Why Even Cardinal Burke Is Unsound….

Cardinal Burke, despite his efforts, is also fundamentally unsound on the question of people who are “divorced and remarried” publicly receiving Holy Communion so long as they are living in continence, that is, not having sexual relations with each other.

Sorry, but no.  Here is the truth of how this situation worked before the infiltration and attack on The Church concurrent with the failed Second Vatican Council.

When two people who were civilly remarried after a civil divorce reverted to Catholicism and could not separate (generally due to having minor children), and necessarily stopped having sex with each other because they fully acknowledged the truth that they were NOT married to each other and that any conjugal contact would be mortally sinful, even then, these people would NEVER receive Holy Communion publicly, or if they did, it would be in a parish very far away where they were totally unknown.

Think about it.  Everyone assumes that married couples have sex with each other.  Do we honestly believe that The Church would want people to PUBLICLY ANNOUNCE AND ADVERTISE their sexual activity (or lack thereof)? Of course not.  So, what Cardinal Burke is advocating is for people who are “living as brother and sister” to do by receiving Holy Communion publicly is either:

A.) Continue to scandalize the faithful who justly assume that all “married” couples have sex with each other, OR

B.) Require the “married” couple to publicly announce on a continual basis that they are not having sex.

This is insane.

There should be NO PUBLIC RECEPTION OF HOLY COMMUNION by people who are living as a married couple with anyone other than their true spouse. Period. The concession of permitting people to continue to cohabit in continence for the sake of rearing children is already a massive, massive concession.  But there is simply no way that such “brother-and-sister” couples can receive Holy Communion publicly, or in a parish in which they are known, because scandal is the byproduct either way, either by the just assumption of the community of the couple’s sexual activity, OR the couples’ persistent public discussion of their sex life, which is a scandal unto itself.

Nope.  Sorry.  This whole discussion is actually built on a false premise to begin with.  Even Cardinal Burke is unsound, which really isn’t surprising, considering that he believes that the failed Second Vatican Council is anything other than the satanic dumpster fire that it so obviously is. The logical progression is simple, PLUS we have the tradition of The Church and the clear historical precedent for dealing with these situations right in front of us.  And yet, even one of the “greatest minds” in the Church today discards both in favor of an illogical and unprecedented non-solution solution.

Oh, and he also thinks Bergoglio is the pope.  Or, at least that is what he says in public.  That is another clue.

Man, if I were a reporter and I could interview Cardinal Burke, I’d put this fairly simple logical corollary to him and not let him weasel his way out of it. Enough of this effeminate “third way” crap. Enough.

Benefactor Masses: Now Up to THREE per Week!!

A quick bit of very good news:  We are now up to THREE Benefactor Masses per week.  They are on

MONDAY

TUESDAY

and

WEDNESDAY.

Talk about starting the week off right!

If any other priests would like to commit to commemorating “Ann’s Benefactors and Supporters” on Thursday, Friday, Saturday or Sunday, let me know!  Either the Venerable Gregorian Rite (Tridentine Mass) OR Divine Liturgy would be fine.  And as always, the rules for “Ann’s Benefactors and Supporters” is once you are on the list, you are on the list forever, even if you decide that you hate me.  And God is the keeper of the list, so it is error-free and 100% secure.  The prayer is for the Salvation of your souls first and foremost, and for your intentions generally.

I would say, “I wish I could do more,” but I don’t want to play-down the enormousness and the movement of grace that comes from having The Holy Sacrifice offered for you while you are yet alive.  The saints and doctors agree that the multiplier relative to Masses offered for the repose of the souls of the dead is substantial. And that stands to reason, if you think about it.  Here is an excellent quote I came across from a Dominican priest:
Father Cole OP writes, “While it is important to keep in mind that Masses for the deceased do help them, one Mass offered for anyone living will have a greater efficacy for that person because in this life all are capable of freely cooperating with any grace and the graces of a Mass may even change the direction of someone’s life including one’s own. However, it may be that a particular grace of a Mass is not accepted for many years which is why one must take a long term view of supplications for loved ones still on earth. Even more, one needs to take an even longer term perspective when praying for the poor souls because we do not see what we are doing to help them. We only know by faith that we are helping them.”

So, once again, thank you for your continued munificence, and remember, Mondays, Tuesdays and Wednesdays are all now days in which the Holy Sacrifice of Calvary is offered for you.

IMG_0016

 

A Parable About a Taco Bell

(Sorry for the dearth of posts. There was some Christmastide travel, guests visiting, and now, the annual post-Christmas chest cold. Yuck!)

When I was a kid, we had two Mexican fast-food joints: Taco Grande and Taco John’s.  Then, when I was about ten, Taco Bell came to town and built from a dirt-start a brand new Taco Bell on a formerly empty lot.  I never liked Taco Bell, and never ate there.  I preferred Taco John’s.

Fast-forward 12-15 years.  I am now in my early 20s, have been gone from the Kansas City area for many years, and have given exactly zero thought to the hometown Taco Bell.  I get a call from someone back in the ancestral homeland who tells me, “Hey, they razed the Taco Bell.”

“What happened? Did it burn?”  After all, why would they raze a building that was less than 15 years old?  Surely there must have been a fire, and razing the remains was the cheapest option, right?

Wrong.

It turned out that inspectors had discovered that the building was so filthy and thus so overrun with cockroaches that even intense treatments from professional fumigation and pest-control firms were ineffective in clearing the building of cockroaches.  So, the only path forward was to raze the building, haul away the cockroach-infested debris, apply pesticide to the pad and surrounding area, and build a brand new building.

Folks, this is what is going to have to happen in Rome.  Because people have failed to take any meaningful steps against the infiltration of faggots into The Church, and especially in Rome itself, Rome is now like the Taco Bell – the only way to clear Rome of the faggots is to destroy Rome.  And I mean physically.

The faggots are absolutely everywhere in Rome, and as much as it pains me to say it, some of the worst, most spectacularly evil, most notorious, sacrilegious, and most enthusiastic of them are on the so-called “right” or “conservative” or “traditional” side of the spectrum.  And it makes sense.  Where can satan still do the most damage? Where does it benefit satan to hide at this late hour? Amongst the Remnant Church.  As long as they remain hidden, like the filthy cockroaches they are, they can continue to privately scandalize, subvert and sabotage.  If they are publicly exposed, the resulting scandal will cause even more people to either leave The Church (usually for Eastern Orthodoxy or sedevacantist cults) or to lose their faith entirely. Either way, satan wins.

Fifty years of looking the other way, not saying anything, treating homosexuality as a joke or a novelty, when it is, in fact, a never-sufficiently-execrated depravity and a capital crime, and specifically in Rome, where faggots are literally meeting up for sacrilegious sodomy INSIDE ST. PETER’S BASILICA, and then turning around and serving the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass or Divine Liturgy a few hours later across town, now the cockroaches are coming home to roost. It is too late get rid of them one-by-one, because they saturate the structure.

If you do your duty and keep the structure clean, you won’t get cockroaches.  If you aggressively attack and exterminate cockroaches at their first appearance, you have a chance to save the structure.  If you pretend not to see them, laugh them off, or even call them “cute” and “harmless”, or worst of all say, “That isn’t a cockroach!  That is a fluffy little bunny! How dare you say that sweet, innocent, fluffy little bunny is a cockroach!”, they will eventually necessitate the complete demolition of the structure.

"Those aren't roaches! They're fluffy bunnies that talk funny and act like girls because they are so intelligent and misunderstood!"

“Those aren’t roaches! They’re fluffy bunnies that talk funny and act like girls because they are so intelligent and misunderstood!”

And only after the complete destruction of the structure will rebuilding be possible. And that is where we are.  We have failed spectacularly to keep the Church clean, and when the first signs came, we denied there was a problem.  Now, God will do what we refused to do.

The aching tragedy in all of this is that a Taco Bell can be thrown back up in a matter of weeks.  The Sistine Chapel and the rest of the artistic, cultural and ecclesial patrimony of Rome can never be replaced.  But, as we all heard when we were children, “THIS is why we can’t have nice things – because you won’t take care of them.” Indeed.  The chastisement is coming, and it is for all of us, because we have all been complicit in our silence and negligence.  In The House of The Lord, EVERYONE is responsible for helping to keep things clean.

 

Mailbag: A Heterosexual (aka NORMAL) Celibate Priest Weighs In

Dear Ann,

A blessed and merry Christmas to you.

Thank you for your blog posts and videos, many of which I have found very helpful in understanding the current insanity in the Church and the world. I am particularly thankful for your recent posts on clerical celibacy and continence.

In the novus ordo Church, even before Pope Frankenstein the Merciful, there is a common notion that allowing a priest to be laicized, so he can marry a woman, is a merciful concession to human weakness.

BULL-.

I am a priest, and I am strongly attracted to women. I can understand the idea that allowing a priest to continue in his ministry after he has fallen into sexual sin (and therefore also sacrilege) with a woman and repented is a merciful concession to human weakness. By the grace of God I have never fallen into such sin as a priest, but I can easily understand how it’s possible.

Laicization and marriage is completely different. Repentance, and therefore true mercy, which requires repentance to be effective, is totally absent. In its place is substituted the cleaning up of a canonically irregular situation. A priest violates his grave obligation of continence by getting it on with a woman, and possibly also violates his obligation of celibacy by invalidly attempting civil marriage with her; and the response of the ecclesiastical authorities is to dispense him from his obligations and allow him to marry her validly in the Church.

Um, no. That doesn’t help. It actually hurts. A lot.

Although it may mean his future copulation with his wife isn’t mortally sinful, it does nothing to purge him of the guilt of his previous mortal sins of fornication, sacrilege, and abandoning his priestly ministry. On the contrary, by receiving a nice signed and sealed rescript from Rome, he is encouraged to believe that he has done the right thing, and is now “right with the Church.” Of course that’s not true. As alter Christus, he was espoused to the Bride of Christ, and has now abandoned Her for some trull that he found more to his liking. His repentance now will almost require a miracle. He will very probably burn in Hell for all eternity, with the blessing of his bishop and the Pope. And how they will avoid burning in Hell for helping him get there, I don’t know.

My moral theology professor in seminary, Fr. Romanus Cessario, O.P., told us that “A priest who leaves for a woman is the scum of the earth.” I see more and more how right he was. Such priests–and they are many–simply declare that they love copulation more than they love God and His Mother. God have mercy on them.

The painful irony, so typical of the post-conciliar Church, is that Fr. Cessario, an excellent teacher of unimpeachable orthodoxy, is also a close friend of the very politically connected woman whose daughter’s scandalous marriage to a priest you recently referred to.

I wish I could draw some pithy conclusion from this, but I can’t, so I’m going to have a beer, read some P.G. Wodehouse, and go to bed. May God bless you and your work. And may He have mercy on His poor Church.

Signed,

Father

A Heartfelt Thanks and Warmest Christmas Wishes

I know that I don’t do enough, and don’t write enough here.  But, as so many people say, “reading Barnhardt generally makes me want to go hang myself.” Yes, I know. If it makes you feel that bad reading it, try to imagine how it feels to write it.  The past two years, especially, have been one staggering, soul-killing scandal and disappointment after another, seasoned liberally with natural disaster. I wish I could say that I see a turnaround coming – I know many of you believe that this Trump situation is just that.  I’m sorry that I can’t join in the sentiment.  I think ARSH 2017 is going to be a year in which God’s wrath is unleashed, and the angel’s cry of “Penence! Penance! Penance!” Will ring out over the earth.  So, please, enjoy this Christmas. Savor the little things.

One thing that I was thinking that I would like to do for my benefactors and supporters (y’all), if possible, is increase the number of Masses that are said for them.  Right now, we are at one Mass per week.  If I could find six more priests who celebrate either the Traditional Roman Rite OR the Divine Liturgy  and would be willing to commemorate my benefactors and supporters one day per week, we could have The Holy Sacrifice of Calvary offered for your intentions and the salvation of your souls EVERY DAY.  Any priests who might be interested, please drop me an email.

Please be assured of my daily prayers for you, such as they are, both in the Rosary and at Mass, specifically at the elevation of The Host, as the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Our Lord Jesus Christ is eternally offered to The Father, with the deepest gratitude for your consistent munificence.  I will try to continue writing and posting things that help in clarifying current events, and sounding the warning on the dangers – of which there are a seemingly inexhaustible supply – bearing down on us.  The point of this website was and is, hopefully, just to help.  The fact that it keeps me fed and watered, and with a roof over my head, and a source of heat, and an internet connection, is not and was never my intention.  It just worked out that way, whether I like it or not. Be assured that in the deep recesses of my ethnically German-Protestant soul, I consider myself, at least partially, a fraud, my living at least partially dishonest, and expect that I will answer for this at my judgment.  Are these the pangs of genuine conscience, or satan trying to get me to shut up?  I doubt I will ever know the answer, firmly, in this life.  But I know I’ll find out at my Particular Judgment.

So, please, please have a Merry Christmas.  Try to help the people around you have a Merry Christmas, too.

Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace to men of goodwill.

The Nativity of Christ, Matteo Rosselli, ARSH 1620, Church of Saints Michael and Cajetan, Florence, early 1600s.

The Nativity of Christ, Matteo Rosselli, early 1600s, Church of Saints Michael and Cajetan, Florence.

 

Diabolical Narcissism in Film: SCROOGE (ARSH 1951)

The best film version of Dickens’ “A Christmas Carol” is the version made in ARSH 1951 starring Alastair Sim as everyone’s favorite Diabolical Narcissist usurious Jew, Ebeneezer Scrooge.

The Scrooge character is a classic DN.  He is a cerebral narcissist – highly successful in his profession, a miser, caring for nothing but “his work”, sitting alone in his room every night, lovelessly single, devoid of human empathy, haughty, critical and disdainful of everyone and everything, looking down on and actively resentful of normal, loving people – embodied by his clark, whom he psychologically abuses, Bob Cratchit, and his family. Love, joy, gratitude and generosity disgust and enrage Scrooge. He hates occasions of happiness, and actively seeks to disrupt and destroy them, especially holidays.  The people around him walk on eggshells to his face – but either pity or dislike him behind his back.  In the “Ghost of Christmas Future” act, Scrooge is genuinely surprised to discover that almost everyone is glad that he is dead – the exception being Bob Cratchit himself, the most direct recipient of Scrooge’s abuse.  Bob Cratchit is thus a metaphor for Christ.

The reason why “A Christmas Carol” is so compelling is because the healing of Scrooge from Diabolical Narcissism is, basically, a miracle.  We love to watch the story unfold because it is such a beautiful and hopeful story.  And so rare.  And, you do realize that the implication at the end is that because of the Christian Cratchet family, Scrooge converts to Christianity, right? “And it was always said that he knew how to keep Christmas well….”

But, what I want to show you is the scene in which Scrooge becomes a Diabolical Narcissist.  It is very clearly depicted in the “Ghost of Christmas Past” act.  Up until that point, Scrooge has revisited his pre-DN youth, although it is revealed that Ebeneezer’s father was cruel towards him because he blamed him for the death of Ebeneezer’s mother.  Ebeneezer had a beautiful girlfriend, Alice, to whom he even gave a ring, declaring, “Oh dearest Alice! If ever I have a change of heart towards you, it will be because my heart has ceased to beat!”  Well – sort of, as it turned out.

Ebeneezer makes the conscious decision to purge all love from his heart upon the death, in childbirth, of his sister Fan.  At her death bed, after she loses consciousness, Scrooge rises and as he is walking away, Fan’s newborn son cries out from his crib.  Scrooge stops, looks at the child with rage in his heart, and in that moment – and you can see it clearly – makes the conscious decision to NEVER LOVE ANYONE OR ANYTHING EVER AGAIN.

And that’s it.

The interesting thing about Scrooge is that he chose Diabolical Narcissism when he was in his 20’s.  The older a person is when they descend, the “easier” it is to come out of Diabolical Narcissism.  But it is still a miracle.  For those poor souls who descended into DN as children, the odds against them are heavily stacked.  But even then, children who descended into DN due to abuse (usually sexual abuse), at least have the ability to recognize the damage that was done to them, and that they were a pure victim of.  The DNs that are the most deeply ingrained, and most profoundly loveless, and for whom miraculous, supernatural intervention is required, are the DNs that were not abused in the conventional sense, but rather deified as children, and thus chose to purge themselves of love in order to “live up” to the hype of their own superiority and “otherness” fed to them by their parents and/or teachers.

Sit in stillness with that.  Do you realize that our entire education system and youth culture revolves around the deification of the child, and has for decades now?  And THAT is the toughest genesis of Diabolical Narcissism to break.

Anyway, here is “Scrooge”, perfect viewing on Christmas Eve night, before heading out to Midnight Mass. The deathbed scene begins at 32:22.  The exact moment when Scrooge becomes a DN is at 33:40. In that moment he says internally, “That’s it. I will not love.” And the ensuing decades are needless tragedy and waste….

Prayers Answered: Feedback on Priestly Celibacy

My prayer today before the Blessed Sacrament was that more convert priests who are married learn about and move toward sexual continence.

Prayer answered. Read on. Bold emphases mine.

Ann,
BLUF (Bottom line up front): I am in complete agreement, and am enormously grateful for the witness given by my brother convert priest.

Coming into the Church, clerical continence was not something mentioned, even once, in our formation. The dispensation from clerical celibacy, authorized only by the hand of the Holy Father himself (Pope Benedict XVI for so many of us, including me), was all that our leadership addressed.

More than a year after my ordination to the priesthood, I ran across the very serious discussion regarding this particular question, and I have been firmly convicted about continence since that time. I do not think one can argue against it theologically with any intellectual integrity. Canonical arguments, however, abound. I have asked two vicars-general (one of whom is a professor of canon law) and a judicial vicar (also a professor) about this particular question. The two responses that I have received have been: 1) do not worry about it unless your leadership worries about it, and 2) unless a canon directly and explicitly revokes a right already held (in this case, the conjugal rights of husband and wife), then such rights are not revoked, even by entry into the clerical state. I know many who would agree whole-heartedly with these responses. I also know many, lay and cleric, who advocate for adopting the Eastern discipline. Some even go so far as to the slippery-slope that your article explicates. It’s a terrifying thought, to be honest.

The first time I mentioned becoming Catholic to my wife was months after I’d been praying, reading, thinking, and discussing it with older men whom I respected, both Catholic and non-Catholic. I did not know what her response would be, though. When I told her that, “I think God is leading us to become Catholic,” her response was, “I’m thinking the same thing.” I viewed it as a work of confirmation though the Holy Spirit. […personal information redacted…]

Corporately, I pray that our leaders will finally address it at some point, as I am not the only one who has brought it up. Because my wife and I have not come to a joint decision in this regard, I’ve received derogatory comments from some “traditional” Catholics. That, I will admit, has bothered me a bit, since I’ve also been accused by others of trying to turn back the clock on the Church, since I, like so many other adult convert priests, am very traditional in the way I approach the One True Faith. I’ve even been accused twice of mixing liturgical rites just for offering the Novus Ordo Mass ad orientem. I am required to offer the Novus Ordo, based on my current assignment. After I complete my service in this arena, though, I have already stated an intention to never offer the Novus Ordo again, but to offer the Traditional Rite and that appropriate to my own diocese. Before I had even contemplated Catholicism, a Catholic priest whom I considered a good friend referred to me as a Nicene Christian, in that I believe what Christians have historically believed since before they started to split into different groups. Christ prayed for our unity, but that unity must be based in the Truth that He brought to us. Unfortunately, since crossing the Tiber, that priest and I have not spoken much, as it turns out that he is quite theologically and liturgically liberal.

Thus, I ask for prayer for my wife and I, and for all my brother married clergy and their wives. May we all come to give this same unified witness to the faith and the reality of the priesthood.

Signed,
Fr.

Be assured of our prayers.

St. Henry II, Holy Roman Emperor, pray for us.

Starting Wednesday Off Right: Stop Doubting and Believe Edition

Our Father, Who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy Name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Amen.

PATER NOSTER, qui es in caelis, sanctificetur nomen tuum. Adveniat regnum tuum. Fiat voluntas tua, sicut in caelo et in terra. Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie, et dimitte nobis debita nostra sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. Et ne nos inducas in tentationem, sed libera nos a malo. Amen.

Incredulity of St. Thomas, detail. ARSH 1602. Caravaggio

Incredulity of St. Thomas, detail. Caravaggio. ARSH 1602.

“My Lord and My God!”
John 20: 28

Antipope Bergoglio’s Next Angle of Attack: Priestly Celibacy

A while back I received an email from a priest who converted to Catholicism as a Protestant clergyman, and was thus ordained a Catholic priest. This priest was married, and thus is now one of the “married priests” in The Church.

I won’t republish the email, because it is too personal, and could give away this particular priest’s identity, but I will state the gist of it in broad strokes.

After reading my essay on Why Priests Can Only Ever Be Men, and learning of the nuptial aspect of the Mass, the Eucharist and the Priesthood itself, and after showing it to his wife, the priest and his wife decided together that they should live in continence – that is, they should cease conjugal relations.  Folks, odds are that most of the Apostles were married.  We know St. John was NOT married.  We KNOW that St. Peter was either married or a widower – because the house of Peter’s mother-in-law is the scene of events recorded in the Gospels.  Common sense tells us that at least some of the other Apostles were probably married.  What I can tell you is that when these men were ordained priests and bishops by Our Lord Jesus Christ, they stopped having conjugal relations with their wives.  The espousal to Christ and His Holy Church, and the nuptial nature of the Eucharist Itself almost by definition implies this.

I bring this up because the next item on the agenda for the demonic wretch Bergoglio and his minions is the destruction of priestly celibacy.  So many look at the situation in the Church with the priesthood being so widely infected by filthy, disgusting, sacregilious sodomites and say, “Good! If priests can be married, then we’ll drive out all of the fags!”  Um, no.  I realize it is tempting to believe that, but that isn’t how it will play out.

What Antipope Bergoglio will start by doing is reinstating the priestly faculties of laicized priests who kept concubines and some fathered children, were caught in their sleazy, disgusting, sacrilegious double-lives, and were thus drummed out and laicized.  So, men who offered the Holy Sacrifice while literally committing adultery against Jesus Christ and His Church, to whom they were espoused – these sleazebags who should spend the rest of their lives begging God to have mercy on their souls, THESE will be the first in line to be reinstated.  And, let’s not sugarcoat this, many of these priests would “absolve” their concubines.  I don’t know if you remember last year when Antipope Bergoglio sent out his “minions of mercy” to absolve the sins reserved to the Holy See.  Well, one of those exceptionally grave sins is the sin of a priest fornicating with a person (male or female), and then “hearing their confession” and “absolving” their sin against the 6th Commandment, which the confessor and confessee DID TOGETHER.  Oh, no.  No, no, no.  Very, very wicked.  Like, satanic.  And, of course, any such confession is invalid.

These priests are not the sort that anyone except a Freemason hellbent on destroying the Church would want.  I am reminded of the uber-sleazy minor celebrity priest who carried on openly with his trashy, yet politically connected concubine (amongst many others) in Rome, even fathering a child with her, and always tending bar at all of her house parties.  Well, finally actual, believing Catholics had seen enough of this deplorable scandal, assembled a dossier and gave the priest an ultimatum: either come clean or we will publicly expose you, but either way, this stops.

So, the priest called all of his contacts in the media, got himself a job lined up, and then scheduled the wedding.  It was quite an event, the bride wore a designer gown – snow white, of course, because what else would a middle-aged woman who had birthed four children, all to married men, including one by a priest whom she carried on with openly for over a decade, wear?  But wait, it gets so much worse.  This priest and his concubine then joined a wedding gift website service and solicited CASH GIFTS for their wedding, posting pictures of themselves in romantic poses.  But wait, just when you thought the depths of mathematically unquantifiable trashiness had been plumbed, it gets so much worse.  The sacreligious couple ordered custom party favors for their wedding reception – corkscrews (yes, a phallic symbol) with “Love Conquers All” custom inscribed on them in Latin.  Yes, love “conquers all”, in the case of this couple the “conquered all” being Jesus Christ, His Holy Church, and vows made there to, apparently.  BUT WAIT.  I haven’t told you worst part yet.  This sacreligious couple did ALL OF THIS while the priest was still a priest – the laicization didn’t come through until a few days before the wedding – the bride/concubine’s very politically connected mother was dispatched in a frenzy to “get the papers signed” inside of one week of the wedding.  Stop and think about that.  Can these people TRULY have been sorry for what they had done, and their years of mortal sin, if they did all of the things recounted above BEFORE THE PRIEST WAS EVEN LAICIZED? The whole thing is one big F-YOU to Jesus Christ, His Church and the priesthood.  Do you see why Antipope Bergoglio is keen to get these wicked priests, and their gutter-slag wives, back on the altar?

Folks, don’t romanticize this.  These priests who took up with concubines are mostly Diabolical Narcissist sociopaths or psychopaths.  These are bad people, doing exceptionally bad things, to prove that they are an “elite” to whom the rules simply do not apply.  They are THE LAST PEOPLE that The Church needs in these dark, dark days.  Don’t think that just because they are straight, or at minimum bisexual, that they are “good priests”.  They are just as wicked, perverted and demonic as the fags.  In fact, most of these priests are “gay positive”, and will be less than zero help in the mortal combat against the sodomites.

Also, I am reminded of the old saying: “When a man marries his mistress, a vacancy opens in that position.” Won’t it be fun when Antipope Bergoglio’s crop of reinstated married sacreligious fornicator priests start getting divorced?  Hmmmm.  I wonder if they will get their annulments fast-tracked too?

Now, let’s go back to the good priest that I heard from, who has realized what exactly the priesthood is, what the Mass is, and what the Eucharist is, and has, exactly like the Apostles, chosen, along with his wife, to live in continence for the rest of his life.  THESE are the sort of men we need.  THAT is a good and holy priest, a man willing to give up something good for something infinitely better.  THAT is a priest who truly loves Our Lord and His Holy Church, who loves the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass, and loves Our Eucharistic Lord.  And, let us not forget his wife, also a good woman, and a good Catholic, who has chosen the better part.

Consider the chaos (hagan lio!) that will come from this, as poorly catechized priests of shallow faith see the very priests who committed adultery against Our Lord and His Church REWARDED and celebrated by the Antipope. Consider the chaos (hagan lio!) when heterosexual priests start demanding that they be released from their vows of celibacy, “in justice” given the reinstatement of priests who treated their vows of celibacy as a joke, and were “rewarded” with marriage and reinstatement.

Please, don’t fall for the fallacy that any priest that has sex with females is “a good priest”.

What a world that I have to write the previous sentence. Ugh.

Christ, have mercy.

 

PRIESTS: Only You Can Prevent Desecration of The Eucharist – Here’s How

What is Satan playing at?  What is the goal that satan is driving towards with regards to the Bergoglian Antipapacy?

Simply put, satan wants to drag as many men into hell as he possibly can because the only way that satan can “hurt” God is to hurt us, whom God so loves. Furthermore, satan wants to “hurt” God by driving as many men into desecration of the Eucharist as possible.  This is why the Bergoglian Antipapacy has been driving since day one to ratify and encourage people to persist in mortal sin, and also to receive Holy Communion in mortal sin.  This is why Antipope Bergoglio and his satanic cadre preach a false gospel of mercy WITHOUT REPENTANCE, and why Bergoglio denies the existence of hell and eternal damnation.  What all of this is driving towards is getting as many people as possible to receive Holy Communion in mortal sin – which is an act of sacrilege. Further, he wants priests to be full, conscious cooperators in this, thus making priests agents of Eucharistic desecration, and every Mass an occasion of sacrilege.

As was fully expected, we now have Antipope Bergoglio’s, and primordially satan’s next angle of attack on the Eucharist: attempting to coerce priests into distributing Holy Communion to non-Catholics, and ultimately non-Christians.  The first wave of attack is Lutherans.  We have known this for years.  I wrote on it HERE in August.  Next will be “all Christians”.  And quick on its heels, “all men of goodwill” or some such – One. World. Religion.

I have been told that my little niche in the orthodox Catholic blogosphere is to be the person that broaches subjects first, so that others are then free to discuss them.  I’m the “icebreaker”.  I have no problem with this, and am happy to help.  So, let’s break some ice.

FAITHFUL CATHOLIC PRIESTS: There is a very simple way to protect Our Blessed Lord in the Most Holy Sacrament of the Altar.  In fact, as Dr. Peter Kwasniewski states so beautifully in footnote 7 of his essay, “The spirit of the liturgy in the words and actions of Our Lady”:

The priest is a man set apart by God and metaphysically changed by the indelible character of Christ’s priesthood, all with a view to consecrating, handling, distributing, and caring for the sacramental Body of Christ and those things that directly pertain to it (such as absolving sins that prevent us from eating the bread of life, apart from which we will die in our sins). The hands of the priest are specially anointed so that they may be worthy of performing these awesome tasks.

The emphasis is mine.  It is the duty of every priest to DEFEND THE BLESSED SACRAMENT.

We are in an unprecedented state of emergency. This is far, far worse than the Arian crisis – make absolutely no mistake.  This makes the Arian Crisis look like a Wednesday afternoon Bridge game.  I believe that Bergoglio is not MERELY an Antipope, but that he may in fact be the False Prophet Forerunner of the Antichrist, the Anti-John the Baptist, and that these days may well be the run-up to the End Times.  Again, an objective survey of history quickly puts down the argument that “all generations have said that…” Well, we have an Antipope squatting on the See of Peter, with the True Pope still living (who is himself the worst pope in history, having enabled the ascendancy of the Antipope by trying to abandon his office by making an invalid “partial resignation”), and the Antipope is attempting to execute the wholesale destruction of The Catholic Church, its sacraments, and the Divine and Natural Law by abrogating the Decalogue (with the Sixth Commandment at the point of his lance), and routinely blaspheming against the Triune Godhead, and assigning divinity to himself. He is further attempting to establish a NEW RELIGION with himself at the center, that matches EXACTLY the agenda of the satanic organization known as FREEMASONRY. Oh, and don’t forget the relentless push for Eucharistic Desecration.

A political pissing match between Italian aristocrats this most certainly is not.

Good and faithful Priests: There is a very simple way for you to defend the Blessed Sacrament, which remember, IS YOUR JOB.

If and when the time comes:

YOU HAVE THE OPTION TO NOT DISTRIBUTE HOLY COMMUNION AT MASS.

In fact, if you discern that for whatever reason, the odds of the Blessed Sacrament being desecrated are high, for example a “Gay Pride” group comes to your Mass, or, as I suspect will come quickly, groups of protestants, musloids, or atheists come to your Mass and present themselves for Holy Communion at the behest of Antipope Bergoglio and his minions, and you realize that it is highly probable that The Eucharist will be desecrated, your duty is clear: DO NOT DISTRIBUTE HOLY COMMUNION.  After you (Father) receive the Precious Blood, you go straight to the Ablutions.

Remember: the purpose of the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is TO WORSHIP GOD by offering to Him the Once and For All Sacrifice of His Son on Calvary.  The Once For All Sacrifice of Calvary is miraculously and supernaturally made present in time at every Mass, and the immolation of The Sacrifice of the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ is effected when the Priest consumes the consecrated Host and the Precious Blood.

The only person that MUST receive the Eucharist, and, in fact, MUST receive the Eucharist under BOTH SPECIES, is the priest celebrant.  PERIOD.

Because the Church has been infiltrated by Freemasons, Communists and sodomites, most Catholics today think that the entire point of the Mass is for them to march up to the front of the Church and receive Holy Communion, which they believe to be a mere symbol.  This is HUMANISM – the cornerstone of Freemasonry.  Catholics today have been taught for the past fifty years BY THE RUBRICS OF THE NOVUS ORDO MASS ITSELF that THEY are the center and focus of the Mass, that the Mass is celebrated FOR THEIR BENEFIT, and that the point of the Mass is the distribution of Holy Communion TO THEM.  This is why the “Shared Meal” motif – by far the LEAST theologically important aspect of the Mass, behind the SACRIFICIAL and NUPTIAL aspects, has been pushed relentlessly by the satanic infiltrators, and the Mass qua Sacrifice was intentionally hidden from the people by stripping nearly every mention of SACRIFICE from the text of the Novus Ordo itself.  After all, one cannot be said to have participated in a meal if one has not eaten – or so the infiltrators would have everyone believe, and sadly, almost all today in the western Church do.  Most Catholics today think that there is really no point in going to Mass if one does not receive Holy Communion – because they believe the Mass is all about THEM. When they see the Novus Ordo elevation, with the priest FACING THEM and holding up the consecrated Host and Chalice TOWARD THEM, they think that the Holy Sacrifice is being offered exclusively TO THEM.  It doesn’t even occur to most of them that the Body and Blood of Christ is being OFFERED TO GOD.

If and when the time comes that a priest should stop distributing Holy Communion at Mass, he can expect MASSIVE negative blowback, even if he has explained why in both sermons and in writing, presumably in a bulletin, and even though he has told his parishioners repeatedly that he will gladly distribute Holy Communion outside of Mass by appointment.  Sadly, most Catholics today are so far gone that if given the choice between desecration of the Eucharist and public distribution of the Eucharist, they will DEMAND the public distribution – because, let’s face it, almost all Catholics in the West receive Holy Communion in mortal sin anyway, thus committing sacrilege and desecration of the Eucharist anyway. We know this by the use of contraception amongst Catholics (over 90%), as well as voting trends, and perhaps most tellingly, by the near total absence of the Sacrament of Confession in Novus Ordo parishes. What this is a function of, of course, is the fact that most Novus Ordo Catholics either actively disbelieve in the Real Presence or have never heard of the Real Presence.

If the priest at my parish announced at Mass tomorrow that due to events in Rome, public distribution of Holy Communion at Mass would cease effective immediately, and that Holy Communion would be distributed only by appointment, I think I would probably weep tears of joy.  How edifying that would be.  What a spectacularly beautiful witness to The Faith, and what a manful display of self-sacrificial love for Our Blessed Lord.  I often abstain from receiving Holy Communion specifically because I need to go to confession – but I go to Mass almost every day.  On those days that I do not receive, I ask the Lord to come to me in Spiritual Communion, and to help me, and to help me make a good confession as soon as possible.  I also ask Him to come to me in Spiritual Communion because I love Him.  I go to Mass first and foremost – always – to worship God AS HE DESIRES TO BE WORSHIPED, which just so happens to be by me being present at Calvary, which He makes supernaturally present at every Mass.  Christ would suffer His entire Passion and death for us as individuals alone as many times as we assist at the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.  When someone loves you that much, you are obliged to worship and adore them.  Only God does or ever could love to that incomprehensible degree.

If it comes to this, and a priest makes the decision to do this, I would strongly recommend dramatically expanding (or beginning) Eucharistic Exposition, Adoration, Benediction and Eucharistic Processions, as well as increasing the availability of the Sacrament of Confession.

The bottom line is this: The Eucharist is God, and precisely because He chooses to make Himself so utterly vulnerable, priests especially have the solemn duty to DEFEND HIM, and do whatever it takes to prevent desecration of The Eucharist, with the faithful backing the priests up every step of the way, including the beautiful witness and sacrifice of foregoing reception of Holy Communion at public Masses, if necessary.  It is high time that the “rights of man” once again take a back seat to the rights of God, to paraphrase Pope Leo XIII.

Good and Holy Priests, in these dark days, you have the power to utterly foil satan’s plans: I beg you, refuse to distribute Holy Communion before knowingly desecrating the Eucharist. You have a choice. Only the enemies of Christ and His Holy Church will hate you for it – and you should want to be hated by such people.

Pope St. Pius X, pray for us.

Christ, have mercy on us.