Yearly Archives: 2016

Starting Tuesday Off Right: Back to the Fight Edition

Our Father, Who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy Name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Amen.

PATER NOSTER, qui es in caelis, sanctificetur nomen tuum. Adveniat regnum tuum. Fiat voluntas tua, sicut in caelo et in terra. Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie, et dimitte nobis debita nostra sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. Et ne nos inducas in tentationem, sed libera nos a malo. Amen.

"My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?"

“My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me?”

“Prayer is not a machine. It is not magic. It is not advice offered to God. Our act, when we pray, must not, any more than all our other acts, be separated from the continuous act of God Himself, in which alone all finite causes operate.

It would be even worse to think those who get what they pray for as sort of court favorites, people who have influence with the throne. The refused prayer of Christ in Gethsemane is answer enough to that. And I dare no leave out the hard saying which I once heard from an experienced Christian: ‘I have seen many striking answers to prayer and more than one that I thought miraculous. But they usually come at the beginning: before conversion, or soon after it. As the Christian life proceeds, they tend to be rarer.  The refusals, too, are not only more frequent; they become more unmistakable, more emphatic.’

Does God then forsake just those who serve Him best? Well, He who served Him best of all said, near His tortured death, “Why hast Thou forsaken Me?” When God becomes Man, that Man, of all others, is least comforted by God, at His greatest need. There is a mystery here which, even if I had the power, I might not have the courage to explore.  Meanwhile, little people like you and me, if our prayers are answered beyond all hope and probability, had better not draw hasty conclusions to our own advantage.  If we were stronger, we might be less tenderly treated.  If we were braver, we might be sent, with far less help, to defend far more desperate posts in the great battle.”

-C.S. Lewis, “The Efficacy of Prayer”

FrancisChurch Dogwhistle Words

You may have noticed that pretty much everything Jorge Bergoglio says is a meaningless pastiche of drooling nonsense, punctuated by a core vocabulary of dogwhistle words, and for those of you who have actually heard him speak, the gutteral, slackjawed verbal tick, “Eehh?”

You can tell who his drooling sychopants are, because they pick up and conspicuously litter their speech and writing with these dogwhistle words and phrases.  For me, these words are now ruined – rendered totally unusable by Bergoglio and his fag toadies.  Just as no more boys can ever be named “Adolf” (Sorry Coors family!), these words and phrases will now incite spittle-flicked nutties whenever they fall upon the ears of decent, God-fearing human beings.

1.  Encounter

This is a dogwhistle for faggots.  Faggots have “encounters” in grotty toilets, bathhouses and Novus Ordo seminaries.  Encounters are brief meetings. Wham, bam, thank you, Fr. Rosica. (Go ahead and sue me Tom, you diabolical fag.  You can get in line to all claims on my non-existent estate right behind the IRS.  Heh.)

2. Dialogue

This is faggot-speak for moral relativism and/or modernism. There is no Truth, and we don’t actually believe what we believe.  Dialogue.

3.  Exclude/include

Bergoglio, being an illiterate moron, seems to not understand that EXCLUDE is a transitive verb, meaning it takes an object. Or does he…? For example:

The Church excludes PERTINACIOUS HERETICS.

The Church is the subject.
Excludes is the transitive verb.
Pertinacious heretics is the direct object.

Bergoglio uses exclude and include like a cudgel, as intransitive verbs, just hanging there without an object, as he makes his strawman arguments.  “Jesus includes and never excludes.”  Jesus includes WHAT OR WHOM?  Unrepentant sodomites? Satanists?  Jesus never excludes WHAT OR WHOM? Baby killers? Nazis? Musloids?

Using exclude and include as intransitive verbs is a dogwhistle for moral relativism.

4.  Closeness

Ew.  Again, another faggot dogwhistle, conjuring images of Roman bathhouses or stopped elevators in Montevideo.

5.  Accompany

Another faggot dogwhistle.  I won’t judge you in your despicable, filthy sin.  Heck, I’ll ACCOMPANY YOU! And if you have a particularly pillowy Brad Pitt lips, why then I’ll even…

6.  Accompany body-to-body

Quite possibly the single most faggoty phrase ever uttered in human history.

7. Tender, tenderness, tenderly

Well.  I guess we can never, ever, ever listen to “Love Me Tender” ever again. Thanks for ruining everything, including ELVIS, fags.

8.  Caress, caressing

Drop this one and all fags within a half-mile radius will come running. Er, make that, sashaying. Snap.

9.  Tenderly caressing

This is the veritable Bat Signal of the fags.  Drop this one and a pink phone somewhere in Casa Santa Marta rings.  See below.

ricca-pope-francis_2622725k

 

10.  The Poor

This is now a dogwhistle for any and all “victim classes”, including fags, adulterers and all aberrosexuals.  Anyone whose behavioral choices that the Church and Divine and Natural Law condemn, are unrepentant, and who will become cheering fanbois for FrancisNewChurch, can be classified as “the poor”. Oh, it is also boilerplate Marxist class warfare incitement.

Email more if you think of them.

The bottom line is this: I judge people who have conspicuously weaved any of these terms into their writing or speech since Bergoglio’s squatting on the See of Peter VERY, VERY HARSHLY.  These are shameless asskissers who are trying to weasel their way into and ingratiate themselves before the FrancisNewChurch Mafia.  Make absolutely no mistake, people who pick up and use these now wretch-inducing terms are throwing billowing smoke signals that they are for sale and ready to play ball with Bergoglio, his toadies and their utterly satanic pro-sodomy, anti-Christ agenda.

You can smell ’em a mile away.  If you come across anyone using this fetid sodomite dogwhistle language, run in the opposite direction before you or someone you love gets tenderly caressed in an unwanted body-to-body accompaniment.