzinger wears a watch on his left wrist and on his right a strange contraption that looks like another watch but is actually an alarm ready to go off if something happens to him . What he himself defined in February 2018, in a letter to the Corriere, «This last period of my life», flows quietly, in the hermitage between the hairpin bends of the Vatican Gardens flanked by trees, waterfalls and altars, which overlooks Rome. Until February 2, in the hall where he receives us there was a nativity scene and a Christmas tree, framed between the library, the icons hung on the walls together with other sacred images: a sober room, not large, welcoming.

The rhythms are routine. Newspapers previously selected by the Vatican offices are read every day. In addition, the Osservatore romano , the Corriere della Sera and two German newspapers arrive in print . At the table, with the Memores we often also discuss politics. And now the Pope Emeritus is curious about Mario Draghi. “We hope he will be able to resolve the crisis,” he says. “He is a very respected man in Germany too.” He mentions Sergio Mattarella, although he admits that he knows the head of state less than his predecessor, Giorgio Napolitano. “How are you?” And the speech slips on the Covid 19 epidemic.

Ratzinger has already been vaccinated , he received the first dose and then he was given the second, like Monsignor Gaenswein and most of the inhabitants of the Vatican City. In this respect, the small state is observed with a touch of envy in Italy and in much of Europe, where vaccines arrive slowly. The virus is frightening, and Benedict mentions the dramatic experience lived by the president of the CEI, Cardinal Gualtiero Bassetti, who was healed after a long battle. “I just saw him again and he told me he is much better now. I found it well ». And when the Pope Emeritus is asked about Francis’ next visit to Iraq, the expression becomes serious, worried . “I think it’s a very important journey,” he notes.”Unfortunately, it falls at a very difficult moment that also makes it a dangerous trip : for security reasons and for Covid. And then there is the unstable Iraqi situation. I will accompany Francis with my prayer ». Some men of the Vatican Gendarmerie and the Swiss Guards are already there to organize all possible protective measures around Pope Francis. Italian intelligence agents have also been present for weeks, but it is not clear who they are collaborating with. There are no comments on this from the monastery where Ratzinger lives. It comes naturally to think of the United States, and to observe that now, with Joe Biden in the White House replacing Donald Trump, relations with the Vatican are destined to improve.

On Biden, the second Catholic president after John Fitzgerald Kennedy, Ratzinger expresses some reservations on a religious level . “It’s true, he’s Catholic and observant. And personally he is against abortion, ”he observes. “But as president, he tends to present himself in continuity with the line of the Democratic Party … And on gender politics we have not yet fully understood what his position is”, he whispers, giving voice to the distrust and hostility of a large part of the US episcopate towards Biden and his party, considered too liberal.

Forty-five minutes have passed, outside it is starting to get dark: far away, even if in reality they are less than a kilometer, you can see the lights of Rome. Benedict gives as a souvenir of the interview a commemorative medal and a bookmark with his blessing photo: both from when he was Pope. And again the paradox emerges not only of his own but of a Church immersed unwittingly in the inextricable intertwining of two papal identities. Ratzinger greets, remaining seated, with a hint of a smile, and thanks by pointing to the two cartoons by Giannelli placed on the table. In one, Benedict symbolically embraces a crowded St Peter’s Square: a nostalgic reminder not only of his pontificate but of the world before Covid 19. And it is an image that contrasts with the powerful, dramatic one of Francis that on March 27, 2020 speaks from the churchyard of the same square, desertified by the coronavirus and ghostly. In the other vignette, in color, the Pope Emeritus hands the keys of the Church to a frowning Francis, adding: «I recommend…». As always when it comes to the Vatican,reality and symbolism are indissolubly linked. And the enigmas of the German Pope Emeritus and the Argentine Pontiff seem to have been made on purpose to feed the legends about ecclesiastical power and its mysteries.

Leaving the monastery, escorted by car by a plainclothes Swiss guard with a headset , one would think that when Ratzinger insists with a veil of voice “the Pope is one”, he is certainly addressing the “fanatics” who do not give up. To reassure them, he speaks to the followers of Francis who fear the intellectual shadow of this old and frail theologian with age. But perhaps, after eight years, with his inner voice, the Pope Emeritus unconsciously whispers it even to himself.


Can. 188 A resignation made out of grave fear that is inflicted unjustly or out of malice, substantial error, or simony is invalid by the law itself.

SUBSTANTIAL ERROR: Ignorance or misjudgment about the essential nature, main terms, or principal motive of the object of an act.

Remember the post about the Diabolical Narcissist gymnastics coach who would abuse children in front of their parents? He blew his brains out Thursday.

The post entitled “We’re ALL Being Watched – Bergoglio, Soros, Palo Alto, the NHS and… a Girls Gymnastics Coach” penned and posted on 15 June, ARSH 2018, used the example of the gymnastics coach John Geddert to demonstrate how DNs derive massive satisfaction and rush from not just committing their sins and crimes, but even more in the getting away with it, and even watching their victims cover for and assent to their abuse.

Thursday Geddert was set to be arraigned on 24 felony counts including sexual assault of a child and human trafficking. Instead of driving to the courthouse, Geddert drove to an interstate rest stop and blew his brains out.

Why he hadn’t been arrested is beyond any rational explanation. He wasn’t going to court for a speeding ticket. He was going to be arraigned for raping little girls, and literal slave-driving.

One of the things Geddert would scream at young girls who didn’t do cartwheels and handsprings to his satisfaction was that they should “go kill themselves.”

It turns out the DN Geddert was projecting. In typical fashion, the DN chose eternal damnation rather than admitting he had done anything wrong. In fact, I’m sure he died telling himself that HE was the victim, and he dindoonuffin. Suicide is the epitome of diabolical narcissism.

As Curly Bill Brocius put it, “Well… bye.”

A Telling Moment in the Video of Pope Benedict’s February 27, ARSH 2013 “Final Blessing”. Wherein Fr. Z Rants…

Beginning at the 0:44 mark, note that some of the seminarians in the shot know the words to the Pater Noster in Latin… and some of them don’t.

Seminarians. In Rome. Before the Bergoglian Antipapacy. Don’t know the Lord’s Prayer in Latin.

Yup.

Fr. Z, do you, perchance, have any thoughts on this matter?

“Listen, all we have to do is RE-BRAND the flu. It’s that simple. We can take over the entire world in a matter of weeks. And they’ll all fall for it, and not a single shot will be fired.”

(This is a full cross-post from NonVeni Mark. His original post is HERE.)


I have a nurse friend who works in a hospital back east. She explained to me how it works. 

Everyone presenting at the hospital is “presumed Covid,” which counts exactly the same as “confirmed Covid” according to CDC rules. Community spread means the “presumed” label is automatic.

Testing for flu is forbidden. Since the patient has already been “diagnosed” with Covid, what good would a flu test do?

See how that works?

My nurse friend is not happy.


Stickypost: You must buy this AMAZING new book “Benedict XVI: Pope ‘Emeritus’?”

(Scroll down for new content.  I’m leaving this incredibly important post at the top of the blog for a while.)

Folks, an absolutely FANTASTIC new book, “Benedict XVI: Pope ‘Emeritus’?”,  has just been published that I cannot recommend strongly enough.  Everyone should buy a copy of this book not only for themselves, but also buy copies to distribute, especially to priests.  It is a SYSTEMATIC, COMPREHENSIVE presentation of the dataset regarding the invalidity of Pope Benedict’s putative resignation assembled by a Columbian attorney named Estefanía Acosta. This book is so good and so well done that I am convinced that it is the fruit of the prayers of the faithful.  

Miss Acosta, born in ARSH 1989, is a native of Medellin, Colombia and has her Masters in Law from the University of Medellin, with her thesis (with honors) being in constitutional law.  She has been an official of the “State Judicial Power” in Colombia, as well as a university professor specializing in the areas of civil and commercial law.  She is a cradle Catholic “revert” desiring to use her education and abilities to defend the rights of God, His Holy Church, and the Papacy.  She has accomplished this goal with the publication of this book.

The book is divided into three sections.  The first, and most important, is the presentation of the canonically air-tight case that Pope Benedict’s attempted resignation in ARSH 2013 was invalid.  The second section, included for the sake of systematic thoroughness, addresses the faux-conclave of ARSH 2013 and Jorge Bergoglio’s heresy, ties to Freemasonry, and non-Catholicity,  but is an historically important record of the infiltration and corruption of the Vatican and College of Cardinals. The Third section is a series of valuable appendices.

The base premise of the book is that Pope Benedict’s attempted resignation was invalid and that he is and has been the one and only living Vicar of Christ since April ARSH 2005.  It is important to remember that this totally unprecedented Antipapacy is like a gangrenous leg, with the infection up to the knee.  If only the foot is amputated, the gangrene will still be present and kill the victim.  FOCUSING ONLY ON THE FAUX-CONCLAVE of ARSH 2013 and/or Jorge Bergoglio’s heresy/apostasy and NOT the ROOT ISSUE OF THE INVALIDITY OF POPE BENEDICT’S ATTEMPTED RESIGNATION is like amputating only the foot of a gangrenous leg – a futile gesture that will only make the situation worse by enabling the installation of ANOTHER ANTIPOPE.  There WAS NO VALID CONCLAVE in ARSH 2013. Jorge Bergoglio is not now and never, ever has been the Pope, and therefore cannot be “deposed” from an office which he has NEVER OCCUPIED.

The only thing I want to warn readers of is the “clunkiness” of parts of the English translation.  It is totally readable and comprehensible, but it is not the silky-smooth prose of a native English speaker.  That’s okay.  This is no problem at all.  I stand in awe of the sheer amount of work that went into this book and its translations.  As of the initial release right now, it is available in Spanish, Portuguese and English, and is available both as a hefty, high-quality paperback and as an e-book.

Folks, BUY THIS BOOK. It will go down in history.

Oh, and as if you needed more encouragement, the 37th and 38th words of the preface are, “Dr. Mazza.” ‘Nuff said.

CLICK HERE TO BUY.

Diabolical Narcissism: When Parents Deify Their Child… the Child Becomes Tiger Woods

As I covered in my Diabolical Narcissism video presentation, one cause of Diabolical Narcissism is when a child is deified by their parent or parents. The DN that I had the misfortune of crossing paths with (but oh, the amount of information that I collected and was then able to share!) was a product of this dynamic. He was the firstborn with a photographic memory, and his parents literally called him “the Blessed George” (name changed) when he was a child. His family told me this, and that “George” was NEVER behaviorally corrected as a child, no matter how rude and hateful, and as he became a teenager, embarrassingly gay and bitchy, his behavior.

The thing about telling a child that they are “a god” is that eventually the child will figure out that they AREN’T a god, but they think they have to maintain the APPEARANCE of their own divinity. Self-loathing is the natural consequence. One of the primary ways the DN tries to maintain the fiction of their own “divinity” both to themselves and to others, is to make the firm, conscious decision to never, ever “stoop” to love another human being. Yep. The voluntary self-purgation of love from the soul. BINGO. Just like satan and the demons.

The deification of a child is THE most difficult to correct and deeply entrenched form of Diabolical Narcissism. It is, statistically, pretty much impossible to reverse without miraculous intervention. And the levels of psychopathy and sexual perversion it yields are some of the worst in the human race. The DN I crossed paths with ended up as one of if not the most notorious layman sodomites on the Rome/Vatican clerical gay scene, literally having sodomitical hook-ups inside St. Peter’s Basilica. Now you know at least a partial reason why CoronaScam has been permitted to happen and the Vatican and St. Peter’s are essentially empty. Our Lord finally had enough of faggots desecrating the Petrine Basilica. It’s the ultimate example of “why we can’t have nice things.”

I bring this up because I came across a quote from Tiger Woods’ father from when Tiger was still a child. Read this, and then understand why Woods became the psychopath sex pervert drug-addled train wreck that he did. Clinical psychologists would say, “He never stood a chance.”

“Please forgive me, but sometimes I get very emotional when I talk about my son … my heart fills with so much joy when I realise that this young man is going to help so many people. He will transcend this game and bring to the world a humanitarianism that has never been known before. The world will be a better place to live in by virtue of his existence and his presence. This is my treasure. Please accept it and use it wisely.”

-Earl Woods

Woods was stoned on drugs and bloated like a dead cow the day before his wreck. The police were not lying when they said he wasn’t drunk. Drunk means alcohol. Woods was almost certainly still stoned out of his gourd on prescription drugs.

Given his narcissistic psychopathy and his Buddhist/atheist beliefs, he will probably not be able to handle not merely being out of golf, but probably permanently crippled to some degree. He seems an extremely high risk for suicide – not uncommon among DNs when faced with worldly “ruin”.

We should pray for him, because he really is one of the most impoverished people alive.

My Daily Lenten Prayers: St. Augustine on how YES, we deserve this, and it is essential that we acknowledge that we deserve it.

One of the hideous prideful rhetorical points that is wafting up like sewer gas from certain quarters is the notion that “God is a jerk” because “we don’t deserve this”. I am hard-pressed to think of a more grievously false and frankly Luciferian sentiment.  You can hear the selfsame serpent that was in the Garden with Eve hissing out this bilge.  Not only do we deserve it, it is a point of incomprehensible wonder and a testament to Our Lord’s loving patience and mercy that He waited as long as He did before “giving us up” (in the aggregate, post-Christian west sense).  Beyond that, we now have incredible daily opportunities to advance in sanctity.  We now live in a world in which walking down the street without a Masonic submission muzzle and smiling and saying “Hello!” to folks you pass is a massive work of fraternal charity.  The only sense in which “we don’t deserve this” is in the sense of “I don’t deserve the favor and privilege of having been born when I was and now being able to live in these times as a daughter of Jesus Christ and His Holy Church.”

Might I share and recommend two prayers that are part of my Lenten observance this year?  If you have the good ol’ Baronius Press hand missal, which so many of us do, you can find these prayers on pages 92 and 95.  These definitely fall under the category of “pray this over and over again until you get it.”

Prayer of St. Augustine (†430)

BEFORE Thine eyes, O Lord, we bring our sins, and we compare them with the stripes we have received.
If we examine the evil we have wrought, what we suffer is little, what we deserve is great.
What we have committed is very grievous, what we have suffered is very slight.
We feel the punishment of sin, yet withdraw not from the obstinacy of sinning.
Under Thy lash our inconstancy is visited, but our sinfulness is not changed.
Our suffering soul is tormented, but our neck is not bent.
Our life groans under sorrow, yet amends not in deed.
If Thou spare us, we correct not our ways: if Thou punish, we cannot endure it.
In time of correction we confess our wrongdoing: after Thy visitation we forget that we have wept.
If Thou stretchest forth Thy hand, we promise amendment; if Thou withholdest the sword, we keep not our promise.
If Thou strikest, we cry out for mercy; if Thou sparest, we again provoke Thee to strike
Here we are before Thee, O Lord, confessedly guilty; we know that unless Thou pardon we shall deservedly perish.
Grant then, O almighty Father, without our deserving it, the pardon we ask; Thou Who madest out of nothing those Who ask Thee. Through Christ our Lord. Amen.

V. Deal not with us, O Lord, according to our sins.
R. Neither reward us according to our iniquities.

Let us pray.—O God, Who by sin art offended and by penance pacified, mercifully regard the prayers of Thy suppliant people, and turn away the scourges of Thy wrath, which we deserve for our sins. Through Christ our Lord.
R. Amen.

Petitions of St. Augustine

O LORD Jesus, let me know myself, let me know Thee,
And desire nothing else but Thee.
Let me hate myself and love Thee,
And do all things for the sake of Thee.
Let me humble myself, and exalt Thee,
And think of nothing else but Thee.
Let me die to myself, and live in Thee,
And accept whatever happens as coming from Thee.
Let me forsake myself and walk after Thee,
And ever desire to follow Thee.
Let me flee from myself, and turn to Thee,
That so I may deserve to be defended by Thee.
Let me fear for myself, let me fear Thee,
And be amongst those who are chosen by Thee.
Let me distrust myself, and trust in Thee,
And will to obey for the love of Thee.
Let me cleave to nothing but only to Thee,
And be poor for the sake of Thee.
Look upon me, that I may love Thee.
Call me, that I may see Thee
And for ever possess Thee. Amen.

As always, I hope this helps.

The Return of the Prodigal Son, Pompeo Batoni, ARSH 1773