And by “more often than not” I mean EVERY SINGLE TIME WITHOUT EXCEPTION.
If holding the base premise that Jorge Bergoglio is now or ever has been the Pope requires you to:
-Tear down and deny the authority of the papacy… CHECK
-Deny the dogma of the indefectibility of the Church… CHECK
-Deny Papal Infallibility, that is, Vatican I, and thus believe that Christ has broken His promise, and thus deny Christ’s Divinity… CHECK
-Go against every Saint and Church Father… CHECK
-Deny visible, objective reality… CHECK
–Violate the Law of Non-contradiction… CHECK
-Play perfectly into the hands of the Freemasons, sodomites and satan himself… CHECK
Then you might consider the possibility, no matter how unthinkable and unlikely it may seem to you, that the Papacy remains intact and supernaturally protected as instituted by Christ, the Church actually is indefectible and remains so, that Vatican I was right and Papal Infallibility is real, and Christ has NOT broken, forsaken or renegged any of His promises, that the Church Fathers and Saints were NOT all mistaken, that visible, objective reality is… REAL, and that the Law of Non-contradiction has not been suspended, and thus you and your base premise are, in fact, wrong.
Just something to maybe consider.
Here is the Matthew 17:20 Initiative. Join me.