Champagne Commie Din-Din: On Trump


Topic 11:  We can’t have law from the “periphery” , right??

Fag:  “It is ridiculous to have law from the periphery, right?”

First, note the echoing of the same Communist vocabulary that Antipope Bergoglio babbles in daily: referring to groups of people as “the periphery”.

Understand that what he means by “periphery” is anyone outside of the Boston-New-York-Washington DC metroplex, and the San Francisco-Los Angels corridor, having any say in anything.  Like, VOTING.  Look at a county-by-county red/blue map of the U.S. It is staggering.  Now, y’all know that I am no Trump fan (read Denninger – read about the mathematical inevitability of having your healthcare expenditures increase and compound by 9% per annum due to the conscious and willful non-enforcement of the law against price-fixing and colluding…), and am still shocked that Trump was allowed to win, but their hatred isn’t just for Trump personally.  It is for anyone that they perceive to be “beneath them” – not of the Ivy League law school coastal  elite.  And the truth is, they’re all trash, and deep down, they know it.  Class is a bearing, a mode of conduct, not a resume, not a designer label, and certainly not a net worth.

Topic 12: So yes, there is a shadow economy, Facebook, Airbnb…

Swiss:  “Yes, there is a shadow economy, like Facebook, Airbnb, because the most important thing is to protect workers – not jobs.” (by “protecting workers” he means protecting the ideology by providing workers with such things as abortion-on-demand and special protections for sex perverts, etc. in service to the ideology, even if this comes at the expense of jobs, or of driving the entire economy into the ground. The ideology is everything – actual people are meaningless.)

Topic 13: Trade in goods will soon be nothing…

Fag:  If in the future, trade in all goods becomes centralized (Global Fascism), trade in goods is nothing….

Entire Table:  “I.T. (Information Technology) is EVERYTHING.  It is a new layer of horizontal law.  Privacy and human rights are irrelevant.  It is now about the COMMODIFICATION OF DATA, and the EU is regulating it, and it affects EVERY ECONOMIC CONSIDERATION.”

Topic 14: We are the archenemy of Trump

Fag:  We are the archenemy of Trump and everything he stands for.  We MUST constrain Trump.  New American “law” must and will be written only by people who have lived outside the U.S. for at least five years!!

Topic 15: What will take Trump down?

Swiss:  So what takes Trump down?

Columbia Commie:  THE SECURITIES ESTABLISHMENT WILL TAKE TRUMP DOWN FIRST AND FOREMOST, IN COOPERATION WITH THE CIA AND FBI.  Private people in the Securities establishment have all kinds of info on Trump.  The best chance is for the Securities industry to declare war on Trump.  They really don’t have to actually prove anything to take him down. But the big fight is between Securities industry and Trump.

—–At this point, I’d like to chime in and say…. TOLDYA!!! I’ve been at war with those psychopaths In the Securities establishment for the better part of a decade now.  They are powerful, they do what they want, and the government/intelligence complex is in bed with them – and not to be explicit, but allow me to use a metaphor to illustrate the point: make no mistake, the Securities establishment is the man in this scenario, and the government/intelligence complex is the 17 year old Guatemalan tranny prostitute working the public restrooms on the I-15.  —-

Part 3 tomorrow…


So I Went Out To Eat Last Night and A Group of Champagne Communists Sat Down at the Next Table…

Last night being the last night before Lent, I went out to dinner for one last round of my favorite yum-yums and slurp-slurps.  As I walked in, I saw a very well-dressed middle aged man who projected anger and misery from every pore sitting alone.  I was seated at the table directly adjacent.  Sure enough, he was extremely nasty to the staff, as they offered him something while he waited for the rest of his party to arrive.

A few minutes later, in walk three more well-dressed middle-aged men, one of which was a flaming queen.  The other two men, I could hear, were not American. I overheard later that one was Swiss and the other German. A few minutes later, a middle-aged Jew, well-dressed and wearing a yarmulke, walks in carrying a plastic bag filled with Ziplock plastic containers.  I sat there thinking, “Oh no.  No, no, no.  He didn’t bring his own FOOD up in here, did he?”  Yup. He gave the bag to the manager and sniffed instructions about heating it up.  So, let me get this straight.  You are SUCH a pious, devout Jew that you can’t eat ANYTHING except your own super-special “ritually pure” food, but you can sit at table with a flaming sodomite?  Sorry, gotta call bullshit on that bullshit right there.

So the party has now arrived.  It turns out there had been some sort of a symposium for lawyers to discuss “international law” (read “power politics”) at a nearby university.  All five were law school professors and presenters at the symposium.  Mister Miserable, it turns out, is a law professor at Columbia who lives in – his words here – “gentrified Harlem, VERY close to the Clinton Offices on 125th Street…” (The other four ooohed and ahhhhed at this.)

At this point I took out my phone and started taking notes, because what was sitting next to me was a table of Champagne Communist “thought leaders”, three American and two European. Ho ho ho. This should be FASCINATING.

The faggot did something that I have never before heard.  He referred to his sodomite partner as his “wife”, but referred to him as “he” and “him”.  I guess at this point, it is all about removing all possible meaning from language for these wretches.

So, let’s get started.  Everything below is paraphrase.  It was all I could do to keep up the note-taking without it being obvious that I was taking notes on their conversation and not “chatting” with someone on my phone.

Topic 1: Nationalism is bad and must be completely purged from humanity.

The Swiss law professor went on a rant about how “deeply engrained” the scourge of Nationalism is in the human mind, citing Switzerland as his example.  Switzerland contains four separate groups: German, French, Italian and Romansh. And even though it is a tiny country, very politically and socially liberal, with four discreet cultural groups with DIFFERENT LANGUAGES, all the Swiss people STILL, he lamented bitterly, identify as SWISS.  If the Swiss all still have this deep Nationalistic pride and identity, imagine how much harder it will be to purge Nationalism from the Germans, or, THE FRENCH!

Topic 2: Typical woman…

They then started talking about the speakers at the conference.  One was a Dutch female law professor.  “Is she straight?” “Yeah, she’s straight. And she expects to be submitted to because of her gender!”

I laughed out loud.

Topic 3:  Law by Stealth

The fag then began to hold forth on how much appreciated the presentation of the Swiss guy, particularly the tactic of “Law By Stealth”, and how well that concept “fits in with our project”.  Indeed.  Also with Bergoglio’s project.  Law By Stealth.  It’s their own term, kids.  Start using it.  That is what all of this crap is.

Topic 4: Was he a threat?

The fag then asked the table who “the man in the back, with the long hair, that asked the questions” was.  Someone answered, “He’s English”. The fag then asked, “Is he a threat?”  Because people who ask substantive questions are “a threat”.

Topic 5: The Goal Is Global Fascism

The Swiss lawyer, it turns out, also has a private practice. When the Fag started talking about how all “private law” is really just a subset of the “imperial governmental” paradigm, and cited ICANN as his example, the Swiss came right out and said that the only possible model is total global control of all trade and businesses. Global Fascism.  He said the “biggest player” is the “OMNIPOTENT REGULATOR”, which can be the “good company”, that is a company that is fully controlled by and submissive to the state, “that is so powerful” that it becomes the de facto regulator.  His example?  You guessed it: Apple.

Topic 6: Human rights – Fascist style

The Swiss then, in the context of Apple, assured the table that with regards to human rights, “they only do it for the public perception”.  The point being, since Apple is “omnipotent”, they are their own regulator, and they decide what their human rights regulations will be.  Then the grumpy Columbia professor chimed in: Apple absolutely breaks the law in Asia, but we (the former U.S.) are fine with that, because it is all “handled between friends”.  Apple is for the “greater good” – that is the globalist-fascist agenda – so “why not let them flex their power?”

Feeling nauseated yet?

Topic 7: Something minor…

I missed the context of this quote, but I darn sure recorded the punchline.  Someone said, “What are they protecting?” The Swiss replied, “Their sovereignty or something.  Something minor.” And it wasn’t a joke.  He was dead serious.

Topic 8: The flaw in the current EU system is…

The German said, “In terms of the EU, WE DECIDE.”  Yeah, we noticed, Franz.

Then Columbia said, “In joining the EU, didn’t the Danes give legal supremacy to the EU?”

Then the Swiss said, “The Parliament is technically supreme, so the flaw is that there is no supreme EU norm.  Denmark has a constitution, yes, de jure, but it is meaningless, de facto.

Topic 9: Free market competition should only be allowed if I benefit from it personally…

Columbia Commie then started talking about how it cost his $100 to take a cab from JFK airport to Harlem, but if he used Uber, it only cost $35, and thus “I always take Uber.” The Fag then said, “I always take the bus.” Columbia Commie then replied, dripping with sarcasm, “Don’t worry.  I won’t tell. It’s your contribution to the “fight against global warming”. At this, the table exploded into laughter.

Topic 10: We Must Make Our Own State…

The Swiss said, “The solution to all of this is to separate.  We must make our own state.”  At this, the Jew piped up and said, “So, the “Two State Solution?” At which the table again ERUPTED into uproarious laughter. That was the biggest laugh of the night, by far.

Well, that’s Part 1.  Check back for Part 2….


And Now It Is Time To Play… WHO SAID IT???!!!!!!!

I’ll take “Austrian Jewish-atheist sex perverts more Catholic than than the Antipope” for one Venezuelan bolivar, Alex…

And the answer is….

“The abandonment of the reproductive function is the common feature of all perversions. We actually describe a sexual activity as perverse if it has given up the aim of reproduction and pursues the attainment of pleasure as an aim independent of it. So, as you will see, the breach and turning point in the development of sexual life lies in becoming subordinate to the purpose of reproduction. Everything that happens before this turn of events and equally everything that disregards it and that aims solely at obtaining pleasure is given the uncomplimentary name of “perverse” and as such is proscribed.”

Remember to phrase your answer in the form of a QUESTION, contestants…

Who is….


Wrong answer?  Mmmmmm?  What ze h*** ist wrong viff zhou exactly?  Und don’t blame shour FAZZAH!!!!


The Odd Love-Hate (but now mostly hate) Dynamic Explained

Even before my Koran Burning back in April of ARSH 2011, I was already being read by what would later be labeled as the “Tea Party” and “Alt-Right”.  There was always a love-hate dynamic going on, with links to me generally prefaced with a disclaimer to the effect… “She’s a completely insane holy roller, but….”

By now the love-hate is mostly hate, certainly because the focus of my writing these days is the Bergoglian Antipapacy, even though the Bergoglian Antipapacy is DIRECTLY AND INTIMATELY TIED AND PARTNERED to both the oligarchy that runs both the post-American global government and financial system (but I repeat myself), which is the forerunner and seedbed of the forthcoming OneWorld Government, and the Islamic political system and its invasion of both Europe and North America.

I have been asked what the cause of the hate coefficient in this love-hate function is about.  Is it the fact that I am a traditional Roman Catholic?  In a broad sense, yes, but there is a far more precise answer, and again, it is DIRECTLY related to what we see going on with this Bergoglian Antipapacy and its incestuous intertwining with the NewWorldOrder.

Many, many people in the Alt-right, and even in the so-called “Tea Party” faction, which even now is an antiquated term (I guess now the Tea Party is, for all intents and purposes, the Trump party?  I think the Venn Diagram overlaps sufficiently to permit the re-naming…) hate me, while still reading what I write, because of two things:

The first, and the most important is the fact that I believe and state openly that contraception in all forms is a grave sin against the 6th Commandment, and is at the very root of almost every problem in the post-Christian, post-modern West today.  In fact, it could be argued and argued well that the West officially became the POST-CHRISTIAN West when it first began to ratify contraception.  The generally accepted date of this happening is ARSH 1931 when the Church of England (of course) “decided” that contraception was permissible in some very limited and specific circumstances.  During WWII the US Military openly encouraged servicemen to “use rubbers” on shore leave.  The pill was invented and went on sale in the early 1960s.  And, now if you object to adult men exposing themselves to little girls in bathrooms, or fail to celebrate every form of sexual perversion conceivable, you are an outcast and soon enough will be ineligible for even the most basic services, including commerce, housing, and freedom of movement.  But make absolutely no mistake, the first concrete step in this process was the ratification, acceptance and use of contraception, which is a mortal sin against the Sixth Commandment.

The second factor is in the same vein, and that is the fact that I openly state that I believe that civil divorce is a fiction, and that I believe in the words of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ that to “remarry” (and also, obviously, to have ANY sexual relations with ANYONE other than one’s spouse – it must be said in these dark days, even though sex outside of marriage is obviously fornication) is the sin of ADULTERY. By now, almost everyone either is themselves or is the first-degree relative of someone who is civilly divorced and either remarried or looking to remarry, or just fornicate.

Simply put, I believe everything the Church teaches and has taught, including about sexual morality.

So, why the hatred?  Because almost everyone – EVERYONE – reading this website has in their past, are now, or plan to in the future, use contraception.  The older guys who read me that are now in their 60s, 70s and 80s, used contraception throughout their marriage(s).  The wife was put on the pill, they had their 2.1 children by pausing the chemical sterilization, and then resumed.  And/or either the wife or husband was mechanically sterilized by having the tubes tied after the birth of child 2.1, or by the husband having a vasectomy. Younger people in the former U.S. contracept at a rate north of 95%. It isn’t even a blip on the moral radar except for a microscopic number of Traditional Catholics.  Likewise, almost everyone has either parents, children, friends or themselves have committed adultery by “civilly divorcing” and then dating, fornicating with and/or aping the sacrament of marriage by “remarrying” while their true spouse is still alive.

HOW DARE YOU! How dare you say that my daughter can’t “be happy” and “find love again” after her divorce?

Easily.  It is what Jesus said.  Jesus is God.  If He said it, it is true, it is unchanging, and it is non-negotiable.  Period. And by the way, mortal sin is neither true happiness nor true love.

So my first marriage went south.  What do you expect me to do?  Live alone and never have sex again for the rest of my life?

Yes.  Exactly.  I expect that because God expects that.  In fact, He commands it. He made a little list.  It is item six on that list. Thou shalt not commit adultery.

Consider this: a vast, vast percentage of the “right” and “Alt-Right” in the U.S. today can clearly see that Antipope Bergoglio is a South American Marxist-Communist that is openly in bed with the Soros/NewWorldOrder oligarchy. Let’s not even go into the other stuff – let’s just look at what is completely obvious and not being hidden in any way.  AND YET, when it comes to these 6th Commandment issues, the vast, vast majority of the right and Alt-Right in the U.S. will stand on the side of Antipope Bergoglio against someone like me, precisely because Antipope Bergoglio is an arch-heretic on pretty much everything related to the 6th Commandment.  They will still stand with him precisely because he ratifies them in their sins, specifically against the 6th Commandment, and that trumps absolutely everything else. Everything.


If the question of the ratification of the sin of sodomy is 50%-50% in a population, and the question of the ratification of the sin of contraception is 99.8%-0.2%, then all satan has to do is choose the latter as the point of attack, and then eliminate the 0.2%, because sin is sin.

I see and hear ALL THE TIME, “See?  Ann is just as much of a Protestant as she was before she converted!  She disagrees with “the Pope”, and so she wants to have her cake and eat it too – Catholicism without “the Pope”.”

In reality, Antipope Bergoglio’s heresy isn’t even germane to the question – if you read me, you know that I am morally certain that Bergoglio is not the Pope and that Pope Benedict XVI still is the one and only Pope because of RATZINGER’S invalid abdication which predated the Bergoglian ascendancy and Antipapacy by fully two weeks – four years ago tonight, in fact.

I think it is morbidly fascinating to see the hierarchy of priorities at play here.  Clearly, being ratified in sins against the 6th Commandment is far, far, far more important to people across the board on a visceral level than politics, economics, and to a lesser extent religious association.  Right and Alt-Right people will take the uber-leftist’s side, and will eventually, let’s just say it, help to purge the microscopic remnant (I use the word very intentionally) that actually believe everything that The Church teaches.

I write this up and post it here not because I have any delusions of turning the cultural tide in any broad sense.  I guess my motive is to get those other people who know and believe in the fullness of the Church’s genuine, constant and infallible teaching on sexual morality, specifically the grave sinfulness of contraception and divorce and “remarriage”, to understand that when the time comes, and it is fast approaching, we should be fully prepared to be betrayed and targeted for “purging” from the ranks of those that we now broadly associate ourselves with on the political spectrum – that is to say the “right” and “Alt-right”. We are considered to be psychologically defective and wholly undesirable.  They DO NOT WANT A WORLD WITHOUT CONTRACEPTION AND CIVIL DIVORCE. WE DO NOT WANT A WORLD WITH THOSE THINGS.  You do the math.

No one wants to keep around a person or group of people who will remind them in any way of their own sins, but most especially those sins against the 6th Commandment, and the power of even the most wretched enemy will be leveraged against us, because deep down, the Sixth Commandment is THE TOP PRIORITY.

It will be much, much easier to deal with this when it happens if we have identified it and prepared for it in advance, namely understanding that any betrayals that might happen will not be about your secular politics – it will be about your sexual morality.

Never forget, Herod ordered this to appease his unlawful concubine,  despite the fact that…Herod feared John, knowing him to be a just and holy man: and kept him, and when he heard him, did many things: and he heard him willingly. (Mark 6: 20)

St. John the Baptist, pray for us.



Starting Monday Off Right: St. Peter Damian on What It Takes Edition

Our Father, Who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy Name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Amen.

PATER NOSTER, qui es in caelis, sanctificetur nomen tuum. Adveniat regnum tuum. Fiat voluntas tua, sicut in caelo et in terra. Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie, et dimitte nobis debita nostra sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. Et ne nos inducas in tentationem, sed libera nos a malo. Amen.

“Nobody can fight properly and boldly for the faith if he clings to a fear of being stripped of earthly possessions.”

-St. Peter Damian


Starting Saturday Off Right: Valiant In Warfare Edition

Our Father, Who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy Name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Amen.

PATER NOSTER, qui es in caelis, sanctificetur nomen tuum. Adveniat regnum tuum. Fiat voluntas tua, sicut in caelo et in terra. Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie, et dimitte nobis debita nostra sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. Et ne nos inducas in tentationem, sed libera nos a malo. Amen.

Be ye valiant in warfare, and fight with the old serpent: and ye shall receive an everlasting kingdom.
-Antiphon at the Magnificat, Vespers of the Feast of St. Matthias


Starting Thursday Off Right: St. Peter Damian Edition

Our Father, Who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy Name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Amen.

PATER NOSTER, qui es in caelis, sanctificetur nomen tuum. Adveniat regnum tuum. Fiat voluntas tua, sicut in caelo et in terra. Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie, et dimitte nobis debita nostra sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. Et ne nos inducas in tentationem, sed libera nos a malo. Amen.

St. Peter Damian (far right) with St. Augustine, St. Anne and St. Elizabeth, Ercole de’ Roberti, ARSH 1481, Milan.

Today is the feast of St. Peter Damian, one of the truly great Doctors of the Church. Why? Why do I say that? Read these twelve quotes…

“Tell us, you unmanly and effeminate man, what do you seek in another male that you do not find in yourself?”
“For God’s sake, why do you damnable sodomites pursue the heights of ecclesiastical dignity with such fiery ambition?”
“By what right or by what law can one bind or loose the other when he is constrained by the bonds of evil deeds common to them both?”
“Who can expect the flock to prosper when its shepherd has sunk so deep into the bowels of the devil?”
“Who, by his lust, will consign a son whom he spiritually begotten for God to slavery under the iron law of Satanic tyranny?”
“This utterly diseased queen of Sodom renders him who obeys the laws of her tyranny infamous to men and odious to God.”
“Without fail, [the vice of sodomy] brings death to the body and destruction to the soul. It pollutes the flesh, extinguishes the light of the mind, expels the Holy Spirit from the temple of the human heart, and gives entrance to the devil, the stimulator of lust.”
”[The vice of sodomy] leads to error, totally removes truth from the deluded mind . . . It opens up Hell and closes the gates of Paradise.”
”[The vice of sodomy] is this vice that violates temperance, slays modesty, strangles chastity, and slaughters virginity.”
[The vice of sodomy] defiles all things, sullies all things, pollutes all things.”
“Who will make a mistress of a cleric, or a woman of a man?”
“It is not sinners, but the wicked who should despair; it is not the magnitude of one’s crime, but contempt of God that dashes one’s hopes.”

Collect of the Mass of St. Peter Damian:

O Almighty God, grant that we may follow the teaching and example of Your blessed confessor bishop Peter, and turn away from the things of earth that we may attain the joys of heaven.

St. Peter Damian, pray for us.

All ye angels, saints, and Mary the mother of God, pray for John Vennari at the hour of his death.

Need Help With A Spanish Translation…

I’m 40 years old now, y’all, and it occurred to me today that it has been TWENTY-FIVE YEARS since I had a formal Spanish language class.  Thus, I am a bit embarrassed to admit that I simply CAN NOT REMEMBER the Spanish word for:

“Trafficking Bolivian-Indian child sex slaves”.

I know.  That word is year-one Spanish, but I just can’t for the life of me remember the word for

“Trafficking Bolivian-Indian child sex-slaves.”

If any of you can remember your high school Spanish better than I can, help me out.

Apropos of ABSOLUTELY NOTHING AT ALL, here is a pic of a man named GUSTAVO VERA having lunch with his very, very, very, very, very close “friend” Jorgito Bergoglio. This appears to have been taken in the dining room of the Casa Santa Marta in the Vatican. Gustavo would visit Jorgito ROUGHLY ONCE PER MONTH from Buenos Aires, and when Gustavo was back in Sud America, he and Jorgito were on the phone constantly.  Gustavo has a very stressful job – he is an Argentinan legislator and also the head of an NGO specializing in radical feminism and LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender) advocacy.  What a profound act of charity for Gustavo, from his meager wages, to pay for MONTHLY ROUND-TRIP FLIGHTS TO ROME to accompany body-to-body, with closeness and the most exquisite tenderness, his very, very, very, very, very close friend, Jorgito.  Thankfully, Jorgito would return the extreme charity by installing Gustavo in the luxury hotel he lives in inside the Vatican, the Casa Santa Marta.

Pray for these two very, very, very, very, very close friends, because apparently Jorgito “broke up” with Gustavo last week.  And it must have been one heck of an argument, because Jorgito had the SWISS GUARD break the news to Gustavo, and escort him off the premises.

Not even a text message, Jorgito?  Ma n’do sta la tua misericordia?

“If it could only be like this always – always summer, always alone, the fruit always ripe…”

And now, apropos of absolutely nothing at all, a musical interlude courtesy of some Latino dude singing one of my favorite Neil Sedaka songs in Spanish.

Again, that name, if you didn’t get it, was GUSTAVO VERA.



It’s Happening: How Long Before Your BANK Demands That You Swear Fealty To Faggotry?

An interesting thing happened yesterday.  I am looking at making a pilgrimage in the spring, and since the pilgrimage site is close enough to a big enough city, I decided to sniff around on Airbnb to see if it would be more afforadable for a group of us to split an apartment, rather than book hotel rooms.

Lo and behold, what greets me, but the following:


Before you continue

Whether it’s your first time using Airbnb or you’re one of our original travelers, please commit to respecting and including everyone in the Airbnb community.

I agree to treat everyone in the Airbnb community – regardless of their race, religion, national origin, ethnicity, disability, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation or age – with respect and without judgment or bias.




Well, I don’t need to tell you that I hit “decline” and was immediately notified that I my account was cancelled.

INSTANTLY one thing popped into my head:


And it will all be done “under the law” in the name of “the state”.

Fear mongering?  Damn right I’m fear mongering.

Come Lord Jesus.