The greatest act of violence one can commit against the Petrine See is to call a man, “Peter” who is not Peter. If you love the Papacy, and are subject to it, you MUST call out Antipopes and publicly acknowledge that the See is vacant, when it is, in fact, vacant, as it has been these 552 days and counting…

Someone should send this to Cardinal Burke. He seems to be deeply confused on this point. He seems to think that refusing to pretend that an Antipope is legitimate is somehow “abandoning Our Lord and the Church.”

I’ll be sure to tell Our Lord all about how I have “abandoned Him and the Church” when I see Him tomorrow morning at the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. 😊

In related news, I’m having trouble keeping a lid on my envy of +Viganò and his “official” “excommunication” from the fart cloud that presents as the Bergoglian Antichurch.

Pleeeeease, let me be next!!! I want black ink documentation that I’m NOT “subsisting in” satan’s fart cloud.

You can mail official documents suitable for matting and framing to:

Ann Barnhardt

6834 S. University Blvd. #419

Centennial, CO 80122

I expect all documents of “excommunication” to be signed by Antipope Bergoglio and countersigned by Touchme Fagnandez.

Now, for your edification and confirmation, our citations about the reality of actual schism:

It is IMPOSSIBLE to enter into schism or be in schism by the act of holding the Catholic Faith whole and entire, and by being in union with and subject to the Vicar of Christ on Earth, and the Petrine See in se.

Good faith controversy over the IDENTITY of the Vicar of Christ is NOT schismatic, by logical definition.

F.X. Wernz, P. Vidal: “Finally they cannot be numbered among the schismatics, who refuse to obey the Roman Pontiff because they consider his person to be suspect or doubtfully electedon account of rumours in circulation.” (Ius Canonicum, 7:398, 1943) 

Rev Ignatius Szal: “Nor is there any schism if one merely transgress a papal law for the reason that one considers it too difficult, or if one refuses obedience inasmuch as one suspects the person of the pope or the validity of his election, or if one resists him as the civil head of a state.” (Communication of Catholics with Schismatics, 1948) 

De Lugo: “Neither is someone a schismatic for denying his subjection to the Pontiff on the grounds that he has solidly founded [‘probabiliter’] doubts concerning the legitimacy of his election or his power [refers to Sanchez and Palao].” (Disp., De Virt. Fid. Div., disp xxv, sect iii, nn. 35-8)

Checking your brain at the door and dispensing yourself from your responsibility as a rational intellect to accurately parse reality is NOT virtuous, and CERTAINLY not Catholic. It’s effeminate, cowardly and pathetic. And it’s in Canon Law:

Canon 748. §1. All persons are bound to seek the truth in those things which regard God and His Church and by virtue of divine law are bound by the obligation and possess the right of embracing and observing the truth which they have come to know.

Here’s my Part 1 video on the Bergoglian Antipapacy from ARSH 2018, specifically at the 2:06:45 timestamp with transcript:

Begin Transcript:

If holding the base premise that Jorge Bergoglio is now or ever has been the Pope requires you to:

-Tear down and deny the authority of the papacy… CHECK ✔️

-Deny the dogma of the indefectibility of the Church… CHECK ✔️

-Deny Papal Infallibility, that is, Vatican I, and thus believe that Christ has broken His promise, and thus deny Christ’s Divinity… CHECK ✔️

-Go against every saint and Church father… CHECK ✔️

-Deny visible, objective reality as we have covered in this presentation… CHECK ✔️

Violate the Law of Non-contradiction… CHECK ✔️

-AND, change your own position 180 degrees. ✔️ All these people on the “conservative” and “Trad” right, six years ago today when Pope Benedict was living in the Apostolic Palace, and plotting his faux-resignation, every one of these people would have defended the Papacy, Papal Infallibility, I mean, it was just a common thing. You believed it.  Now these people have turned 180 degrees and are on a daily basis attacking the Papacy. 180 degree turn.  With all of these criteria here above. ✔️

Denying dogma. ✔️

Holding positions that necessarily lead almost immediately to a denial of the Divinity of Christ. ✔️ COME ON!

How could you NOT begin from the assumption that the error must be with YOUR base premise, and NOT with God, His Holy Church, and His saints?  How could you sit here and it not INSTANTLY occur to you that YOU must be the one that is wrong? 

I must be holding a false base premise.  There MUST be something wrong with my assumption that Bergoglio is the Pope. Not with the Papacy. Not with the Church. Not with the saints, not with anything else.’

The narcissism…. ✔️

I am hard-pressed to think of a group that has been a bigger failure over the past century than theologians and canon lawyers… and yet.  AND YET.  We’re all supposed to bow and scrape to them? You can’t even think THIS through?  It hasn’t even occurred to you that maybe the problem isn’t God, His Church and all the saints – maybe, maybe the problem is with YOUR base premise?  A group of people who have done nothing but fail for almost a century now, that is theologians and canon lawyers.”

End Transcript.

Again, the TIMESTAMP you want here is 02:06:45. I hope this helps.

Saints Peter and Paul, pray for us.

Bruce Jenner is a man. And furthermore I consider that islam must be destroyed.