A.) First, just a note on Trump’s 2005 hot mic comments. Apologists for Trump are making the argument that what he said was mere “locker room braggadocio” and “all men talk like that.”
Um, excuse me, but NO. I don’t know who y’all hang out with, but let me assure one and all right now that there are plenty of heterosexual men who DO NOT and WOULD NEVER think, much less say those sorts of things about any woman ever. I know this, because I am proud to call a handful of them my friends. The notion that my male friends, heterosexual and every bit as aware of female beauty and charm as the next chap, would, for example, in my absence sit around and say things like, “Man, that Ann – I’d sure like to grab that pussy”, is simply impossible. It is MORALLY impossible for a good, Christian man to speak, or even THINK in those terms. And if I even suspected that they did talk like that in my absence, I would sever the friendship immediately and entrust them to God in prayer. What I would NOT do is engage in relativism, such as, “Well, Bill Clinton is a rapist, so it’s no big deal.” That’s insane. It’s morally insane. Beware of ANYONE who is so in-the-tank for a person that they defend sickening behavior with appeals to relativism. A virile man makes JUDGMENT CALLS, and makes simple judgment calls easily. It is the effeminate man, desperate for human respect and desperate to attach himself to an Alpha Narcissist that will make all manner of excuses for his Alpha attachment (in this case Trump) in a desperate bid to maintain the sycophantic connection.
It seems to me that this is a textbook symptom of the post-Christian culture that even the so-called “conservative right” lives in today – this belief that it is pretty much impossible to be anything other that a complete moral degenerate, and that to be a heterosexual man is to be a man who objectifies women and views them as mere “pussies to be grabbed”. Way to fall for the Marxist-feminist conditioning, y’all. Hook, line and sinker. Every time someone says “All guys talk like that…”, all the feminists, and Satan their father, put another point on the ol’ scoreboard.
Trump’s Motivation Explained
B.) I explained this on a radio interview a few weeks ago, and have explained it to people in person several times, and each time the people I have explained it to have declared it a revelation, which “explains everything”. So, I will put it in writing here.
This kayfabe presidential campaign by Trump is about one thing:
Increasing the value of the Trump Brand.
It is NOT about Trump becoming “president” of the former-United States. Never was, folks. It was pre-arranged with the Clintons as a means of re-installing the Clinton mafia in The White House while allowing Trump to evolve the Trump brand and increase the value of the Trump brand by billions of dollars.
Donald Trump began by cultivating his persona as a real estate tycoon and casino mogul in the 1980s. But that is a somewhat limited market, and also very cyclical and risky. After all, building giant mirror-penis skyscrapers and slapping your name on them in gold-mirror caps can only take narcissist so far. He then decided to expand and elevate his persona by moving into entertainment – specifically reality shows – in the 1990s and 2000s. While risky and cyclical like real estate, entertainment is far LESS risky once a given entertainer has established a foothold. Trump did that with “The Apprentice”.
Being “friends” with the Clintons, Trump saw how lucrative the political racketeering paradigm was, specifically the “speaking fees”, which are just extremely thinly-veiled bribes and payola, and the “Clinton Global Initiative”, which is a straight-up money laundering racket. But, in order for Trump to break into the world of ten-figure political racketeering, he needed to evolve his brand even further. He needed to evolve into “Donald Trump: Global Statesman”.
And THAT, my dears, is why he brokered and concocted the kayfabe with the Clintons that you are now seeing. Was Trump inspired in all of this after his dabble in Professional Wrestling a few years ago? Were his business dealings with on again-off again billionaire Vince McMahon (owner of WWF/WWE Pro Wrestling) his inspiration for the kayfabe “presidential” run? NOTHING would surprise me at this point.
Now to the “winning and losing”. This is all fake. Clinton is going to “win” and was always going to win no matter what because the elections themselves are a sham. I know this is really, really hard for Americans to come to grips with, but these national-level elections are all bullshit and have been for a while. Donald Trump wants NOTHING TO DO with being “president” of the former-United States. Think about it. What person in their right mind would want to be “president” over the next four years, as the catastrophic destabilization, the aggressive execution of the Cloward-Piven strategy comes to full flower? As I said from the beginning, the Obama regime would incite a race-based civil war inside the U.S., while simultaneously destabilizing the rest of the world AND reforming and arming a new islamic Caliphate. Check. The Obama regime also executed the Cloward-Piven Strategy upon the U.S. economy AND healthcare delivery system. This was done in a two-pronged attack, namely Obamacare and the dissolving of the Mexican border. Check.
Don’t you realize that if Trump “won” and was “president” for the next four years that he would be blamed for all of the shit-hitting-the-fan that is going to happen? It would DESTROY HIS BRAND. Now, if Trump “loses”, as was always the plan betwixt him and the Clintons, he STILL has all of the cache of being a nominee for “president”, and still gets his brand transformed into that of “global statesman”, but instead of being blamed for all of the “shit hitting the fan” over the next four years, will instead be able to sit back, go on TeeVee, and EVERY TIME SOMETHING HORRIBLE HAPPENS, Trump will say, “If I had been President, that wouldn’t have happened. If I had been President, I would have prevented that….” And thus his brand will increase ALL THE MORE with each coming catastrophe. Ka-ching, ka-ching, ka-ching. Folks, Trump only truly wins, if he “loses”.
I’d also like to point out that this brand evolution involves not just Donald Trump, but it is also pretty clear that he is setting up his kids, especially Ivanka and Eric, to eventually enter the political kayfabe as characters in their own right. Trump is 70 years old, and understands estate planning well. Hell, if the Clintons can set Chelsea up, who has ZERO charisma, then Trump knows he can position Ivanka and Eric to be bigtime players in the political kayfabe.
Trump’s Rhetoric Is All a Farce
“But, but, but… Trump is saying all the right things! He MUST be on side!”
Okay. Think of it this way. You all think I am a person of above-average intelligence, right? (Insert snarky comment here….) Do you think, that IF I WANTED TO, I could fake being a leftist? Do you think that I am intelligent enough to know the left’s talking points, their priorities, what they WANT TO HEAR, and that if I wanted to, I could fake being a leftist? Of course I could. One of the hallmarks of a good rhetorician is knowing and being able to front-run the opposite side’s arguments and talking points. The is also one of the hallmarks of a good military leader – being able to anticipate the enemy’s tactics. Now, Trump is no genius, but he isn’t dumb. So, do you honestly think it is totally beyond him to sit down and say, “Alright. What do I need to say, what talking points do I need to push, in order to ingratiate myself to the political right in the U.S. today?”
A.) Close the borders, “build a wall”
B.) Pro-life, but not TOO pro-life
Folks, here are some Trump quotes from within the last 20 years. Leopards don’t change their spots this radically unless there is a 10-figure payoff on the deal….
1) “I probably identify more as Democrat.”
2) “I’ve been around for a long time. And it just seems that the economy does better under the Democrats than the Republicans.”
3) “Nancy — you’re the best. Congrats. [signature]”
—Handwritten note to Speaker Nancy Pelosi
4) “Bush is probably the worst president in the history of the United States.”
5) “I’m totally pro-choice.”
6) “I want to see the abortion issue removed from politics. I believe it is a personal decision that should be left to the women and their doctors.”
7) “I’m very liberal when it comes to health care. I believe in universal health care.”
8) “The Canadian plan also helps Canadians live longer and healthier than Americans… We need, as a nation, to reexamine the single-payer plan.”
9) “By imposing a one-time 14.25 percent net-worth tax on the richest individuals and trusts, we can put America on sound financial footing for the next century.”
10) “I think he [Obama] has a chance to go down as a great president.”
Folks, all of this is kayfabe – professional wrestling kayfabe, except without the wrestling. The Clintons don’t care about Trump’s kayfabe attacks because they know it is all part of the show, and like all Diabolical Narcissist psychopaths, THEY GET OFF ON HAVING THEIR MALEFACTIONS AND CRIMES EXPOSED, AND THEN WATCHING AS PEOPLE NOT ONLY DON’T CONFRONT MUCH LESS PROSECUTE THEM, BUT ACTIVELY SUPPORT AND DEFEND THEM.
If I may be a tad crude for a moment, Bill Clinton has gotten far more sexual pleasure off of the exposure and acceptance of his history of rapes and consensual hook-ups than he ever got out of the actual rapes and hook-ups themselves. And the same goes for Trump. Trump is getting off on that 2005 “pussy grabbing” tape being released as he watches countless people COME RUNNING TO HIS DEFENSE. This is heroin-laced catnip for these Diabolical Narcissist psychopaths whose greatest pleasure is telling themselves, “I’m so f***ing brilliant these people will defend me and kiss my ass EVEN MORE when they see what a f***ing monster I am and what I’ve done.”
I anxiously await the tsunami of emails telling me how wrong I am about Trump, and how Trump is going to save the world. Just remember guys, your sycophancy to Trump and your need for him to be your glorious leader despite a mountain of objective evidence that he is a DN psychopath con-artist is pure, unadulterated, textbook EFFEMINACY.
(And yes, much the same effeminate dynamic of blind sycophancy is the fuel on which the Bergoglian antipapacy is running. But that is a different post.)
I hope this helps.