CHOP! Bergoglio Beheads Another, and a Warning About Liturgical Fetishists – Wolves in Jacquard and Lace

Only days removed from saying that he really, really doesn’t enjoy beheading his “archconservative” enemies, Antipope Bergoglio today fired a young, healthy, pro-life, pro-family, pro-marriage conservative archbishop in Brazil, Archbishop Aldo di Cillo Pagotto, who also has been an outspoken anti-Communist.

But wait! Before we all go crazy, it is absolutely essential to know that there were problems in this archdiocese with sodomite priests and seminarians, including the abuse of minors (read “teenaged boys”).  This is what is being cited as the reason for the firing of this archbishop.

Given this, I feel it is an opportune moment to explain several things to you all out there, so that there is a genuine comprehension of the chessboard as it now sets, and of the gameplan and tactics of the enemy.  It isn’t difficult to comprehend, but it is one of those things that needs to be clearly explained in order to be easily understood.

First, it is essential to state that any tolerance of aberrosexuals within the clergy and seminaries is, of course, a horrible malfeasance on the part of the bishop which should warrant drastic action, up to and including the bishop’s removal. Yes. Absolutely. No question.

HOWEVER, literally every diocese and archdiocese on the planet has sodomites and aberrosexuals who have infiltrated or are trying to infiltrate The Church, some of them are already ordained, and some are still in seminary.  EVERY DIOCESE AND ARCHDIOCESE HAS SODOMITE INFILTRATION.

So, if you think about this, what it means is that Antipope Bergoglio and his henchmen can use the UNIVERSALLY PRESENT PRETEXT OF SODOMITE INFILTRATION to justify the firing of ANY BISHOP.

Do you see this?  This is EXACTLY what has been going on for the past 3 years.  Bergoglio surrounds himself, and in fact was installed as Antipope by a cadre of flagrant, horrific sodomites, including protectors of incestuous child rapists, Card. Gottfried Daneels first among them.  Bergoglio caused enormous outrage in Chile just last spring – outrage which the media has refused to publicize – by appointing the odious sodomite Juan Barros as Archbishop of Osorno.  Barros is neck-deep in a massive ongoing investigation of child rape, in which Barros is repeatedly and credibly reported to not only have covered-up for his child-raping priest buddies, but to have actually, physically observed some of the child rapes as an, ahem,  enthusiastic spectator.

Bergoglio immediately installed one Msgr. Battista Ricca as the head of his residence (Casa Santa Marta) AND as the overseer of… wait for it… the Vatican Bank, a position for which the odious sodomite Ricca had exactly zero qualification, experience or competence.  Ricca was well-known to Bergoglio from South America.  Ricca was a Vatican diplomat posted in Montevideo, Uruguay, just across the bay from Buenos Aires, and Ricca was a flagrant, notorious and scandalous presence, shacking up and carrying on OPENLY with his sodomite sex partner – a former Swiss Guard named Patrick Haari.  Further, Ricca was caught in flagrante delicto in an elevator with a boy child prostitute in Montevideo, and got the crap beat out of him at least once cruising for sex in a public park notorious for such evil activity.  The people of Montevideo were so outraged that they rose up and demanded Ricca’s expulsion, whereupon Ricca was sent back to Rome, to resume his place in the Vatican Bathhouse. Ricca and Haari’s luggage was initially sent by Haari to the Vatican as diplomatic baggage – and the Vatican refused delivery.  This luggage, when later found and opened, was found to contain a pistol, enormous quantities of sodomite pornography, and dozens of condoms.

When Bergoglio was installed, he reunited with his old neighbor, and Ricca was instantly made a de facto prince(ss). Why? Because Bergoglio is all about power and loyalty to his regime, and as a diabolical narcissist and fairly unintelligent man, is highly, highly susceptible to flattery and outward displays of loyalty.  Ricca, as is true with most sodomite men, most especially those of the queeny variety, can be sickening, shameless flatterers.  Sodomites also tend to be of above-average intelligence.  I can almost promise you that the cadre of sodomites that Bergoglio surrounds himself with are considered by Bergoglio to be “smart”, “witty” and “intelligent” – and thus Bergoglio derives tremendous narcissistic satisfaction from “holding court” around the dining table in the back corner of the dining hall at Casa Santa Marta and being flattered and told how “brilliant” he is by these sodomites. And so, Bergoglio is happy to surround and ally himself with them, even though I strongly suspect that Bergoglio himself is not a sodomite.  Bergoglio just doesn’t ping my gaydar.

"Do you think I'm smart, Battista?"

“Do you think I’m smart, Battista?”  — “Yes, dear. We ALL do. And, darling, you’re the only one with the humility and ambition to do this….”

Meanwhile, conservative bishops, such as Bishop Finn, formerly of St. Joseph, Missouri, and Archbishop John Nienstedt, formerly of Minneapolis/St. Paul, are fired.  Look folks, this is really easy to understand.  The Enemy has infiltrated the Church with so many sodomites over the past 50+ years that they are present in every diocese and archdiocese.  Further, sodomite men are almost always attracted to TEENAGED BOYS, which are legally children.  Thus, what you have is a situation whereby EVERY BISHOP could be removed for having priests in his diocese that are guilty of misconduct with minor children and/or seminarians.  And so, Antipope Bergoglio uses this satanic set-up to prosecute his ideological agenda.

Now stop and sit in stillness with that until the full, demonic evil of it sets in.  Antipope Bergoglio is using the sexual abuse of minor children and seminarians as the means to SELECTIVELY PURGE, THAT IS, “BEHEAD”, HIS IDEOLOGICAL ENEMIES. Since the sodomite infiltration is everywhere, his simply goes after bishops who are “conservative”, “orthodox”, and/or “anti-Marxist” and leaves totally unmolested (NPI) his ideological fellow-travelers, no matter how horrific and egregious their crimes.

So back to the Archbishop in Brazil that Antipope Bergoglio fired today.  Not only has this man been a strong voice against the Culture of Death, a signatory of the Filial Appeal to “Pope Francis” on the Future of the Family, friendly toward priests and faithful who celebrate and attend the Tridentine Mass, but also an outspoken… wait for it… ANTI-COMMUNIST in Brazil. Well, no wonder.  This guy has had a bullseye on his back, and even willingly made himself a target by signing documents specifically critical of the Bergoglian agenda and contrary to Bergoglio’s Marxist political ideology.  Remember this?


Now, to part two of this essay, and I suspect this dynamic was indeed in play with this Brazilian Archbishop, and we have to be honest about these things.  Is it utterly essential that orthodox, “traddy” Catholics face with manful virility the problems within their own ranks – specifically the presence of homosexual men that are attracted to the Traditional Mass not from any genuine religious belief, but due to Liturgical Fetishism. These men, nearly all of them homosexually oriented, are a massive scandal and are incredibly destructive – driving away heterosexual men and attracting more homosexual liturgical fetishists like themselves.

This problem is, as far as I can tell, a far greater problem in Europe than it is in North America.  Traddyland in Europe is largely an ARISTOCRATIC, UPPER-CLASS phenomenon.  In North America, it is exactly the opposite – American traddyland skews decidedly to the “peasant” culture.  In many American trad parishes, the women are often mistaken for Mennonites out in the world, with their ankle-length jumpers, long hair, veils worn in the “babushka” way,and non-use of cosmetics.   I always stand out in Trad parishes in North America because I tend to wear “sharp” outfits, heels, make-up, and I wear my veil in the European “bridal” way – swept back behind my shoulders – or I wear a sharp hat to cover my head. But I digress.  The point is that precisely because the American Trad paradigm is more grounded in a “peasant” culture, the men are more manly, on average, and thus the priests and seminarians are manly too.  In Europe, there is more of a problem with a spirit of effeteness amongst the men.

There was a bishop in the North of Italy that would take pretty much any priest or seminarian that was “traddy”, thinking in good faith but extreme naiveté that all trads are solid, orthodox, believing Catholics, and that these poor priests and seminarians had been driven out of their respective dioceses or seminaries SOLELY BECAUSE THEY WERE TRADS.  Alas, what ended up happening was this bishop’s diocese turned into a hotbed of these homosexual liturgical fetishists, and just as with Novus Ordo or secular homosexual men, the molestation of pubescent boys ensued.  Because remember, all sex perverts are Diabolical Narcissists, and DNs, by definition, are vampiric and seek to create more DNs by hurting, scandalizing and abusing victims.  Homosexuals especially look to groom, recruit and create more DN sex perverts in order to keep the whole sordid paradigm alive. And so, Bergoglio jumped at this chance, replaced the bishop by installing a liberal Auxiliary, and then basically stripped the bishop of all authority.  But make no mistake, the primary agenda was to suppress the Trad Catholic culture – not to protect children.

Another way to think of this is like the example of a bar owner.  Bar owners have to be incredibly careful about letting homosexuals come into their bar and carry on.  Why?  Because the sight of homosexuals kissing, dancing and acting out is utterly repellant and nauseating to normal people.  It literally makes a decent person sick to behold it.  So, a barkeeper, if he permits such behavior, can literally lose his entire established clientele in ONE WEEKEND, to have it replaced with the sodomites, who tell all of their friends that they have just “acquired new territory”.

A situation just like this was recounted to me in a trad parish in Europe.  There was an extremely competent liturgist in the parish, but this man was literally a raging queen. He was horrifically cruel to both the laymen and the clergy, and was grossly irreverent in the sacristy. He was tolerated solely because he had such a high level of expertise.  Then, one day, after there was some failure to comply with his demands, he threw what can only be described as a “fag fit” and swished out in a haughty huff.  The parish was delighted and relieved to see him go, despite the loss of his expertise.  Why?  Because they were a young parish and they were terrified that this one raging queen was going to drive away every heterosexual man – both lay and clergy – and attract in more homosexuals, thus turning the parish into a veritable bathhouse. Straight men do not want to be around, much less be verbally and emotionally abused by, fags. Period. Straight men will flee from fags even faster than they flee from domineering, nagging women, for obvious reasons.

I am starting to hear more about these sorts of concerns in North America.  I have received more than one email from concerned mothers of children in trad parishes who simply do not feel comfortable leaving their sons alone with the “choir director” or “altar server organizer” – always “confirmed bachelors” who, let’s be honest, lay the needle on the old gaydar on the peg and then break the spring.

We all need to start speaking up about these things, specifically calling out and ostracizing men who act like this.  Folks, the “queeny” affectation is 100% voluntary.  I have personally witnessed men turn it on and off like a switch. Even if a homosexual man is not acting out and engaging in homosexual sex “behind closed doors”, men who ACT like queens, and do everything they can to telegraph to those around them that they are homosexually oriented ARE A SCANDAL, and their behavior is nothing less than OBSCENE.  It is also a massively reliable indicator of Diabolical Narcissism. To behave in such a way that implies even a winking approval of, much less a prideful wallowing in sin that cries out to heaven for God’s vengeance is simply beyond the pale.

So, for you Trads, especially those in North America who might not know exactly what this “liturgical fetishim” looks like, here are some key traits to look out for and guard against:

  • Contempt for genuine Catholic piety, especially simple piety
  • Contempt for rank-and-file Trads as “stupid”
  • Contempt for Trads because they “don’t understand Catholicism and take it (the actual religion) all way too seriously”, hurling the word “rigorist” as a pejorative (you think I’m kidding on this one – so many people have been told this it is stunning)
  • Rejection of the notion that the Novus Ordo must be abolished – because the idea that the waiter or janitor or blue-collar rabble have and know the same Mass as the “elite” is repellant, and defeats the entire purpose of their liturgical fetish
  • Hyper-criticality, haughtily luxuriating in running down everything – music, ceremonies, vestments, flowers, architecture, regardless of the financial or personnel resources of the parish. Every Mass is “yet another abomination”, the choir is “grotesque”, the servers are “retarded”, vestments are “rags”. Often, the objectively better the liturgy is, the more vicious the criticism will become, because the liturgical fetishist derives intense narcissistic satisfaction from criticizing things that are actually very good – thus proving how vastly superior they believe themselves to be
  • Irreverence and impiousness in the sacristy and even in the sanctuary – using extreme profanity, sometimes mere feet from the Blessed Sacrament
  • Resenting being asked to help do anything, always acting put-upon and put-out
  • Resenting NOT being asked to help do anything
  • Never saying “thank you” to anyone
  • Effete, queeny comportment – screeching, hooting, feminine raging

These are all, it seems to me, pretty common-sense things to look out for.  The key is overcoming the pathological effeminacy that has been inculcated into every one of us and to start doing again what people used to do to these types of people before our culture was destroyed: ostracize them. Cast them out.  Make it clear that there is no place for this sort of scandalous behavior in a Catholic Culture.  The summation is simply this:

One cannot be an aberrosexual (physically active or not) or aberrosexual sympathizer, and an orthodox Catholic, and expect to survive as a cleric and especially as a prelate – and that’s as it should be. We Trads MUST be diligent about self-policing on this point, because as was explained above, satan has set the chessboard such that his agents will use ANY aberrosexual presence against us, completely irrespective of the massive, massive hypocrisy of it all.  Satan doesn’t care that he is a hypocrite, and, in fact, derives intense satisfaction in his hypocrisy precisely because it is a function of mendacity (lying) and manifest injustice. The Rule of Law, and specifically the notion of EQUAL PROTECTION and UNIVERSAL REDRESS is under an intense, and perhaps final attack both in the secular realm and in the Church.  We have an ideological tyrant Antipope who is eager to capitalize on the corruption from top-to-bottom in order to gather ever-more power to himself.  Thus, we must be “wise as serpents” and do everything we can to make certain that we give him, and any nefarious actors that come after him, as little as possible to work with. A good place to start is driving out homosexual liturgical fetishists from among us, both clerics and laymen, and making sure that our garden is kept thoroughly weeded.

St. Peter Damian, pray for us.


Starting Wednesday Off Right: What Is A Man? Edition

Our Father, Who art in heaven, hallowed be Thy Name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Amen.

PATER NOSTER, qui es in caelis, sanctificetur nomen tuum. Adveniat regnum tuum. Fiat voluntas tua, sicut in caelo et in terra. Panem nostrum quotidianum da nobis hodie, et dimitte nobis debita nostra sicut et nos dimittimus debitoribus nostris. Et ne nos inducas in tentationem, sed libera nos a malo. Amen.


“For a man is not merely whosoever has hands and feet of a man, nor whosoever is rational only, but whosoever practices piety and virtue with boldness.”
-St. John Chrysostom

Prophecy Comes In Many Forms: Lulu Belle and Scotty

Straight out of ARSH 1952, y’all.

“I’m No Communist”

We’re living in a country that’s the finest place of earth
But some folks don’t appreciate this land that gave them birth
I hear that up in Washington they’re having an awful fuss
‘Cause Communists and spies are making monkeys out of us

The bureaus and departments have been busy night and day
They’re figuring out just how we gave our secrets all away
And Congress has appointed a committee so they said
To find out who’s American and who’s a low-down Red.

They call them up to Washington to speak for Uncle Sam
But when they ask them what they are, they shut up like a clam
I wish they’d take and put me on the witness stand today
I’d yell so loud old Stalin could hear me all the way

Refrain: I’m no Communist, and I’ll you that right now
I believe a man should own his own house and car and cow
I like this private ownership, and I want to be left alone
Let the government run its business and let me run my own

Our government is bigger than it ever was today
The more they hire to work for it, the more they have to pay
Our public servants should be proud and honest you would think
Instead of taking bribes and dressing up their wives in mink

The taxes keep on going up of that there is no doubt
But still they just can’t take it in as fast as they dish it out
Our national debt is monster size and growin’ every day
Our children’s children, still unborn are gonna have to pay

Our dollar used be the soundest money on this earth
But now two bucks won’t even buy a good old dollar’s worth
Unless we stop inflation and take care of what we’ve got
The Communists may win the fight and never fire a shot

“You Are Not the Potato!” and Other Inneresting Things

So I was visiting with a friend whose mother tongue is technically Spanish, and we were discussing the Bergoglian Antipapacy, and we were discussing how pleasing it would be to stride up to Bergoglio and denounce him to his face.  I settled on, “Tu no eres la Papa!”, at which point my friend reminded me that “pope” in Spanish is obviously EL PAPA, not “la papa”.  Gotta get the gender of those articles right!  He then went on to say that “la papa” in Spanish actually a secondary word for “potato”, the primary word being “patata”.  I guess “la papa” might be akin to “taters” for us.  And ever since then I will randomly giggle to myself as I envision myself striding manfully up to Bergoglio, pointing directly at his nose and in my most authoritative and virile voice, soaked with gravitas, bellowing,

“YOU are not the potato!”

I think this should be some sort of secret passphrase.  A coded greeting.  As in, “Hail! You are not the potato!”  Can’t you just hear at the after-Mass coffee in the parish hall people greeting each other with, “You are not the potato!” “And YOU are not the potato!” A veritable cacophony of anti-tuberial denunciations!

It would also be a good name for a band.

Kids, it’s either laugh, or go sit on the stairs and sob.  Might as well laugh when we can.

There is only one potato. The one on the left, mugging for the camera, that is not the potato. That is the antipotato.

There is only one potato. The one on the left, mugging for the camera, that is not the potato. That is the antipotato.

2.  What did I do for the 4th of July, the 240th anniversary of the founding of a no-longer-extant Freemasonic republic that had the seeds of its own inevitable auto-destruction sown into it?  I went to Mass.  A Requiem (Mass for the dead) was said.  This was no coincidence.

3. is back up and running.  All is well.  Whew!

4.  Here is one of my all-time favorite country singers, Marty Robbins, doing what the failed Vatican II Council should have done, but didn’t: denouncing global Communism. Enjoy. Functionality Problems UPDATE: RESOLVED

UPDATE:  All is now well with .  They did have an issue on their end, but it is now resolved. THANK YOU!

Yes, I see that is having some sort of profound functionality problem.  I am trying to get in contact with them.  As more info comes in, I will let you know.  What I am seeing is that the recurring donations are still mostly (?) going through, but I suspect this is because the recurring profiles are a function of the payment clearinghouse, WePay.

If I need to make a change, I’ll let you know ASAP, obviously.

In answer to the many inquiries, YES, the University Blvd. snail mail address (on the contact page) is still good and is checked multiple times per week;

and YES, my Cornerstone Cattle Marketing 16 hour DVD set is still for sale ($500), and if you are interested in that, email me to order and for payment instructions.

As always, thank you!!! Remember, every Tuesday at 0830 is the weekly “Benefactor Mass”, offered in the Venerable and August Gregorian Rite, so set an alarm!

Diabolical Narcissism: Gregory Corna, Human Evil On Full Display

This post is extremely adult in nature, and revolves around intense sexual perversion and pornography.  I am posting this first and foremost to educate you all, specifically the fact that human evil more often than not presents on the surface as completely normal.  Diabolical Narcissists, especially cerebral DNs, can prowl throughout the world almost undetected.  These people are, on the surface, not drooling, raging demoniacs.  They hide in plain sight among us.  And boy, do I have a doozy of an example.

First, this is an email from the man in question, one Gregory Corna. Corna seems to be some sort of naval engineer. His professional website is .

Here is an email I received from Corna not long ago. Caution: Think long and hard before visiting the website mentioned below.  Remember, your ENTIRE browsing and searching history is permanently logged, and can be used against you.  Look, it is horrific.  It’s really, really bad.  You don’t need to look at it, nor should you. And things once seen can never be unseen, and the demons use images and memories against us whenever they can.  So again, I would urge you NOT to browse to the website below.

from: gregory corna <>
to: “” <>
date: Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:41 AM

Hi Ann,

My name is Greg and I am the owner, webmaster of .
I am based in Las Vegas and need a strong controlling woman for the main actor on my site.
You could ware a full rubber suite with face mask and your Name and info would aways be a secret. I could pay all expanses to Las Vegas and do the videos in the Aria hotel ,I live very close at Veer Tower.
I will pay per video, we could shoot 4 or 5 in a weekend.
This site has a big following of men that need to be controlled by a strong woman .
Please give me a call at my cell (954) 465-4440
I am a big fan of your views.
Thanks for your time,

Now, here is a voicemail from Gregory Corna.  It is two minutes and twenty seconds of pure human evil, diabolical narcissism at its most refined.  Listen to how calm, cool, casual and even confident Corna sounds.  This is what a human soul, utterly devoid of charity, utterly devoid of human empathy, utterly devoid of shame or any pangs of conscience sounds like. Transcript below.

Hi Ann.  My name’s Gregory.  You can contact me at 954-465-4440. Uh, I’ve been listening to your political speech and, uh, your views are very common to mine. I’m very impressed. Uh, it looks like you might need some work. I’ve got a unusual situation where I run an adult website. The name of it is window girl dot com. And it features strong German women that are strap-on mistresses to men, that control men, and, uh, I do videos about that. Uh, I haven’t updated the site in such a long time because the original woman has passed away, but if you’d be interested in doing, uh, videos, I think we could come to an arrangement for money, and uh, this would be like with a full rubber suit, nobody would know you, you wouldn’t have to talk too much.  It would be very controlling situations over men, and uh, sexually I think you might be interested in that. And I could be willing to pay you some money up front. The website makes a little bit of money, but I, I do this mostly because of my interest in, uh, dealing with strong, uh, controlling women. And, besides that attitude, you have the exact same views I have on islam, and uh, a lot of other things, and your, uh, speech on the, um, scam banksters and the Federal Reserve, I went into that quite a bit too.  I’m a retired, uh, ship’s captain and I have got a strange, uh – strange desires, but, uh, we might be able to talk. If you’re interested just to talk about this possibly, uh, give me a call. The website again is window girl dot com. My name’s Gregory, and my phone number is 954-465-4440. And, believe me, we have a lot in common politically and, uh socially. It’s, it’s amazing. Thank you.

Okay, this guy is so totally far-gone, so thoroughly evil and in the clear grip of satan that the only real hope he has is supernatural.  It is utterly imperative to comprehend that his lucidity, functionality in society, and, apparently his career, his clarity of thought and speech is not evidence that he is not evil, but is precisely evidence that he IS EVIL.  Gregory Corna is not insane per se, nor is he actively possessed by demons. Gregory Corna is in full control of his faculties, and has FREELY CHOSEN EVIL.  People who are drooling, ranting, and manifesting insanity are the people for whom the culpability of evil is reduced. This Gregory Corna is one of the most chilling manifestations of evil I have yet encountered.

I would like to ask any of the priests reading this if they can please offer the Holy Sacrifice for this guy, if you have any open days coming up, because again, that is pretty much his only hope.  If you can say a Mass for this guy, Gregory Corna, shoot me an email and let me know.


Answering the Question: Why Has Christ Permitted the Bergoglian Antipapacy?

I am inundated with emails from people who just a few short years ago would have described their faith as strong, solid and even unshakable – people for whom the thought of ever, ever losing their faith or questioning or doubting in even the slightest way the Church, and even Our Lord Himself, specifically His love for us, was all but impossible. We’re talking daily Tridentine Mass-goers. Daily Rosary prayers. All because of the Bergoglian antipapacy.

First, realizing that Jorge Cardinal Bergoglio, S.J., known in his obedience as “Francis”, is, in fact, an antipope, and not the Vicar of Christ, is a tremendous consolation in and of itself. Thank God for Canon 188. Thank God for Archbishop Georg Ganswein spilling the beans on Pope Benedict’s ontological error with regards to the papacy at the Gregorian University in Rome a few weeks ago. As was pointed out to me by an entrenched Vatican employee earlier today, Ganswein, from a purely professional perspective, should have been fired immediately for the sheer obliviousness and stupidity of running his mouth as he did. My response is, what one person calls “obliviousness and stupidity”, I call “Divine Providence.”

But still the fact of the scandal of Bergoglio remains. Souls are being scandalized unto eternal damnation by this most wicked and malignant of antipopes, many of whom are the immediate family members – children and spouses – of the remnant faithful. Yes, yes, we can see that technically, legally, Bergoglio does not besmirch the papacy, and yet the damage his is doing is so profound that it will, in all likelihood, drive the Remnant Church into the catacombs. Why is Our Lord permitting this? Why doesn’t He rise up?

The answer lies in His Love and His Mercy.

Everyone agrees that the Bergoglian antipapcy is a scourge, a castigation. Rorate Caeli published a very widely-read piece on this very recently. I myself have been posting this famous quotation from St. John Eudes for YEARS, although in truncated form. Here is the full quote:

‘THE MOST EVIDENT MARK of God’s anger and the most terrible castigation He can inflict upon the world are manifested when He permits His people to fall into the hands of clerics’ who are priests more in name than in deed, priests who practice the cruelty of ravening wolves rather than the charity and affection of devoted shepherds.

Instead of nourishing those committed to their care, they rend and devour them brutally. Instead of leading their people to God, they drag Christian souls into hell in their train. Instead of being the salt of the earth and the light of the world, they are its innocuous poison and its murky darkness.

St. Gregory the Great says that priests and pastors will stand condemned before God as the murderers of any souls lost through neglect or silence. Tot occidimus, quot ad mortem ire tepidi et tacentes videmus. Elsewhere St. Gregory asserts that nothing more angers God than to see those whom He set aside for the correction of others, give bad example by a wicked and depraved life.’

Instead of preventing offenses against His Majesty, such priests become themselves the first to persecute Him, they lose their zeal for the salvation of souls and think only of following their own inclinations. Their affections go no farther than earthly things, they eagerly bask in the empty praises of men, using their sacred ministry to serve their ambitions, they abandon the things of God to devote themselves to the things of the world, and in their saintly calling of holiness, they spend their time in profane and worldly pursuits.

When God permits such things, it is a very positive proof that He is thoroughly angry with His people, and is visiting His most dreadful anger upon them. That is why He cries unceasingly to Christians, “Return, 0 ye revolting children . . . and I will give you pastors according to my own heart” (Jer. 3, 14-15). Thus, irregularities in the lives of priests constitute a scourge visited upon the people in consequence of sin.’

-St. John Eudes, ‘The Priest: His Dignity and Obligations’

So if we all agree with St. John Eudes that Bergoglio is a scourge on us, that is, God’s PEOPLE, the first question we must ask ourselves is WHAT EXACTLY it is that we have done to deserve this? Then, once we have determined that, we must – MUST – stop doing that, and, presumably do the opposite.

What I would submit is the great crime against God committed by His People over the past 50 years is our SILENCE – our passive, impotent, effeminate acceptance of the profound violence done against Him, His Church, and His Liturgy. We, our parents, our grandparents, our great-grandparents, sat in silence and watched as sodomites turned the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass into a neo-pagan low-rent cruise ship floorshow. Our response was either the silence of apostasy, as more than 90% of Catholics in the West simply stopped going to Mass, or the silence of tacitly accepting the obvious abuse and overt hostility toward Our Lord and His Church by diabolically narcissistic sex perverts and their truly pathetic, co-dependent hangers-on. The collapse of our culture, the abortion, the ascendancy of sexual perversion, the collapse of the Rule of Law – all of these things are DERIVATIVE of the destruction of the Liturgy, a destruction that we sat, wallowing in our collective effeminacy, and watched.

So my question, in rebuttal to the commentariat’s responses to my “Vocem Alienorum” piece is this: If we all agree that it has been precisely our inaction over the past 50 years that has brought down this scourge upon us, how can it possibly, possibly make sense that the proper response to the Bergoglian antipapacy is MORE SILENCE? MORE RETREAT? MORE SHOULDER-SHRUGGING? MORE FATALISM? MORE EFFEMINACY? MORE INDIFFERENCE?

And that brings us, somewhat paradoxically, to Our Lord’s incomprehensible Love for us, and His Mercy.

The reason Our Lord is letting the Bergoglian Antipapacy happen, is because He is giving us ONE. LAST. CHANCE to cease the very crime we have committed against Him for lo these 50 years, one last chance to come to His defense. One last chance to shake off our effeminacy and instead rise up in virility and fight for Him.

As I have been desperately trying to convey for years, a “personal relationship with Jesus Christ” is utterly, utterly essential. Our Lord is a PERSON. He loves us PERSONALLY. He is not a philosophy, a political ideology, a legal matrix or an abstraction of any kind. He is a PERSON who not only who loves us, but perhaps even more incomprehensibly, wants to be LOVED BY US. As we have learned in our ongoing study of Diabolical Narcissism, DN humans, and their demonic analogues in the angelic plane, are those who refuse to either love, or BE LOVED. God, obviously being the “infinite opposite” of diabolical, loves and desires to be loved.

Why does God come to us in the Eucharist? Why does He condescend to change a humble piece of bread into His physical substance? Why does He allow Himself to be called down onto the altar by a man – a priest? Why does he allow Himself – His physical substance – to be reposed inside of all of those tabernacles? Why does He expose Himself to possible desecration all day every day all over the world?

He makes Himself so incredibly vulnerable so that WE CAN TAKE CARE OF HIM. He leaves Himself wide open and exposed so that we can be good and loving TO HIM. He who provides and gives us everything, even gives us the ability to give back to Him. He who guards, defends and protects us, gives us the ability to guard, defend and protect Him. He who has given us the beauty of the stars and galaxies, the mountains, the sea, the plants and animals, has given us the ability to give Him the beauty of our architecture, our works of art, and our music. And most especially, He who stepped into the breach and fought and conquered sin and death for us, the perfect act of chivalry, borne of perfect virility, borne of perfect, infinite love, gives us the chance to DEFEND HIM, to confront and combat His enemies. He intentionally remains passive – for a time – precisely so that we may rush to HIS AID. Why? Because He knows that in doing this – doing the right thing – we will be truly happy.

This is what we have failed to do, and what we are being given one last chance to do now, in these dark days. Just as he gave Peter the three-fold chance to unwind his three-fold denial, which Peter jumped at and did with tears from the shore of the Sea of Tiberias all the way to his cross on the Vatican Hill with the words “Agapo-se”, “I love you” on his lips, so now we are being given the chance to “unwind” our silent betrayal. Turning our backs on Him and retiring to our diversions and navel-gazing distractions – and that is what they are, distractions from the pangs of our consciences as we fail, YET AGAIN, to stand and defend our Beloved Savior, and the souls that Our Beloved God loves – will never, ever provide genuine happiness. It can only ever provide a prolongation of earthly, sensual comfort. Turning our backs on Our Lord, telling ourselves the lie that objective reality, truth itself, is unknowable, and even if known, far too risky or costly to speak in anything but the most hushed tones amongst the right company, as He is attacked by an axis of sodomites, Freemasons, Modernists and satanists with a dimwitted arch-heresiarch squatter paraded before them as their ringleader, is more of the same malfeasance that brought this scourge down upon us in the first place.

I had occasion to have a truly disheartening conversation with a priest recently about a situation where I am currently living involving the display and selling of pornographic materials, in a location where children pass every day. He used the metaphor of the Titanic to make his point, namely that the ship is going down, and that it is futile, and even smacks of pride, to think that I or anyone else can do anything to correct the situation – that any efforts we make to resist the onslaught of evil is “rearranging deck chairs while the band plays on.”

I have been a bit of a Titanic buff since 1986 when the wreck was discovered, and what immediately sprang to my mind was the following, which answers the question, “What should we do in the face of inevitable catastrophe?”

On board the Titanic were numerous uber-wealthy passengers and titans of industry. One was the billionaire Benjamin Guggenheim, who was on board with his mistress. Guggenheim, upon learning that the ship was going down, took his mistress and her maid up to the deck and put them in a lifeboat. He then went back to his cabin whereupon he and his valet put on their finest eveningwear, went back to the foyer of the Grand Staircase, reposed themselves in deck chairs, and sat, sipping brandy and smoking cigars, until they died.

Also on board for the maiden voyage was J. Bruce Ismay, the owner of the White Star Line, essentially the owner of the Titanic. Upon consulting with Thomas Andrews, the naval architect who designed the Titanic and oversaw its construction at the Harland & Wolff shipyards in Belfast who was also onboard for the maiden voyage, and knowing that the ship was doomed, Ismay immediately went up to the lifeboat decks and began urgently pleading with incredulous passengers to get into the lifeboats. Many passengers refused, refusing to believe that the Titanic was going to sink. Ismay used his authority and credibility as the owner of the White Star Line to convince people to board lifeboats. He stayed on deck until the very end, and in the final moments of the great barque, saw and was encouraged to jump into a collapsible lifeboat. Ismay survived, and despite his heroic efforts on deck, was destroyed in the press for not going down with the ship – largely by his enemy, newspaper magnate William Randolph Hearst. But Guggenheim, after seeing only to his mistress and her maid, retired to two hours of self-absorbed and self-satisfied sensual decadence and naval-gazing as he waited to die, apparently indifferent to the other 2200 souls aboard, and was hailed as a hero.

The analogy here is clear. Yes, the Titanic is going down. Barring a supernatural intervention – which is possible – the Barque of Peter as we have known it is going down. With the Titanic it was a matter of infiltration of water. With the Church, it is a matter of the infiltration of Communists, Modernists, sodomites and satanists. It will no longer be the majestic “Titanic”, and will be reduced to only the lifeboats. But lifeboats are barques too – just smaller, and less comfortable.

We MUST warn others. We MUST tell them the truth of the situation so that they understand the enormity of what is happening, and so that they will get into the lifeboats and be saved. We MUST tell them that to follow Antipope Bergoglio is to reject Christ and embrace the spirit of Antichrist. And we must keep doing this until the very end. The good news is that on the Barque of Peter, as with the Miracle of the Loaves and Fishes, there is an infinite supply of lifeboats. Launch one, and another appears. So long as there are souls waiting to board a lifeboat, GOD WILL PROVIDE. But we are players in this. If we take the Guggenheim route, the route of fatalism, souls will be lost that could have been saved, and, in all likelihood, we will be lost ourselves, because failure in charity – indifference – so often manifests as a sin of omission.

Finally, and with great sadness, it must be said that the statement “We have the pope that we deserve,” is indeed true. We have a pope who has been saturated in bad theology and bad philosophy. We have a pope who is intimately tied to the failed Vatican II Council. We have a pope who is weak, and who, like the hirelings, has abandoned the sheep and fled from the wolves. Yes, we most assuredly have the pope we deserve: Joseph Ratzinger, Pope Benedict XVI. Pray for Pope Benedict, and pray for Bergoglio, that he repents, reverts to Catholicism, dies in the state of grace and achieves the Beatific Vision.

Antipope Bergoglio Confesses Lutheranism

The call by the Antipope Bergoglio for The Church to beg the forgiveness of sodomites for having offended them, while nauseating, is not entirely shocking.

The real shocker in the latest airplane interview is Antipope Bergoglio CONFESSING LUTHERANISM.

After reading this, how can we possibly, possibly believe that this man is the Vicar of Christ, and that there is “no way we can know” his status?  To confess Lutheranism is to not be Catholic.  For Bergoglio to be the Pope requires that he be a CATHOLIC.  So, we are firmly into Principle of Non-Contradiction territory yet again. Bergoglio can not be both Catholic and not Catholic. His confession in the presser is Lutheran.


Kleinjung: Too much beer … Holy Father, I wanted to ask you a question. Today you spoke of the gifts of the shared Churches, of the gifts shared by the Churches together. Seeing that you will go in I believe four months to Lund for the commemoration of the 500th anniversary of the reformation, I think perhaps this is also the right moment for us not only to remember the wounds on both sides but also to recognize the gifts of the reformation. Perhaps also – this is a heretical question – perhaps to annul or withdraw the excommunication of Martin Luther or of some sort of rehabilitation. Thank you.

Pope Francis: I think that the intentions of Martin Luther were not mistaken. He was a reformer. Perhaps some methods were not correct. But in that time, if we read the story of the Pastor, a German Lutheran who then converted when he saw reality – he became Catholic – in that time, the Church was not exactly a model to imitate. There was corruption in the Church, there was worldliness, attachment to money, to power…and this he protested. Then he was intelligent and took some steps forward justifying, and because he did this. And today Lutherans and Catholics, Protestants, all of us agree on the doctrine of justification. On this point, which is very important, he did not err. He made a medicine for the Church, but then this medicine consolidated into a state of things, into a state of a discipline, into a way of believing, into a way of doing, into a liturgical way and he wasn’t alone; there was Zwingli, there was Calvin, each one of them different, and behind them were who? Principals! We must put ourselves in the story of that time. It’s a story that’s not easy to understand, not easy. Then things went forward, and today the dialogue is very good. That document of justification I think is one of the richest ecumenical documents in the world, one in most agreement. But there are divisions, and these also depend on the Churches. In Buenos Aires there were two Lutheran churches, and one thought in one way and the other…even in the same Lutheran church there was no unity; but they respected each other, they loved each other, and the difference is perhaps what hurt all of us so badly and today we seek to take up the path of encountering each other after 500 years. I think that we have to pray together, pray. Prayer is important for this. Second, to work together for the poor, for the persecuted, for many people, for refugees, for the many who suffer; to work together and pray together and the theologians who study together try…but this is a long path, very long. One time jokingly I said: I know when full unity will happen. – “when?” – “the day after the Son of Man comes,” because we don’t know…the Holy Spirit will give the grace, but in the meantime, praying, loving each other and working together. Above all for the poor, for the people who suffer and for peace and many things…against the exploitation of people and many things in which they are jointly working together.

“He did not err.”


Bergoglio has all along thrown massive, massive hints that it is Lutheranism that he admires, and Catholicism that he desipses.  Bergoglio from literally his first Mass has gone out of his way to NOT reverence the Eucharist. He does not, as policy, genuflect before Our Lord in the Eucharist – including at the consecration of the Host and Chalice at Mass.  He does not participate in the Corpus Domini procession in Rome – instead driving in a car from the Lateran Basilica to Mary Major.  He mocks the Rosary, and holds in scathing contempt the “colonialists” and the Spanish Crown which converted millions and millions of human souls from some of the most overtly satanic pagan paradigms ever seen on earth, to the One True Church, almost exactly concurrent with the Lutheran revolt which he openly gushes over in the remarks above.

And then, there is this:


“What is reconciliation? Taking one from this side, taking another one for that side and uniting them: no, that’s part of it but it’s not it … True reconciliation means that God in Christ took on our sins and He became the sinner for us. When we go to confession, for example, it isn’t that we say our sin and God forgives us. No, not that! We look for Jesus Christ and say: ‘This is your sin, and I will sin again’. And Jesus likes that, because it was his mission: to become the sinner for us, to liberate us. “

Now compare Antipope Bergoglio’s words above to this quote from Luther:

“Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong, but let your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is the victor over sin, death, and the world. We will commit sins while we are here, for this life is not a place where justice resides… No sin can separate us from Him, even if we were to kill or commit adultery thousands of times each day.”
(ref. ‘Let Your Sins Be Strong, from ‘The Wittenberg Project;’ ‘The Wartburg Segment’, translated by Erika Flores, from Dr. Martin Luther’s Saemmtliche Schriften, Letter No. 99, 1 Aug. 1521. – Cf. Also Denifle’s Luther et Lutheranisme, Etude Faite d’apres les sources. Translation by J. Paquier (Paris, A. Picard, 1912-13), VOl. II, pg. 404))

It also bears repeating Luther’s thoughts on marriage, given Antipope Bergoglio’s enthusiasm for fornication, adultery and serial concubinage:

“It is not in opposition to the Holy Scriptures for a man to have several wives.”
(ref. De Wette, Vol. 2, p. 459).

And finally, this: Luther or Antipope Bergoglio?

“What I teach and write remains true even though the whole world should fall to pieces over it”
(Luther- ref. Weimar, Vol. 18, Pg. 401).

My full essay, “Luther, in His Own Words” can be found HERE. It is worth a review given the fact that the Antipope has just confessed Lutheranism, and I suspect will, in fact, attempt to rehabilitate Luther more in the coming months as the 500th anniversary of the Lutheran Revolt is reached.

Remember, all of this – ALL OF THIS – is fully explainable, and the Church remains indefectible and spotless Bride of Christ, if one simply acknowledges the objective reality that Jorge Bergoglio is not now and never was the Pope.  Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger remains the one and only living Vicar of Christ, whether he believes it, or likes it.  Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger could no more bifurcate the papacy than I could. Ratzinger’s mind is not the arbiter of reality, much less supernatural reality.  And neither is mine – reality is reality, and it is my job to conform my rational intellect to it, and the Principle of Non-Contradiction is a foundational plank in that conformation. I cannot, in good conscience, violate the Principle of Non-Contradiction. Calling Jorge Bergoglio “The Vicar of Christ” REQUIRES violation of the Principle of Non-Contradiction, therefore, the premise CANNOT be true. It cannot be included in the domain of “The Real”.


Antipope Bergoglio Says Church Should Apologize to, Nay, Beg Forgiveness of Sodomites for Having Offended Them


In the hour-long freewheeling conversation that has become a trademark of his international travels, Francis was asked if he agreed with recent comments by a German Roman Catholic cardinal that the Church should apologize to gays.

Francis looked sad when the reporter asked if an apology was made more urgent by the killing of 49 people at a gay club in Orlando, Florida this month.

He recalled Church teachings that homosexuals “should not be discriminated against. They should be respected, accompanied pastorally.”

He added: “I think that the Church not only should apologize … to a gay person whom it offended but it must also apologize to the poor as well, to the women who have been exploited, to children who have been exploited by (being forced to) work. It must apologize for having blessed so many weapons.”

The Church teaches that homosexual tendencies are not sinful but homosexual acts are, and that homosexuals should try to be chaste.

Francis repeated a slightly modified version of the now-famous “Who am I to judge?” comment he made about gays on the first foreign trip after his election in 2013.

“The questions is: if a person who has that condition, who has good will, and who looks for God, who are we to judge?”


Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi said that the pope, by saying “has that condition”, did not imply a medical condition but “a person in that situation”. In Italian, the word “condition” can also mean “situation”.

“We Christians have to apologize for so many things, not just for this (treatment of gays), but we must ask for forgiveness, not just apologize! Forgiveness! Lord, it is a word we forget so often!” he said.

Later, Antipope Bergoglio was asked about the controversy surrounding the Ganswein Thesis (Pope Benedict XVI Ratzinger believing that he could bifurcate the papacy).  I found Antipope Bergoglio’s answer to be an instance of diabolical forthrightness:

“There is only one pope.”

Exactly, and it ain’t you, Jorge.

I think we need to revisit Romans 1…

For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error. And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient; Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, Detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

[God delivered them up: Not by being author of their sins, but by withdrawing his grace, and so permitting them, in punishment of their pride, to fall into those shameful sins.]

Foolish, dissolute, without affection, without fidelity, without mercy. Who, having known the justice of God, did not understand that they who do such things, are worthy of death; and not only they that do them, but they also that consent to them that do them. Migrating Servers

One of the small handful of negative emails I have received since posting “Vocem Alienorum” was from the chap who has been hosting this site for the past few years, giving me 60 days to vacate his server.  The migration to the new server is happening now, and thus I am experiencing sporadic outages, and I have had reports that some emails are bouncing.  I’m sure it will clear up within 24 hours.