The Uganda Martyrs Died Because They Refused to Engage in Sodomy with King Mwanga

So Francis/Bergoglio has flown off to Africa and will be visiting Uganda on Friday, I think.  There is going to be great talk while he is there of the Uganda Martyrs, and it is widely suspected that since there were 13 Catholics and 11 Anglicans in the company of martyrs, it will all be lyingly cast as a great proof that “this Church is as good as that church” and “the differences don’t matter” blah blah blah.

Please spread the TRUE STORY and REAL POINT of the Ugandan martyrs far and wide, and don’t let the evil Freemasonic infiltrators and enemies of God and His Holy Church twist this into yet another heresy-supporting perversity.

King Mwanga was 19 years old and a raging sodomite.  The Ugandan martyrs were young Christian men, the youngest being 14 years old and some of them actually OLDER than King Mwanga himself, the eldest being 25 years old, who were pages in Mwanga’s court that categorically refused to comply with his demand that they engage in homosexual sex with him or anyone else, including his… wait for it… MUSLOID buddy, Lutaya.

In the week leading up to the commencement of the great bloodletting, a lad named Matthias Gayinga refused to have sex with the musloid Lutaya at King Mwanga’s specific order.  Matthias Gayinga was tortured, but not to death, for his virile stance against the sodomite wretches Mwanga and Lutaya.  This incident, and the “splendid example” as it was called among the Christians, is what led directly to the rage and mass martyrdom at the sodomite Mwanga’s hands.

The leader and protector of the young men and boys in Mwanga’s court was a Catholic man named Charles Lwanga who had ascended to that role just a few days earlier when his predecessor was beheaded by King Mwanga. Upon being made head page in Mwanga’s court, Charles Lwanga himself asked to be baptized and received into the Church on November 15, ARSH 1885.  When King Mwanga’s favorite male concubine, a lad named Mwafu, revealed that another man named Denis Sebuggwawo was instructing him and the other boys, under Charles Lwanga’s supervision as head page in the court, in the Catechism and preparing them for baptism, and that is why Mwafu had stopped coming to Mwanga’s court (for sodomy with King Mwanga), King Mwanga became enraged, sealed the court and summoned his executioners.

Charles Lwanga, knowing that they would all be killed by the raging sodomite king, immediately baptized the four catechumens on May, 26, ARSH 1886.  The next morning they were summoned before King Mwanga, and the Christians were asked to identify themselves, and then asked to apostatize.  Not one lad apostatized.  All stood manfully for Christ, knowing it meant their torture and death.

As I have hinted at with regards to my upcoming video, almost all sodomites have freely adopted the psychological pose and emotional palate of the demonic, and thus relish in inflicting wanton suffering upon others.  Generally they are confined to emotional and spiritual cruelty, but when given power, like King Mwanga, they are reliably physically sadistic.  The torture of the Ugandan Martyrs is no exception to this.  Charles Lwanga was separated from the rest of the lads and had his feet BURNED OFF before being finally killed. As his feet were being burned off, Charles Lwanga said to the executioner, “It is as if you are pouring water on me. Please repent and become a Christian like me.”

The other lads were marched 37 miles, and at the place of execution were wrapped in reed mats, stacked like logs, and burned as a human pyre.

I find several extremely relevant points here.

First, King Mwanga’s demand was not just for sodomitical sex, but CONSENSUAL sex.  The lads were not raped, it seems.  This is a huge distinction, and so reflective of our contemporary culture and situation.  Sodomites are never content to be “left alone” to their wretched depravity.  The cultural progression goes from tolerance to acceptance, acceptance to ratification, ratification to support, and support to participation.  King Mwanga tortured and killed those lads because they refused to crawl down into hell with him – just as the demons and their human allies want every human being to freely choose hell, just as they did.

Second, we all know that the part about the sodomy will be totally glazed over by FrancisMercyEcumenicalChurch this week.  Heck, just in researching this post I came across Catholic websites that never mention it – only “the King’s immoral practices”, being conspicuously careful to never say what those “immoral practices” were. According to the evil infiltrators of the Church, poor King Mwanga just wanted to be “loved”, albeit in a “different way” with it own unique “value”. Who are we to judge, and who were these pious, rigid, fundamentalist, creepy young men who judged King Mwanga judgmentally, and refused to encounter, dialogue and accompany him body-to-body with the tender caresses of the God of Surprising Newness on his equally valid path through the fragrant lands of teh sweet, sweet buttsecks?

Make no mistake, according to FrancisNewMercyChurch, the Ugandan Martyrs had it coming.

I look forward to the Cirque de Soleil-level contortions that will be required to explain how EXACTLY the Anglicans among the company of martyrs can be reconciled to the Anglican milieu of today, since the Anglicans have enthusiastically embraced sodomy in all its forms.  How exactly will “Bishop” Vickie explain to her “wife” in that evening’s pillow talk that celebrating a feast commemorating martyrs who died refusing to engage in consensual sodomy is in no way judging or casting aspersions on their sapphic union?

I look forward to FrancisNewMercyChurch pointing to the Ugandan Martyrs as proof that “we are all the same” when the Anglicans DO NOT BELIEVE THAT WHAT THESE MARTYRS DIED FOR IS EVEN A SIN.

Please tell everyone you can about St. Charles Lwanga and his Companions and their glorious and holy deaths at the hands of a raging sodomite and his musloid instigator, standing against that sin so vile, so foul, that it cries out to heaven for God’s vengeance, and that even the demons themselves withdraw from once instigated, given their angelic nature: SODOMY.

St. Charles Lwanga and Companions, pray for us, that we too may die before we ever capitulate to sodomites.

Oh, wait.  I guess it is too late for that….




Monday Miscellany and Catch-Up

1. It is MONDAY, so that means today the Holy and August Sacrifice of the Mass, will be offered for my Benefactors.  Thank you.

2.  I have been pretty much bedridden for the past week fighting, what I have finally determined to be, an actual influenza strain.  I had a fever for most of last week, and then the fever broke and I thought I was on the mend, but the telltale stinging lung (right, in my case) kept me down (and awake coughing all night – yuck).  I have had pneumonia as an adult, and it is nothing I want anything to do with ever again unless I am to die of it.  And I don’t think I am supposed to die of pneumonia complications from influenza here in my “van down by the river”.  And I sho’ nuff’ ain’t stepping’ foot in no hospital.  Fo-Get-Dat.

3.  Work and research continues apace on the big video on NPD.  I cannot tell you how many points of connection and nexuses keep cropping up.  I will probably try to release the video first as an edited whole, then in shorter clips by specific topic, and then finally the “director’s cut”, which will include the parts where I break down sobbing, blow my nose, and then continue.

4.  People are asking, “Why is this your last video?”  Simply, because I am old and tired, war’s-a-comin’, and this topic is so over-arching, that I really don’t see how I will have anything video-worthy to say beyond it.  It is also, unlike the other videos, even the economics video which touched directly on my professional vocation, such an intensely personal topic, and the prognosis is so bleak and difficult, that it has already damn-near killed me, and may yet.

5.  I will say this: I don’t mean to get all “mystic”, because I am not.  HOWEVER, I can feel with each passing day the palpable demonic presence and shadow falling over Riverville and the world.  It isn’t a paranoia or mere fantasy scapegoat.  It is real.  The demonic is bursting forth out of every crevice.  And as my video will explain, the entanglement of men with the demonic realm is so pervasive that the demonic need not resort to supernatural manifestations.  If they have an army of men to do their dirty work, why not expend them first?  In fact, demonically-allied men can actually do far more damage to souls, as the sight of a supernatural demonic manifestation will actually drive men back into the arms of Our Blessed Lord and His mother.  Just ask an actual exorcist what the effect of having the complete living shit scared out of them by witnessing a demonic manifestation was.  It was almost certainly an increase in personal humility and love of God.  No, no.  The demons want us to kill EACH OTHER as much as possible, because the demons themselves have no credibility, whereas men do have credibility with one another, and thus we will try to rationalize and moralize and justify the behaviors of men – even those who have chosen to walk the demonic path.  Remember, the title of my video will be, “Remember Lot’s Wife.”

6.  I want to make a few quick-hitter points, just because this stuff bothers me when I read it and the simple, obvious explanations go unsaid or uncomprehended.

A.) So, the French Flag, the Tricolore, or the three vertical fields of red, white and blue IS THE FLAG OF THE SATANIC FREEMASONIC REVOLUTION.  Did you not watch my presentation about the French Revolution and the Vendee Genocide?  The Tricolore flag is the flag of the BAD GUYS THAT GENOCIDED THE VENDEE AND TOSSED LIVING BABIES FROM BAYONET TO BAYONET.  Oh my gosh.  Will you PLEASE stop superimposing the Sacred Heart of Jesus over the Tricolore.  It is so blasphemous I can’t even quantify it.  If you are wondering, THIS is the French Flag most commonly used before the Freemasonic Revolution:

Flagof France


B.)  Charlie Sheen has HIV because in his demonic slide to the dark side, he, like all sex perverts, had to keep pushing into freakier and more evil perversions in order to maintain “pleasure levels”.  Female porn stars with fake breasts failed to arouse him after a while.  And so, Charlie Sheen started having sex with men dressed and surgically mutilated to look like women.  Except with penises.  Yeah.  Charlie Sheen got AIDS from homosexual anal sodomy with drag queen prostitutes.  Because no one is BORN GAY.  That is all a lie.  Men having sex with men is an acquired habit resulting from a demonic descent into pathological narcissism which perverts the psychosexual drive into something that you and I should pray God we never actually understand.

C.) My “Islamic Sexuality: A Survery of Evil” video presentation is going viral again.  Good.  Here is the deal.  The original version was scrubbed from my YouTube account by YouTube because it was flagged as “hate speech”.  THIS is why I encourage MIRRORING and COPYING of all of my stuff.  There are many, many mirrored version still completely available on YouTube.  Just do a YouTube search of something like “Barnhardt Islamic Sexuality” and it will come right up.

I DON”T CARE THAT IT ISN’T THE ORIGINAL VERSION.  My God, what kind of a moral monster would I have to be to actually give a crap about YouTube hit counts or “copyright” with regards to this?  Seriously.  Child rape.  Female genital mutilation.  Rape.  Prostitution.  Incest.  Bestiality. Necrophilia. YOU THINK I’M IN THIS FOR THE MONEY OR PERSONAL GLORY?  Just watch it and spread it, by any means necessary.  In fact, please spread it to other platforms besides YouTube.



Typical Malignant Narcissist Hypocrite: Bergoglio is Against War (Unless It’s War Initiated by Fascist Generals Attacking Peaceful Islanders by Surprise In Order to Play Into Nationalistic Prejudices)

(I’m shamelessly lifting on this piece from Mr. Spalding over at MahoundsParadise.  He wrote a post on this very thing in August, but after Francid’s verbal diarrhea on Wednesday condemning ALL war, including just war of DEFENSE, I just had to bring this back to the fore.)

Jorge Bergoglio is very simply a bad, bad man.  Shameless.  Self-serving.  Disgusting.

Listen to what Bergoglio said in April of ARSH 2012 at a Mass commemorating the 30th anniversary of the Argentinians getting their asses kicked in their war of naked aggression and unbridled greed against the U.K. as they attempted to seize by brute force, against the unanimous will of the people, driven by the abject greed and lust for fishing and mineral rights, the Falkland Islands.

Listen. To. This.

“We come to pray for all who have fallen, sons of the homeland who went out to defend their mother, the homeland, and to reclaim what is theirs, that is of the homeland, and it was usurped.”

Which is total, complete bee-ess.  The Falklands have been a U.K. territory since they were essentially abandoned by the Spanish in the 1830s.

Get this: In March of ARSH 2013, almost concurrent with Bergoglio’s election (or whatever that was), the Falklands held a referendum asking the citizens to vote on whether they preferred to stay under the U.K. or be administered by the Peronist-Fascist failed state of Argentina. The total population of the Falklands was 1516.  Of those guess how many voted for Argentinian rule?


The final vote tally was:

U.K.: 1513 votes
Argentina: 3 votes

So when Bergoglio talks about how important it is to “listen to the sheep”, understand that it is the pure lying, manipulating agitprop of a power-hungry malignant narcissist thug.  Bergoglio doesn’t care what anyone else says or thinks.  Including God Almighty.

All Bergoglio cares about is imposing his will and ginning up as much personal narcissistic satisfaction as he can.  In these dark days, that means playing to the Culture of Death and the New World Order, make absolutely no mistake.

If the NWO wants the reformed islamic Caliphate to invade and overrun the West, well then, Bergoglio will denounce ALL WAR, including DEFENSIVE WAR, in order to ensure that he remain “popular” with the psychopaths in Brussels, Washington and the U.N.

But when back in Argentina, he will actively preach naked war of greed and aggression in order to gain narcissistic satisfaction from the Nationalist throngs, and he does it to this day, referring to the Falklands exclusively as the “Malvinas”.

I really do despise him. What a horrible, horrible man.

Dr. Taylor Marshall Nails the Islamic Invasion Using Aquinas

I am shamelessly reposting the whole thing here, because it is that important, but strongly encourage you to click over and visit Dr. Taylor Marshall’s site,

Islamic Refugee Crisis: Good Samaritan or Maccabean Response? Or both
By Dr. Taylor Marshall
What would Thomas Aquinas Say?

What would Saint Thomas Aquinas say about the Refugee Crisis?

We as Christians are debating among ourselves about whether or not we have a moral duty to receive refugees fleeing Muslim nations.
This article is politically incorrect and says things that might shock you. Please read the entire article until the very last two paragraphs before making a judgment or writing incendiary comments. This might be one of the clearest things you’ve read on the topic, because it draws on virtue ethics of Thomas Aquinas – something generally ignored in our day and age. – Godspeed, Taylor Marshall
Are We Good Samaritans?
As Christians we remember Our Lord’s parable about the Good Samaritan recounting how the outwardly religious clerics (the priest and the levite) passed the injured man in the road, but how the Samaritan proved to “be his neighbor” and care for him. Christ rebukes the outwardly religious hypocrites and commends the good Samaritan.

When it comes to the refugee crises, none of us wants to be the hypocrite who turns his steps to the opposite side of road to avoid caring for an injured victim.

Or Are We Good Maccabeans?
Meanwhile, if you are Catholic, you’ve been listening to the book of Maccabees this week in the daily Mass readings. These biblical lessons approvingly recount how Mattathias along with his Maccabean sons and companions rightfully used physical violence against their political oppressors the Seleucid Greeks who were actively using force to undermine the conscience and convictions of the People of God.

So which are we?

Are we the caring Samaritans or the crusading Maccabeans?

The Catholic political theology of Saint Thomas Aquinas can help us with this question:
Thomas Aquinas Black largeLet’s first suspend all emotional appeals, and set down a few logical and calm points of agreement to get us all on the same page:

In the Summa theologiae, Thomas Aquinas places politics under the civic virtue of patriotism which is itself a sub-virtue of justice. Our discussion is ultimately not about “politics” but the virtuous duties of justice toward God, our families, our nations, and all of humanity (in that order).
-For Thomas Aquinas, all political human laws must be: 1) in accord with reason; 2) published or promulgated; 3) by rightful political authority; and for the common good (See STh q. 90, aa. 1-4). If a political law is lacking in any of these four attributes, it is for Thomas, not a law at all.
The duty of the political magistrates (the Republic or Kingdom) are by the virtue of justice different than the duty of the civilian person. Citizens are not de facto judges, soldiers, police officers, or legislators (STh q. 90, a. 3).
-Muslims explicitly affirm that Muhammad is the Last Prophet of God.
-Muslims explicitly affirm that Our Lord Jesus Christ is certainly not the Son of God.
-These two Muslim affirmations place all Muslims in implicit or explicit theological contradiction with Christians who profess Jesus Christ as the Son of God and consequently conclude that Muhammad was a false prophet.
-For Sunni Muslims (the majority of global Muslims), the mandate to erect Sharia law in every human government is a doctrine of faith. Muslims must in accord with their conscience pursue this theological belief that Sharia law must be promulgated in every human society (England, France, Poland, USA, Mexico, etc.)

So how does this apply to Refugees from Islamic nations?
When we move through the logical points above, we begin to discover a few logical conclusions:

-Muslims are bound by conscience to erect Sharia law in your nation. This is a bad thing for baptized Christians. At best it means being taxed at a higher rate (the Muslim jizya tax for Christians). At worse it means death.
-If you live in a democracy, a 51% political Islamic majority will allow “we the people” to promulgate Sharia law. They are following their conscience and religious beliefs in this matter. They will do this just as they have done in any other community where they captured the majority (Mecca, Palestine, Egypt, Syria, etc.)
-It is a duty of of justice for Christian people to strive to prevent the promulgation of false laws (i.e. those contrary to reason or the common good). Christians are called to be politically active and advocates for the common good and natural law.
-While we have the Christian duty to care for the refugee, the sick, the victim, and the injured, we have a greater common duty by justice to preserve the state of law and our religious liberty first and foremost.
-We see this principle in our Scriptural readings. When it comes to the Samaritan, he rightfully cares for the victim. However, when it comes to the nation and the threat of terrorism (Seleucid Greeks), false laws, and the danger of our children, military, and civic peace, we (like the Maccabees) are politically obliged to resist, protect, and expel…for the common good.

The Analogy of the Familial Home
I am the head of a household. I earn an income to feed my wife and my children. With my surplus, I care for orphans, widows, the church, pro-life causes, single-mothers, and other apostolates that I feel God has called me to support.

Justice and charity demand that I care for the less fortunate and it is a Catholic belief that our salvation depends on how we treat the hungry, the naked, the homeless, and the sick.


I am not obliged to take the homeless into my house and have them sleep in my daughter’s bedroom at night. I am not obliged by justice or charity to give the homeless a vote over my financial decisions. He does not have the right to choose what’s for dinner. The homeless man does not (by my charity) receive a right to my continued support. The homeless man cannot share a bed with my wife when I am traveling. Nor may he presume a right over my children’s belongings.


Since we live in a democracy (“we the people”), political refugees de facto gain a measure of political authority over our laws, taxes, finances, military, religious holidays, and legislative bodies.

This principle applies to refugees universally. It applies even more so when the refugee in his conscience believes that he is morally obligated to introduce and vote for the enshrinement of Sharia law.

There is also the further problem that 5%-20% of global Muslims are considered to be “radicalized,” which means that they are consciously willing to use terrorist tactics to advance their Muslim worldview against the West. If you knew that 10% of your child’s Halloween candy was poisoned, would you allow your child to consume any of it?

So what would Thomas Aquinas say?
I’m afraid that Thomas would be much harsher than most of us would feel comfortable with.

Thomas prizes the “common good” so highly under the virtue of political justice that he openly promotes arms and capital punishment against those who are publicly “dangerous and infectious.”

The common good is the peace of society so that life and faith can thrive. Babies can be born and have a happy life. Grandparents can grow old together. Anyone who seeks to destroy the common good should be, according to Thomas, destroyed.

Thomas Aquinas also taught that anyone that fomented “danger to the community” or heretical movements is worthy of the death penalty:

“Therefore if a man be dangerous and infectious to the community, on account of some sin, it is praiseworthy and advantageous that he be killed in order to safeguard the common good.” STh II-II q. 64, a. 2.

It is permissible to kill a criminal if this is necessary for the welfare of the whole community. However, this right belongs only to the one entrusted with the care of the whole community — just as a doctor may cut off an infected limb, since he has been entrusted with the care of the health of the whole body. STh II-II q. 64, a. 3.

Have no doubt that Thomas Aquinas would have stated that Christian nations should receive Christian refugees but refuse Muslim refugees for the sake of national justice and the common good. The Muslim’s official declaration of faith denies natural law (eg, polygamy), religious liberty (eg, Sharia), and the implicitly Muhammad’s teach and example of political violence.

What’s our Catholic Response? The Samaritan Uses the Hotel
We Christians should be generous with humanitarian aid toward Muslims and all people. We should send money and resources to those who have been dispossessed. We should be loving and generous with Muslims. Kindness brings about conversion and understanding. We should also try to topple the Islamic State and eradicate terrorism in our lands and in the Islamic lands.

Remember the Good Samaritan! He did not take the roadside victim home with him. Rather, the Good Samaritan put the victim up in a hotel and paid for him to get better. The Good Samaritan was good and commended by Christ. The Good Samaritan did the right thing: humanitarian aid.

We are not required by Christ to take victims that oppose our faith and our way of life and make them into our political heirs. We are not required to take them into our homes.

But we are obliged to help them. And if terrorists use our charity as a pretense to hurt us, then, as Thomas Aquinas says, they should be swiftly destroyed.

Saint Thomas Aquinas, pray for us.

Taylor Marshall

Cut the Crap: The problem is islam, and it has to be exterminated. Period.

This is a repost from January ARSH 2015.  My prayer tonight is that this will mark the beginning of the Counterrevolution.

Death to islam.

Death to Freemasonry.

Vive le Christ Roi!



So, a little review for those of you who may be new.

1. Islam is a political system, NOT a religion, and unless and until humanity wakes the hell up and STOPS referring to it as a religion, there is no hope. Islam is a hyper-aggressive, militaristic, expansionist, totalitarian political system designed to create a super-rich micro-oligarchical ruling class with a massive, destitute, genetically handicapped underclass below. The paper-thin faux-religious facade was a conscious, specific con from the very beginning – much like Mormonism and Scientology – a pure racket using borrowed and piggy-backed religious motifs to lend credibility to a massive, loosely-knit network of crime syndicate cells.

Here is a quote from Osama bin Laden that sums it all up:

“Our talks with the infidel West and our conflict with them ultimately revolve around one issue; one that demands our total support, with power and determination, with one voice, and it is: Does Islam, or does it not, force people by the power of the sword to submit to its authority corporeally if not spiritually? Yes. There are only three choices in Islam: [1] either willing submission [conversion]; or [2] payment of the jizya, through physical, though not spiritual, submission to the authority of Islam; or [3] the sword, for it is not right to let him [an infidel] live. The matter is summed up for every person alive: Either submit, or live under the suzerainty of Islam, or die.”
–Osama Bin Laden
(The Al Qaeda Reader, p. 42)

Definition of suzerainty: a situation in which a region or people is a compulsory tributary to a more powerful entity, which controls its foreign affairs while allowing the tributary vassal state internal autonomy.

Please note that the quote above makes perfectly clear that islam DOES NOT CARE IF YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE ANY OF THEIR FAUX-RELIGIOUS BULLSHIT OR NOT – BECAUSE THAT’S NOT THE POINT. All that matters is EARTHLY submission and control of landmass. All of that five-times-per-day sticking one’s butt in the air while some bisexual shrieks about a non-existent pagan moon deity over a loudspeaker is not “prayer”. It is an outward sign of submission to the musloid political system. NOTHING more. It’s a gang signal. It’s a salute.

Islam isn’t about “allah” or “paradise” or “prayer” or “spirituality” or how human beings should relate to one another or how human beings should relate to a “god” or the eternal fate of the human soul. THEY DON’T CARE ABOUT ANY OF THAT. Islam is about acquiring physical, earthly territory and installing a totalitarian government over the earth that provides a cadre of “elites” masquerading as some sort of “clergy” with massive decadent wealth and as much twisted perverted sex as they want, including homosexual and heterosexual pedohilia, ephebophilia, concubinage, incest, bestiality and necrophilia. There is nothing new under the sun. They want power, they want money and they want sex. The “religious” aspects are a stone-cold con, which Bin Laden himself declared in no uncertain terms.

2. They can’t be reasoned with. They can’t be dialogued with. There is no such thing as “radical islam”. There is islam, which is even more bloodthirsty, conscienceless and perverse than what we are seeing today. We cannot possibly imagine what they would do if given true carte-blanche. Islam today is like an eleven year old boy – just BARELY on the cusp of puberty, just BEGINNING to test the waters. These beheadings, rapes, suicide attacks and terror operations are BUSH LEAGUE. Just as it is nonsensical and depraved to refer to Nazis as “radical Nazis” and “moderate Nazis” – as if ANY Nazism could ever be considered acceptable, so it is with islam. This is why Egyptian president Sisi’s recent speech calling for a “reformation” of islam is nonsense. All Sisi’s speech did was confirm that Sisi himself doesn’t actually believe any of it, and instead of doing the morally correct thing and renouncing islam, Sisi wants to have his pancakes and eat them too. He wants everyone – like him – to subscribe to and associate themselves with something that they don’t actually believe in or take seriously. (How very Pope Francis of him.) Well, you can pour maple syrup on a puddle of bloody, diarrhetic hogshit all you want, but it will never, ever be pancakes.

This is where this Social Justice Warrior “I feel triggered” crap is going to end…

Mere resignations aren’t enough.  Destroying someone’s career and livelihood isn’t enough.  Imprisonment won’t be enough.  In fact, what is shown below won’t be enough.  There will need to be torture and probably also rape – because it will never, ever, ever be enough with these demoniacs.

There is no such thing as satisfaction with them.  There is only rage, hatred, envy and spite.  That is all they feel.

Make no mistake.  We are in a dead sprint to this and worse than this:


Pick-Me-Up Music Post

As has been discussed here for years, the best secular, non-liturgical music is that which can be heard as either God singing to man, or man singing to God.

Just reiterating – this is music for OUTSIDE the liturgy – OUTSIDE the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Divine Office.

Here’s one!  A really good one, too!

“To Make You Feel My Love”, originally penned by Bob Dylan, but covered to great effect by my so-not-favorite country singer, in fact, the man who ATE country music… Garth Brooks.  Yeah.  I know.

Anyway, if you read the lyrics as God singing to mankind, and disregard the whole Garth Brooks qua Garth Brooks thing, it will make you cry.  I have added a couple of suggestive motifs below, in red brackets.

When the rain’s blowing in your face
And the whole world is on your case [worldly and demonic persecution]
I would offer you a warm embrace [Confession and Eucharist]
To make you feel My Love

When the evening shadows and the stars appear [demons]
And there is no one to dry your tears [because sweetie, there probably ain’t gonna be]
I could hold you for a million years
To make you feel My Love

I know you haven’t made your mind up yet [Because you have free will]
But I would never do you wrong [The Law]
I’ve known it from the moment that we met [When I created you and sewed you together in your mother’s womb]
There’s no doubt in My Mind where you belong [With Me, in heaven, forever]

I’d go hungry, I’d go black and blue [the Scourging at the Pillar]
I’d go crawling down the avenue [The Way of the Cross to Calvary]
There ain’t nothing that I wouldn’t do
To make you feel My Love

The storms are raging a rollin’ sea
Down on the highway of regret [Sin]
The winds of change are blowing wild and free [Heretics]
But you ain’t seen nothing like Me yet [Come, Eternal and Unchanging Lord Jesus]

There ain’t nothing that I wouldn’t do [Humiliation, torture, execution, withstand sacrilege]

Go to the ends of the earth for you [Incarnation leading to Calvary, and then the Eucharist, the Real Presence in the Eucharist all over the earth in the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass]

Make you happy, make your dreams come true [We can’t even begin to imagine…]
To make you feel My…….. Love [I’m in.  You had me at “Hello.”]