Good grief, this is positively ARTISTIC. Please, Sweet Jesus, let this Chris Jackson (a pen name), be a normal, decent, non- trainwreck, genuine, believing Catholic man.
The topic is: does Pope Paul IV’s bull of ARSH 1558 declaring that a heretic cannot hold ecclesiastical office still apply to the Church today?
Jackson writes:
“No one seriously denies that Cum ex has been overtaken by later legislation. But Grant’s deeper claim is that this fact somehow erases the principle behind it: that because a sixteenth-century penal mechanism was later streamlined, the theological axiom it expressed has evaporated too. That leap is untenable.”
I have to stop quoting or else I’ll just end up cross-posting the entire piece. It’s short, and every paragraph is a beatdown like Cassius Clay standing over a helplessly supine Joe Frazier.
Wait. One more. Jackson again:
“The question that matters is not whether Paul IV’s document is laminated in canon law, but whether the divine law it presupposes still applies: Can a public non-Catholic be the visible head of the Catholic Church?
That question remains. And Cum ex remains relevant; not as a talisman of legalism, but as a historical witness to an unchanging truth: membership in the Church precedes jurisdiction. The bull may have gathered dust in the Vatican archives, but the principle it articulates did not.”
Just click over and read it.
https://bigmodernism.substack.com/p/the-paper-trail-and-the-papacy-ryan

