I posted a few weeks ago that it is now appropriate for serious-minded people to start considering the possibility that Pope Francis is, in fact, the Antichrist. Well, I heard from many serious people, and I will share the consensus, which I believe is almost certainly correct.
First, the serious consensus is that Pope Francis is NOT the Antichrist. He is, without question, the Spirit of Antichrist, but not the individual Antichrist himself. Why? The Antichrist will be A.) extremely intelligent, which Bergoglio is not, and B.) teaching and tradition with regards to the Antichrist holds that he will be a layman.
What the serious consensus today is, however, is that there is a very, very high probability that Francis is the False Prophet forerunner of the Antichrist, who is paving the way and laying the groundwork for the Antichrist.
John the Baptist was executed for defending the sanctity of Marriage vis-a-vis the state, namely King Herod. Bergoglio is himself attacking Marriage, and not only fails to speak out against the state, but is openly cooperating with it as an ally.
John the Baptist was genuinely unconcerned with the material and everything he said and did was in regards to the human soul and its eternal fate. Francis is an utter materialist who frames everything up to and including the slaughter of preborn children in material terms, and says hardly anything about the eternal fate of the soul – and was reported to have confessed in an interview his belief in the heresy of Soul Annihilation, which has gone uncorrected in any way to this day.
John the Baptist proselytized the One True Faith, and the essentiality of baptism. Francis condemns proselytization, tells people he has no interest or desire to convert them to Christianity, and openly embraces false religions.
John the Baptist preached repentance. Bergoglio denies the need for repentance and casts this as “mercy”.
John the Baptist’s charge was to “Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight His paths.” Francis has stated and has as his motto “hagan lio”, which means in Spanish, “make a mess” or more colloquially, “raise hell”. Francis proudly sows utter chaos.
John the Baptist diminished himself so that Christ might shine. Bergoglio diminishes Christ so that Francis might enjoy more worldly popularity and “power”.
Now, read the following quote from this glowing article from a New Jersey newspaper about a sodomite priest at a local parish and then sit in stillness with the full horror of what damage Francis has done in just over two years. He now has people denying that GOD HIMSELF will judge us for our sins. Stop and think about that. Use logic and progress your way through that. If “p”, then “q”. If “q” then “r”. If “r” then “s”.
Where it leads, and leads quickly, is to nihilism (the utter rejection of all moral principles, and the belief that life is meaningless), utter hedonism and mass murder.
Hoboken resident Caren Rankin, a parishioner of Saints Peter and Paul Church, was similarly unfazed and supportive of the news [that the new parish priest is an open, unrepentant sodomite]. She didn’t think it would bother her friends in the church, either.
“I believe as the pope believes,” she said. “The pope said God doesn’t judge, so I don’t judge.”
Just another judgmental, unmerciful Christian getting his comeuppance.
Um. Yeah. Been SCREECHING the fact that he is a dirty, dirty thug Peronist-Fascist since, um, oh, A FEW HOURS AFTER HE WAS ELECTED. But I’m not bitter or frustrated or anything. Nope. Not me.
… but what does “Peronist” mean?
Well, I can’t take credit for this explanation. This was a comment on a Fr. Z thread by an Argentinian in September of ARSH 2014, it is was so informative that I saved it for future reference. Now is the time, because none outside of Argentina really knows what “Peronist” means, other than having to do with Juan and Eva Peron. Well, wonder no more. Here it is. If I may be permitted to put it is a nutshell, Peronism is INSTITUTIONAL NARCISSISTIC PSYCHOPATHY.
28 September 2014 at 11:19 AM
Argentinian here. Peronismo and Justicialismo are two different names for the same thing: the “Peronista” party had to change its name due to a new law which forbade political parties to include personal references in their names, so they re-branded it “Justicialista” party.
The main idea behind justicialismo/peronismo is not about economy or politics, it is about power. The peronist leader thinks: “The best thing that can happen to the country is not freedom or development or peace or education or whatever… the best thing that can happen to the country is ME. Therefore I have to amass as much power as I can, and for that I have to amass as much wealth as I can. Once I have the power, I will bring peace and prosperity. Somehow.”
That’s why you have liberal peronists, conservative peronists, marxist peronists, keynessian peronists, libertarian peronists, and so ad nausseam, because actual ideas about how to actually govern are secondary, the primary thing for the peronist is for he/she to be the one ruling.
Of course, they say that peronismo is about bringing social development to the poor. That may be true, but they don’t have any clear idea of how to actually achieve that. Some of them think that it is all about giving money and stuff to the people for free, others have some degree of formal socioeconomic thought. But power always comes first. If a peronist government has to choose between the welfare of the nation and power, the answer is always power. And if a peronist leader have to choose between his/her beliefs and power, the answer is, again, power.
So, if you have a vague desire for “social justice” and are willing to support whatever peronist is above you in the ladder in order to eventually take your turn there, that’s enough to be a peronist. Sociopolitical discussions are not to be had within the party. The most famous peronist adaggio is “Que se doble pero que no se rompa”, which roughly means, “let it bend but never break”. A marxist peronist and a capitalist peronist will sing the peronist march together and affirm that “the best thing which can happen to a peronist is another peronist”. Because they will support each other when the time comes. Schisms within the peronist party are always about power, never about doctrines or beliefs.
So, if you think that Pope Francis will bring collegiality to the Church you are dead wrong: it is his time to hold the power and he will use it. He will allow some form of collegiality but only for those thing which he does not care about, and only if he has no choice.
My Benefactors and supporters, past, present and future, and their intentions will be remembered and offered up by the priest celebrating the Holy and August Sacrifice of the Mass in the Gregorian Rite:
TOMORROW, AUGUST 1, ARSH 2015 at the *MANGER GROTTO ALTAR IN THE BASILICA OF THE NATIVITY OF OUR LORD JESUS CHRIST IN BETHLEHEM*
and SUNDAY, AUGUST 2, ARSH 2015 at the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass on the **ALTAR ATOP CALVARY IN THE BASILICA OF THE HOLY SEPULCHRE IN JERUSALEM.**
I don’t have exact times. This news just came to me, out of the blue, a few minutes ago.
This is the best news is a long time. God bless you all.
Grotto Altar, Basilica of the Nativity, Bethlehem.
Altar atop Calvary, Basilica of the Holy Sepulchre, Jerusalem
1. Status update, and thank you for the kind inquiries again. First, as you have probably guessed, I am tired. Really, really tired. As civilization implodes and the objective reality of the situation becomes more and more undeniable, the hatred and isolation increases parabolically. It is a strange thing to see normalcy bias and effeminacy in their end stages. I reckon it just proves that all manifestations of denial of objective reality, including the “soft” and “passive” modes, all lead to the same point – a murderous contempt of those who refuse to capitulate to and enjoin the delusion. So, yeah. I am tired. And not in the “take a nap” sense.
In terms of the “new parking spot”, I think I am stable through the end of October, and issues and concerns that cropped up in May are now, as far as I can tell, lost in the bowels of the bureaucracy. Bloated bureaucracies do have the occasional temporary advantage of causing a beneficial stagnation as they sink beneath their own weight. But it is always temporary.
2. A quick, poignant point of linguistics that many of you may not have picked up on. In the first Planned Barrenhood video, the salad-noshing “doctor” continually refers to the babies’ heads as “calvarium”, the medical term for skull, specifically the braincase portion of the skull, or skullcap. If you recall, the hill upon which Our Blessed Lord was crucified is called “Golgotha”, Aramaic for “place of the skull”, and some sources even use the world “skullcap” to describe the shape of the hill of Golgotha. So, the word “Calvary” is the Latinized (Calvariae), and then Anglicized form of the Aramaic placename. So, unwittingly, this person keeps calling out to all the world the locus of our salvation, and proclaiming Christ.
And the light shineth in darkness, and the darkness did not comprehend it.
3. A friend sent me a message a few days ago relating the death of her childhood sweetheart, possibly from drug involvement. He was baptized, but fallen away and involved in bad things. I was reminded of something I heard in a homily in Denver, right after the Aurora movie theater shooting. God exists outside of time and is in no way constrained by it. Therefore, it is a good and holy thing to pray for the grace of conversion or reversion by an act of perfect contrition at the moment of death for someone whom has already died. When I was in Rome, I prayed for the people who died in the Colosseum as I passed by it, that they had good and holy deaths, and weren’t afraid.
We all tend to be completely linear in our thinking with regards to time, but that is a profoundly limited and unchristian thought process. Hence the Protestant inability to understand that the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is the same, once-for-all sacrifice of Calvary, made present at EVERY Mass in succession through linear time by the very manipulation of time itself upon the altar by God. We perceive time as a line, but that line can be looped back on itself by God such that the point of Calvary and the point of today/now touch in intersection. Thus, Calvary reaches both backwards and forwards through time in both directions (remember, the Last Supper was a Mass in the sense that Our Lord confected the Eucharist, transubstantiated bread and wine, and the Apostles received the Eucharist, His Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity, not bread and not wine. The Last Supper was the Holy Sacrifice of Calvary – in anticipation.) And this was done BEFORE the event of Calvary had occurred. Thus, when Our Lord said, “And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all things to Myself,” the “drawing” is the drawing or reconciling of every moment of time, both before and after, through the event of Calvary, which then can be said is the “hub” of linear time.
So, by all means, pray for graces and for those already in the past on the linear timeline, and also consider that it is possible that YOU have or will receive graces as the result of prayers of people far in the future.
4. Speaking of the Colosseum and bloodsports and all that, it occurred to me that we are seeing something in human culture that is so evil and so debased that it may be an entirely new phenomenon. We are now seeing people humiliate, embarrass and now even physically mutiliate themselves VOLUNTARILY. This is what Bruce Jenner is doing. I anticipate that Bruce Jenner will have his penis and testicles cut off, and this will be done as part of a ratings-getting ploy, no doubt timed to sweeps. After Jenner has cut off his own genitals, there probably won’t be anything more he can do to cause further spectacle, the entertainment complex will lose interest, and Jenner will probably commit suicide.
The Church was built by the blood of the martyrs. Satan knows this, obviously. Why would he not modify his plans in order to minimize the power of true Christian martyrdom? I suspect the plan this time around is to keep actual torture, mutiliations, rapes and martyrdoms as hidden and unknown as possible, and instead to satisfy the bloodlust of the satanic culture through auto-mutiliation and suicide for as long as possible. Just a guess, but it seems logical.
5. A very good question, with a very good answer:
If indifference is the opposite of charity, as you say, why aren’t demons and satan indifferent to us? Why are they “prowling throughout the world seeking the ruin of souls”, as the St. Michael prayer says?
Excellent question. Because satan and the demons are, remember, fallen ANGELS. Their NATURE is ANGELIC. Angels, of both types, are pure, massive intellects. They have no matter, no physical bodies. Indifference is tied to sloth, which is a function of a physical nature. Creatures of angelic nature have to, as part of their nature, either love ferociously or hate ferociously, but indifference is impossible given their nature. The hatred of the demons is borne from envy – envy of mankind which has been redeemed by Christ and has the potentiality of seeing God – something which they can never, ever do.
It is a subtle point, but can be better grasped by remembering this example:
Is it possible to love and hate someone at the same time? Sure. We have all experienced this to one degree or another.
Now, is it possible to love and be indifferent towards someone at the same time? Nope. That is completely illogical and makes no sense whatsoever. Likewise, the statement “I both hate and am indifferent toward you” is also self-contradicting gibberish. It simply makes no sense. Thus, we see that indifference is indeed the exclusive antipode of charity, or love, and must never, ever, ever be hailed or respected as virtuous.
Ergo, for the Things Our Lord Did NOT Say file:
Blessed are the indifferent, for they shall have no need of being comforted.
6. “Effusum Est In Terra Jecur Meum” means “my liver is poured out upon the earth”, from Lamentations 2:11
My eyes have failed with weeping, my bowels are troubled: my liver is poured out upon the earth, for the destruction of the daughter of my people, when the children, and the sucklings, fainted away in the streets of the city.
Defecerunt prae lacrimis oculi mei, conturbata sunt viscera mea; effusum est in terra jecur meum super contritione filiae populi mei, cum deficeret parvulus et lactens in plateis oppidi.
“It is a serious thing to live in a society of possible gods and goddesses, to remember that the dullest most uninteresting person you can talk to may one day be a creature which,if you saw it now, you would be strongly tempted to worship, or else a horror and a corruption such as you now meet, if at all, only in a nightmare. All day long we are, in some degree helping each other to one or the other of these destinations. It is in the light of these overwhelming possibilities, it is with the awe and the circumspection proper to them, that we should conduct all of our dealings with one another, all friendships, all loves, all play, all politics. There are no ordinary people. You have never talked to a mere mortal.”
Yep. It’s Team I Love You vs Team Oh F*** You, and kids, Team Oh F*** You is up ten runs and is one out away from putting the game, series and season to bed. At this point, one is sorely tempted to just head for the parking lot.
A scene that has often come into my mind, both sleeping and waking — I am standing in the wings of a theatre waiting for my cue to go onstage. As I stand there I can hear the play proceeding, and suddenly it dawns on me that the lines I have learnt are not in this play at all, but belong to quite a different one. Panic seizes me; I wonder frenziedly what should I do. Then I get my cue. Stumbling, falling over the unfamiliar scenery, I make my way onto the stage, and then look for guidance to the prompter, whose head I can just see rising out of the floor-boards. Alas he only signals helplessly to me and I realise of course that his script is different from mine. I begin to speak my lines, but they are incomprehensible to the other actors and abhorrent to the audience, who begin to hiss and shout: “Get off the stage!”, “Let the play go on!”, “You’re interrupting!”. I am paralysed and can think of nothing to do but to go on standing there and speaking my lines that don’t fit. The only lines I know.
– Malcom Muggeridge “Chronicles of Wasted Time: The Green Stick” (ARSH 1972)
“The process of death wishing, in the guise of liberalism, has been eroding the civilization of the West for a century and more, and now would seem to be about to reach its apogee. The Liberal mind, effective everywhere, whether in power or in opposition, has provided the perfect instrument. Systematically, stage by stage, dismantling our Western way of life, depreciating and deprecating all its values so that the whole social structure is now tumbling down, dethroning its God, undermining all its certainties. And all this, wonderfully enough, in the name of the health, wealth and happiness of all mankind. Previous civilizations have been overthrown from without by the incursion of barbarian hordes; ours has dreamed up its own dissolution in the minds of its own intellectual elite. Not Bolshevism, which Stalin liquidated along with all the old Bolsheviks; not Nazism, which perished with Hitler in his Berlin bunker; not Fascism, which was left hanging upside down from a lamp-post along with Mussolini and his mistress – none of these, history will record, was responsible for bringing down the darkness of our civilization, but Liberalism. A solvent rather than a precipitate, a sedative rather than a stimulant, a slough rather than a precipice; blurring the edges of truth, the definition of virtue, the shape of beauty; a cracked bell, a mist, a death wish…”
-Malcolm Muggeridge “The Great Liberal Death Wish” (ARSH 1979)
Oh, yeah. Tyqueisha and Scheherazade in da hood are mos’ def’ gonna be wantin’ in on dis.
And why not, right? I mean, what is the surest guarantee a male can have that Tyqueisha is NOT going to get pregnant, and is financially independent – even someone he could hustle and mooch off of himself, and is therefore an absolute guaranteed “free ride”?
How about Tyqueisha being five or six months pregnant? With twenty grand in human foie gras just waiting to get a tiny bit cuter before harvest and replanting? Hell, Tyqueisha could double-crop. Two per year harvested at 23 weeks. That leaves a six week window to resume cycling again and conceive the next human being for harvest and sale. Hell, maybe Jon Corzine could work with the CME to set up futures on human body part commodities.
So people think that this expose’ of the Dr. Mengele-wannabe discussing the proper method for crushing a baby’s skull in order to preserve those high-dollar organs whilst noshing on her salad and Syrah is going to yield positive effects with regards to this satanic evil, let me just burst your bubble right now.
This civilization is SO. FAR. GONE. that this will cause an explosion in later-term abortions, as psychopathic, demonically oppressed American women, especially in the rap/hip-hop, honey-boo-boo trailer trash contingent and militant Marxist-feminist upper middle classes will now be looking to cash in on their abortions.
Oh, and NOTHING is going to happen to anyone involved in the extant parts trade even though these are felonies. Because NO. RULE. OF. LAW.
As you sit there reading this right now, there are females from sea to shining sea screwing to get pregnant with the plan of carrying the baby to six or seven months, and then presenting themselves at Planned Parenthood – looking for a cut of the action on the body parts for a five-figure payday. Because now they know.
Originally penned and posted in January ARSH 2011, long before any of us had ever heard the name “Bergoglio”.
The weekend before His Passion, Jesus went and stayed with His friend Lazarus (whom He had raised from the dead) and Lazarus’ sisters Martha and Mary. Mary brought out a very expensive flask of ointment for the dead and applied it to Jesus’ feet with her hair. The whole house was filled with the sweet smell of that ointment. And guess who gets all mouthy about this? Yep. Judas Iscariot – who already was planning to sell out Jesus, and had been planning on cashing in on Him since the miracle of the loaves and fishes a few days earlier. Specifically, when Jesus told the people that they must eat His Flesh and drink His Blood, and kept repeating it over and over and over again to be sure that everyone understood that He meant it literally, Judas (with urging from satan) decided that Our Lord was nuts and started planning to betray Him and profit from it. That whole episode is in John chapter 6. Read it.
Back to Lazarus’ house in John 12. Judas gets all holier-than-thou and complains that the flask of ointment could have been sold for 300 pence and “given to the poor”. Does this not sound like the godless Marxist liberals of today who are so quick to tell everyone else what they should be doing with their money and assets, all in the name of the poor, of course?
Then, an absolutely delightful verse – verse 6:
“Now he said this, not because he cared for the poor; but because he was a thief, and having the purse, carried the things therein.”
Um, hello? The Holy Ghost is talking to us. Are we listening? That verse should make the hair on your arms stand up. Is this not a PERFECT mapping to our contemporary situation? You have a “disciple” who doesn’t really believe in Jesus or what He says – he just pretends to because he thinks he can gain power and wealth by associating with Jesus for now. He’s just working the “Jesus angle”. But everything he is doing behind the scenes is working in direct opposition to Our Lord. Now, this “disciple” starts trying to appear pious and devout by pontificating that all wealth and resources should, by definition, be redistributed to “the poor”. But in truth, he is just a thief.
Dude. Can this be any more obvious?
Now here is the key passage from Jesus Himself:
“Jesus therefore said: Let her alone, that she may keep it against the day of My burial. For the poor you have always with you; but Me you have not always.”
First of all, Jesus says, “Let her alone.” (Sinite illam.)
Judas has appointed himself the arbiter of wealth and asset distribution and has decided that Mary’s flask of ointment (or the cash value thereof) should have gone to the poor. And Jesus says, “Let her alone.”
It is hers to do with as she (and her family) sees fit, and they have seen fit to use it to anoint their beloved Jesus.
Judas, sit down and shut your proto-Marxist piehole. THWAP!
(Cough cough cough)
In the next phrase, Jesus explains economics in eight words (FIVE in Latin): “For the poor you have always with you.” (Pauperes enim semper habetis vobiscum.)
What does He mean? Does He mean, “Bah, forget the poor! Live it up!”
Absolutely not. What He is explaining is that in all free societies wealth will always exist within a SPECTRUM.
Let’s compare a “poor” person in the U.S. to a “poor” person in Bangladesh. A poor person in Bangladesh lives in the gutter without so much as a cardboard shelter to sleep under. They are sick from malnutrition and starvation. They probably dress in rags, and certainly do not own a pair of shoes. Bathing only occurs when they can immerse themselves in a river, which is opaque with sewage. They own nothing except the rags that they wear. Every day is a struggle to get a bit of clean water and enough food to merely survive. That’s a poor person in Bangladesh.
What constitutes a “poor” person in the U.S.? A poor person in the U.S. does not have cable. A poor person in the U.S. does not have broadband internet access, and may not even own a PC. A poor person in the U.S. may have just within the last year or two five years finally switched from a cathode ray tube television to a flat screen, digital model. A poor person in the U.S. receives food stamps, medicaid and a welfare check. A poor person in the U.S. is probably overweight. A poor person in the U.S. drives a car that is so old that it came with a factory cassette player. A poor person in the U.S. lives either in a trailer or a HUD apartment complex. A poor person in the U.S. probably DOES have a smart phone with internet connectivity.
Understand that on a percentage level, these two descriptions are equivalent. A “poor” person in the U.S. has a standard of living that would be considered luxurious in Bangladesh and other impoverished countries. The notions of “wealth” and “poverty”, by logical and mathematical definition, exist within a SPECTRUM. And no matter what we do, that spectrum will always, always exist. That is what Jesus is saying. There will always be a top-end, and there will always be a bottom-end. In some nations (like Bangladesh), that spectrum is very broad and reaches very far down into poverty, indeed. There are billionaires in Bangladesh, and there are people starving in the gutters in rags. In the U.S., we certainly have a wealth spectrum, but the low end is much higher and the spectrum is much narrower. We have many billionaires, but our lower-end is nowhere NEAR as low as Bangladesh’s.
The point is, no matter how much you bring up the bottom-end, there will ALWAYS, by mathematical definition, BE a bottom-end. If the bottom-end were a $100,000 per year household income and a $300,000 home in today’s dollars, then a household with a $100,000 income and a $300,000 home would be considered “poor”, called “poor”, and Marxists would tell those “poor” that they were being “oppressed” and “deserved” and were “entitled to” a $500,000 annual household income and an $800,000 home. DO YOU UNDERSTAND?
(Cough cough cough cough)
Someone is always going to have more money and assets than somebody else. It is impossible to have a free society wherein every person has exactly the same level of wealth. Someone has to be the business OWNER, and someone has to be the EMPLOYEE. Someone has to be the wage PAYER and someone has to be the wage EARNER. If everyone in a culture were economically equal at all times, there would be zero employment because no one would work for anyone except themselves. You can’t have a company with 10,000 CEOs. Conversely, you can’t have a company that is nothing but entry-level laborers. Someone has to be responsible. Someone has to sign the paychecks. Someone has to determine the course of the business. Someone has to risk their assets and wealth to start-up the company in the first place. And, at the other end, someone has to scrub the toilets. The only way to get true, complete equality of wealth would be to KILL EVERYBODY.
Silly Rabbits. Stop obsessing about the baby killing. My friend and consultant Prof. John Schellnhuber says there are 6.5 BILLION too many of you….
Since we know from Jesus that there will always be a wealth spectrum, it is obviously disordered to eliminate said spectrum and collapse it down to a single point of “economic equality”. To do that would collapse the society itself and result is chaos and poverty for ALL. (Ahem, MARXISM, TYRANNICAL OLIGARCHY, cough, cough.)
What then should the objective be? I think that the former-U.S. and other free-market capitalist societies were the closest humanity has ever been to the ideal, and though imperfect, are certainly pointed in the right direction. The ideal is a healthy wealth spectrum that is always moving higher through growth and moral technological advancements and innovations, is open-ended on the top side, but has an intrinsic morality such that the top-end of the wealth spectrum always makes certain that the bottom end advances apace and that the spectrum maintains its proportional width – or even narrows a bit. This is achieved through personal charity AND through a moral, lawful society that allows for movement both up AND down the spectrum.
The top-end cooperates with the bottom end to enable upward mobility for those who work hard, and are innovative. Conversely, if someone on the top-end does not work hard or is dishonest in his dealings, he can and will fail and slide back down the spectrum.
This freedom of movement within the spectrum – both up AND down – is essential. Trapping people on the low-end (ahem, cough, WELFARE STATE, CLOWARD-PIVEN STRATEGY, OBAMA REGIME, cough) is equally as immoral as the disgusting oligarchical upper-classes who think themselves immune from morality, the rule of law or personal responsibility (ahem, cough, OBAMA REGIME AND ENTIRE POLITICAL CLASS, cough, cough).
“Are you a Traveling Man?” “Ah, hello Hiram….”
So, there you go. Economics as explained by our Blessed Lord in five little words while He was hanging out at His friends’ house having supper the weekend before He died. And proof that Judas Iscariot was the intellectual father of Marxism and of scumbag politicians in general.
I can’t recommend this video highly enough. It is a visualization of how capitalist societies have lifted the entire population of the planet’s standards of living as well as life expectancy. This is a spectacular four minutes and is well worth everyone’s time. But remember, this was produced in ARSH 2009. All of the genuine, healthy progress that has been made is EXACTLY what is being undone now before our very eyes by Marxist globalists like the Obama regime, the Eurozone and the FrancisChurch toadies.
Thanks again to Patrick Archbold and the kids over at CreativeMinorityReport.com for publishing it. We took a slight pause whilst all of the Communizing and blaspheming was going on down in South America, but we’ll finish the seven part series out this week.
** Fun bonus. Can you find the grammatical mistakes? What rank are you in the grammar Nazi Reich? Test yo’ skillz!