In this latest piece for WhatIsUpWithTheSynod.com , which is going to continue even though the Synod Against the Family is now concluded, I go specifically after sodomite priests, namely one Fr. James Martin, a Jesuit fag – but I repeat myself.
One of the comments says that we need to start calling these people out and asking them directly and publicly, “Father Rosica, are you a homosexual?” “Cardinal Weurl, are you a homosexual?” (I have no videographic evidence of Donald Weurl being a fag, but I do know that when he was in seminary his nicknames were “Weurl the Girl” and “Donna”.) “Archbishop Cupich, are you a homosexual?” “Pope Francis, are you a homosexual?”
Absolutely. I agree 100%. Hound them. Make it so they cannot appear in public without being point-blank asked if they are fags. Over and over and over again.
Same with the lesbian nuns.
Enough of this sodomite crap, and enough of cowering in fear of these depraved perverts.
The word seems to be out that the 39th anniversary of “that tragic event”, as my father always used to call it, has rolled around yet again. I remember my 9th birthday very well, as the Kansas City Royals won the World Series in Game 7 against the Cardinals that night. Thirty. Years. Ago.
In keeping with a birthday tradition that is now over 10 years old on this blog, here is one of my favorite songs, “Will There Be Any Stars In My Crown” by the Cox Family.
I am thinking today of that beautiful land
We shall reach when the sun goeth down;
When through wonderful grace by my Savior I stand,
Will there be any stars in my crown?
Will there be any stars, any stars in my crown,
When at evening the sun goeth down?
When I wake with the blest in those mansions of rest,
Will there be any stars in my crown? In the strength of the Lord let me labor and pray, Let me watch as a winner of souls;
That bright stars may be mine in the glorious day,
When His praise like the sea-billow rolls.
Oh, what joy it will be when His face I behold,
Living gems at His feet to lay down;
It would sweeten my bliss in the city of gold,
Should there be any stars in my crown.
I told you they were going to go after the Sacrament of Confession.
So this is the truly malignant Archbishop of Chicago, Blasé Cupich, a man so vile and so odious, so filled with contempt for the Church and the Mass that he literally locked the Latin Mass parish in Rapid City, South Dakota out of their church and refused to let them celebrate the Easter Triduum in 2002. Here is the local newspaper write-up on that.
Below is an audio recording of Cupich saying the following about the Sacrament of Confession, which is also called the Sacrament of Reconciliation or the Sacrament of Penance. This quote begins at the 0:55 mark:
“We use that word “reconciliation” all the time. It doesn’t mean about giving people forgiveness. It comes from an anatomical root, namely the eyelash, it is called a cilia. So you begin to see eye-to-eye with people.”
First, his statement that the word “reconcile” comes from eyelash is utter, complete balderdash. It is a pure fabrication, utterly made up, and completely wrong.
the Latin word reconciliare (restore; reconcile)
using the Latin prefix re-
derived from the Latin word conciliare (attract favor of, render favorably disposed; commend; bring a woman to man as wife, match; procure as a mistress; unite, bring together, about)
derived from the Latin word concilium (association, society, company; public gathering, meeting; popular assembly; sexual union, coition; close conjunction)
using the Latin prefix con- (together)
derived from the Latin prefix com-
derived from the Latin word cum (with)
derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *kom (near, with, together)
derived from the Latin word calare (to call, inserted or placed between; announce, proclaim; summon; let down, allow to hang free; loosen)
derived from the Greek word chalao, χαλάω (to lower (as into a void))
derived from the Greek word kaleo, καλέω (to ‘call’ (properly, aloud, but used in a variety of applications, directly or otherwise))
derived from the Greek word chalan
derived from the Proto-Indo-European root *kelə- (to call)
The second point is more important, though. What he is saying is that the Sacrament of Confession is a NEGOTIATION between the confessee and the Church wherein the confessee TELLS THE CHURCH, which is to say, GOD, what the confessee’s conscience has determined is “right” and “wrong”. And then FrancisNewMercyChurch, in the spirit of “accompaniment” and “dialogue” RATIFIES the sinful actions of the confessee, so long as the confessee’s “inviolable conscience” is clear and they “feel” good about themselves.
This is nothing less than the worship of man. It is demanding that the Church, and thus God Himself, bow down and worship man as the source and arbiter of “truth” itself.
The only thing that is left for them to do, which we have seen the early indications of from Bergoglio, is to create some sort of new quasi-liturgical action whereby the Church qua Church is made to apologize to man. Like a “confiteor” that the Church prays to man. You think I’m kidding? I am not. Look for something like this attached to the new “General Absolution” services that they are going to start pushing in the so-called “Year of Mercy”.
As more and more people realize that Bergoglio is trying to do nothing less than destroy the Church, I am reminded of those first days in March ARSH 2013. I called the disaster that was coming, and I called it without hesitation, based upon one simple thing.
At his first Mass in the Sistine Chapel Bergoglio did not genuflect to the Host or to the Precious Blood, which is God Himself, after the consecration.
Everything else flows from that. Everything flows from the Liturgy. Everything flows from the Eucharist. Bergoglio signaled from the very, very beginning that he did not believe, but no one wanted to look. No one wanted to face reality.
Well, face it now, as the Church Militant is probably in its last days as we know it.
“I saw within a city, a meeting of clergy, laymen and women, who were sitting together, eating and making frivolous jokes, and above them a dark cloud which descended in a plain submerged in darkness. Amid this fog, I saw Satan sitting and around him, many companions as people were in the meeting which was going on underneath. All these evil spirits were continually moving and busy trying to push the people at this meeting to do evil. They whispered to them to their ears and acted on them in all possible ways. These people were in a very dangerous state of sensual excitement and in provocative conversations. Churchmen were those whose principle were: “You have to live and let live. In our time we should not be apart or be a misanthrope (a person who hates or distrusts humankind): we must rejoice with those who rejoice.”
Irwin Schiff was a talmudic jew and probably didn’t believe much of any of the supernatural of Judaism (which is a false religion), much less Christianity (which, in orthodox praxis, is True). You know, like almost all “Christians” today. And yet he died in prison standing for what he believed, and, rightly, knew to be true, namely that money has time value and that capricious , evil, illegitimate governments had neither the right nor the preciousness to abrogate these simple, obvious truths. And yes, he was a Jew. (So what does that say about YOU, Coward, Effeminate Christian????)
As you all know, anyone who would like to round like up people and execute them by virtue of their DNA sequences and not even try to convert them as “irredeemable”, well, sweetie, you better be there with a good kevlar vest because if I am within a one mile radius behind a 50 cal with some good German glass…. Not that a vest would help.
Irwin Schiff should have been saved. God willed for the Jew, Irwin Schiff, to be saved. If he was not, it is because he, Irwin, failed to investigate and know God, and we failed to tell him. And we will all answer for it. But make no mistake, delicate little snowflakes: there is ZERO question of “invincible ignorance” here with regards to Irwin Schiff. Invincibiliy has nothing to do with Irwin Schiff. His ignorance, if it persisted to his death, had NOTHING to do with “invincibility”. NOTHING.
So sit your ass down and shut up about that nonsense.
If you want to know why, with this massive traffic I sill get from financial people, I still don’t go “after the money” and pay to the secular Jews and Christians that like economic/market/derivative commentary, and I still make Krazy Holy Roller, mostly awkward Jesus posts, well, ponder Irwin Schiff and understand.
Irwin Schiff probably never converted and never received baptism and on fed on Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Don’t you think for a damn minute that I don’t know where Irwin Schiff almost certainly is now. He died a Jew. That ain’t good. But he was right about a helluva lot about these earthly dynamics, which CAN then lead the soul to the greater supernatural truths, which then lead us to nothing less than heaven for eternity.
Christian economics makes sense, but you also have to embrace and confess the SUPERnatural.
Money has time value.
There will never be Utopia on earth.
Robbing the laborer of his just wage is sin, and robbing the widows and the orphans of their living is sin, but so is robbing from Peter to pay Paul, and so is ABROGATING the 7th, 9th and 10th Commandments in the name of “equality”.
Our reasons for our respective tax strikes were obviously not 100% the same, but thank you and RIP, Irwin Schiff.
I’m not perfect, and what is more I know the Gospel, I know what sin is, and what my sins mean, and I still willfully commit them. I know that the Law is nothing less than God Himself saying to me, “Ann, if you do these things, it will hurt Me grievously.” And yet, I do them anyway. It is almost like I have Narcissistic Personality Disorder or something. But I don’t, so I can’t even blame that. But I hope that I will be able to show the perseverance under imprisonment that Irwin Schiff showed.
(Repost from December ARSH 2014 inspired by Cardinal Burke’s statement recently that he is, in fact, a fundamentalist. Well, of course he is. Anyone who actually believes anything is, with regards to that belief, a fundamentalist. To be a fundamentalist is nothing less than to believe what you believe. It is a truly, truly deranged and depraved mind that can hold as not just tenable, but admirable and virtuous that he does not actually believe what he believes. Te estoy mirando, Jorge.)
I have been asked to comment repeatedly on Pope Francis Bergoglio’s recent trip to Turkey, his facing Mecca and saying to the Mufti beside him, “We must adore God” before “praying” for several minutes, and his remark that the koran is a book of peace.
Sure. I can comment. It is extremely unpleasant, but I guess these things have to be said.
First, we have to go back to the core premise and sick reality that most people in today’s post-modern western world give every possible appearance of “not actually believing any of that bullshit“. And by “bullshit”, I mean Christianity. It is a badge of honor, sign of self-regarded elite enlightenment and intelligence (yeah, that’s a laugh-out-loud line), and a prerequisite for membership in the “Cool Kids Club” to deny Truth, and self-loathe the very house you live in.
Given this, most people, including it would appear Pope Francis, are incapable of processing how it is that musloids could possibly take islam and the koran seriously, because they have made quite clear that they do not take Christianity, the Bible including the words of Our Blessed Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, and the teaching of His Body and Bride, the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church, the least bit seriously, and are embarrassed and enraged by those who do.
And so, he tells musloid leaders to get islamic “fundamentalists” under control.
And there’s the key word: fundamentalists.
This is the definition of “fundamental”:
Adjective form: forming a necessary base or core; of central importance; affecting or relating to the essential nature of something or the crucial point about an issue; so basic as to be hard to alter, resolve, or overcome.
Noun form: a central or primary rule or principle on which something is based.
The root is the Latin “fundare”, meaning “to found”.
Now just sit in stillness with that for a moment.
Pope Francis hates “fundamentalist” Catholics and rails against them, that is Catholics who ACTUALLY BELIEVE in the most basic fundaments of Christianity. In fact, he has already destroyed a very successful and thriving order called the Franciscan Friars of the Immaculate. What was their crime? Rampant sodomy? No. Teaching heresy? No. Escorting women into human abattoirs so they could slaughter their infant children? No. Their crime was that they believed in the Church and Her teachings, and preferred the Traditional Form of the Holy and August Sacrifice of the Mass. They celebrated both forms, but preferred the Traditional Mass. And they were growing exponentially. Until last year, when Pope Francis destroyed them. What is worse, he is refusing to let the Friars be released to go elsewhere, for example back to their home dioceses, where their bishops want them and could use them. Again, their crime? They ACTUALLY BELIEVE IN CATHOLICISM. They are FUNDAMENTALISTS.
So when Pope Francis goes before musloid leaders and tells them to “clamp down on fundamentalists”, he has street cred, because he has already destroyed one “fundamentalist” order, which has put terror in the hearts of every other genuinely, authentically Catholic order and fraternity out there. There is a palpable “lay low” mentality out there that simply did not exist two years ago today.
Terror, rape, murder, theft, looting, pillaging, lawlessness, aggression and the establishment of a decadent, jackbooted micro-oligarchy are FUNDAMENTALS of the islamic political system. The koran is an explicit manifesto of this. The faux-religious facade – the promise of sex in the afterlife, the submission to a capricious, evil faux-deity – is just that, a facade, taken seriously by only by those of below-average intelligence (due largely to centuries of inbreeding) and by those who are demonically oppressed or possessed, of which there are likely tens if not hundreds of millions worldwide today.
The difference here is the one thing that we are not allowed to speak about or even think in the rotting carcass of post-modern western civilization, (and now we see that this thoughtcrime also applies within FrancisNewChurch): There is ONE TRUTH. And what’s more, that ONE TRUTH resides in the Body and Bride of Christ – the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. One. There is ONE TRUTH. There is ONE TRUE RELIGION. One. The entire notion of “multiple truths” is self-contradictory, abject drooling nonsense.
This statement is today the crime of crimes. Sodomy? Who am I to judge? Abortion? Quit obsessing. Marxism? If you’re against it you must hate the poor. The Sixth Commandment? You’ve GOT to be kidding.
You say “There is One Truth and only One True Religion”? EVIL!! IMMODERATE!! SHUT UP!! SHAME ON YOU!! HOW DARE YOU SPEW YOUR FUNDAMENTALISM!! HOW DARE YOU PREACH HATE!! GET OUT!!
Since the post-modernists believe that there is no truth, or that there are multiple truths, which is at its core the same position as believing that there is no truth at all, they view Christianity and islam as being two variants on the same socio-political theme. And since all of the “Cool Kids” in the Catholic Church don’t actually believe any of that “Catholic bullshit”, they are mystified that there are actually musloids who actually believe any of their bullshit, and thus the admonition to get the “islamic fundamentalists” under control.
In short, these people believe that a Utopia can be brought about by purging the human race of anyone who actually believes anything, first among them being people who believe in the Truth, namely orthodox, practicing Catholics. Because, let’s face it, that is the stumbling block, the wrench in the monkey works. And then, sure, there can be musloids, just as long as they don’t actually believe in the fundamentals of the islamic political system, and there can be Hindus and Buddhists, just as long as they don’t actually believe any of their crap, and there can be Mormons and animists, and heck even wiccans and satanists, just as long as they don’t actually believe or take seriously any of their crap either. In fact, humanity will be “enriched” by the “diverse tapestry” of religions, just as soon as nobody actually believes or takes seriously any of that bullshit.
So I’m not too proud to admit that I am blessed with the insomnia. And right now, I am fully inverted. Up all night, and if I want to be up before the crack of noon, I better not just set the phone alarm, but sleep with the phone on my chest so that the vibration brings me to the point of infarction when it goes off.
What does a 21st century insomniac do to while away those frustrating early morning hours? Why, watch YouTube videos, of course. Last night’s spelunking into the caves of the internet brought me to the following video. Twenty-two minutes. I thought, “Oh, this’ll put me to sleep.” Wrong. Incorrect. I couldn’t look away. It is riveting. It is the serious history of Political Correctness going back to its roots at World War I, (or as those of us in the know like to refer to that period, FATIMA).
If I survive the war (which I won’t) and if I am crowned Holy Roman Emperor (which I won’t be, because I’m a chick and a peasant and all that), the first thing I would do, even before nuking Mecca and Medina into an inland sea of glass, would be to burn to the ground, plough the ashes and then salt the earth (just to be sure), COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY.
If there is an actual, physical portal to hell on this, God’s Good Earth, it is somewhere within Columbia University.