Monthly Archives: July 2017

Watermelon, Tobasco and Ire

ALPHA:

“Only the person who becomes irate without reason, sins. Whoever becomes irate for a just reason is not guilty. Because, if ire were lacking, the science of God would not progress, judgments would not be sound, and crimes would not be repressed.

Further, the person who does not become irate when he has cause to be, sins. For an unreasonable patience is the hotbed of many vices: it fosters negligence, and stimulates not only the wicked, but above all the good, to do wrong.”
(St. John Chrysostom, Homily XI super Matheum, 1c, nt.7)

BETA:

“Ire may be understood in two ways.

In one way, as a simple movement of the will that inflicts punishment not through passion, but by virtue of a judgment of the reason: and in this case, without a doubt, lack of ire is a sin. This is how Chrysostom understands ire when he says: ‘Ire, when it has a cause, is not ire but judgment. For properly speaking, ire is a movement of passion. And when a man is irate with just cause, his ire does not derive from passion. Rather, it is an act of judgment, not of ire.”

In another way, ire can be understood as a movement of the sensitive appetite agitated by passion with bodily excitation. This movement is a necessary sequel in man to the previous movement of his will, since the lower appetite naturally follows the movement of the higher appetite unless some obstacle prevents it. Hence the movement of ire in the sensitive appetite cannot be lacking altogether, unless the movement of the will is altogether lacking or weak. Consequently, the lack of the passion of ire is also a vice, as it is the lack of movement in the will to punish according to the judgment of reason.”
(St. Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, II, II, q. 158, art. 8)

GAMMA:

“We’ve had enough of exhortations to be silent! Cry out with a hundred thousand tongues. I see that the world is rotten because of silence.”
-St. Catherine of Siena, Doctor of the Church

DELTA:

NEW WORD TO ADD TO THE LEXICON: PSEUDOGAMY

I will be using “Pseudogamy” instead of “gay marriage” or any other form that gives even the slightest whiff of legitimacy to these filthy sodomites aping the sacrament of marriage in their narcissistic, prideful, rebellion against God.  Pseudo means, of course, “not genuine, or sham”, from the Greek meaning “false”.  The root “gamy” means “of or pertaining to marriage and/or fertilization”, also from the Greek.  So, false, sham marriage.  Yep.

EPSILON:

A note from “Mr. B” of Barnhardt Podcast #011 fame, beginning at the 43:58 mark:

Hi, Ann.

Many thanks to you and SuperNerd for so thoroughly addressing my question on yesterday’s podcast. I noted well your comment that the solution to my situation was latent in my question. You have helped me to see that, elucidated many angles to the issue that I hadn’t fully considered, and helped me to realize acutely the stand I must take.

Thanks again.

In Christ,

“Mr. B”

In case you haven’t checked out the Podcast, Mr. B has a sodomite in his extended family, complete with pseudogamous accomplice, and he is literally the only person left in his entire family that has a problem with this grave scandal.  He asked for thoughts and advice.  We had plenty to offer.

ZETA:

I really appreciated the precision Mark Docherty over at NonVeniPacem made about Absolute Certitude, Legal Certitude and Moral Certitude in his post about the invalidity of Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger’s attempted “partial resignation”, and the Bergoglian Antipapacy.

In particular, it seemed to me that his explanation that with regards to Moral Certitude, the level of proof is actually INVERSE to the gravity of the situation was especially important.  That seems backward when one is first confronted with it, but I thought of an example that might help folks understand the concept.

Let’s say you walk into a kitchen and see a two-year old sitting in front of the kitchen sink with the under cabinet doors open, holding a big plastic bottle with the cap off, getting ready to put the bottle to his mouth and drink.

Do you need to run scientific tests on the content of the bottle before you act?

Do you need to consult with any other human being on the planet before you act, including the child’s parents?

No.  You must act, and you must act IMMEDIATELY. You are morally certain that the child is in grave, grave danger, and thus you are morally obligated to cry out and physically lunge at the child, remove the bottle from his hands, and prevent him from possibly poisoning himself.  This action has a low risk of harm, and a very high probability of doing good.  Even with only the evidence of your eyes, and only the context of the child’s position, and the traditional placing of cleaning chemicals under the kitchen sink, this is MORE than enough to oblige a person to act swiftly and with maximum force.  You WILL get that bottle out of that child’s hands NOW.

ETA:

Mark your calendars!  Set an alarm!

The Holy and August Sacrifice of the Mass will be offered in the Venerable Gregorian Rite according to the Missal of Pius V for the reversion to the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church for Mike Pence and Family on THURSDAY, JULY 6, at 5:00PM EASTERN DAYLIGHT TIME.

Please attach yourself to this Mass and pray for the Pence family and for the priest who will be offering the Mass.

THETA:

Ending on a happy note, I have discovered a delicious, healthy and cheap culinary delight:  Watermelon marinated in Tobasco.  I saw this as a part of a salad/appetizer on a menu recently and said to myself, “That is either completely delicious, or completely nasty, and my Spidey-sense tells me that is it probably delicious.”

Sure enough… JACKPOT!

This is now a go-to snack, especially in the morning to get the ol’ metabolism fired up.  I recommend buying the BIG BOTTLE of Tobasco at the store.

Starting Tuesday Off Right: Naked Deformity Edition

Our Father, Who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy Name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Amen.

PATER NOSTER, qui es in caelis, sanctificetur nomen tuum. Adveniat regnum tuum. Fiat voluntas tua, sicut in caelo et in terra. Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie, et dimitte nobis debita nostra sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. Et ne nos inducas in tentationem, sed libera nos a malo. Amen.

St. Irenaeus of Lyons, Born ARSH 130, Died ARSH 202. Student of St. Polycarp, who was in turn a disciple of the Apostle John.

Error, indeed is never set forth in its naked deformity, lest, being thus exposed, it should at once be detected. But it is craftily decked out in an attractive dress, so as, by its outward form, to make it appear to the inexperienced more true than truth itself.
-St. Irenaeus of Lyons

“If we speak explicitly about communion for the divorced and remarried, you do not know what a terrible mess we will make. So we won’t speak plainly, do it in a way that the premises are there, then I will draw out the conclusions.”
Archbishop Bruno Forte, quoting Antipope Bergoglio

Another Trad Blog Acknowledges Pope Ratzinger Is Only Living Pope, Bergoglio an Antipope

NonVeniPacem, after a year of refuting the so-called “Barnhardt Thesis” in Trad circles, has publicly acknowledged that he is now morally certain that Pope Benedict’s attempted partial resignation was wholly invalid due to substantial error per Cannon 188, and that Bergoglio is an Antipope.

Welcome to reality.  Jump in, the water’s freezing! (But in a refreshing, invigorating, one might even say vivifying way….)

LINK HERE.

What practically changes in one’s life when this truth is acknowledged? Well, one prays for the actual Pope (Benedict) at the Te Igitur, prays for Pope Benedict in the Rosary every day, and prays for the recognition and removal of Antipope Bergoglio qua Antipope, and for Bergoglio’s repentance and reversion to Catholicism, that he die in a state of grace and achieve the Beatific Vision. Also, everything happening in the Vatican makes perfect sense, and is in no way scandalous in the sense of tempting one to lose faith in Jesus Christ and His Holy Catholic Church. Truth eliminates scandal, even when the Truth is ugly. It’s a paradox, of which Christianity is replete.

Barnhardt Podcast #011: A Man’s Enemies Shall Be of His Own Household



[Direct link to the MP3 file]

In this episode we talk about President Trump’s “body-slamming CNN” tweet, James O’Keefe exposing CNN admitting they are publishing fakes news purely for the ratings, and reiterate again that if you have cable, Netflix, Hulu, etc. you are subsidizing the mainstream media leviathan. We also read and comment on a listener’s email on the topic of “What to do about sodomites in one’s extended family.”

Saying of the week: “You are the average of the five people with whom you spend the most time.”

Recommended Reading: The Key Character in Brideshead Revisted: Mrs. Beryl Muspratt

Feedback: You can email Ann and her co-host at [email protected] with your questions, comments, secrets for finding silence during your day, etc.

Subscribe: You can subscribe for free to the podcast through any of the podcast links and services below:

Listen on Google Play Music

How, Exactly, Is Charlie Gard NOT a Christian Martyr?

Given the fact that Great Britain is a cesspit of post-Christian paganism, and soon to be a confessing territory of the Caliphate, I was really worried that Baby Charlie Gard was not baptized.  So, I put out a call to see if anyone knew, and I am happy to report that the lad’s parents have indeed had him baptized.  So, when he is murdered by the NHS, probably tomorrow or Monday, with the full, explicitly-stated approval of Antipope Bergoglio through his faggot henchman Paglia (that’s the guy who had a homoerotic mural of Our Lord painted on the counter facade of his episcopal cathedral in Italy by a notorious sodomite pornographer – is there anything more satanic than a sacriligious sodomite that desecrates holy spaces?), we can be assured that while not a canonized saint, given that he is baptized, and thus cleansed and redeemed of the stain of Orioginal Sin, and obviously not guilty of any personal sin, that young Charlie will be in heaven.  Further, he will carry the Palm of Martyrdom, with his blood on the hands not only of the evil NHS of post-Christian, neo-pagan Britain, but also on the hands of Antipope Bergoglio, the Sodomite filth Paglia, and all the rest of them that didn’t speak out.

And if any of you are struggling with the simple logic of this situation, the reason why murdering a baptized infant is bad is because it involves MURDERING.  And in this case, it involves breaking the Natural and Divine Law which clearly dictates that PARENTS are the ultimate authority in the lives of their children.

If the state asserts that it can literally murder your children, then what can’t it do?  Can it cut off your sons’ penises and castrate them? Can it clitorectomize your daughters?  Yep.  Can it force your children to worship “allah”, or Bergoglio, or Mark Zuckerberg, or satan himself?  Yep. Can it remove your children from your custody and place them with a “tolerant” sodomite couple that won’t inculcate them with “Christian hate”?  Yep.

I’m no Sarah Palin fan, but she was 100% correct when she called the “death panels” dynamic of all socialized medicine.  As the mother of a Down’s Syndrome child, she understood that dynamic well, and rightly called it.

Oh yes.  Charlie Gard is being martyred.  Make no mistake.