Worshiping satan is zero disqualification for high government office.

People are being sent to prison for saying that there are two immutable sexes.

Tiny children are being mandatorily groomed in schools by open pedophiles.

The longest standing ovation at the Venice Film Festival last week was for a movie about bisexual teenaged cannibals who felt “judged”.

And there’s that small ongoing matter of mandatory injections of openly known and proven poison sterilants.

And… an obvious Antipope at the head on the obvious Antichurch while the True Church, under intense persecution, glows in terrifyingly visible eclipse.

It can’t be much longer now.

Reportage on the MonkeyPox czar here. Extreme content and image warning. Intense blasphemy.

I take Ivermectin prophylactically on the 1st and 2nd, and 15th and 16th of the month, AND if I feel the first hint of a bug (Susan was naughty for waiting as long as she did – take Ivermectin at the first tickle; it can’t hurt, and it’s cheap, so there is no reason to delay) OR have been around anyone with a bug. I carry it in my purse at all times in an unmarked 50ml dropper bottle to give away to anyone who needs it. The stuff isn’t merely a broad-spectrum antiviral, but also an anti-inflammatory and there is all kinds of evidence rolling in that it is an anti-tumoric. Yes, as in ANTI-CANCER. It’s clearer every day why BigPharma and the Malthusians went to war against Ivermectin. Ivermectin actually helps people to be healthy, safely and inexpensively – and they want everyone sick and dead, consuming their satanically-expensive and now often CANNIBALISTIC poisons. It’s that simple, and that evil.

Thanks to Susan Matthiessen at the LesFemmes blog for sharing her testimony!

Click here to read.

God is so good. Not only does He provide, but He usually makes things available to us simply and at a minimal cost. In this case, all you need to do is open your medicine cabinet. Who doesn’t already have Pepto Bismol on hand?

Remember folks, the active ingredient here is Bismuth Subsalicylate, which other diarrhea meds like Maalox and Mylanta do not contain. What you want here is Ol’ Pink, either the brand name version, Pepto Bismol, or a generic equivalent. And either liquid or tablets are fine. Just as long as it contains Bismuth Subsalicylate.

Here is the link to the research paper.

Share aggressively, and stock up on Pepto, lest the Malthusian Murderers ban it. Their poisonous injections and toxic drugs (i.e. Paxlovid) must be defended from all competition! And as we move into respiratory virus season, add Pepto Bismol to your list of totally safe things to take if you get a chest bug whether you have gut issues or not, because… why not? It CANNOT hurt… unlike every other poison being pushed by BigPharma and the human population reduction criminals.

As always, I… WE hope this helps!

Bismuth subsalicylate as potential treatment for Covid-19 pneumonia: A case series report

Chris Kahlenborn¹*, Walter B. Severs²and Khalid Nawab¹

• ¹Department of Internal Medicine, Penn State Health Holy Spirit Medical Center, Camp Hill, PA, United States
• ²Professor Emeritus of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States

Various literature cited suggests that bismuth may have usefulness against Covid-19 both in vitro and in vivo. During the course of caring for Covid-19 patients we administered bismuth subsalicylate to those who displayed diarrhea and/or gastric complaints. Using relatively conservative criteria, upon retrospective review, we noted marked improvement in oxygen requirements in most of the cases. This improvement was observed even when prior therapy with standard anti-Covid drugs had failed. Our overall impression is that these positive results support a detailed evaluation of bismuth as an adjunct treatment for the treatment of Covid-19.

Remember ladies, you can do it! Just make the decision! No more sloppy modern clothes! Make apparel 1951 again! I get all of my dresses, semi-bespoke, from eShakti. And after the war, when textile manufacturing is re-started on the North American landmass in the Old South where the cotton is grown, someone PLEASE start up the eShakti business model domestically!

Green tea-length polka dot dress, light beige tulle-crinoline petticoat, beige espadrilles. Straw brimmed hat with matching green ribbon not shown.

“When green is all there is to be,

Well, it could make you wonder why,

But, why wonder? Why wonder?

I’m green and it’ll do fine ’cause it’s beautiful,

And I think it’s what I want to be.”

https://bvm.la/videos/30f65429-4a67-42bf-80fc-9512f37be59d/ed6a60ab-d9de-4b7a-a2f1-f4fa88637253_20220828_171632.mp4

Dr. Mazza en fuego!!! 🔥

Timestamps!

8:30 – Dr. Mazza on “What was Benedict XVI doing?” What does Benedict think he accomplished?” He talks about the Peter Seewald interview, and other interviews and statements

11:00 – What are the criterion for being a Pope? Benedict says: the follower of peter is not merely bound to a function (being the Bishop of Rome). The idea that you can have an active Pope, and one which is not.

14:00 – Why he still gives apostolic blessings in his own name, why his title is still His Holiness, why he still wears white and lives in the Vatican.

15:00 – Benedict remains a father in a deep inward sense. Functional vs Sacred.

16:50 – Benedict’s statement about the crisis of the Priesthood after Vatican 2.

20:00 – Statements by Archbishop Georg Gänswein, secretary to Benedict.
 
26:00 – Benedict may have committed a “substantial error” by trying to abandon his office of pope.
 
29:00 – Quote from Bergoglio about the “papacy being a sacrament.” (Not in the literal sense, in the sense of it being of sacramental nature). In other words, the idea that “you can never stop being pope until death.”

37:26 – First interpretation – Benedict could resign all public-facing responsibilities, but still be pope. If he believed this, he committed substantial error.

38:45 – Second interpretation – If Benedict thought that by becoming pope gave you a permanent sacramental mission that does not stop by resigning as Bishop of Rome, then you can’t resign.

40:00 – This weekend, Saturday the 27th, there will be a consistory (election of new Cardinals) in Rome, something Francis has not had in about 7 years. However, Pope Francis may visit the shrine of St. Celestine. St. Celestine was the first pope in history to resign, and his anniversary of consecration as bishop in 1294 is this Sunday. Dr. Mazza then talks about the history of St. Celestine.
UPDATE: “Francis praises humility of 13th-century pope who resigned”

50:00 – Dr. Mazza talks about the history of papal resignations, starting with St. Clement.

53:46 – St. Pontian in the year 235.

56:00 – Pope John XII & Leo VIII in the year 963.

58:00 – Pope Benedict IX and Gregory VI

1:00:00 – Pope Innocent the 3rd in 1198 – quotes regarding the papacy being a sacrament (spiritual message).

1:07:30 – Pope Celestine the 5th’s resignation and Pope Boniface VIII.

1:11:00 – Pope Gregory the 12th in the 1400’s – three different “popes,” a Council was held in Constance in 1417.

1:15:00 – Question, Why is knowing who the Pope is important to my Faith?

1:17:45 – Question, What would be the implications for indefectibility and visibility of the church if Benedict passes away leaving Francis in place for some time? Dr. Mazza mentions Innocent II and Anacletus.

1:19:30 – Question, Would Benedict be the oldest living pope in the history of the Church? Yes.

1:19:40 – Question, If Celestine was wrong about the ability to resign, would not that make Boniface VIII an anti-Pope? If Boniface VIII, then would not his addition to the ability of a pope to resign to canon law be a nullify?

1:20:40 – Question, So if Innocent III taught magisterially that the pope is married to his Office, a bond that can only be broken by death, and then a century later Boniface VIII teaches the opposite and changes canon law, because otherwise, Boniface himself would have been antipope… where does this leave us? Would not Innocent’s teaching be infallible as defined at Vatican I?

1:23:00 – Question, If substantial error is a condition for resigning the papacy, would not it also follow that it is a condition for accepting the papacy? If so, and Benedict XVI was in substantial error even before accepting the papacy, would not that mean his acceptance was invalid and ergo he was an antipope?

1:25:00 – George asks Dr. Mazza why Benedict XVI has not put this whole mess to bed by addressing the confusion.

1:31:45 – Question, Bergoglio may not have received permission to accept the papacy from the Jesuit Superior until after his “election,” how could he have accepted without the permission?

1:33:30 – Comment, methinks this is step one of the “papal council.”

1:33:45 – George asks Dr. Mazza what would a Cardinal intervention look like if they stood up and finally called this situation a schism.

1:36:20 – Comment, The person who commented from 1:33:30 added to their comment, saying “democratization of the papacy.”

1:38:40 – Comment, Shia LaBeouf has become Catholic while portraying Padre Pio in an upcoming film. A prayer of thanks for this high-profile witness.

1:39:32 – George comments on modernism and relativism and how Francis is convincing people of new “doctrine,” how people don’t know their faith, and how people don’t know what’s going on.

1:42:50 – Sister Lucy and “diabolical disorientation.”

1:43:30 – Question, Do you think Canon 185 is being misinterpreted? It clearly seems to put forth emeritus as simply a title and not an office in and of itself.

1:44:30 – George talks about Dr. Mazza’s “Pope History” class.

1:46:00 – Transitions to a back-and-forth discussion about Fatima in general, the Miracle of the Sun, Fr. Gruner, and “public prophetic revelation.”

1:48:00 – Comment, “maybe we are supposed to be burning (chastisement).” Transitions into discussion about Our Lady’s message at Akita, about “the living would envy the dead.”Transitions to George talking about the First Five Saturdays.

1:52:30 – Question, “Can we do First Saturdays in a parish location where they are not explicitly recognized during the Mass?” Transitions to discussion regarding the requirements for the First Five Saturdays.

1:57:30 – Question, “What is to argue against a Maccabian-style operation against the Vatican, our church HQ… Is there a reason not to? At this point, what more reason do we need!”

1:58:45 – Question, “To Steel-Man the Argument: What would have to happen, or new evidence would have to emerge, for you to seriously consider that Benedict’s resignation might have been valid and Francis could be pope?”
 
2:00:00 – Closing statement by George: Encourage and support your priests, they are people to, and need it. Ends with a Hail Mary.