Diabolical Narcissism: Gregory Corna, Human Evil On Full Display

This post is extremely adult in nature, and revolves around intense sexual perversion and pornography.  I am posting this first and foremost to educate you all, specifically the fact that human evil more often than not presents on the surface as completely normal.  Diabolical Narcissists, especially cerebral DNs, can prowl throughout the world almost undetected.  These people are, on the surface, not drooling, raging demoniacs.  They hide in plain sight among us.  And boy, do I have a doozy of an example.

First, this is an email from the man in question, one Gregory Corna. Corna seems to be some sort of naval engineer. His professional website is www.chiefengineercorna.com .

Here is an email I received from Corna not long ago. Caution: Think long and hard before visiting the website mentioned below.  Remember, your ENTIRE browsing and searching history is permanently logged, and can be used against you.  Look, it is horrific.  It’s really, really bad.  You don’t need to look at it, nor should you. And things once seen can never be unseen, and the demons use images and memories against us whenever they can.  So again, I would urge you NOT to browse to the website below.

from: gregory corna <gcorna@msn.com>
to: “Ann@Barnhardt.biz” <ann@barnhardt.biz>
date: Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:41 AM
subject: Windowgirl.com

Hi Ann,

 
My name is Greg and I am the owner, webmaster of www.WindowGirl.com .
I am based in Las Vegas and need a strong controlling woman for the main actor on my site.
You could ware a full rubber suite with face mask and your Name and info would aways be a secret. I could pay all expanses to Las Vegas and do the videos in the Aria hotel ,I live very close at Veer Tower.
I will pay per video, we could shoot 4 or 5 in a weekend.
This site has a big following of men that need to be controlled by a strong woman .
Please give me a call at my cell (954) 465-4440
 
I am a big fan of your views.
 
Thanks for your time,
Greg

Now, here is a voicemail from Gregory Corna.  It is two minutes and twenty seconds of pure human evil, diabolical narcissism at its most refined.  Listen to how calm, cool, casual and even confident Corna sounds.  This is what a human soul, utterly devoid of charity, utterly devoid of human empathy, utterly devoid of shame or any pangs of conscience sounds like. Transcript below.

Hi Ann.  My name’s Gregory.  You can contact me at 954-465-4440. Uh, I’ve been listening to your political speech and, uh, your views are very common to mine. I’m very impressed. Uh, it looks like you might need some work. I’ve got a unusual situation where I run an adult website. The name of it is window girl dot com. And it features strong German women that are strap-on mistresses to men, that control men, and, uh, I do videos about that. Uh, I haven’t updated the site in such a long time because the original woman has passed away, but if you’d be interested in doing, uh, videos, I think we could come to an arrangement for money, and uh, this would be like with a full rubber suit, nobody would know you, you wouldn’t have to talk too much.  It would be very controlling situations over men, and uh, sexually I think you might be interested in that. And I could be willing to pay you some money up front. The website makes a little bit of money, but I, I do this mostly because of my interest in, uh, dealing with strong, uh, controlling women. And, besides that attitude, you have the exact same views I have on islam, and uh, a lot of other things, and your, uh, speech on the, um, scam banksters and the Federal Reserve, I went into that quite a bit too.  I’m a retired, uh, ship’s captain and I have got a strange, uh – strange desires, but, uh, we might be able to talk. If you’re interested just to talk about this possibly, uh, give me a call. The website again is window girl dot com. My name’s Gregory, and my phone number is 954-465-4440. And, believe me, we have a lot in common politically and, uh socially. It’s, it’s amazing. Thank you.

Okay, this guy is so totally far-gone, so thoroughly evil and in the clear grip of satan that the only real hope he has is supernatural.  It is utterly imperative to comprehend that his lucidity, functionality in society, and, apparently his career, his clarity of thought and speech is not evidence that he is not evil, but is precisely evidence that he IS EVIL.  Gregory Corna is not insane per se, nor is he actively possessed by demons. Gregory Corna is in full control of his faculties, and has FREELY CHOSEN EVIL.  People who are drooling, ranting, and manifesting insanity are the people for whom the culpability of evil is reduced. This Gregory Corna is one of the most chilling manifestations of evil I have yet encountered.

I would like to ask any of the priests reading this if they can please offer the Holy Sacrifice for this guy, if you have any open days coming up, because again, that is pretty much his only hope.  If you can say a Mass for this guy, Gregory Corna, shoot me an email and let me know.

 

Answering the Question: Why Has Christ Permitted the Bergoglian Antipapacy?

I am inundated with emails from people who just a few short years ago would have described their faith as strong, solid and even unshakable – people for whom the thought of ever, ever losing their faith or questioning or doubting in even the slightest way the Church, and even Our Lord Himself, specifically His love for us, was all but impossible. We’re talking daily Tridentine Mass-goers. Daily Rosary prayers. All because of the Bergoglian antipapacy.

First, realizing that Jorge Cardinal Bergoglio, S.J., known in his obedience as “Francis”, is, in fact, an antipope, and not the Vicar of Christ, is a tremendous consolation in and of itself. Thank God for Canon 188. Thank God for Archbishop Georg Ganswein spilling the beans on Pope Benedict’s ontological error with regards to the papacy at the Gregorian University in Rome a few weeks ago. As was pointed out to me by an entrenched Vatican employee earlier today, Ganswein, from a purely professional perspective, should have been fired immediately for the sheer obliviousness and stupidity of running his mouth as he did. My response is, what one person calls “obliviousness and stupidity”, I call “Divine Providence.”

But still the fact of the scandal of Bergoglio remains. Souls are being scandalized unto eternal damnation by this most wicked and malignant of antipopes, many of whom are the immediate family members – children and spouses – of the remnant faithful. Yes, yes, we can see that technically, legally, Bergoglio does not besmirch the papacy, and yet the damage his is doing is so profound that it will, in all likelihood, drive the Remnant Church into the catacombs. Why is Our Lord permitting this? Why doesn’t He rise up?

The answer lies in His Love and His Mercy.

Everyone agrees that the Bergoglian antipapcy is a scourge, a castigation. Rorate Caeli published a very widely-read piece on this very recently. I myself have been posting this famous quotation from St. John Eudes for YEARS, although in truncated form. Here is the full quote:

‘THE MOST EVIDENT MARK of God’s anger and the most terrible castigation He can inflict upon the world are manifested when He permits His people to fall into the hands of clerics’ who are priests more in name than in deed, priests who practice the cruelty of ravening wolves rather than the charity and affection of devoted shepherds.

Instead of nourishing those committed to their care, they rend and devour them brutally. Instead of leading their people to God, they drag Christian souls into hell in their train. Instead of being the salt of the earth and the light of the world, they are its innocuous poison and its murky darkness.

St. Gregory the Great says that priests and pastors will stand condemned before God as the murderers of any souls lost through neglect or silence. Tot occidimus, quot ad mortem ire tepidi et tacentes videmus. Elsewhere St. Gregory asserts that nothing more angers God than to see those whom He set aside for the correction of others, give bad example by a wicked and depraved life.’

Instead of preventing offenses against His Majesty, such priests become themselves the first to persecute Him, they lose their zeal for the salvation of souls and think only of following their own inclinations. Their affections go no farther than earthly things, they eagerly bask in the empty praises of men, using their sacred ministry to serve their ambitions, they abandon the things of God to devote themselves to the things of the world, and in their saintly calling of holiness, they spend their time in profane and worldly pursuits.

When God permits such things, it is a very positive proof that He is thoroughly angry with His people, and is visiting His most dreadful anger upon them. That is why He cries unceasingly to Christians, “Return, 0 ye revolting children . . . and I will give you pastors according to my own heart” (Jer. 3, 14-15). Thus, irregularities in the lives of priests constitute a scourge visited upon the people in consequence of sin.’

-St. John Eudes, ‘The Priest: His Dignity and Obligations’

So if we all agree with St. John Eudes that Bergoglio is a scourge on us, that is, God’s PEOPLE, the first question we must ask ourselves is WHAT EXACTLY it is that we have done to deserve this? Then, once we have determined that, we must – MUST – stop doing that, and, presumably do the opposite.

What I would submit is the great crime against God committed by His People over the past 50 years is our SILENCE – our passive, impotent, effeminate acceptance of the profound violence done against Him, His Church, and His Liturgy. We, our parents, our grandparents, our great-grandparents, sat in silence and watched as sodomites turned the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass into a neo-pagan low-rent cruise ship floorshow. Our response was either the silence of apostasy, as more than 90% of Catholics in the West simply stopped going to Mass, or the silence of tacitly accepting the obvious abuse and overt hostility toward Our Lord and His Church by diabolically narcissistic sex perverts and their truly pathetic, co-dependent hangers-on. The collapse of our culture, the abortion, the ascendancy of sexual perversion, the collapse of the Rule of Law – all of these things are DERIVATIVE of the destruction of the Liturgy, a destruction that we sat, wallowing in our collective effeminacy, and watched.

So my question, in rebuttal to the commentariat’s responses to my “Vocem Alienorum” piece is this: If we all agree that it has been precisely our inaction over the past 50 years that has brought down this scourge upon us, how can it possibly, possibly make sense that the proper response to the Bergoglian antipapacy is MORE SILENCE? MORE RETREAT? MORE SHOULDER-SHRUGGING? MORE FATALISM? MORE EFFEMINACY? MORE INDIFFERENCE?

And that brings us, somewhat paradoxically, to Our Lord’s incomprehensible Love for us, and His Mercy.

The reason Our Lord is letting the Bergoglian Antipapacy happen, is because He is giving us ONE. LAST. CHANCE to cease the very crime we have committed against Him for lo these 50 years, one last chance to come to His defense. One last chance to shake off our effeminacy and instead rise up in virility and fight for Him.

As I have been desperately trying to convey for years, a “personal relationship with Jesus Christ” is utterly, utterly essential. Our Lord is a PERSON. He loves us PERSONALLY. He is not a philosophy, a political ideology, a legal matrix or an abstraction of any kind. He is a PERSON who not only who loves us, but perhaps even more incomprehensibly, wants to be LOVED BY US. As we have learned in our ongoing study of Diabolical Narcissism, DN humans, and their demonic analogues in the angelic plane, are those who refuse to either love, or BE LOVED. God, obviously being the “infinite opposite” of diabolical, loves and desires to be loved.

Why does God come to us in the Eucharist? Why does He condescend to change a humble piece of bread into His physical substance? Why does He allow Himself to be called down onto the altar by a man – a priest? Why does he allow Himself – His physical substance – to be reposed inside of all of those tabernacles? Why does He expose Himself to possible desecration all day every day all over the world?

He makes Himself so incredibly vulnerable so that WE CAN TAKE CARE OF HIM. He leaves Himself wide open and exposed so that we can be good and loving TO HIM. He who provides and gives us everything, even gives us the ability to give back to Him. He who guards, defends and protects us, gives us the ability to guard, defend and protect Him. He who has given us the beauty of the stars and galaxies, the mountains, the sea, the plants and animals, has given us the ability to give Him the beauty of our architecture, our works of art, and our music. And most especially, He who stepped into the breach and fought and conquered sin and death for us, the perfect act of chivalry, borne of perfect virility, borne of perfect, infinite love, gives us the chance to DEFEND HIM, to confront and combat His enemies. He intentionally remains passive – for a time – precisely so that we may rush to HIS AID. Why? Because He knows that in doing this – doing the right thing – we will be truly happy.

This is what we have failed to do, and what we are being given one last chance to do now, in these dark days. Just as he gave Peter the three-fold chance to unwind his three-fold denial, which Peter jumped at and did with tears from the shore of the Sea of Tiberias all the way to his cross on the Vatican Hill with the words “Agapo-se”, “I love you” on his lips, so now we are being given the chance to “unwind” our silent betrayal. Turning our backs on Him and retiring to our diversions and navel-gazing distractions – and that is what they are, distractions from the pangs of our consciences as we fail, YET AGAIN, to stand and defend our Beloved Savior, and the souls that Our Beloved God loves – will never, ever provide genuine happiness. It can only ever provide a prolongation of earthly, sensual comfort. Turning our backs on Our Lord, telling ourselves the lie that objective reality, truth itself, is unknowable, and even if known, far too risky or costly to speak in anything but the most hushed tones amongst the right company, as He is attacked by an axis of sodomites, Freemasons, Modernists and satanists with a dimwitted arch-heresiarch squatter paraded before them as their ringleader, is more of the same malfeasance that brought this scourge down upon us in the first place.

I had occasion to have a truly disheartening conversation with a priest recently about a situation where I am currently living involving the display and selling of pornographic materials, in a location where children pass every day. He used the metaphor of the Titanic to make his point, namely that the ship is going down, and that it is futile, and even smacks of pride, to think that I or anyone else can do anything to correct the situation – that any efforts we make to resist the onslaught of evil is “rearranging deck chairs while the band plays on.”

I have been a bit of a Titanic buff since 1986 when the wreck was discovered, and what immediately sprang to my mind was the following, which answers the question, “What should we do in the face of inevitable catastrophe?”

On board the Titanic were numerous uber-wealthy passengers and titans of industry. One was the billionaire Benjamin Guggenheim, who was on board with his mistress. Guggenheim, upon learning that the ship was going down, took his mistress and her maid up to the deck and put them in a lifeboat. He then went back to his cabin whereupon he and his valet put on their finest eveningwear, went back to the foyer of the Grand Staircase, reposed themselves in deck chairs, and sat, sipping brandy and smoking cigars, until they died.

Also on board for the maiden voyage was J. Bruce Ismay, the owner of the White Star Line, essentially the owner of the Titanic. Upon consulting with Thomas Andrews, the naval architect who designed the Titanic and oversaw its construction at the Harland & Wolff shipyards in Belfast who was also onboard for the maiden voyage, and knowing that the ship was doomed, Ismay immediately went up to the lifeboat decks and began urgently pleading with incredulous passengers to get into the lifeboats. Many passengers refused, refusing to believe that the Titanic was going to sink. Ismay used his authority and credibility as the owner of the White Star Line to convince people to board lifeboats. He stayed on deck until the very end, and in the final moments of the great barque, saw and was encouraged to jump into a collapsible lifeboat. Ismay survived, and despite his heroic efforts on deck, was destroyed in the press for not going down with the ship – largely by his enemy, newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst. But Guggenheim, after seeing only to his mistress and her maid, retired to two hours of self-absorbed and self-satisfied sensual decadence and naval-gazing as he waited to die, apparently indifferent to the other 2200 souls aboard, and was hailed as a hero.

The analogy here is clear. Yes, the Titanic is going down. Barring a supernatural intervention – which is possible – the Barque of Peter as we have known it is going down. With the Titanic it was a matter of infiltration of water. With the Church, it is a matter of the infiltration of Communists, Modernists, sodomites and satanists. It will no longer be the majestic “Titanic”, and will be reduced to only the lifeboats. But lifeboats are barques too – just smaller, and less comfortable.

We MUST warn others. We MUST tell them the truth of the situation so that they understand the enormity of what is happening, and so that they will get into the lifeboats and be saved. We MUST tell them that to follow Antipope Bergoglio is to reject Christ and embrace the spirit of Antichrist. And we must keep doing this until the very end. The good news is that on the Barque of Peter, as with the Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes, there is an infinite supply of lifeboats. Launch one, and another appears. So long as there are souls waiting to board a lifeboat, GOD WILL PROVIDE. But we are players in this. If we take the Guggenheim route, the route of fatalism, souls will be lost that could have been saved, and, in all likelihood, we will be lost ourselves, because failure in charity – indifference – so often manifests as a sin of omission.

Finally, and with great sadness, it must be said that the statement “We have the pope that we deserve,” is indeed true. We have a pope who has been saturated in bad theology and bad philosophy. We have a pope who is intimately tied to the failed Vatican II Council. We have a pope who is weak, and who, like the hirelings, has abandoned the sheep and fled from the wolves. Yes, we most assuredly have the pope we deserve: Joseph Ratzinger, Pope Benedict XVI. Pray for Pope Benedict, and pray for Bergoglio, that he repents, reverts to Catholicism, dies in the state of grace and achieves the Beatific Vision.

Antipope Bergoglio Confesses Lutheranism

The call by the Antipope Bergoglio for The Church to beg the forgiveness of sodomites for having offended them, while nauseating, is not entirely shocking.

The real shocker in the latest airplane interview is Antipope Bergoglio CONFESSING LUTHERANISM.

After reading this, how can we possibly, possibly believe that this man is the Vicar of Christ, and that there is “no way we can know” his status?  To confess Lutheranism is to not be Catholic.  For Bergoglio to be the Pope requires that he be a CATHOLIC.  So, we are firmly into Principle of Non-Contradiction territory yet again. Bergoglio can not be both Catholic and not Catholic. His confession in the presser is Lutheran.

LINK TO FULL PRESSER TRANSCRIPT HERE

Kleinjung: Too much beer … Holy Father, I wanted to ask you a question. Today you spoke of the gifts of the shared Churches, of the gifts shared by the Churches together. Seeing that you will go in I believe four months to Lund for the commemoration of the 500th anniversary of the reformation, I think perhaps this is also the right moment for us not only to remember the wounds on both sides but also to recognize the gifts of the reformation. Perhaps also – this is a heretical question – perhaps to annul or withdraw the excommunication of Martin Luther or of some sort of rehabilitation. Thank you.

Pope Francis: I think that the intentions of Martin Luther were not mistaken. He was a reformer. Perhaps some methods were not correct. But in that time, if we read the story of the Pastor, a German Lutheran who then converted when he saw reality – he became Catholic – in that time, the Church was not exactly a model to imitate. There was corruption in the Church, there was worldliness, attachment to money, to power…and this he protested. Then he was intelligent and took some steps forward justifying, and because he did this. And today Lutherans and Catholics, Protestants, all of us agree on the doctrine of justification. On this point, which is very important, he did not err. He made a medicine for the Church, but then this medicine consolidated into a state of things, into a state of a discipline, into a way of believing, into a way of doing, into a liturgical way and he wasn’t alone; there was Zwingli, there was Calvin, each one of them different, and behind them were who? Principals! We must put ourselves in the story of that time. It’s a story that’s not easy to understand, not easy. Then things went forward, and today the dialogue is very good. That document of justification I think is one of the richest ecumenical documents in the world, one in most agreement. But there are divisions, and these also depend on the Churches. In Buenos Aires there were two Lutheran churches, and one thought in one way and the other…even in the same Lutheran church there was no unity; but they respected each other, they loved each other, and the difference is perhaps what hurt all of us so badly and today we seek to take up the path of encountering each other after 500 years. I think that we have to pray together, pray. Prayer is important for this. Second, to work together for the poor, for the persecuted, for many people, for refugees, for the many who suffer; to work together and pray together and the theologians who study together try…but this is a long path, very long. One time jokingly I said: I know when full unity will happen. – “when?” – “the day after the Son of Man comes,” because we don’t know…the Holy Spirit will give the grace, but in the meantime, praying, loving each other and working together. Above all for the poor, for the people who suffer and for peace and many things…against the exploitation of people and many things in which they are jointly working together.

“He did not err.”

He.
Did.
Not.
Err.

Bergoglio has all along thrown massive, massive hints that it is Lutheranism that he admires, and Catholicism that he desipses.  Bergoglio from literally his first Mass has gone out of his way to NOT reverence the Eucharist. He does not, as policy, genuflect before Our Lord in the Eucharist – including at the consecration of the Host and Chalice at Mass.  He does not participate in the Corpus Domini procession in Rome – instead driving in a car from the Lateran Basilica to Mary Major.  He mocks the Rosary, and holds in scathing contempt the “colonialists” and the Spanish Crown which converted millions and millions of human souls from some of the most overtly satanic pagan paradigms ever seen on earth, to the One True Church, almost exactly concurrent with the Lutheran revolt which he openly gushes over in the remarks above.

And then, there is this:

FULL VATICAN RADIO LINK HERE

“What is reconciliation? Taking one from this side, taking another one for that side and uniting them: no, that’s part of it but it’s not it … True reconciliation means that God in Christ took on our sins and He became the sinner for us. When we go to confession, for example, it isn’t that we say our sin and God forgives us. No, not that! We look for Jesus Christ and say: ‘This is your sin, and I will sin again’. And Jesus likes that, because it was his mission: to become the sinner for us, to liberate us. “

Now compare Antipope Bergoglio’s words above to this quote from Luther:

“Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong, but let your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is the victor over sin, death, and the world. We will commit sins while we are here, for this life is not a place where justice resides… No sin can separate us from Him, even if we were to kill or commit adultery thousands of times each day.”
(ref. ‘Let Your Sins Be Strong, from ‘The Wittenberg Project;’ ‘The Wartburg Segment’, translated by Erika Flores, from Dr. Martin Luther’s Saemmtliche Schriften, Letter No. 99, 1 Aug. 1521. – Cf. Also Denifle’s Luther et Lutheranisme, Etude Faite d’apres les sources. Translation by J. Paquier (Paris, A. Picard, 1912-13), VOl. II, pg. 404))

It also bears repeating Luther’s thoughts on marriage, given Antipope Bergoglio’s enthusiasm for fornication, adultery and serial concubinage:

“It is not in opposition to the Holy Scriptures for a man to have several wives.”
(ref. De Wette, Vol. 2, p. 459).

And finally, this: Luther or Antipope Bergoglio?

“What I teach and write remains true even though the whole world should fall to pieces over it”
(Luther- ref. Weimar, Vol. 18, Pg. 401).

My full essay, “Luther, in His Own Words” can be found HERE. It is worth a review given the fact that the Antipope has just confessed Lutheranism, and I suspect will, in fact, attempt to rehabilitate Luther more in the coming months as the 500th anniversary of the Lutheran Revolt is reached.

Remember, all of this – ALL OF THIS – is fully explainable, and the Church remains indefectible and spotless Bride of Christ, if one simply acknowledges the objective reality that Jorge Bergoglio is not now and never was the Pope.  Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger remains the one and only living Vicar of Christ, whether he believes it, or likes it.  Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger could no more bifurcate the papacy than I could. Ratzinger’s mind is not the arbiter of reality, much less supernatural reality.  And neither is mine – reality is reality, and it is my job to conform my rational intellect to it, and the Principle of Non-Contradiction is a foundational plank in that conformation. I cannot, in good conscience, violate the Principle of Non-Contradiction. Calling Jorge Bergoglio “The Vicar of Christ” REQUIRES violation of the Principle of Non-Contradiction, therefore, the premise CANNOT be true. It cannot be included in the domain of “The Real”.

 

Antipope Bergoglio Says Church Should Apologize to, Nay, Beg Forgiveness of Sodomites for Having Offended Them

shocked

In the hour-long freewheeling conversation that has become a trademark of his international travels, Francis was asked if he agreed with recent comments by a German Roman Catholic cardinal that the Church should apologize to gays.

Francis looked sad when the reporter asked if an apology was made more urgent by the killing of 49 people at a gay club in Orlando, Florida this month.

He recalled Church teachings that homosexuals “should not be discriminated against. They should be respected, accompanied pastorally.”

He added: “I think that the Church not only should apologize … to a gay person whom it offended but it must also apologize to the poor as well, to the women who have been exploited, to children who have been exploited by (being forced to) work. It must apologize for having blessed so many weapons.”

The Church teaches that homosexual tendencies are not sinful but homosexual acts are, and that homosexuals should try to be chaste.

Francis repeated a slightly modified version of the now-famous “Who am I to judge?” comment he made about gays on the first foreign trip after his election in 2013.

“The questions is: if a person who has that condition, who has good will, and who looks for God, who are we to judge?”

FORGIVENESS, NOT JUST APOLOGY

Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi said that the pope, by saying “has that condition”, did not imply a medical condition but “a person in that situation”. In Italian, the word “condition” can also mean “situation”.

“We Christians have to apologize for so many things, not just for this (treatment of gays), but we must ask for forgiveness, not just apologize! Forgiveness! Lord, it is a word we forget so often!” he said.

Later, Antipope Bergoglio was asked about the controversy surrounding the Ganswein Thesis (Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger believing that he could bifurcate the papacy).  I found Antipope Bergoglio’s answer to be an instance of diabolical forthrightness:

“There is only one pope.”

Exactly, and it ain’t you, Jorge.

I think we need to revisit Romans 1…

For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error. And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, Detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

[God delivered them up: Not by being author of their sins, but by withdrawing his grace, and so permitting them, in punishment of their pride, to fall into those shameful sins.]

Foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy. Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them.

Barnhardt.biz Migrating Servers

One of the small handful of negative emails I have received since posting “Vocem Alienorum” was from the chap who has been hosting this site for the past few years, giving me 60 days to vacate his server.  The migration to the new server is happening now, and thus I am experiencing sporadic outages, and I have had reports that some emails are bouncing.  I’m sure it will clear up within 24 hours.

Starting Friday Off Right: Happy Birthday, John the Baptist! Edition

Our Father, Who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy Name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Amen.

PATER NOSTER, qui es in caelis, sanctificetur nomen tuum. Adveniat regnum tuum. Fiat voluntas tua, sicut in caelo et in terra. Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie, et dimitte nobis debita nostra sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. Et ne nos inducas in tentationem, sed libera nos a malo. Amen.

JohntheBaptist

“The Lord hath called me by my name from the womb of my mother, and He hath made my mouth like a sharp sword; in the shadow of His hand He hath protected me, and hath made me as a chosen arrow.”

Isaiah 49: 1-2
Introit of the Feast of the Birthday of St. John the Baptist

Benefactor Mass Tuesdays Continue As Before & New Ann Interview on islam

I.  First, Benefactor Mass Tuesdays continue exactly as before, every Tuesday morning at 0830 Eastern Time in the Venerable Gregorian Rite.  As I covered in “Vocem Alienorum”, even if an antipope is commemorated at the Te Igitur, the Mass is still absolutely valid, the Eucharist is confected and the Holy and August Sacrifice is offered.  The priest who is saying these Masses for you every Tuesday has not told me whom he is commemorating, and if he has anything he wants me, and thus you all to know, it is up to him to tell me.

Remember, my (or your) coming to the realization that Bergoglio is an antipope in no way changed his state.  We have to keep reminding ourselves of this because our culture is so hyper-narcissistic that we all tend to believe that our minds create reality and truth.  If I am correct, which I obviously believe that I am, then Bergoglio has never been the pope, and every Mass with him commemorated at the Te Igitur has been illicit.  So, as I said, nothing has changed, except for my mind, which I believe is now more aligned with the truth, specifically on this question. And that’s all I care about at the end of the day.  NOTHING is more important than the truth.

And, while we are on the subject, THANK YOU for your continued munificence. Money is a fungible proxy for HUMAN LIFE; the capacity to labor, produce and create through time, and thus whenever money is donated from one person to another, what is happening is one person is literally giving a piece of their life away.  One hour’s wage, one day’s wage, etc.  And you will never, ever get that time back.  If you give me the equivalent of three hour’s wage, you can never, ever go back to those three hours and “re-earn” that money.  Once time is spent, it is spent.  That is a staggering thought. The very best thing I can do to repay you is to have the Holy Sacrifice of Calvary offered for you.  Most human beings never have a single Mass offered for them while they are yet alive, and sadly, only a very few have Masses offered for them after they have died.  It is truly wonderful that so many people are now having so many Masses offered for them while they yet live.  I suppose at the General Judgment we might all find out that this was the only reason that this website and all of this weird stuff happened – so that those Masses would be offered for you. And that is consoling.

II.  If you want the full plasma arc torch treatment of islam, what it is, and how it must be dealt with, I did an interview Saturday with young Elijah Johnson, which is embedded here below:

Vocem Alienorum: The Voice of Antipope Francis Bergoglio Is the Voice of A Stranger

It is now clear to me, and I feel it morally incumbent upon me given my position to publicly state that I believe Jorge Bergoglio, “Francis” to be an Antipope, never having been canonically elected, and that Joseph Ratzinger, Pope Benedict XVI is still the Roman Pontiff.

The sheer quantity of evidence, and the diversity of the confluent evidence sets, is now so utterly overwhelming that I believe that a person, fully informed of the dataset, would have to engage in the willful suspension of disbelief to continue to acknowledge Bergoglio as Roman Pontiff.

I will structure this essay in terms of time.  We will begin with prophecy. Next we will address the “resignation” of Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger in light of what I will refer to as the “Gänswein Thesis”. Next we will address the “election” of Bergoglio in light of the publicly confessed malfeasance of the so-called “St. Gallen Mafia”.  Next we will look at a brief, incomplete list of Antipope Bergoglio’s heresies, blasphemies and antichristological actions.  Finally, we will discuss what exactly this means, both for The Church as a whole, and for me personally, in the hopes that others can be, if not edified, then at least informed by my personal experience.

PROPHECY

Prophecies are given to us by God the Holy Ghost to help us in extraordinary times and circumstances.  God is not trying to trick us or hide from us.  It is quite the opposite, in fact. God in His infinite mercy, knowing that we would bring this ecclesial and social catastrophe upon ourselves, warned us of what would befall us, and left a “trail of breadcrumbs” for us to follow, by sending prophets and even His own Mother, appearing and warning us of events to come should we refuse to turn back to God.  We are now living in those days.

St. Francis of Assisi

Act bravely, my Brethren; take courage, and trust in the Lord. The time is fast approaching in which there will be great trials and afflictions; perplexities and dissensions, both spiritual and temporal, will abound; the charity of many will grow cold, and the malice of the wicked will increase.

The devils will have unusual power, the immaculate purity of our Order, and of others, will be so much obscured that there will be very few Christians who will obey the true Sovereign Pontiff and the Roman Church with loyal hearts and perfect charity. At the time of this tribulation a man, not canonically elected, will be raised to the Pontificate, who, by his cunning, will endeavour to draw many into error and death.

Then scandals will be multiplied, our Order will be divided, and many others will be entirely destroyed, because they will consent to error instead of opposing it.

There will be such diversity of opinions and schisms among the people, the religious and the clergy, that, except those days were shortened, according to the words of the Gospel, even the elect would be led into error, were they not specially guided, amid such great confusion, by the immense mercy of God.

Then our Rule and manner of life will be violently opposed by some, and terrible trials will come upon us. Those who are found faithful will receive the crown of life; but woe to those who, trusting solely in their Order, shall fall into tepidity, for they will not be able to support the temptations permitted for the proving of the elect.

Those who preserve their fervour and adhere to virtue with love and zeal for the truth, will suffer injuries and, persecutions as rebels and schismatics; for their persecutors, urged on by the evil spirits, will say they are rendering a great service to God by destroying such pestilent men from the face of the earth. But the Lord will be the refuge of the afflicted, and will save all who trust in Him. And in order to be like their Head [Jesus Christ], these, the elect, will act with confidence, and by their death will purchase for themselves eternal life; choosing to obey God rather than man, they will fear nothing, and they will prefer to perish [physically] rather than consent to falsehood and perfidy.

Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it under foot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor, but a destroyer.

Works of the Seraphic Father St. Francis Of Assisi, [London: R. Washbourne, 1882], pp. 248-250

Please note that St. Francis specifically warns that those who remain faithful to Jesus Christ and His Holy Church and refuse to follow the man “not canonically elected, raised to the Pontificate” will be accused of being “rebels and schismatics“.  As this essay and my position works its way through the internet in the coming days and weeks, be sure to note that I will be accused of being, and denounced as, a schismatic. I know this will happen, and therefore have no fear or anxiety about it.

Next, Cardinal Manning:

“The apostasy of the city of Rome from the vicar of Christ and its destruction by Antichrist may be thoughts very new to many Catholics, that I think it well to recite the text of theologians of greatest repute. First Malvenda, who writes expressly on the subject, states as the opinion of Ribera, Gaspar Melus, Biegas, Suarrez, Bellarmine and Bosius that Rome shall apostatize from the Faith, drive away the Vicar of Christ and return to its ancient paganism. …Then the Church shall be scattered, driven into the wilderness, and shall be for a time, as it was in the beginning, invisible; hidden in catacombs, in dens, in mountains, in lurking places; for a time it shall be swept, as it were from the face of the earth. Such is the universal testimony of the Fathers of the early Church.”
– Henry Edward Cardinal Manning, The Present Crisis of the Holy See, 1861, London: Burns and Lambert, pp. 88-90)

Pope Pius XII:

“I am worried by the Blessed Virgin’s messages to Lucy of Fatima. This persistence of Mary about the dangers which menace the Church is a Divine warning against the suicide of altering the Faith, in Her liturgy, Her theology and Her soul. … I hear all around me innovators who wish to dismantle the Sacred Chapel, destroy the universal flame of the true Faith of the Church, reject Her ornaments and make Her feel remorse for Her historical past.”
“A day will come when the civilized world will deny its God, when the Church will doubt as Peter doubted. She will be tempted to believe that man has become God.”

Now, Our Lord’s mother herself.

Our Lady of La Salette:

“Rome will lose the Faith and become the seat of Antichrist.”

Our Lady of Fatima:

“Satan rules even in the highest positions and determines the direction of things. He will succeed in worming his way even into the highest summits of the Church…”

“But this will be a time of great trials for the Church. Cardinals will oppose cardinals. Bishops will oppose bishops. Satan will walk in their ranks. In Rome, there will be great changes. What is rotten will fall and what will fall will never rise again. Darkness will envelope the Church and the world will be thrown into a panic.”

I will stop there simply for the sake of brevity, but even the most cursory investigation into prophecies reveals a common, overarching theme: Mass apostasy – FROM THE TOP DOWN.

Clearly, we are seeing the fulfillment of these prophecies. To deny this is to deny obvious, objective reality.

The “Resignation” of Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger

On 11 February, ARSH 2013, Pope Benedict XVI announced that he would resign the papacy effective 28 February ARSH 2013 at 8:00pm Rome time.  After his “resignation”, Ratzinger still wore the papal white cassock, still referred to himself as “Pope Emeritus Benedict XVI”, and continued to live in the Vatican.

On 20 May, ARSH 2016, Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger’s personal secretary and confidant Archbishop Georg Gänswein delivered a speech at the Gregorian University in Rome in which he described in detail Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger’s views on his status as pope. Gänswein stated openly that Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger considers himself still to be a participant in the Petrine Ministry, which by his “resignation” he “expanded”, with his role being “contemplative”, while his successor’s role is “active”. He further stated that Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger believes that his resignation was “quite different” to that of Pope Celestine V, and that it is specifically for this reason that Pope Benedict XVI did NOT revert to his given name and continues to wear the papal white cassock while living inside the Vatican Walls.

They key here lies in Canon Law, specifically Canon 188.

Canon 188
A resignation made out of grave fear that is inflicted unjustly or out of malice, substantial error, or simony is invalid by the law itself.

They key here is the up-until-now almost incomprehensible and ignored provision for “substantial error”.  What could that possibly mean?  Up until now, it was speculated that if a pope were to resign thinking erroneously, for example, that he were OBLIGED to resign at a certain age, or some such, that this was what was being referenced.  But to think that a pope could be so ignorant is ridiculous, indeed.  No.  We now know what “substantial error” is.  Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger made a “substantial error” in believing that the papacy could be “expanded” – in this case, bifurcated into a diarchy.  Pope Benedict XVI submitted an invalid resignation not because he was coerced, but because he mistakenly believed and continues to believe that he could at once resign, thus allowing for the election of a successor, and yet still remain a Pope – note the use not of the definite article “the”, but of the indefinite article “a”.  This is SUBSTANTIAL ERROR if ever, ever there were so, and thus, according to Canon 188, Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger’s resignation of 28 February ARSH 2013 was “invalid by the law itself”, and thus, he remains the one and only Roman Pontiff, whether or not he believes it or likes it.

As a corollary to this, it might be argued that since Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger has publicly acknowledged Bergoglio as Pope, that Ratzinger has himself promulgated schism by acknowledging a man he knows to be an antipope as pope. My response to this is that Ratzinger truly believes his SUBSTANTIAL ERROR. Ratzinger truly believes – wrongly – that BOTH he and Bergoglio are “participants in the Petrine ministry”, and thus that he does NOT think that he is schisming the Church.

At this point, let me make it clear that I am in no way trying to paint Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger as blameless or “the good guy” in all of this – his error and his actions have been catastrophic and have led directly to countless souls being scandalized unto damnation by Antipope Bergoglio.  Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger’s ontology is CLEARLY warped, and in retrospect, we should not be altogether shocked by this given his activities and associations during the mid-20th century, specifically during the failed Second Vatican Council, and his lifelong defense of that clearly failed council.  However, he was validly elected Pope, and, according to Canon 188, having submitted a resignation made out of “substantial error”, still is the one and only Roman Pontiff, and I do not believe that it was his malicious, malevolent intention to schism the Church, or to consciously promulgate an antipope. I think that Joseph Ratzinger simply made one of the biggest mistakes in the history of the Church. And he will answer for it.

I further anticipate that in the days and weeks following the publishing of this piece, that I will be called a “sedevacantist”.  If and when you see this, take it as certain proof that the person in question either did not read this essay, or is dishonest.  I clearly do NOT believe the See of Peter is vacant.  I believe that Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger is still the Roman Pontiff, and will be until he either dies, or VALIDLY resigns.

The “Election” of Bergoglio  

The trail of breadcrumbs continues as we look at the conclave and “election” of Bergoglio in March of ARSH 2013.  In September of ARSH 2015, Cardinal Daneels, a notorious Belgian pro-sodomite and protector of incestuous pedophiles, who is one of Bergoglio’s top lieutenants, openly, proudly revealed the existence of a “mafia” – his term – which calls itself the St. Gallen Mafia.  It is a group of Cardinals whose agenda was the opposition of Joseph Ratzinger/Pope Benedict XVI.  Daneels happily admitted that this St. Gallen Mafia openly electioneered and campaigned outside of the conclave for Jorge Bergoglio to be installed as “pope”, and that once installed that Bergoglio would then radically and permanently transform the Church.

This is an excommunicable offense, according to none other than Pope John Paul II’s document Universi Dominici Gregis.  While this alone does not appear to invalidate an election, in combination with the other evidence streams, it adds to the overall dataset indicating that something is terribly, terribly wrong, and that a satanic corruption is present at the very, very highest levels of the Vatican, and is especially concentrated around the very person of Jorge Bergoglio.

Bergoglio’s Litany of Heresies

In the interest of brevity, I will refer you to DenzingerBergoglio.com , who are now up to 134 articles on statements made by Bergoglio that savor of heresy – and this compendium is woefully incomplete. But, let us look at just a few, and ask ourselves, “Whose voice do I hear? Is it the voice of Jesus Christ the Good Shepherd, or is it the voice of the serpent?”

When Bergoglio says that souls that do not achieve the Beatific Vision are annihilated, I do NOT hear the voice of Jesus Christ.  I hear the voice of satan.

When Bergoglio says that “the Spirit” is telling him that the words of Jesus Christ are void, and that to adhere to the words of Christ Almighty is “resisting the Spirit” – that is, the Second and Third Persons of the Triune Godhead are in opposition to each other, I do not hear the voice of Jesus Christ the Good Shepherd.  I hear the voice of a blasphemer.

When Bergoglio says that the Blessed Virgin Mary perhaps, while standing at the foot of The Cross, accused God of deceiving her, I hear not the voice of Jesus Christ the Good shepherd, I hear the voice of the devil.

When Bergoglio says that pious Catholics are “divinizers” and “idolaters” – violations of the First Commandment – I do not hear the voice of Jesus Christ the Good Shepherd.  I hear the voice of satan.

When Bergoglio says that God wills mortal sin, I do not hear the voice of Jesus Christ, the Good Shepherd.  I hear the voice of the serpent.

When Bergoglio says that “the great majority” of sacramental marriages are null, and that unmarried, cohabiting couples have “a real marriage” with “the grace of a real marriage”, I do not hear the voice of Jesus Christ the Good Shepherd, I hear the voice of a ravenous wolf.

When Bergoglio directly analogizes the Great Commission to spread the Gospel and Baptize all nations, to islamic jihad, I do not hear the voice of Jesus Christ the Good Shepherd, I hear the voice of an antichrist.

By Whose Authority Do I Presume to Denounce Bergoglio?

I titled this piece “Vocem Alienorum” from John 10 – the Good Shepherd discourse:

Amen, amen I say to you: He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up another way, the same is a thief and a robber. But he that entereth in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep. To him the porter openeth; and the sheep hear his voice: and he calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out. And when he hath let out his own sheep, he goeth before them: and the sheep follow him, because they know his voice. But a stranger they follow not, but fly from him, because they know not the voice of strangers (vocem alienorum).

This proverb Jesus spoke to them. But they understood not what He spoke to them. Jesus therefore said to them again: Amen, amen I say to you, I am the door of the sheep. All others, as many as have come, are thieves and robbers: and the sheep heard them not. I am the door. By Me, if any man enter in, he shall be saved: and he shall go in, and go out, and shall find pastures. The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I am come that they may have life, and may have it more abundantly.

I am the Good Shepherd. The good shepherd giveth his life for his sheep. But the hireling, and he that is not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and flieth: and the wolf catcheth, and scattereth the sheep: And the hireling flieth, because he is a hireling: and he hath no care for the sheep. I am the Good Shepherd; and I know mine, and mine know Me. As the Father knoweth Me, and I know the Father: and I lay down My life for my sheep.
John 10: 1-15

The notion that we laymen – the sheep – are NOT to listen and discern whose voice it is that we hear is abject lunacy.  The notion the we laymen – the sheep – are to sit and wait for the hirelings – that is to say today’s faithless and effeminate clergy and prelates – to TELL US that the lying, hissing heresies and blasphemies we hear are, in fact, the words of a wolf before we react is clearly refuted by Our Blessed Lord.  Further, the notion that we the sheep should willfully suspend disbelief and follow A WOLF if the hirelings tells us to, is, again, utterly irrational patent absurdity which is explicitly refuted by Our Lord and Savior in the Gospels.

We laymen, the sheep, are to listen and discern. If we hear the voice of satan and follow it, we will answer for it as we stand alone, as individuals, before Jesus Christ at our particular judgments. Blaming the hirelings will be no defense.  It is abundantly clear by now that to follow the heretical, blasphemous Bergoglio is to turn away from the sweet voice of Our Savior, and instead to follow a wolf.

It is also very instructive at this point to revisit Galatians Chapter 1.  St. Paul could have put this caution in no stronger terms.  It speaks for itself:

But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach a gospel to you besides that which we have preached to you, let him be anathema. As we said before, so now I say again: If any one preach to you a gospel, besides that which you have received, let him be anathema.
-Galatians 1: 8-9

Who am I to judge?

WHO DO I HAVE TO BE?

Bergoglio’s Mental Fitness

The notion that Bergoglio is “non compos mentis” is a fantasy.  He contradicts himself because in his evil, warped mind, contradiction is not only non-problematic, it is a valuable tactic to deceive, confuse, obscure and provide so-called “plausible deniability”.  Bergoglio has stated openly that he wants chaos, he seeks and encourages chaos.  Contradiction is a key element of chaos.

Bergoglio says he doesn’t remember things when asked specific questions.  In terms of questions asked about his documents, he genuinely does NOT remember specifics of the text because HE DID NOT WRITE THE TEXTS.  He farmed them out to ghostwriters whom are co-conspirators in his evil ideology.  Bergoglio has little-to-no familiarity with the footnotes in Amoris Laetitia.  At other times he claims to not remember things because he is a liar.  It really is that simple.  This man has been at war with Jesus Christ and His Holy Church for decades.  To blame his actions on senility or a degenerative brain disease is simply pious fantasy, and not realistic.

What This Means In Practical Terms

First and foremost: Masses in which an antipope is commemorated in the Canon by the priest offering the Holy Sacrifice IS A VALID MASS.  The Eucharist is confected, the Holy Sacrifice is offered.   

Further, I have been assured in the strongest possible terms that for me to receive Holy Communion in a Mass in which I know that Bergoglio has been commemorated as Pope is NOT an act of hypocrisy on my part. I know that the Mass is valid.  I know that the Eucharist was confected. I know that Our Lord is desirous to come to me and I to Him in the Sacrament of the Altar, provided I am in a state of grace.

If my position on Bergoglio is correct, which I obviously believe that it is, what this means is that the commemoration of him as Pope in the Canon is either ILLICIT, or MISTAKEN.  We have a clear historical precedent for this.  During the Great Western Schism, due purely to political intrigue and NOT any questions of heresy, there were three men simultaneously claiming to be pope.  One of these men was the True Pope, and the other two were antipopes.  These antipopes were not blaspheming heretics like Bergoglio.  Again, the entire situation was due purely to POLITICAL INTRIGUE.  And so, two giants of the Church – both saints and one a Doctor of the Church, backed different “popes”.  What this means is that one of these saints was wrong, and one was right.  Who was the saint that backed the True Pope?  It was St. Catherine of Siena, Doctor of the Church, and laywoman. Did you know that St. Catherine was NOT a professed nun?  She was a Dominican tertiary (third order) who was given permission to wear the Dominican habit.  She was a laywoman.

And who was the saint, one of the true intellectual giants of the Church, who was wrong and backed an antipope?  It was St. Vincent Ferrer, who was a priest, and thus offered the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass many, many times having commemorated an antipope in the Canon.

Here is an interesting precision: St. Vincent Ferrer’s commemoration of an antipope is not even called “illicit” – it is called “mistaken”.

In terms of this situation, I strongly suspect that the standard will be much higher.  Bergoglio is a flagrant blaspheming heretic.  St. Vincent Ferrer did not back a blaspheming heretic – he backed a man involved in political intrigue so convoluted that it was extremely difficult to tell who was the True Pope.  All of the information outlined in the sections above has been widely reported and is available to almost every priest on the planet via the internet – oftentimes through a smartphone that almost every priest on earth carries on his physical person. Further, there is a video record of many of Bergoglio’s heresies. I suspect that illicaity is far more in play than mistakenness in these dark days.

Rebuttals

I already know too well what the responses to this will be, so I will answer them immediately to save us all time.

First:  Ann Barnhardt is a cuckoo-pants conspiracy theorist who has finally “gone sedevacantist and left the Church”

I respond: I believe that Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger is still the Roman Pontiff and thus the See of Peter is occupied and has been all along, and I am still very much in the Church, and went to Mass and received Holy Communion this morning from a priest in a community 100% in unity with the See of Peter. Antipope Bergoglio was commemorated in the Canon, and I know this not because I could hear it (obviously – the Canon is said silently in the Venerable Gregorian Rite), but because I have specifically discussed this with the priest who offered the Sacrifice, and I know his position vis-a-vis Bergoglio as of 24 hours previous.

Further, the accusation of mental instability or a detachment from reality with regards to me is something I am by now used to – from the very closest of associates all the way down to the saddest of internet combox trolls, and I offer it to Our Lord, carrying His Cross to Calvary, bearing the scoffs and affronts, reproaches and calumnies that He suffered.  If I am wrong, please God let me be corrected.  If I am right, thank God for consoling me with the truth.

Also please remember that it is a frankly brilliant “chess strategy” that satan has set up and executed in forcing people who call out actual, genuine “conspiracies”, hidden crimes and societal abnormalities to be instantly lumped in with the truly mentally impaired people who believe in such things as chemtrails, shape-shifting lizard-Jews, underground civilizations and pretty much every other plot device from Star Trek: The Next Generation. I know I will be lumped in with these people, and view it as, to continue the chess analogy, sacrificing a pawn, knight or bishop in order to liberate the queen.  So be it.

Second: “No one else is following you. No one else is saying this, most especially no one with any authority.”

I respond: Truth is not a democracy or a popularity contest.  Either Bergoglio is the Pope or he is not.  My thoughts on this do not determine Bergoglio’s status.  All I am doing is conforming my rational intellect to the truth.  If Bergoglio is not the Pope today, then he never was.  Bergoglio did not “cease being the pope” when my rational intellect definitively apprehended that he was an Antipope.  And the same goes for everyone else.  If Bergoglio is Antipope, even if the entire human race now alive on earth unanimously says that he is the Pope – that does not matter.  The ontological reality is outside of the human mind – no matter how many minds may believe in a certain proposition. And in this case, we are talking about a supernatural reality.

Third: “You are going to suffer adverse consequences for this.”

I respond: Fiat mihi secundum verbum tuum. Be it done to me according to Thy word.

“Ann, your donations will dry up! You are in a precarious financial position as it is, you cannot risk the total cessation of cash flows!”

Fiat mihi secundum verbum tuum.

“Ann, you will lose most of your audience!  Any good you have been doing in terms of education and edification will be lost because people won’t read you or listen to you any more! You are destroying what credibility you had because no one else is saying or will say that Bergoglio is an antipope publicly!”

Fiat mihi secundum verbum tuum.

“Ann, you are going to lose friends over this!”

Fiat mihi secundum verbum tuum.

“Ann, you are going to lose revenue-generating business relationships over this!”

Fiat mihi secundum verbum tuum.

“Ann, you might have to move again, as no one will want you in their parish! You’re poison!”

Fiat mihi secundum verbum tuum.

And so, in the hopes that this will help the countless people who are now, and will be in the future scandalized by Antipope Bergoglio, who look at the evidence and simply cannot explain how it is that his heresies and blasphemies can possibly reconcile to the supernatural reality of the See of Peter, I offer the simple answer that explains every question and clarifies every confusion, and eliminates every scandal:

Jorge Bergoglio is not now and never has been The Vicar of Jesus Christ on Earth.  Jorge Bergoglio is an Antipope, and Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger is the true and only Roman Pontiff alive today, and will remain so until his death, or his valid resignation.

I will conclude with today’s Communion Verse, the Fifth Sunday After Pentecost, Psalm 26: 4:

“One thing I have asked of the Lord, this will I seek after; that I may dwell in the house of the Lord all the days of my life.”

St. Athanasius, pray for us.
St. Catherine of Siena, pray for us.
St. Vincent Ferrer, pray for us.

Ann Barnhardt
19 June, ARSH 2016

 

 

 

Repost By Request: How A Sane, Virile Leader or Leaders Would Handle the Musloid Problem

THIS is how the musloid problem should be faced and solved.  It isn’t difficult.

1.  Formally declare islam a POLITICAL SYSTEM, and in no way a religion or falling under any religious protections whatsoever.

2.  Criminalize islam in every form.

3.  Formally recognize the islamic caliphate as a political entity. Define as Islamic Suzerainty ANY NATION that tolerates its existence or engages in any diplomatic negotiations or dialogue with any part of the Caliphate as defined above.

4.  Declare war on the islamic caliphate and all of its Suzerainties.

5.  Nuke Mecca and Medina to glass after generously, mercifully giving a 24 hour evacuation notice.

6.  Seize and physically destroy every mosque in the homeland.

7.  Arrest, intern and deport every musloid.  Cancel the citizenship of those with citizenship.  This was done with American citizens who were members of the German American Bund (American Nazi Party) during WWII.  And yes, you’re damn right it was the morally correct thing to do.  Read up HERE.)

8.  Establish a quarantine on all majority islamic nations, shoot down all aircraft attempting to leave the airspace, excepting deportation aircraft returning for the next load of garbage.  Intercept and tow back to port of origin all ships and boats attempting to leave any port.  Build walls on all land borders with every inch within range of .50 cal sentry guns.

9.  Send in the missionaries.  Consecrate all formerly islamic lands to Jesus Christ the Sovereign King.  Preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ.  Offer the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.  Pray the Divine Office.  Baptize every human being that asks for it.  The rest will take care of itself.

Agree or disagree on any of the above points, but understand that the gist of the solution is the following:

Stop the spread.
Contain them where they are.
Use the only thing they understand – PHYSICAL FORCE AND STRENGTH.
Aggressively proselytize.
Fully acknowledge that even a converted musloid, like a domesticated wild animal, will be dangerous for the rest of his life and can never be fully trusted.

Ann Barnhardt
11 December ARSH 2015
Feast of St. Damasus

Reaffirmed
15 June ARSH 2016
Feast of St. Germaine Cousin

Jihadist Was A Fag! Also, Water Wet! Sun Rises in East!

Ready to listen now?  Ready to grapple with the hideous reality of the situation? Because I’m ready to explain the whole islam and faggotry thing, if you’re ready to listen.

First, here is my presentation from ARSH 2011, “Islamic Sexuality: A Survey of Evil”, in which I describe in sick, sordid detail how the islamic culture is just one big hairball of sexual perversion – most especially the fact that most of the men are FAGGOTS.

As with my Diabolical Narcissism video, you would be doing the world a solid if you copied and mirrored this.  The more versions there are, the harder it is to censor. THERE IS NO COPYRIGHT CONCERN ON ANY OF MY VIDEOS.  And YouTube scrubbed the original from my channel YEARS ago.

As I suspected from the very, very beginning, and alluded to in the “When Bad People Get Murdered By Other Bad People…” post, Orlando Jihad Boy was a stone-cold fag.

How did I know? What were my clues?

Well, he was a musloid.  So that’s numero uno.

Second, he was Afghani.  So, the assumption is that not only was he a fag, but so is his daddy, who probably raped his own son throughout his childhood. Boy rape and adult faggotry is NORMATIVE in Afghani culture.  I cover Bacha Bazi (boy sex auctions – as popular in Afghanistan as NFL Football is in the former U.S.) in the video above at length.

So let’s take what we have learned so far about Diabolical Narcissism and tie everything about Orlando together, because only when understood in light of Diabolical Narcissism does any of it make sense – and then it all makes PERFECT sense.

First, islam is the most effective system on earth, even surpassing Communism and the other Marxist milieus, for creating Diabolical Narcissists.  Islam, being a satanic political system masquerading as a religion, with the driving force behind it (N.P.I.) being supernatural – that is, satan and the demons – exists to make human beings into DNs. Islam’s primary function is to purge all love from the hearts of those under its jackboot, making them into loveless automatons, mercenaries of hell capable of only anger, hatred, jealousy and fear.  Islamic culture is the quintessence of the Alpha-Beta dynamic, with a micro-oligarchy above (imams and recently super-rich oil sheiks), and a MASSIVE Beta underclass below.  As a DIRECT COROLLARY, islamic culture is THE MOST SEXUALLY PERVERTED CULTURE on the planet.  The men are all fags, pedophiles, goat humpers, dead body humpers, and transvestites.  Faggotry is EVERYWHERE.  I posted a quote I heard recently: “I’ve never met a gay Arab – but I’ve never met a straight one either.” It’s funny because it’s TRUE.

Just ask anyone who has served a tour of duty anywhere in the musloid world.  They will tell you the same thing:  THEY’RE ALL FAGS.  In Iraq, MPs complained about the number one challenge in the detention facilities being KEEPING THE MALE INMATES OFF OF EACH OTHER.  In Afghanistan, our Boys in Uniform are being driven into PTSD and suicide because they are ordered to TURN A BLIND EYE TO CHILD RAPE.  How many of our servicemen have walked up on one of their Afghani “allies” ass-raping a little boy, and then been ordered to ignore it, and then just a few minutes later have to “train” and “mentor” the very man they just saw ASS RAPING A LITTLE BOY?

You want to know why these guys come home psycho-spiritually cacked, and eventually blow their own brains out?  It’s because of the soul-crushing, despair-inducing scandal of that – not combat trauma.

And this applies to the female population too.  Most of the women have had clitorectomies, AND were sexually abused as children.  Remember, sexual perversion is derivative of Diabolical Narcissism, so most sex perverts will abuse both sexes if given the chance.  So, the females become DN too as a result of the sex abuse, and as will be the topic of an upcoming essay, because women are literally built by God to love, when a woman goes DN, the results are often even more cruel and more vicious than a DN man – which is saying something indeed.  Have you noticed how most suicide bombings involve a woman – usually the MOTHER – egging her own child on into committing murder-suicide?  Have you not noticed how most of these “honor killings” are egged on, if not explicitly ordered by a woman, again, usually the mother of the victim? Do you realize that it is the mother who holds down the daughter to have her clitoris cut off with a razor blade?  Yeah. When women go DN, it is the worst.

So, now to the confusion and hand-wringing over Orlando Jihadfag “killing his own”.  Yeah.  They all do this.  We see the near-daily reports of ISIS and other musloids throwing fags off of buildings and the like.  Well, sure.  It’s exactly like the Nazis.  The high-level Nazis, including Mr. Hitler himself, were all super-pervy fags.  They were into drag, boys (what do you think the Hitler Youth was about?) and Hitler himself was into perverse sex acts involving bodily waste.  The origins of the Nazi Party and the SA especially, were in the homosexual underworld.  If you haven’t read “The Pink Swastika” , do so now.

Fags hate fags.  Fags kill fags. What do you expect?  As we have already learned, sexual perversion is derivative of Diabolical Narcissism.  DNs are capable, by their own free choice, of only anger, hatred, jealousy and fear.  As we pinned down in the post about Hell and the Damned, the damned hate each other, most especially those that cooperated, enabled or didn’t warn them about their sin.  So, as we discussed, those guilty of sexual sins, if they end up damned, will spend eternity in close proximity to those that they engaged in those sins with, and will hate them for eternally for it.

Look folks, these sodomite sex clubs like Pulse aren’t pubs where people go to hang and and talk.  These places exist and are designed to facilitate and enable SODOMITICAL SEX ACTS.  Orlando Jihadfag was a regular at this place.  He had probably had sex with some of the other sodomites that were there that night.  Like I said, it was an image of hell on earth – the damned hating the damned, the people who cooperated in their sin.  Anger. Hatred. And Fear.  Fear that they could expose him.  Of course he hated them and wanted to kill them.  Of course ISIS throws fags off of buildings.  Of course the Nazis killed Ernst Rohm and the SA on The Night of the Long Knives in ’34, and of course they rounded up fags and sent them to the camps.  OF COURSE THEY DID.  What else would you expect?  What part of “hearts utterly devoid of love” are we not understanding?

Remember, a hallmark trait of DNs, and a pillar of islam, is LYING.  Mendacity.  In islam it is called “taqiyyah”.  Lying is specifically ratified “so long as it is in service to a goal”.  Well, isn’t it always?  The koran calls “allah” not just a deceiver, but THE BEST AND GREATEST DECEIVER. Over and over and over again.  As an aside, whenever any dumbass heretical priest or bishop blasphemes about allah being “the same God we worship”, the fact that the Catholic Church teaches as infallible dogma that God can neither deceive nor be deceived should be rubbed in their faces until they either shut up or repent of their blasphemy.  The father of lies is satan.

The reason I bring this up is HYPOCRISY.  Yes, this whole dynamic with regards to islam and fags is about as hypocritical as it gets.  And hypocrisy is a subset of MENDACITY, or lying, as St. Thomas teaches in the Summa.  DNs lie. DNs are hypocrites on a sometimes hard-to-believe scale. Islam is the purest transmission vector on earth of Diabolical Narcissism. And almost 100% of faggots are DNs.  Thus, hypocrisy should be expected and anticipated.  Being surprised or thrown by it, especially in this context, is just inexcusable at this late stage in the game.

Finally, if you have watched the DN Video, can you determine what kind of Narcissist Orlando Jihadfag was? Somatic or Cerebral?

SOMATIC.  Somatic narcissist adult men TAKE SELFIES.  And, Orlando Jihadfag was also a user of steroids – CLASSIC somatic narcissist behavior.

Not only is this stuff EASY to understand, it is highly predictable – IF one understands and acknowledges the OVERARCHING GLOBAL PATHOLOGY: DIABOLICAL NARCISSISM, of which islam is THE most perfected transmission vector.