Here’s the citation I mentioned on the Kokx Podcast episode on Friday. The English translation of the text is below. The author refers to Bergoglio as “Pope.” We, of course, know that he was an Antipope from the beginning.
The rejection of the sacraments by Bergoglio and the conclave: is it the end of the false church prophesied by Padre Pio?
By Cesare Sacchetti
April 23, 2025
In the end, the announcement came in the most unexpected and surprising way, one of those that really makes you think of the intervention of Divine Providence.
After months of uncertainties and ambiguity, and after a long hospital period in which Santa Marta had not even shown an image of Bergoglio, on the day of Easter Monday, the death of Pope Francis is announced.
According to the Vatican bulletin, the pontiff died at 7:35 in the morning following a stroke, a state of coma and finally heart failure, and when the camerlengo cardinal, the Irish Farrell, makes his announcement in a heavy voice, a first contradiction already emerges.
In the statement of the cardinal dean, Giovanni Battista Re, where the college of cardinals is convened the morning after his death, it is written that Francis would have died instead at 7:45, a discrepancy that has obviously not even been highlighted by the media, who in these hours are performing in a flood of celebrations of their favorite pontiff.
Cardinal Parolin near the body of Bergoglio
They are obviously not telling the fact that alone demolishes in one blow the image of the pope “of the last” that the media are trying to sew on Bergoglio.
According to Vatican sources, in the last hours of his earthly life, Francis even refused the sacraments, even denying access to his room to the major penitentiary.
A refusal by Francesco even during his hospitalization at the Gemelli polyclinic, when the pope was already in serious health conditions.
So much was the hatred against God that lodged in the heart of this man, that he even came to commit the most blasphemous of acts.
However, nothing can disturb the flow of lies of the media narrative that in these hours does not seem to be telling the death of the pontiff of Santa Romana Chiesa, as those of a pop icon, seasoned with a whole series of anecdotes about his passion for football and empanadas made by transsexuals.
It is true that we have not reached this point in a day.
From the Second Vatican Council onwards, the pope’s royalty has progressively dissipated since, for example, Paul VI, born Giovanni Montini, stripped himself of the papal tiara in 1964 which was then sold to a merchant of Jewish origin in New York.
Paul VI
Bergoglio, however, represents in this sense the completion of the definitive secularization of the pontificate.
In fact, there is no longer any semblance of the papacy as it has been understood in the past centuries, so much so that the pope with Francis has become more like a show star who stops on the street to stop autographs, who shows himself riding in a Fiat Panda to convey a false pauperistic message, and who organizes in favor of a camera his entrance to an optician in the historic center of Rome always to convey the demagogic image that the pope is a “man of the people”, when in reality he should be first of all a man of God, and Don’t go in search of popular consensus or acclaim, which have been drastically reduced in the last 6-7 years.
Francis, however, certainly did not “come from the end of the world” to ensure that the papacy kept the dogmas of the Catholic faith and to feed the souls towards paradise and save them from hell, whose existence was de facto denied by himself enough to call him “empty” together with his atheist friend, and in a strong smell of Freemasonry, Eugenio Scalfari, founder of the newspaper La Repubblica, house organ of the Italian progressive left.
Bergoglio felt perfectly at ease with such characters. He refused the company of real men of faith, persecuted by him for their will to practice the ancient rite of the Tridentine mass, a liturgical cornerstone of the Church for centuries, and went to the home of abortionists and propalists of the modern world like Emma Bonino, who in these hours mourns his loss after revealing that Francis had asked her to “continue our battles”.
Francesco radiant together with Emma Bonino
It doesn’t take much else to have the clear certainty that Jorge Mario Bergoglio was a fifth pillar planted in the bosom of the Church.
In his pontificate there was everything that should not have been on paper.
There were the trans, dear to him, and received with all the honors in the Vatican, there were the pedophiles he had protected since the time of his archbishopric in Argentina, there were the Freemasons, called “dear brothers”, there was the Rotary, the paramasonry of which Francis was a member, there was the Pachamama adored on the Vatican gardens, there was the defense and promotion of the lethal vaccines of pharmaceutical companies, and there were even priests who practiced homosexual coexistence in the light of day.
Ecclesiastical Freemasonry and the preparation of the pontificate of Bergoglio
However, heresy was not built in one day.
It was a pontificate prepared with great care and attention by the various followers of Freemasonry who probably made a careful study on the personality of this man, extremely narcissistic, angry and with a strong aptitude for scare speech, well known to Vatican employees.
Freemasons must have judged these ideal characteristics to place on the papal throne a man with the deliberate intent to definitively destroy the Church of Christ.
However, those who think, as it was said before, that the Bergogliano pontificate was a sort of “oversight” of the recent years of the Church are deluded, since if this man has arrived where he has arrived, it is certainly not because he himself as appointed pontiff, but obviously because in the body of the Church there were those enemies who have patiently infiltrated it over the decades and one could also say of the centuries.
In the writings of the Alta Vendita Freemasonry, one of the most powerful, in fact everything is written there.
The various Freemasons who belonged to this upper level of the lodges made no secret of their will to infiltrate the Catholic Church and to ensure that the pope in the future would be an instrument and no longer an opponent of freemasonry, which since its existence proposes to destroy the Church.
Even further went a former priest, Canon Roca, who then passed through the ranks of Freemasonry, who towards the end of the nineteenth century made a disturbing prophecy and described the coming of a pontiff who would have made his own the false materialistic verb of the Freemason of Jewish origin, Karl Marx, born Mordecai Levy.
Roca described a pope who would have preached the theories of collectivism that were already making their way in the age of enlightenment, and what other purpose they had other than to put an end to private property to establish a society similar to a commune, in which the family as such no longer exists and where there is obviously no longer even the concept of homeland, since the borders have evaporated to give way to this universal republic vaged by the various Freemasons.
What else was Jorge Mario Bergoglio if not the perfect living embodiment of what Canon Roca predicted almost a century and a half ahead?
What else was this man than the result of a long process of apostasy that reduced this bi-thousand-year-old institution to such pitiful conditions?
The apostasy was certainly there because the enemy, as we have seen, with great patience and perseverance has infiltrated among the ranks of the Church to give life to another institution now desacralized and completely similar to any NGO that rather than having as its foundation the truth of Catholicism has adopted the Enlightenment verb of human rights by the various French Freemasons such as Voltaire, Rousseau and Montesquieu.
The apostasy announced over time
It should be remembered, however, that the Church is not an earthly institution. It doesn’t belong to men even though they went too hard to ruin it.
It was founded by Christ for the salvation of souls, and Jesus’ very promise to his apostles was that it would exist until the end of time.
The test it is going through can only have been “granted” by Providence, which has taken care to make known several times over time of which obscenities and heresies the Church would have become a spokesperson.
One of the first warnings of the coming of apostasy was that which occurred in 1846, when the Madonna appeared to the two French children, Maximin Giraud and Melanie Calvat, to whom it was announced that the Church would become the seat of the Antichrist.
The two children of La Salette, Maximin Giraud and Melanie Calvat
The Church at that time was very different from the present one. It was a Church that was not afraid to say that it was the sanhedrin, and certainly not Rome, that killed Jesus, as some Israeli jurists hosted on RAI screens have tried to believe, and it was a Church that on the pages of Civiltà Cattolica talked about the Jewish question, while today on this magazine you can find the Christianization of the illegal immigrant, one of the pins of Bergoglio’s pontificate.
This appearance was approved by the Church, which also in the following years received other signals that a similar scenario would unfortunately occur, when, for example, the great pontiff Leo XIII had in 1884 the well-known vision of the Church fallen into the hands of Satan for 100 years.
There was also no lack of other warnings in the last century, starting from Fatima, even if here the machine of ecclesiastical Freemasonry worked to hide from the faithful the third part of the secret of Fatima, in which there was talk of how the leaders of the Church would become the spokespersons of apostasy.
The Madonna had given explicit instructions. She had ordered the Church to reveal the third part of the secret by 1960, but the pontiff of the time, John XXIII, Angelo Roncalli, who had already started Freemasonry and was elected after Cardinal Siri, threatened, was forced to give up, hid the secret, as Father Malachi Martin revealed who fled to the United States after witnessing this scene.
The vicar of Christ who censors the Madonna. One time one would never have thought of telling such a fact, but this was the evil that had penetrated the Vatican walls and that also led the other pontiffs after Roncalli to hide from the faithful the truth about the infection of the Church.
Padre Pio had already been there to see her, among others. The saint of Pietrelcina had already revealed to his friend, Father Amorth, that this false church would be established that would arrive where Jorge Mario Bergoglio had arrived.
Francis can be considered to all intents and purposes the zenith of such infiltration, and the question that many have been asking themselves for some time now, and whether this ordeal of this institution has finally come to an end, or whether there will be another station of the Via Crucis.
It is impossible to answer this question without trying to lean on the shoulders of those who had those visions and who, like the mother of God, appeared on other occasions after Fatima, such as Garabandal and Akita, to warn humanity about the dangers they incured for their rejection of God and to announce at the same time the Triumph of her Immaculate Heart.
It is not in fact a hypothesis that the Church will be healed, but a certainty because it was the Virgin herself who said it.
Therefore, there cannot be the slightest doubt about the final victory….